:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民參與刑事審判程序的證據能力判斷:兼論鑑定證據之證據能力判斷標準
書刊名:國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者:蘇凱平
作者(外文):Su, Kai-ping
出版日期:2021
卷期:50:4
頁次:頁1923-1989
主題關鍵詞:關聯性國民法官科學證據道伯弗萊RelevancyLay judgeScientific evidenceDaubertFrye
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:184
  • 點閱點閱:6
期刊論文
1.吳冠霆(20060700)。論刑事證據之關連性。法令月刊,57(7),21-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Wistrich, Andrew J.、Guthrie, Chris、Rachlinski, Jeffrey J.(2005)。Can Judges Ignore Inadmissible Information? The Difficulty of Deliberately Disregarding。University of Pennsylvania Law Review,153(4),1251-1345。  new window
3.Cheng, Edward K.、Yoon, Albert H.(2005)。Does Frye or Daubert Matter? A Study of Scientific Admissibility Standards。Virginia Law Review,91(2),471-513。  new window
4.陳祐治(20080200)。刑事訴訟與證據法系列(1)--現行刑事證據規定亟待檢討。法令月刊,59(2),57-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.金孟華、陳又寧(20150900)。論圖案與印記證據之證據能力。中研院法學期刊,17,423-476。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Landsman, Stephan、Rakos, Richard F.(1994)。A Preliminary Inquiry into the Effect of Potentially Biasing Information on Judges and Jurors in Civil Litigation。Behavioral Sciences & the Law,12,113-126。  new window
7.陳運財(20170100)。如何建構人民信賴的司法體系--追求權責相符的刑事審判制度。檢察新論,21,3-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.金孟華(20180900)。證據相互影響論--以刑事證據法為中心。中研院法學期刊,23,171-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Lynch, M.(2003)。God's signature: DNA profiling, the new gold standard in forensic science。Endeavour,27(2),93-97。  new window
10.Weiss, K. J.、Watson, C.、Xuan, Y.(2014)。Frye's Backstory: A Tale of Murder, a Retracted Confession, and Scientific Hubris。Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law,42(2),226-233。  new window
11.Vidmar, N.(2005)。Expert Evidence, The Adversary System, and The Jury。American Journal of Public Health,95(Supplement 1),137-143。  new window
12.Seaman, J. A.(2013)。A Tale of Two Dauberts。Georgia Law Review,47(3),889-922。  new window
13.Ryan, M. J.(2020)。Escaping The Fingerprint Crisis: Blueprint for Essential Research。University of Illinois Law Review,2020(3),763-810。  new window
14.Reitz, John C.(1998)。How to do Comparative Law。The American Journal of Comparative Law,46(4),617-636。  new window
15.Reimann, M.(2003)。The Progress and Failure of Comparative Law in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century。The American Journal of Comparative Law,50(4),671-700。  new window
16.Polizzi, K. N.(2017)。How Long Do We Keep Fryeing: The Future of Expert Scientific Evidence in California。Chapman Law Review,20(2),393-420。  new window
17.Murphy, E.(2007)。The New Forensics: Criminal Justice, False Certainty, and the Second Generation of Scientific Evidence。California Law Review,95(3),721-797。  new window
18.Langleben, D. D.、Moriarty, J. C.(2013)。Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law and Research Policy Collide。Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,19(2),222-234。  new window
19.Imwinkelried, E. J.(1995)。Evidence Law Visits Jurassic Park: The Far-Reaching Implication of the Daubert Court's Recognition of the Uncertainty of the Scientific Enterprise。Iowa Law Review,81,55-78。  new window
20.Goodman-Delahunty, J.、Wakabayashi, K.(2012)。Adversarial Forensic Science Experts: An Empirical Study of Jury Deliberation。Current Issues in Criminal Justice,24(1),85-103。  new window
21.Giannelli, P. C.(1993)。"Junk Science": The Criminal Cases。Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology,84(1),105-128。  new window
22.Faigman, D. L.(2008)。Admissibility Regimes: The "Opinion Rule" and Other Oddities and Exceptions to Scientific Evidence, the Scientific Revolution, and Common Sense。Southwestern University Law Review,36,699-722。  new window
23.Edmond, G.、Cunliffe, E.、Hamer, D.(2020)。Fingerprint Comparison and Adversarialism: The Scientific and Historical Evidence。Modern Law Review,83(6),1287-1327。  new window
24.Bernstein, D. E.、Jackson, J. D.(2004)。The Daubert Trilogy in the States。Jurimetrics,44(3),351-366。  new window
25.Berger, M. A.(2003)。Expert Testimony in Criminal Proceedings: Questions Daubert Does Not Answer。Seton Hall Law Review,33,1125-1140。  new window
26.蘇凱平(20200300)。重新探索自由心證:以憲法與刑事訴訟法的價值衝突與解決為核心。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,49(1),339-401。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.曾春僑(2020)。指紋鑑定方法與實務。在野法潮,45,80-85。  延伸查詢new window
28.彭莉娟(20090300)。當指紋遇見道伯特法則--美國拜倫米切爾案例介紹。刑事科學,66,17-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.張永宏(20151100)。論刑事準備程序之運作--以人民參與審判為核心。月旦裁判時報,41,89-100。  延伸查詢new window
30.施志鴻、金榮泰、鄧皓允(20190500)。腦指紋技術運用於犯罪偵查之研究。警學叢刊,49(6)=244,29-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.吳燦(20200600)。刑事證據能力判斷的案例研討--臺灣米蘭達法則與證據排除主張逾期之法效。月旦法學,301,6-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Gatowski, S. I.、Dobbin, S. A.、Richardson, J. T.、Ginsburg, G. P.、Merlino, M. L.、Dahir, V.(2001)。Asking the Gatekeepers: A National Survey of Judges on Judging Expert Evidence in a Post-Daubert World。Law and Human Behavior,25(5),433-458。  new window
圖書
1.李學燈(1992)。證據法比較研究。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.林俊益(2017)。刑事訴訟法概論。臺北:新學林出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community, National Research Council(2009)。Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward。The National Academies Press。  new window
4.黃朝義(2017)。刑事訴訟法。新學林出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.花滿堂(2018)。刑事訴訟法爭議問題研究。新學林出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.朱石炎(2018)。刑事訴訟法論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.Sklansky, David A.(2016)。Evidence: Cases, Commentary, and Problems。New York, NY:Wolters Kluwer。  new window
8.林鈺雄(2020)。刑事訴訟法。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
9.王兆鵬、張明偉、李榮耕(2020)。刑事訴訟法。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
10.王兆鵬(2007)。美國刑事訴訟法。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Best, A.(2018)。Examples & Explanations for Evidence。Wolters Kluwer。  new window
12.Broun, K. S.、Dix, G. E.、Imwinkelried, E. J.、Kaye, D. H.、Mosteller, R. P.、Roberts, E. F.、Swift, E.(2014)。McCormick on Evidence。West Group。  new window
13.Park, R. C.、Leonard, D. P.、Orenstein, A. A.、Nance, D. A.、Goldberg, S. H.(2018)。Evidence Law, A Student's Guide to the Law of Evidence as Applied in American Trials。West Academic Publishing。  new window
14.王正嘉(2020)。審議式法庭--人民參與刑事審判。臺大出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
15.Regensburger, D.(2019)。Criminal Evidence: From Crime Scene to Courtroom。Wolters Kluwer。  new window
16.National Research Council(2006)。Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards: Summary of Meetings。The National Academies Press。  new window
17.Mueller, C. B.、Kirkpatrick, L. C.、Richter, L. L.(2018)。Evidence。Wolters Kluwer。  new window
18.黃東熊(2017)。刑事訴訟法研究。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.邱鼎文(2020)。刑事證據開示之考察:比較法、理論與應用。元照。  延伸查詢new window
20.林永謀(2010)。刑事訴訟法釋論。臺北:林永謀。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Michaels, R.(2012)。The Functional Method of Comparative Law。The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Graziadei, M.(2003)。The Functional Heritage。Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.李榮耕(2012)。初探證據關聯性之要求。甘添貴教授七秩華誕祝壽論文集。承法數位文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE