On account of “coercive investigation” of administrative investigation which is necessary to actualize investigation’s goals often infringes civil rights, this thesis attempts to discuss how coercive investigation actions builds appropriate legal basis. In the first place, we tried to define and categorize administrative investigation, and discuss the principle of investigation by authority or litigant’s petition. We also clarify the nature of the collaborative obligations and whether it could be enforced. We also described the idea of coercive investigation, and arrange valid actions of direct and indirect coercive investigation. If relevant party ignored the collaborative obligations and unconfirmed, whether administrative agency could take actions to enforce them to get requisite evidence, which depends on the nature of the investigation. Besides, if opposite party denied to perform obligation, or if the regulations were inadequate, whether administrative agency could take actions by the acts of The Administrative Execution Act? All above are closed to The Administrative Execution Act. On the other hand, the legitimacy requirements were strict inevitably while administrative agency takes direct coercive investigation actions. Could administrative agency process requisite direct investigation without regulations? Would administrative agency entitled to administrative searching privileges after pitied search warrant under the Writ doctrine of criminal procedure? This thesis attempts to offer suggestions for contributing the solutions.