:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從「辨乎騷」到「變乎騷」看劉勰的通變思想
書刊名:輔大中研所學刊
作者:吳戈
作者(外文):Wu, Ge
出版日期:2015
卷期:34
頁次:頁63-79
主題關鍵詞:復古通變異質性通約性RevivalTradition and changeDifferenceCommonality
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:13
從「辨乎騷」 《文心雕龍》〈在如何面對對待已有的文化遺產的問題上當然被作為通變基點礎上,處理好迥異於儒家意識形態但又有著不可忽視的巨大影響力和文學價值的《離騷騷入經」不同,劉勰承認了緻的「辨」,才能順利地進行一方面以經典之義作為宗旨其與經典一併納入通變思想體系又區別處理兩種文化的方式方面,構成劉勰通變思想的完整體系。
The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons – the 28th chapter of Tradition and Change, illustrates that the principle of change in literary is to make the revival of tradition classics. Hence, the classical Confucianism should be the starting point of making new literary and artistic creation when there are so many cultural heritages surrounding. In order to maintain the core of Classics when changing, it is necessary to encounter and explain the impact of Li Sao, whose ideological sphere is different from Confucianism but with the tremendous influence and literary value. Different from transplanting Li Sao into Classic of Poetry (or Shijing) indiscriminately by Han academicians, Liu Hsieh recognizes the difference of Li Sao, and also deems the guide of change as following: it needs to study Li Sao dialectically before innovating new changes successfully. In the process of studying and understanding Li Sao, Liu sticks to principal as classical Confucianism, meanwhile he adapts to new trend of literature in order to take both classics and new in to his conception of tradition and change. This method is to have mainstream culture coexist with second arising culture, but also to keep the different characters of two cultures, considering inheritance and innovation, which is the construction of Liu Hsieh’s whole conception of tradition and change.
期刊論文
1.江寶釵(19940300)。從「辨騷」到「變乎騷」--朝向一個文學史觀的建立。中國學術年刊,15,183-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李金坤(200202)。辨騷篇「博徒」、「四異」正詮。河北大學學報,6。  延伸查詢new window
3.唐輝(200511)。從文心雕龍•辨騷看劉勰的文化辨騷意識。廣西社會科學,7。  延伸查詢new window
4.馮憲光(200511)。從文心雕龍•辨騷看中國文論思維形態。社會科學家,33。  延伸查詢new window
5.王元貞(200605)。從辨騷看劉勰「宗經」與「逆經」思想的矛盾與超越。三峽大學學報,3。  延伸查詢new window
6.莫恆全(200708)。謝其詳論劉勰寫作文化遺產的辯證觀。欽州學院學報,22。  延伸查詢new window
7.王少良(201202)。「文心雕龍•辨騷」篇的文學通變觀。大連大學學報,33。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳秀美(20140600)。從文體「正變」論劉勰「文之樞紐」的典範性意義。淡江中文學報,30,65-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.黃景進(19990800)。宗經與辨騷:劉勰論「文之樞紐」。中華學苑,53,123-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.范文瀾(2002)。文心雕龍講疏。河北:河北教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.錢鐘書(2004)。錢鐘書散文集。浙江:浙江文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.特里.伊格爾頓、柏敬澤、王傑、傅德根、麥永雄(1997)。美學意識形態。廣西:廣西師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄧以蟄(199804)。鄧以蟄全集。合肥:安徽教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.康得、鄧曉芒(2002)。楊袓陶校判斷力批判。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉師文勇(2011)。先秦兩漢魏晉南北朝文論講疏。四川:四川出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.哈羅德•布魯姆、江寧康(2011)。西方正典--偉大作家和不朽作品。南京:譯林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.張利群(200210)。變乎騷。山西大學學報。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉勰(2014)。范文瀾注文心雕龍。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉義慶、余嘉錫(2007)。世說新語箋疏。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.顏之推、檀作文(2007)。顏氏家訓。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.Jaspers, Karl、魏楚雄、俞新天(1989)。歷史的起源與目標。北京:華夏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.劉渼(20010000)。臺灣近五十年來「文心雕龍學」研究。臺北:萬卷樓。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.徐復觀(2014)。文心雕龍的文體論。中國文學論集。北京:九州出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE