大航海時期的臺灣乃近年來興盛的書寫素材。作為歷史人物的「揆一」（Frederick Coyett，1615～1687）與其背後的荷蘭東印度公司，在臺灣史的評價經過由負面形象轉趨多元論述的軌跡。本文援用「新歷史主義」觀點，剖析陳耀昌《福爾摩沙三族記》（2012）、平路《婆娑之島》（2012）、林克明《天涯海角熱蘭遮》（2016），論其如何呈現揆一特質與定位。巧妙的是，三部小說皆設法將揆一與荷蘭東印度公司的立場分開視之。陳耀昌以惜才態度將揆一英雄化；而平路雖給予揆一自我辯駁機會，然該小說在同情／譴責之間可見徘徊；林克明則以鄭成功身邊的多血統後裔虛構人物為敘事者，對揆一較多論評之說。綜觀三者，足能窺探新世紀以降荷蘭學文獻譯介帶來之影響，並證成多元書寫背後，小說家透過揆一傳遞／連結臺灣史觀，分別表露隱含性別、族群視角的立場與情感，其美學貢獻亦在補足歷史文獻下難以窺見之人物靈魂。

In the great voyage of period, As for a historical character ＂Frederick Coyett＂ and the East India Company, the negative image has been transferred to diversified narrations in Taiwan History evaluations. This article is adopted ＂New Historicism＂ perceptions to analyze Chen Yaochang ＂Formosa Three Tribes Note＂ (2012), Ping Lu ＂Formosa Islands＂ Lin KeMing ＂The Ends of the Earth of Zeelandia＂ (2016) and discourse Frederick Coyett traits and positions. The three novels regard Frederick Coyett and the East India Company as individual part. Chen metaphors Frederick Coyett as a heroize with cherish attitude, however, Ping Lu gives the chance of self-debate that the novel connote related to sympathy and denouncement. Lin KeMing takes Zheng Chenggong as various lineage descendant fictional character for narrator and commends more about Frederick Coyett. To see these three characters, we can know how Holland literature references influenced by New Century and prove translation works that writers transfer and connect Taiwan History with Frederick Coyett to express implied gender, ethnic groups positions and emotions. The aesthetic contribution is to reinforce each character of soul that is not easy to be perceived in history references.