:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:費德勒[F. E. Fiedler]認知資源理論[Cognitive Resource Theory]適用性之研究
書刊名:屏東師院學報
作者:陳慶瑞
出版日期:1994
卷期:7
頁次:頁1-43
主題關鍵詞:費德勒權變領導理論認知資源理論F.E. FiedlerContingency leadership theoryCognitive resource theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:172
     認知資源理論 (Cognitive Resource Theory)的提出,乃係費德勒(F.E. Fiedler)為了因應權變領導理論 (Contingency Leadership Theory)的所謂「黑箱」問題而來。其主要目的,乃在於企求闡明LPC與情境因素的交互作用中,如何導引出領導效能的問題。 本研究以臺灣地區的163所國民小學為研究對象,其中包括163位校長和872位教師。至於其研究結果之主要發現如下: 1.在低度工作壓力之下,校長的知能與績效的相關較高。 2.無論在何種壓力之下,校長經驗與績效無顯著差異。 3.在高指示行為下,受到教師高度支持的校長,其知能與績效之相關,比不受支持的校長為高。 4.在校長係低指示行為,而團體係高度支持情況下,教師知能與績效之相關,顯然此低度支持者為高。 5.工作的複雜度愈高,則校長知能與績效的相關愈高。
     The development of the Cognitive Resource Theory by F.E. Fiedler was in large part due to Fiedler's expecting to be able to cope with those critics who clained that his Contingency Leadership Theory was a "black box". The main purpose of this theory was to clarify have those interactions among personality attribute, which were reflected by the LPC score, and situational factors affected leadership effectiveness. The subjects of this study included 163 principals and 872 teachers taken from a random sample of 163 elementary schools in the area of Taiwan. The major findings of this study were concluded as follows: l.In regard to the correlation between principals' cognitive abilities and their leadership performance, those principals who were under lower stress revealed higher correlation than those principals who were under higher stress. 2.The principal's experience did not predict performance. 3.The correlation between principal's cognitive abilities and performance were higher when they were highly directive behavior and teachers were highly supportive than they were highly directive behavior but teachers were not supportive. 4.Under conditions that principals were low directive behavior, the correlation between teacher cognitive abilities their performance were higher when teachers' group was highly supportive than the group was low supportive. 5.The degree of complexity of task contributed to the degree of correlation between principals' cognitive abilities and their performance.
期刊論文
1.陳慶瑞(19890400)。認知資源理論:權變領導研究之新取向。現代教育,4(2)=14,119-125。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳慶瑞(19911200)。權變領導整合理念之探討。初等教育研究,3,95-140。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳慶瑞(19870700)。領導行為測量新指標:LPC分類的理論基礎。現代教育,2(3)=7,153-156。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳慶瑞(1987)。認知資源理論發展背景之分析。教育研究,6,50-54。  延伸查詢new window
5.Fiedler, F. E.(1971)。Validation and extension of the contingency model of leadership effectiveness: A review of empirical findings。Psychological Bulletin,76,128-148。  new window
6.Fiedler, F. E.(1972)。Personality, motivational systems, and behavior of high and low LPC persons。Human Relation,25,391-412。  new window
7.Fiedler, F. E.(1986)。The contribution of cognitive resources and leader behavior to organizational performance。Journal of Applied Social Psychology,16,532-548。  new window
8.House, R. J.(1971)。A path goal theory of effectiveness。Administrative Science Quarterly,16,321-338。  new window
9.Fiedler, F. E.、Leister, A. F.(1977)。Leader intelligence and task performance: A test of a multiple screen model。Organizational Behavior and Human Perforipance,20,1-14。  new window
10.Fiedler, F. E.、McGuire, M.、Richardson, M.(1989)。The role of intelligence and experience in successful group performance。Applied Sport Psychology,1,132-149。  new window
11.Kerr, S.、Jermier, J. M.(1978)。Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning andmeasurement。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,22,375-403。  new window
研究報告
1.Fiedler, F. E.(1984)。The contribution of cognitive resources and leader behavior to organizational performance (計畫編號:Rep. No.84-4)。Seattle:University of Washington。  new window
2.Fiedler, F. E.(1992)。The leadership situation and the black box in contingency theories (計畫編號:Rep . No .92-1)。Seattle:University of Washington。  new window
學位論文
1.陳慶瑞(1986)。費德勒權變領導理論適用性之研究--以我國國民小學為例(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳慶瑞(1993)。費德勒權變領導理論研究--理論分析與擴展(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳慶瑞(1987)。費德勒權變領導理論研究。台北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fiedler, F. E.、Chemers, M. M.(1984)。Improving leadership effectiveness: The leader match concept。New York:John Wiley and Sons。  new window
3.Hersey, P.、Blanchard, K. H.(1988)。Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
4.Fiedler, F. E.、Garcia, J. E.(1987)。New approaches to effective leadership: Cognitive resources and organizational performance。New York:John Wiley and Sons。  new window
5.Stogdill, R. M.(1974)。Handbook of leadership。New York:Free Press。  new window
6.Steers, R. M.(1977)。Organizational effectiveness: A behavioral view。Santa Monica, California:Goodyear。  new window
7.Fiedler, Fred E.(1967)。A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
8.Vroom, Victor H.、Yetton, Phillip W.(1973)。Leadership and Decision Making。University of Pittsburgh Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fiedler, F. E.(1964)。A contingency model of leadership effectiveness。Advances in experimental social psychology。New York:Academic。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE