:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺中師院初教系學生「性別角色與自尊關係」之探討
書刊名:臺中師院學報
作者:陳淑絹
出版日期:1995
卷期:9
頁次:頁1-25
主題關鍵詞:臺中師院初教系學生性別角色自尊
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:116
  • 點閱點閱:53
     本研究旨在討大學生性別角色與自尊的關係。樣本全部取自國立臺中師範學院初等教育系大三學生,計男生五十名,女生五十八名。以林邦傑修訂的「性別角色量表」及楊世瑞修訂的「自尊量表」作為評量工具,首先以卡方檢定分析性別與組別在性別角色類型之差異;其次再以二因子變異數分析四種性別角色類型在自尊分數的差異,並進一步探討性別與性別角色類型間之交互作用。主要發現如下: 1.男女生的性別角色類型是有顯著差異的,男生傾向於男性化類型,女性傾向於女性化類型。 2.組別間的四種性別角色類型是沒有顯著差異的。 3.男女生在自尊分數上的差異達顯著水準,女生的分數高於男生。 4.四種性別角色類型在自尊分數上的差異達顯著水準,兩性化的自尊分數最高,其次為男性化。 5.性別與性別角色間無交互作用。 最後,研究者提出本研究在教育上的意義,及未來研究之建議。
     The purpose of study was to investigate college student the relation between sex-role and self-esteem. The subjects were selected from the junior of the Department of Elementary Education in National Taichung Teaching's College. There were 50 boys and 58 girls. The measures used in this study included: Ben-Je Lin revised "Sex-role Inventory" and Si-Re Yung revised "Self-Esteem Inventory". First, the data was analyzed by x2 test to examinate the differences between sexes and groups among the sex-role patterns. Second, the data was analyzed by two-factor ANOVA to examinate the differences between sex and sex-role of self-esteem score. The main fingings as follows: 1.In the comparison between sexes, there are significantly differences among the sex-role patterns. The boys tend to masculinization, the girls tend to effemination. 2.In the comparison between groups, there are no differences among the sex-role patterns. 3.In the comparison between sexes, there are significantly differences of the self-esteem. The girls' score higer than boys. 4.In the comparison between sex-role patterns, there are significantly differences of the self-esteem. The bisexuality's score are highest, the second is masculinization. 5.There is no interaction between sex and sex-role of the self-esteem. Finally, the researcher propose the meaning of this study and the suggestions for further studies.
期刊論文
1.Jones, W. H.、Chernovetz, M. E.、Hansson, R. O.(1978)。The enigma of androgyny: Differential implications for males and females?。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,46(2),298-313。  new window
2.林美珍、張本聖(19880800)。中老年人性別角色與人格之研究。教育與心理研究,11,113-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林瑞欽(19800200)。性別差異在諮商中的意義。輔導月刊,16(3/4),29-32。  延伸查詢new window
4.林清財(19880500)。兒童性別角色之發展。臺灣教育,449,16-20。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bem, S. L.(1977)。On the Utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,45(2),196-205。  new window
6.鄭玄藏(19920300)。兩性角色。學生輔導通訊,19,12-17。  延伸查詢new window
7.Lamke, L. K.(1982)。Adjustment and sex-role orientation in adolescence。Journal of Youth and Adolescence,11(3),247-259。  new window
8.Kelly, J. A.、Worell, J.(1977)。New formulation of sex roles and androgyny: a critical review。Journal of Consulting and clinical Psychology,45(6),1101-1115。  new window
9.Block, J. H.(1973)。Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-culture and longitudinal perspectives。American Psychologist,28,512-526。  new window
10.Whitley, B. E.(1983)。Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,44,765-778。  new window
11.Wells, K.(1980)。Gender-role identity and psychological adjustment in adolescence。Journal of Youth and Adolescence,9(1),59-73。  new window
12.Worell, J.(1978)。Sex roles and psychological well being: Perspectives on methodology。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,46(4),777-791。  new window
13.Spence, J. J.、Helmreich, R.、Stapp, J.(1975)。Ratings of self and peers on sex role attribution and their relation to self-esteem and concepts of masculirity and feminity。Journal of personality and social psychology,32,29-39。  new window
14.O'Connor, K.、Mann, D. W.、Bardnick, J. M.(1978)。Androgyny and self-esteem in the upper-middle class: a replication of Spence。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,46(5),1168-1169。  new window
15.何英奇(19810600)。大學生性別角色與自我概念的關係。教育心理學報,14,221-230。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Bem, Sandra L.(1974)。The measurement of psychological androgyny。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,42(2),155-162。  new window
學位論文
1.李然堯(1984)。中國兒童性別角色發展之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.何金針(1986)。國中學生性別角色與生活適應、學習成就之關係(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃靜芬(1984)。性別角色與國中男女生學習家政之需要及興趣研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊世瑞(1987)。性別角色認定課程對國中女生角色認定、自尊與生活適應之影響研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李靖雅(1992)。性格之書。臺北:漢清出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.李美枝(1980)。社會心理學。臺北:大洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.李美枝(1987)。女性心理學。大洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.張春興、林清山(1984)。教育心理學。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.張春興(1991)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉惠琴(1983)。從心理學看女人。臺北:張老師出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃天中、洪英正(1992)。心理學。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.薇薇夫人(1993)。一個女人的成熟。台北:一葦國際股份有限公司出版部。  延伸查詢new window
9.薇薇夫人(1993)。一個男人的成長。台北:一葦國際股份有限公司出版部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.朱瑞玲(1988)。中國人的社會互動--論面子的問題。中國人的心理。台北:桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.文崇一(1988)。從價值取向談中國國民性。中國人的性格。台北:桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.余德慧(1987)。中國人心底的故事。人情與中國人的面具性格。臺北:張老師。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃光國(1988)。中國人的人情關係。中國人的觀念與行為。臺北:巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.蕭福生(1991)。為什麼亞當不同於夏娃--談性別角色形成與教育。做個剛柔並濟的人。台北:張老師出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Ashmore, R. D.(1990)。Sex, gender, and the individual。Hand Book of Personality Theory and Research。New York:The Guilford Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE