:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:都會原住民兒童生活適應與學習適應及其關聯研究
書刊名:初等教育學刊
作者:劉春榮 引用關係吳清山 引用關係陳明終
出版日期:1995
卷期:4
頁次:頁147-180
主題關鍵詞:都市原住民兒童生活適應學習適應
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(7) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:448
  • 點閱點閱:138
本研究旨在瞭解台北市原住民國小見童生活及學習適應的情悟,並探討二者間的關聯:同時比較台北市原住民國小兒童的人口變項及環境變項在其生活適應與學習適應上的差異。研究兼採文獻分析及問卷調查二種方式,以台北市原住民國小兒童數量最多的十二所學校為樣本學校,其四至六年級一七四人原住民兒童為對象,研究獲得以下五點結論: 一、原住民兒童遷入大都會,因為受到文化不利與衝突、家庭支持力量不足、知識傳遞受阻礙、行為表現失據、同儕關係隔閡、內心困惑與矛盾等因素之影響,都可能面臨生活適應的困境。 二、大都會之原住民兒童,由於受到文化差異與不利、低社經地位階層、家庭環境、學校環境、語言轉錄上困難等因素之影響,導致有學習適應困難的現象。 三、台北市原住民國小兒童,自認在三□向生活適應方面以社會適應較佳,生活目標、遊戲調適及親和力次之,社交技巧則有待加強。在負向生活適應方面,以情緒不穩定最為嚴重,不適應感次之,神經質、身體自卑感及行為不成熟則較無不適應的傾向;而級任教師的觀察,認為原住民國小兒童在正向生活適應方面以遊戲週適及社會適應最佳,親和力及社交技巧次之,生活目標的建立有待加強;在負向生活適應方面,則以行為不成熟及情緒不穩定較為嚴重,不適應感次之,身體自卑感及神經質則較無不適應的傾向。此項調查結果,顯示原住民國小兒童在生活適應的感受與教師的看法並不一致,其中可能會有文化認知的差異存在。 四、台北市原住民國小兒童自認在學習適應方面,以學習調適及學習環境的適應最佳,學習態度及學習習慣次之,學習方法最需加強;至於級任教師認為以學習調適及學習環境的適應最好,學習方法次之,學習態度及學習習慣最需加強,師生看法差距不大。 五、台北市原位民國小兒童生活適應與學習適應具有密切相關,不管是兒童自陳或級任教師觀察結果,兩者間關聯密切。 根據以上的結論提出以下的建議: 一、加強原住民兒童生活及學業輔導工作。 二、提供原住民兒童較多的學校,其教師有關原住民的訊息。 三、推動原住民兒童家長親職教育,建立正確的教養觀。 最佳本研究亦對未來的研究提出二點建議。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between life ad-justment and academic adjustment, as well as the effects of both environmental variables and demographic variables on the life adjustment and academic adjustment of aboriginal elementary shool students. This study employed both literature review and survey methods. In total, 174 students from 12 elementary schools in Taipei city were selected as survey sample. The findings were as follows: 1.The aboriginal elementary school students encountered difficulty in life ad-justment and academic adjustment coming to live in Taipei city, due to their cultural disadvantages and conflicts, the lack of family support and knowl-edge, behavior problems, poor peer relationship and internal puzzles. 2. The difficulty of aboriginal elementary school students in cultural lag and disadvantages, school environment, family conditions, language usages lead them to maladjustment in learning. 3. In the area of positive adjustment, the survey showed that they felt best in the categories of social adjustment, then in the life goals, playing adjustment and affinity relationship, finally in that of social skills. In the area of nega-tive life adjustment, they indicated they felt worst in the categories of emotional adjustment, then in that of maladjustment, while feeling O.K. in those of neurosis, physical humbleness and immature behavior. The teachers of the survey sample students indicated, in the area of positive life adjustment, that students were doing best in the categories of playing ad-justment and social adjustment, then in those of affinity relationship and social skills, finally in that of the life goals. In the area of negative life ad-justment, they were doing worst in those of immature behavior as wall as emotional adjustment, then in that of maladjustment, nevertheless doing O. K. in those of physical humbleness and neurosis. In summary, the above findings demonstrated signifcant differences between the feeling of the students and the perception of the teachers concerning the area of their life adjustment attributing in part to the difference in their cultural recognition. 4.In the area of learning adjustment, the survey sample displayed that they felt best in the categories of learing adaptability and learning environment, then in those of learning attitude and learning habit, while feeling the most necess-ity to the improvement of learning methods; nevertheless, the teachers of the survey sample exhibited that they were doing best in the categories of learning adaptability and learning environment then in that of learing method, while indicating the most necessity to the inprovement of those of learning attitude and learning habit. It appeared similar inconsistency be-tween the students' feeling and the teachers' perception. 5. The result showed the close relationship between the life adjustment and learning adjustment of students. This study recommends that: 1. strengthen the guidance system for the life and academic adjustment issues of aboriginal elementary school students. 2. provide more related information for the teachers whose schools included many aboriginal students. 3. initiate parental education for the parents of the aboriginal students for the purpose of establishing sound bearing habits. 4. examine further related research topics. Finally, interpretation and discusses of survey results were presented in this study.
期刊論文
1.黃萬益(19751200)。國小學生學習適應問題之研究。新竹師專學報,2,183-256。  延伸查詢new window
2.李坤崇(1994)。國中學生學習適應及其相關因素之研究。臺南師院學報,27,75-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張景媛(19890500)。無特殊學習類型學生學習適應與知覺之研究。教育心理學報,22,215-242。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.徐光國(19940500)。花蓮縣社會不利背景學童學業與行為適應及其輔導效果。社會科教育學報,2,97-156。  延伸查詢new window
5.路君約(1968)。少年人格測驗的編製。心理與教育,2,23-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.賈馥茗(1967)。中學生的主要問題與輔導。心理與教育,2,73-75。  延伸查詢new window
7.Carter, H. D.(1961)。Over-Achievers and Under-achierers in the Junior high School。California Journal of Education Research,12,51-56。  new window
8.Entwistle, N. J.、Entwistle, D.、Cowell, M. D.(1971)。The Academic Performance of Students, Biritish。Journal of Menical Educational Psychology,41,258-267。  new window
9.簡茂發(19860600)。大學生適應問題及其相關因素之探討研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,28,左1-左90。  延伸查詢new window
10.簡茂發(19780600)。父母教養態度與小學兒童生活適應之關係。教育心理學報,11,63-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.張曉春(19740300)。臺北地區山地移民調適初步調查研究。思與言,11(6),1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.張曉春(19740500)。臺北地區山地移民調適初步調查研究。思與言,12(1),27-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.任秀媚(19861200)。山地單語與山地雙語兒童語文能力及智力之比較研究。新竹師專學報,13,241-256。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.吳英璋(1985)。如何幫助適應困難學生。七十三年大學校院輔導工作研討會,23-28。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊孝濚(1995)。台灣原住民教育發展與改進五年計畫。師資培育國際研討會,中華民國師範教育學會主辦 。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊國樞(1983)。從互動論觀點談青少年的問題與輔導。台北市少年輔導工作研討會。  延伸查詢new window
4.蕭新煌(1987)。台灣土著傳統社會文化與人權現況。「台灣土著傳統文化與人權現況」研討會,中國人權協會主辦 。  延伸查詢new window
5.樊明德(1995)。時間與空間因素對原住民與漢民族國小及國中生自我概念、親子關係、師生關係、同儕關係及學業成績之影響比較研究。雅美族鄉土語言教學研討會,台東縣政府教育局主辦 。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡敏玲(1995)。國小一年級原住民學童在校及在家互動模式之詮釋性研究。八十三學年教育學門研究計畫成果發表會,行政院國家科學委員會主辦 。  延伸查詢new window
7.Ogbu, J.(1985)。Variability in Minority School Performance: A Problem in Search of a/2 Explanation。The eight fourth annual meeting of the american anthropological association。Washington, D. C.。  new window
學位論文
1.王齡慶(1992)。少數族群青少年學校生活適應之相關因素探討(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.盧美貴(1980)。國小教師教導方式與學生學習行為之關係(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林進材(1992)。城郊地區國小高年級學生學校適應比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳仕宗(1995)。偏遠國小學生學業成就的社會環境因素之探討(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.劉蔚之(1992)。一個山地學校的多元文化教育之俗民誌研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳清山(1984)。台北市國民中學導師專業教育背景、管教態度對學生生活適應之影響(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.盧強(1986)。山地國中學生自我觀念、生活適應與學業成就之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.張新仁(1982)。國中學生學習行為--學習方法、學習習慣、學習態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳英豪、汪榮才、李坤崇(1991)。國中國小學生學習適應及其相關因素之比較研究。臺南:國立台南師範學院初等教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
2.Atwater, E.(1987)。Psychology of Adjustment-Personal Growth in a Changing World。Prentice-Hill Inc.。  new window
3.Piaget, J.(1967)。Six psychological studies。New York:Vintage Books。  new window
4.路君約(1981)。少年人格測驗指導手冊。臺北:中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Raygor, A. L.、Wark, D. M.(1970)。Systems for study。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
6.謝高橋(1991)。台灣山胞遷移都市後適應問題之研究。台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉焜輝(1976)。現代人的心理衛生。臺北市:天馬出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Arkoff, A.(1968)。Adjustment and mental health。McGraw-Hill。  new window
9.Shaffer, L. F.、Shoben, E. J.(1956)。The psychology of adjustment: A dynamic and experimental approach to personality and mental hygiene。Boston:Houghton Mifflin。  new window
10.Lazarus, R. S.(1969)。Patterns of Adjustment and human effectiveness。New York:Mcgraw-Hill。  new window
11.李亦園(1982)。台灣土著民族的社會與文化。台北:聯經文化事業出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李亦園(1978)。都市中高山族的現代化適應。台北:中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳新華、林振江、周月霞(1990)。國民小學生活適應量表編製研究。高雄:壽山國民小學。  延伸查詢new window
14.俞筱鈞(1984)。適應心理學--人生週期之正常適應。台北:中國文化大學出版部。  延伸查詢new window
15.張建成(1992)。教育擴展過程中台灣土著的教育成就。台北:國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳英豪、林正文、李坤崇(1988)。國小學生學習適應之評量研究。台南:國立台南師院學院初等教育系。  延伸查詢new window
17.許木柱(19870000)。阿美族的社會文化變遷與青少年適應。臺北:中研院民族所。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.劉焜輝(1985)。師大學生自我概念生活適應關係之研究。台北:國立台灣師範大學學生輔導中心。  延伸查詢new window
19.Derlega, V. J.、Janda, L. H.(1981)。Introduction to Personal Adjustment。Scott, Foresman and Company。  new window
20.Goodsten, L. D.、Lanyan, R. I.(1979)。Adjustment, Behavior and Personality Reading。Addison-Wesley Publishing company。  new window
21.Lindgren, H. C.、Fish, L. W.(1976)。Psychology of Personal Development。New York:John Wiley & Sons Inc.。  new window
22.國立教育資料館(1995)。當前教育問題與對策。臺北市:國立教育資料館。  延伸查詢new window
23.Sawrey, J. M.、Telford, C. W.(1971)。Psychology of adjustment。Boston:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
24.陳奇祿(19920000)。臺灣土著文化研究。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.教育部(1995)。中華民國教育報告書。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Siryk, B.(1981)。Idenfifcation of High Risk College Stdent, Draft,(ED 210973)。 。  new window
其他
1.Cook, K. E.(1970)。Differences between Self-concepts of Disadvantaged and Nonadvantaged high School Students with Certain types of Rural and Urban Communities。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE