臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：三種權力觀的鼎立對峙:真正利益與不可共量性
書刊名：人文及社會科學集刊
作者：郭秋永／鄧若玲
作者(外文)：Kuo, Chiu-yeoung／Deng, Jo-ling
出版日期：1996
卷期：8:2
頁次：頁1-39
主題關鍵詞：權力；政治理論；方法論；Power；Political theory；Methodology
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:159
  • 點閱點閱:74
　　　　　在當代社會科學方法論的研究領域中，S. Lukes （1974） 的權力觀，引起了一系列廣泛而又深刻的辯論；各種不同的見解，至今依然層出不窮而少有定論，J. Isaac甚至指出，這一連串的論戰，正足以展現出社會科學根本無法擺脫「規範束縛」的一個完美例子。 在這些繁雜的爭議中，最糾纏不清、但也最具關鍵性的，莫過於「真正利益」與「不可共量性」兩個論題了，若能針對這兩個關鍵課題，進行抽絲剝繭的爬梳工作，從而提綱挈領地指出解決方向，則不但裨益當代的權力研究，而且有助於提升整個政治研究的水準。本著此一信念，本文的分析，將從下述三個方面，逐一進行。首先，概述三種權力觀的鼎立對峙，從而指出權力觀的爭論，基本上繫於利益觀念的不同理解，其次，評述偏好、利益、及「真 正利益」之間的關聯，進而剖陳「真正利益」的引介及其困難，最後，論述三種權力觀的「不可共量性」。
　　　　　Steven Lukes's monograph Power: A Radical View (1974) offers a critical analysis of pluralist and nondecision theories of power, leading to a suggested "three-dimensional view" of power. A great deal of ink has been used debating the so-called "three views of power." Though the controversy is made particular to the views of power, it is a perfect example of the way social science is normatively constituted. The aim of this paper is to explore some of the methodological problems generated by Lukes's power theory. Our investigation has two phases. After making some brief, exploratory remarks about the "three views power," we try to analyze the problem of "real interest," which is the most interesting dispute about the underpinnings of the power theory, and the problem of "incommensurability," which is used to defend the theses of essential contestability. These investigations will be done by examining the contrasting accounts advanced by Steven Lukes and his critics.
期刊論文
1.Isaac, Jeffrey(1987)。Beyond the Three Faces of Power: A Realist Critique。Polity，20，4-31。  new window
2.Gray, John N.(1977)。On the Contestability of Social and Political Concepts。Political Theory，5，331-348。  new window
3.Gallie, W. B.(1955)。Essentially contested concepts。Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society，56，167-198。  new window
4.Dahl, Robert A.(1958)。A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model。American Political Science Review，52(2)，463-469。  new window
5.Rahl,Robert A.、郭秋永(19860600)。權力的概念。中山社會科學譯粹，1(3)，1-24。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭秋永(19950900)。解析「本質上可爭議的概念」：三種權力觀的鼎立對峙。人文及社會科學集刊，7(2)，175-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Gray, J.(1978)。On Liberty, Liberalism and Essential Contestability。British Journal of Political Science，8，385-402。  new window
8.Lukes, S.(1977)。A Reply to K. I. Macdonald。British Journal of Political Science，7(3)，418-419。  new window
9.Swanton, C.(1985)。On the 'Essential Contestedness' of Political Concepts。Ethics，95，811-827。  new window
10.Reisch, G.(1991)。Did Kuhn Kill Logical Empiricism?。Philosophy of Science，58(2)，264-277。  new window
會議論文
1.林正弘(1991)。論孔恩的典範槪念。第二屆美國文學與思想研討會。臺北：中央研究院美國文化研究所。517-533。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wrong, Dennis H.(1979)。Power: Its Forms, Bases, and Uses。Oxford：Basil Blackwell。  new window
2.Birch, Anthony H.(1993)。The Concepts and Theories of Modem Democracy。Routledge。  new window
3.Bachrach, P.、Baratz, M. S.(1970)。Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice。New York, NY。  new window
4.Gray, J.(1993)。Post-Liberalism: Studies in Political Thought。London。  new window
5.Lukes, Steven(1977)。Essays in Social Theory。New York, NY：Columbia University Press。  new window
6.Dahl, R. A.(1991)。Modern Political Analysis。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice Hall。  new window
7.Crenson, Matthew(1971)。The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-Decisionmaking in the Cities。Baltimore：The Johns Hopkins Press。  new window
8.Bachrach, Peter、Botwinick, Aryeh(1992)。Power and Empowerment: A Radical Theory of Participatory Democracy。Philadelphia：Temple University Press。  new window
9.Dahl, Robert A.(1961)。Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City。New Haven, Connecticut。  new window
10.Connolly, William(1993)。The Terms of Political Discourse。Princeton：Princeton University Press。  new window
11.呂亞力(1979)。政治學方法論。臺北：三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.金吾倫(1994)。托馬斯．庫恩。台北：遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.Bernstein, Richard J.(1983)。Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis。Philadelphia：University of Pennsylvania Press。  new window
14.郭秋永(1988)。政治學方法論研究專集。臺北：商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
15.Isaak, Alan C.(1984)。Scope and Methods of Political Science: An Introduction to the Methodology of Political Inquiry。Homewood, Illinois：The Dorsey Press。  new window
16.Lukes, S.(1991)。Moral Conflict and Politics。Oxford：Clarendon Press。  new window
17.Hempel, Carl Gustav(1966)。Philosophy of Natural Science。Prentice Hall, Inc.。  new window
18.Isaac, Jeffrey(1987)。Power and Marxist Theory: A Realist View。Cornell University Press。  new window
19.Lukes, Steven Michael(1974)。Power: A Radical View。Macmillan Press。  new window
20.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
21.顏良恭(1995)。公共行政中的典範問題。臺北市：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Kuhn, T.(1970)。Reflections on My Critics。Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.方萬全(1989)。翻譯、詮釋與不可共量性。分析哲學與科學哲學論文集。香港：香港中文大學新亞書院。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lane, Jan-Erik、Stenlund, Hans(1984)。Power。Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis。Beverly Hill：Landon：Sage Publication。  new window
4.Dahl, Robert(1994)。The Concept of Power。Power: Critical Concepts。New York：Routledge。  new window
5.Lukes, Steven(1979)。On the Relativity of Power。Philosophical Disputes in the Social Science。Sussex：Harvester Press。  new window
6.Benton, T.(1994)。Objective, Interests and the Sociology of Power。Power: Critical Concepts。N. Y.：Routledge。  new window
7.Hindess, B.(1994)。Power, Interests and the Outcomes of Struggles。Power: Critical Concepts。N. Y.：Routledge。  new window
8.Knights, D.、Willmott, H.(1994)。Power, Values, and Relations: A Comment on Benton。Power: Critical Concepts。N. Y.：Routledge。  new window
9.Kuhn, T. S.(1982)。Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability。Philosophy of Science Association 1982。East Lansing, MI：Philosophy of Science Association。  new window
10.Lazarsfeld, P.、Rosenberg, M.(1972)。From the Language of Social Research。Continuities in the Language of Social Research。N. Y.：The Fress Press。  new window
11.Lukes, S.(1994)。Critical Note: Reply to Bradshaw。Power: Critical Concepts。N. Y.：Routledge。  new window
12.McLachlan, H.(1994)。Is 'Power' an Evaluative Concept?。Power: Critical Concepts。N. Y.：Routledge。  new window
13.Noble, J.(1982)。Social Structure and Paradigm Synthesis: Theoretical Commensurability and the Problem of Mannheim's Paradox。The Paradigm Problem in Political Science。North Carolina：Carolina Academic Press。  new window
14.Thorson, S.(1982)。Strict Incommensurability of Selected Theories of Rational Choice。The Paradigm Problem in Political Science。North Carolina：Carolina Academic Press。  new window
15.Bradshaw, A.(1994)。Critical Note: A Critique of Steven Lukes' Power: A Radical View。Power: Critical Concepts。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
16.Kuhn, Thomas S.(1977)。Theory Change as Structure Change: Comments on the Sneed Formalism。Historical and Philosophical Dimension of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science。Dordrecht, Netherlands：D. Reidel。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：641（臺灣：634，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1827278 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67635928
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上