本研究旨在回顧與分析「因應」量表的編製情形，以供未來偏製相關的因應量表 之參考。首先，本研究乃就「因應」的意義進行探討；其次，則探討相關因應量表的編製情 形；根據本研究對相關因應量表的編製之研究發現：（１）就所探討的因應量表之測量內容 言，以測量「因應方式或策略」較多；（２）就編製因應量表的效度言，以「理論建構效度 」為基礎，再配合「因素分析」考驗的做法較多；（３）就編製因應量表的信度言，以求量 表之「內部一致性係數」來考驗者較多；（４）就量表的性質言，以自陳的態度量表居多； （５）就量表之作答或計分方式言，以 Likert 式的四點或五點量表最多，少數則採塞斯通 量表式的作答。最後，提出「以本研究所發現的因應量表編製要點為未來研究工具發展之參 考」及「嘗試應用現代測驗理論於因應量表的編製」等兩項建議。

　　　　　The 19 coping inventories were reviewed and analyzed in this study. The review of these coping inventories were made according to the authors, the date of publication, construct domains, approach of design, format, validity analysis, reliability analysis, explication scores, and audience. The results of this study were summarized as follows: 1. Coping ways and strategies were usually the construct domains of coping inventories. 2. Theoretical construct and factor analysis were usually used as the methods for the validity analysis. 3. Internal consistency was usually as the method for the reliaility analysis. 4. Most coping inventories were self-reported attitude scales. 5. The response options of most coping inventories were Likert format scale.