:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學生果報信念量表的建構與發展之研究
書刊名:中華輔導與諮商學報
作者:蔡明昌
作者(外文):Tsai, Ming-chang
出版日期:2018
卷期:51
頁次:頁181-216
主題關鍵詞:大學生生命教育果報信念果報信念量表學校輔導Karma beliefKarma belief scaleLife educationSchool counsellingUndergraduate
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:298
  • 點閱點閱:15
果報信念是國人在進行倫理抉擇與面對生命困境時的重要思考模式之一,對於生命教育與學校輔導工作具有重要的意義。然而,迄今為止尚未發展出適合文化與國情的研究工具,也未對國人果報信念進行較深入且系統性的瞭解。基於此,本研究的主要目的,係建構大學生果報信念的主要內涵,並發展出一套適用於國內大學生的果報信念測量工具,並進行大學生果報信念調查,以了解當前大學生的果報信念概況。研究者採用文獻探討、實地訪談及問卷調查等三種研究方法,以大學生為研究對象,透過傳統文化果報觀點的探討、相關實徵研究的歸納、以及針對大學生的實地訪談,建構出大學生果報信念的主要內涵,據以編擬量表初稿。在透過專家審核、預試等程序進行題目的修正與刪減之後,形成共28題之正式量表,並以分層多階段抽樣法進行抽樣,抽取1158位大學生進行調查。研究結果發現本研究所發展的大學生果報信念量表具有良好的信、效度;我國大學生對於果報信念中的現世報應、死後報應、子孫承負及創造命運的說法傾向相信;而對於功過相抵、宗教救贖及接受命運的說法,則傾向不相信;此外,亦發現國內大學生的果報信念具有性別和宗教上的差異。最後,研究者並進一步根據研究結果,就果報信念在教育與輔導上的應用與意涵進行討論並做成結論。
Karma belief is the critical view point of Taiwanese in the situation of ethical decision and suffering. For life education and school counselling, karma belief has the important implications. However, there is neither measurement of karma belief that base on the culture, nor systematic examination in karma belief of Taiwanese. Base on above, the main purpose of this present study was to construct the contents of karma belief, develop a measurement of karma belief for college students in Taiwan, investigate the karma belief of native undergraduate, and understand the profile of karma belief of undergraduate in Taiwan. In order to reach the purpose, the researcher used the methods of literature discussion, interview and survey, constructed the contents of karma belief by the examination of traditional culture and interview, selected undergraduate to be the empirical research subjects. The formal Karma Belief Scale (KBS) consists of 28 items, and divided into seven dimensions. Subjects were sampled by the way of stratified multi-stage sampling. A sample of 1158 college students was recruited to finish the Karma Belief Scale. In order to examine the reliability of Karma Belief Scale, the way of test-retest reliability and Cronbach's alpha reliability were used. The Exploratory factor analysis and Confirmatory factor analysis was calculated to check the validity of Karma Belief Scale. The result of this study showed the reliability and validity of Karma Belief Scale was generally well. The undergraduate in Taiwan to tend to believe the beliefs of 'retribution in this life', 'afterlife retribution', 'retribution in descendant' and 'create destiny'. However, the undergraduate in Taiwan have the tendency of rejecting the beliefs of 'offset of good and evil', 'religious redemption' and 'accept destiny'. The relationship between religious faith and karma belief was significant. The students who without any religious faith had the less beliefs in all dimension of Karma Belief Scale. The Christian students had lower score in the dimension of 'retribution in descendant', 'offset of good and evil', 'accept destiny' and 'create destiny' than the students who had the religious faith of Buddhism, Taoism, I-Kuan Tao and Folk belief. The difference of karma belief between male and female undergraduate in Taiwan was significant. The female undergraduate had higher acceptation in the dimension of 'retribution in this life', 'afterlife retribution', 'retribution in descendant' and 'create destiny' than male undergraduate. The male had lower acceptation in the dimension of 'offset of good and evil', 'religious redemption'. Finally, this present study discussed how to apply the result of this study to life education and school counseling. The karma belief has both advantages and disadvantages in the practice of life education and school counseling. In life education, the karma belief could be used to be the one of criteria in situation of ethical decision and in answer the question of 'Why should become a moral person?' However, belief of karma may let students looking forward the external remuneration then could not to be autonomous, and lack the moral courage to criticize the violation. In school counseling, when people encounter the impermanence of life, they need a reasonable attribution instead of relief of suffering. So the karma belief could be the comfort when student in suffering, but the disadvantage of karma belief may just like the Karl Manx's ridicule to religion, is the opium of the people, could let them hold the negative view of fatalism, don't want work hard to deal with difficult, even the difficult is not really serious.
期刊論文
1.Yeo, S. S.、Meiser, B.、Barlow-Stewart, K.、Goldstein, D.、Tucker, K.、Eisenbruch, M.(2005)。Understanding community beliefs of Chinese-Australians about cancer: Initial insights using an ethnographic approach。Psycho-Oncology,14(3),174-186。  new window
2.Yen, W. J.、Teng, C. H.、Huang, X. Y.、Ma, W. F.、Lee, S.、Tseng, H. C.(2010)。A theory of meaning of caregiving for parents of mentally ill children in Taiwan, a qualitative study。Journal of Clinical Nursing,19(1/2),259-265。  new window
3.張俊(20041200)。宗教為德行許諾幸福--道教、佛教、基督教三模式。世界宗教學刊,4,135-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李坤崇、歐慧敏(19960100)。青少年因應策略量表編製報告。測驗年刊,43,241-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.尤煌傑(20030600)。哲學問題大家談:你是否相信佛教所謂前世、今生、來世「因果循環」的教義?。哲學與文化,30(6)=349,171-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林偉(2006)。「三世」概念與「善惡報應」:佛教中國化的一個範例分析。現代哲學,2006(1),90-95。  延伸查詢new window
7.杜時忠、程紅艷(2007)。「無德而富」與道德教育的根本性危機。華東師範大學學報,25(1),20-27。  延伸查詢new window
8.李雄、張宇理(1993)。「因果報應」與「因信稱義」有衝突嗎?。中信月刊,371。  延伸查詢new window
9.徐明生(2008)。「承負」與「輪迴」:道教與佛教兩種果報理論的比較。江蘇科技大學學報,8(2),10-14。  延伸查詢new window
10.趙春娥(2008)。儒佛果報觀異同之比較:兼談佛教的本土化。青海民族研究,19(3),79-83。  延伸查詢new window
11.Anand, J.(2009)。Psychological healing and faith in the doctrine of Karma。Mental Health, Religion & Culture,12(8),817-832。  new window
12.Yen, C. L.(2013)。It is our destiny to die: The effects of mortality salience and culture-priming on fatalism and karma belief。International Journal of Psychology,48(5),818-828。  new window
13.Levy, B. R.、Slade, M. D.、Ranasinghe, P.(2009)。Causal thinking after a tsunami wave: Karma beliefs, pessimistic explanatory style and health among Sri Lankan survivors。Journal of Religion and Health,48(1),38-45。  new window
14.袁光儀(20021200)。《太平經》承負報應思想探析。成大宗教與文化學報,2,167-209。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.楊深坑(19960300)。理性的冒險、生命的行動及主體性的失落與拯救--人類圖像的歷史變遷與教育改革之展望。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,37,19-38。  延伸查詢new window
16.Hardin, Garrett(1968)。The tragedy of the commons。Science,162(3859),1243-1248。  new window
研究報告
1.瞿海源(1994)。台灣地區社會變遷基本調查計劃:第二期第五次調查計劃執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC 83-0301-H-001-034-B1)。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.傅仰止、杜素豪(2010)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫:第五期第五次調查計畫執行報告。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳昱全(2011)。民間宗教信仰因果報應觀:作為一種臺灣民眾日常生活的導引(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.歐陽教(1985)。教育哲學導論。臺北市:文景出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳俊升(1988)。教育哲學大綱。臺北:臺灣商務出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Paranjpe, A. C.(1998)。Self and identity in modern psychology and Indian thought。New York:Plenum Press。  new window
4.李亦園(20040000)。宗教與神話論集。臺北:立緒。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.邱皓政(2000)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Weber, Max、康樂、簡惠美(2007)。基督新教倫理與資本主義精神。遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.酒井忠夫、劉岳兵、孫雪梅、何英鶯(2010)。中國善書研究。南京:江蘇人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.AERA、APA、NCME(1999)。Standards for educational and psychological testing。Washington, DC:American Educational Research Association。  new window
9.蔡文輝(2004)。社會學。台北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
10.Kakar, S.、Kakar, K.(2007)。The Indians: Portrait of a people。New Delhi:Viking/Penguin。  new window
11.Brokaw, Cynthia J.(2014)。The Ledgers of Merit and Demerit: Social Change and Moral Order in Late Imperial China。New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
12.Kymlicka, Will(2002)。Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction。Oxford University Press。  new window
13.傅偉勳(1993)。死亡的尊嚴與生命的尊嚴--從臨終精神醫學到現代生死學。臺北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析實務。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Cohen, Jacob E.(1988)。Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
圖書論文
1.Marx, K.、中共中央馬恩列斯著作編譯局(1972)。[黑格爾法哲學批判]導言。黑格爾法哲學批判。北京:中共中央編譯局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Horton, R.(1979)。Ritual man in Africa。Reader in comparative religion。New York:Harper & Row。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE