:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:網路調查方法在教育研究上可行性之探究:以國小學童人際關係與學校壓力之研究為例
書刊名:中正教育研究
作者:施佩芳
作者(外文):Shih, Pei-fang
出版日期:2010
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁31-76
主題關鍵詞:人際關係學校壓力網路調查方法Interpersonal relationshipSchool stressWeb-based survey method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:175
  • 點閱點閱:62
網路調查方法不同於紙筆問卷調查方法,它是一種利用網路虛擬世界來進行教育研究的新方法,故本研究以高雄市國小五、六年級學生694人為對象,進行兩種調查方法的比較,來探究網路調查方法在教育研究上之可行性,並了解學童人際關係與學校壓力之相關情形。研究結果得知網路調查方法和紙筆問卷調查方法都有良好的信度與效度,表示兩者都是有效的、可信賴的調查方法;另外兩種調查方法所獲得的學童人際關係都屬於中度知覺、學校壓力都屬於低度知覺,以及學童人際關係與學校壓力具有中度相關性,亦即透過兩種調查方法,學生所知覺到的人際關係與學校壓力的調查結果相同。由上可知,網路調查方法是傳統紙筆問卷調查法的可行替代方案,亦為教育研究提供了另一種可行的研究方法。
The web-based survey method and paper-and-pencil questionnaires survey method were different, because the web-based survey method employed the virtual world as the research tool to perform the research. The subjects came from 694 fifth and sixth graders in Kaohsiung. The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of web-based survey in educational research, and to understand the relations between interpersonal relationship and school stress of elementary school students. Followings were the findings from the study: 1.Both the web-based survey method and paper-and-pencil questionnaires survey method were reliable and valid survey methods . 2.Both the web-based survey method and paper-and-pencil questionnaires survey method showed the result of medium interpersonal relationship, low school stress, and medium correlations between interpersonal relationship and school stress of elementary school students. In conclusion, the web-based survey method represented a workable alternative plan to traditional paper-and-pencil questionnaires survey method. The web-based survey method also provided another research method for educational research.
期刊論文
1.Lin, N.、Ensel, W.、Dean, A.(1981)。Social support scales: A methodological note。Schizophrenia Bulletin,7(1),73-89。  new window
2.Helsen, M.、Vollebergh, W.、Meeus, W.(2000)。Social Support from Parents and Friends and Emotional Problems in Adolescence。Journal of Youth and Adolescence,29(3),319-335。  new window
3.Cartland, J.、Ruch-Ross, H. S.、Henry, D. B.(2003)。Feeling at home in one’s school: A first look at a new measure。Adolescence,38,305-319。  new window
4.Witte, J, C.、Amoroso, L. M.、Howard, P. E. N.(2000)。Research methodology: Method and representation in Internet-based survey tools--mobility, community, and cultural identity in Survey。Social Science Computer Review,18(2),179-195。  new window
5.許嘉容、吳裕益(20070600)。高雄市國小資優資源班學生學校壓力與學校適應之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,32(2),115-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.莊道明(19981200)。我國學術資訊網路使用及資訊倫理教育之研究。圖書館學刊.臺大,13,169-197。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Couper, M. P.(2000)。Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches。Public Opinion Quarterly,64(4),464-494。  new window
8.McCabe, S. E.、Boyd, C. J.、Couper, M. P.、Crawford, S.、D'Arcy, H.(2002)。Mode Effects for Collecting Alcohol and Other Drug Use Data: Web and U.S. Mail。Journal of Studies on Alcohol,63,755-761。  new window
9.Davis, G.(1997)。Are Internet surveys ready for prime time?。Marketing News,31(8),31-32。  new window
10.Layne, B. H.、DeCristoforo, J. R.、McGinty, D.(1999)。Electronic versus Traditional Student Ratings of Instruction。Research in Higher Education,40,221-232。  new window
11.余民寧、李仁豪(20060900)。調查方式與問卷長短對回收率與調查內容影響之研究。當代教育研究,14(3),127-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳麗珠、謝旻蒼(20021200)。網路調查在教育研究之應用:以全國中小學教育經費基本需求調查為例。教育研究資訊,10(6),85-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.蔡金田(20050400)。新科技衝擊下的教育研究--網路調查方法論的問題。教育資料與研究,63,123-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.張德勝(20050600)。The Validity and Reliability of Student Ratings: Comparison between Paper-pencil and Online Survey。中華心理學刊,47(2),113-125。new window  new window
15.Schonlau, Matthias、Van Soest, Arthur、Kapteyn, Arie、Couper, Mick(2009)。Selection Bias in Web Surveys and the Use of Propensity Scores。Sociological Methods & Research,37(3),291-318。  new window
16.Romano, J. L.(1997)。Stress and Coping: A Qualitative Study of 4th and 5th Graders。Elementary school guidance & counseling,31(4),273-282。  new window
17.Buchanan, T.、Smith, J. L.(1999)。Using the Internet for Psychological Research: Personality Testing on the World Wide Web。British Journal of Psychology,90(1),125-144。  new window
18.Dommeyer, C. J.、Moriarty, E.(2000)。Comparing two forms of an e-mail survey: Embedded vs. attached。International Journal of Market Research,42(1),39-50。  new window
19.Pitkow, J. E.、Recker, M. M.(1995)。Using the Web as a survey tool: Results from the second WWW user survey。Computer Networks and ISDN Systems,27,809-822。  new window
20.Tse, A. C. B.(1998)。Comparing the Response Rate, Response Speed and Response Quality of Two Methods of Sending Questionnaires: E-mail vs. Mail。Journal of the Market Research Society,40(4),353-362。  new window
21.Compas, B. E.、Orosan, P. G.、Grant, K. E.(1993)。Adolescent stress and coping: implications for psychopathology during adolescence。Journal of Adolescence,16(3),331-349。  new window
22.House, James S.、Umberson, Debra、Landis, Karl R.(1988)。Structures and Processes of Social Support。Annual Review of Sociology,14,293-318。  new window
23.Umberson, D.、Chen, M. D.、House, J. S.、Hopkins, K.、Slaten, E.(19961000)。The effect of social relationships on psychological well-being: are men and women really so different?。American Sociological Review,61(5),837-857。  new window
24.周巧芳、曾柔鳴、黃財尉(20071200)。嘉義市國小高年級學童學校壓力與因應策略之研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊,3,97-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.游森期、余民寧(20060600)。網路問卷與傳統問卷之比較:多樣本均等性方法學之應用。測驗學刊,53(1),103-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.張德勝(20040400)。The Results of Student Ratings: Paper vs. Online。師大學報. 教育類,49(1),171-185。new window  new window
27.梁培勇(19931200)。小學兒童壓力觀初步探討。中華心理學刊,35(2),87-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.蘇蘅、吳淑俊(19970100)。電腦網路問卷調查可行性及回覆者特質的研究。新聞學研究,54,75-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.周子敬、彭睦清(20050300)。國內大專院校教師工作壓力及工作滿足感模式。教育心理學報,36(3),201-219。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.周祝瑛(20070200)。學雜費之外:臺灣地區大學生教育費用之研究。教育研究,154,110-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.施佩芳(2003)。國小學童A型行為、導師權力類型與學校壓力之相關研究。台東師院學報,14上,245-266。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.徐昊杲、蔡國強、李榮東、林俊雄(2001)。我國專科學生電腦使用狀況調查研究。全國技術及職業教育研討會:一般技職及人文教育類I,16,323-331。  延伸查詢new window
33.謝富榮(2007)。台中縣國小學童電腦態度調查:兼論網路調查法在教育研究之可行性。國立屏東教育大學學報,28,1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.簡瓊雯、林珊如(2005)。臺灣國小教師網路資訊行為之研究。中華民國圖書館學會會報,74,133-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Carini, R. M., Hayek, J. H., Kuh, G. D., Kennedy, J. M.,、Ouimet, J. A.(2003)。College student responses to web and paper surveys: Does mode matter?。Research in Higher Education,44,1-19。  new window
36.Grandcolas, U., Rettie, R.,、Marusenko, K.(2003)。Web survey bias: Sample or mode effect?。Journal ofMarketing Managemenl,19(5/6),541-561。  new window
37.Kwak, N.,、Radler, B.(2002)。A comparison between mail and web surveys: Response pattern, respondent profile, and data quality。Journal of Official Statistics,18(2),257-273。  new window
38.McCabe, S. E.(2004)。Comparison of web and mail surveys in collecting illicit drug use data: Arandomized experiment。Journal of Drug Education,34(1),61-72。  new window
39.McCabe, S. E., Boyd, C. J., Young, A., Crawford, S.,、Pope, D.(2005)。Mode effects collecting alcohol and tobacco data among 3rd and 4th grade students: A randomized pilot study of web-form versus paper-form survey。Addictive Behaviors,30,663-671。  new window
40.McCullough, D.(1998)。Web-based marketing research: The dawning of a new era。Direct Marketing,61(8),36-39。  new window
41.Miller, E. T., Neal, D. I., Roberts, L. I., Bear, I S., Cressler, S. O., Metrik, J. et al.,(2001)。Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: Is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods?。Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,16(1),56-63。  new window
42.Pealer, L., Weiler, R. M., Pigg, R. M., Miller, D.,、Dorman, S. M.(2001)。The feasibility of web-based surveillance system to collect health risk behavior data from college students。Health Education Behavio,28,547-559。  new window
43.Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, R. W., Harris, K. M., Jones, I., Tabor, I. et al.,(1997)。Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the national longitudinal study on adolescent health。JAMA,278,823-832。  new window
44.Shannon, D. M.,、Bradshaw, C. C.(2002)。A comparison of response rate, response time, and cost of mail and electronic surveys。Journal of Experimental Education,70(2),179-192。  new window
45.Shannon, K. O.(2005)。New technology and research: An analysis of internet survey methodology in political science。Political Science & Politics,38,263-267。  new window
46.Swoboda, S. J., Muehlbeiger, N., Weitkuat, R.,、Schneeweiss, S.(1997)。Internet surveys by direct mailing: An innovative way of collecting data。Social Science ComputerReview,153,34-50。  new window
學位論文
1.林承賢(2006)。網路問卷調查回收率影響因素之初探分析 -以1999~2003年台灣博碩士論文為例-(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.江德怡(2006)。國小學童家庭休閒活動、親子互動、及其人際關係之研究(碩士論文)。高雄師範大學,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
3.張一帆(1997)。全球資訊網與傳播調查研究--調適性電子問卷系統之設計與發展(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.張宜慶(1999)。電腦網路德菲研究系統之建構及其可行性研究(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.林淑華(2002)。國小學童情緒管理與人際關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊玉女(1991)。兒童的生活壓力、自我能力評估及其適應行為之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。  延伸查詢new window
7.曾肇文(1996)。國小學童學校壓力、因應方式、社會支持與學校適應之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院,新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
8.高源令(1992)。國小學生日常生活壓力之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.方武昌(2002)。國小學童資訊學習適應之相關因素研究―以澎湖地區為例,台南市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hamachek, D. E.(1982)。Encounter with others。New York:The Dryden Press。  new window
2.Humphrey, J. H.(2004)。Childhood stress in contemporary society。New York:The Haworth Press。  new window
3.Greenberg, Jerald、Baron, Robert A.(1997)。Behavior in Organization。Prentice-Hall。  new window
4.張宏文、邱文芳(1996)。實用人際關係學。台北市:商鼎。  延伸查詢new window
5.張紹勳(2004)。研究方法。臺北:滄海書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃月霞(1993)。教導兒童社會技巧。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
7.張春興(1998)。教育心理學--三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.徐西森、連廷嘉、陳仙子、劉雅瑩(2002)。人際關係的理論與實務。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Hewson, C.、Yule, P.、Laurent, D.、Vogel, C.(2003)。Internet research methods: A practical guide for the social and behavioral sciences。London:Sage。  new window
10.Curtis, A. J.(2000)。Health psychology。Routledge。  new window
11.Robbins, Stephen P.、李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬(2002)。組織行為學。華泰文化。  延伸查詢new window
12.Dillman, Don A.(2000)。Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
13.Lazarus, Richard S.、Folkman, Susan(1984)。Stress, Appraisal, and Coping。Springer。  new window
14.Boenisch, E.、Haney, M.著、余泳泳(1998)。人際、工作、金錢、休閒、心靈、身體六大壓力管理DIY。台北市:商智文化。  延伸查詢new window
15.Goyder, J(1987)。The silent minority。Boulder, CO。  new window
16.Helms, B. J.,、Gable, R. K.(1990)。Assessing and dealing with school relating stress in grades 3-12 students。  new window
17.Lumsden, J.(2007)。Online-questionnaire design guidelines。Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements。Hershey, PA。  new window
18.Paterno, J., Henderson, P.、Dickey, S. W.(1987)。Children’s identification of stress related factors and coping strategies。  new window
19.Singh, M.,、Burgess, S.(2007)。Electronic data collection methods。Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements。Hershey, PA。  new window
其他
1.Jensen, I. M.(2003)。Ten easy ways to increase response rates for your online survey。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃毅志(2002)。社會階層、社會網絡與心理幸福。社會階層、社會網絡與主觀意識:台灣地區不公平的社會階層體系之延續。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ye, J.(2007)。Overcoming challenges to conducting online surveys。Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements。Hershey, PA:Idea Group Reference。  new window
3.McDermott, J. F.(1997)。Risk and protective factors in child and adolescent psychiatric disorders。Handbook of child and adolescent psychi atry。New York:Wiley。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE