參考文獻
壹、中文部分
方子華(民92)。國小學生家庭閱讀活動、學校閱讀環境與閱讀動機之相關研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
朱剛(民91)。20世紀西方文藝文化批評理論。台北：揚智。
何三本(民84)。幼兒故事學。台北：五南。
何應傑(民92)。兒童閱讀圖畫書意義建構之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。
吳春田(民90)。低年級學童在故事教學中的讀者回應。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。
吳新發譯(民82)。文學理論導讀。台北：書林。
宋珮譯(民95)。觀賞圖畫書中的圖畫。台北：雄獅。
李冠蓉(民87)。兒童插畫於平面上之探討。國立台灣科技大學藝術 研究所碩士論文。
李惠加(民87)。圖畫書的閱讀。幼教資訊，88，50-53。
李惠加(民91)。幼兒及其母親圖畫書反應探究(二)－以不同版本的《馬頭琴》為例。載於譚小媛主編「兒童文學與兒童語言」學術研討會論文輯：兒童文學的閱讀與應用(232-270)。台北：富春文化。
李漢偉(民79)。兒童文學講話。高雄：復文。
沈添鉦、俞志昌（民88）。國小高年級學童在文學討論中的問題與回應之研究：兼論兒童文學在國小語文課程中的地位。發表於台灣地區兒童文學與國小語文教育研討會。
汪榮才(民85)。國民小學資賦優異學生在科學文章閱讀歷程中後設認知知識及後設認知控制之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告，計畫編號：NSC 85-2413-h-024-001。
幸佳慧(民87)。兒童圖畫故事書的藝術探討。國立成功大學藝術研究所碩士論文。
幸佳慧(民89)。兒童圖畫故事書的藝術散步－藝術風格介紹。美育，113，19-30。
林文寶等(民85)。兒童文學。台北：五南。
林真美(民84)。活用圖畫書，增加親子情。載於張湘君主編，認識幼兒讀物。台北：天衛文化。
林敏宜(民89)。圖畫書的欣賞與應用。台北：心理。
林清山譯(民81)。教育心理學－認知取向。台北：遠流。
松居直(民84)。幸福的種子--親子共讀圖畫書。台北：台灣英文雜誌社。
邱叔雅(民85)。幼兒圖畫書的欣賞與應用。蒙特梭利雙月刊，7，29-31。
侯明秀(民93)。無字圖畫書的圖像表現力及其敘事藝術之研究。國立台東大學兒童文學研究所碩士論文。
洪文瓊(民93)。台灣圖畫書發展史-出版觀點的解析。台北：傳文文化。
徐素霞(民87)。圖像語言藝術與純藝術之創作探討。美育，91，31-36。
郝廣才(民84)。大師名作繪本PARENTS’ GUIDE《親子手冊》。台北：格林。
馬景賢(民89)。跟父母談兒童文學。台北：國語日報。
張子樟(民89)。「好書大家讀」的評選省思。載於劉鳳蕊主編，擺盪在感性與理性之間—兒童文學選集1988-1998。台北：幼獅文化。
張佩歆（民88）。安東尼．布朗圖畫書作品中的諷刺性遊戲。國立台東師範學院兒童文學研究所碩士論文。
張湘君(民82a)。敬老尊老乎—由兒童圖畫書中老人角色的刻畫談起。台北師院學報，6，163-186。
張湘君（民82b）。讀者反應理論及其對兒童文學教育的啟示。東師語文學刊，6，286-307。
梁秋月(民90)。國小教師、家長與兒童對薛佛西斯坦愛心樹之詮釋。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。
梁菁雯(民93)。不同讀者對林明子圖畫書插畫之反應。國立嘉義大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文。
畢恆達(民85)。詮釋學與質性研究。載於胡幼慧主編，質性研究-理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，27-44。台北：巨流。
許月貴(民91)。兒童文學之評鑑、選擇與教學探究－以圖畫故事書閱讀教學為例。載於第六屆「兒童文學與兒童語言」學術研討會論文集。台北：富春文化。
許郁芳(民90)。圖畫作家風格研究—以昆汀布雷克及瑪夏布朗的作品為例。國立台東師範學院兒童文學研究所。
許海嬋(民93)。親子對幻想類圖畫書詮釋之研究。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭研究所碩士論文。
郭恩惠(民88)。兒童與成人對兒童圖畫故事書的反應探究。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。
郭靜姿(民80)。學習動機、策略運用與後設認知能力之相關探討及其所建構而成之後設理解模式在資優教學上的運用(下)。資優教育季刊，38，9-15。
郭靜姿(民83)。不同閱讀能力成敗歸因方式、策略運用與後設認知能力之差異比較。師大學報，39，284-325。
郭麗玲(民80)。在畫中說故事的「圖畫書」。社教雙月刊，46，20-33。
陳海泓(民86)。讓兒童的想像力展翅飛翔—以《瘋狂星期二》導讀為例。語文教育通訊，18，43- 54。
陳海泓（民88）。兒童讀物、閱讀課和圖書館館藏對兒童學業成就以及教育機會均等之理論探討。臺南師院學院，32， 頁1-25 。陳海泓(民90)。如何利用圖畫故事書發展兒童的創造力。語文教育通訊，23，64-78。
陳淑婷(民95)。在國中實施「由下而上」及「由上而下」閱讀教學策略訓練的對比研究。國立高雄師範大學英語學系碩士論文。
陳燕谷譯(民83)。讀者反應理論批評，台北：駱駝。
傅林統(民68)。兒童文學的認識與鑑賞。台北：作文。
傅林統（民89）。兒童文學的思想與技巧。台北：富春文化。彭懿(民95)。遇見圖畫書百年經典。台北：信誼基金社。
黃永宏(民91)。信誼基金會出版之兒童圖畫書插畫風格分析。國立台灣科技大學設計研究所碩士論文。
黃郇媖(民94)。幼兒文學概論。台北：光佑文化。
黃淑娟(民89)。國小學童圖畫書導賞教學及其插畫反應探討。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
黃淮麟（民90）。兒童對圖畫書插畫風格喜好發展。國立台灣科技大學設計研究所碩士論文。
黃慧珊(民92)。兒童對幻想性圖畫書的反應。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭研究所碩士論文。
葉詠琍(民71)。西洋兒童文學史。台北：東大圖書有限公司。
董之林譯(民83)。接受美學理論。台北:駱駝。
廖麗慧(民89)。約翰伯寧罕圖畫書研究。國立台東師範學院兒童文學研究所碩士論文。
劉鳳芯(民89)。圖畫書。載於劉鳳蕊主編，擺盪在感性與理性之間—兒童文學選集1988-1998。台北：幼獅文化。
劉鳳芯譯(民89)。閱讀兒童文學的樂趣。台北：天衛文化。
蔡尚志(民81)。兒童故事原理。台北：五南。
蔡銘津(民85)。增進學童閱讀理解的認知結構模式。資優教育季刊，61，19-24。
鄭明進(民85)。兒童圖畫書大事記。雄獅美術，302，52-56。
鄭瑞菁(民94)。幼兒文學(第二版)。台北：心理。
龍協濤(民86)。讀者反應理論。台北：揚智文化。
謝正瑜(民93)。兒童圖畫書的圖像語言表現賞析教學對兒童繪畫表現影響之研究。國立新竹教育大學進修部美勞教學碩士論文。
謝美寶(民92)。國小學生閱讀態度、家庭閱讀環境與閱讀理解能力關係之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
鍾嘉文譯(1988)。當代文學理論。台北：南方。
藍慧君(民80)。學習障礙兒童與普通兒童閱讀不同結構文章之閱讀理解與理解策略的比較研究。特殊教育研究學刊，8，175-202。顏若映(民82)。先前知識在閱讀理解上之認知研究。國立政治大學「教育與心理研究」，16，385-412。
蘇振明(民79)。「兒童讀物插畫」的導賞教學研究。台北市立師範學院學報，21，389-412。
蘇振明(民87)。認識兒童讀物插畫及其教育性。美育，91，1-10。
貳、西文部分
Aaron, P. G. & Malatesha-Joshi, R. (Eds.). (1992). Reading problems: Consultation and remediation. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Ackerman, J. (1993). The promise of writing to learn. Written Communication, 10(3), 334-370.
Alexander, P., & Jetton,T. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbarm.
Anderson, R. C. & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Anderson, R. C. (1994). Role of the reader’s schemata in comprehension, learning and memory. In R. B. Ruddell, M. Rapp, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 469-482) (4th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 255-293). NY: Longman.
Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E., Scott, J., & Wilkinson, L. (1984). Becoming a nation o f readers: The report of the commission on reading. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Applebee, A. N. (1973). ERIC/RCS report: The elements of response to a literary work: What we have learned. Research in the Teaching of English, 11(3), 255-271.
Applebee, A. N. (1978). A child’s concept fo story. Chicago: University of chicago Press.
Applebee, A. N. (1981). Writing in the secondary school. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Armbruster, B. B., & Osborn, J. H. (2002). Personal response to literature. In Reading instruction and assessment: Understanding the IRA standards. Boston, MA: A Pearson Education Company.
Asher, S. R. (1980). Topic interest and children’s reading comprehension. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Asher, S. R., Hymel, S., & Wigfield, A. (1978). Influence of topic interest on children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 10, 35-47.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Cognitive mornitoring in reading. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension (pp. 21-44). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Barthes, R, (1977). The death of the author. In image, music, text (S. Heath, Trans.) (pp. 142-148). New York: Hill & wang.
Barton, J., & Sawyer, D. M. (2003). Our students are ready for this: Comprehension instruction in the elementary school. The Reading Teacher, 57, 334-347.
Beach, R. (1983). Attitudes, social conventions and response to literature. Journal of Research and Development on Education, 16(3), 47-54.
Beach, R. (1997). Students’ resistance to engagement with multicultural literature. In T. Rogers & A. Soter (Eds.), Reading across cultures. New York: Teachers College Press.
Beach, R., & Hydns, S. (1991). Research on response to literature. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume II, (pp. 453-491). New York: Longman.
Beaven, M. H. (1972). Responses of adolescents to feminine characters in literature. Research in the Teaching of English, 6, 48-68.
Beck,I. L., McKeown, J. G., Hamilton, R. L., & Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Blair-Larsen, S. M. & Vallance, K. M. (1999). Comprehension instruction in a balanced reading classroom. In S. M. Blair-Larsen & K. A. Williams (Eds.), The balanced reading program: Helping all students achieve success. International Reading Association Press.
Britton, J. (1984). Viewpoints: The distinction between participant and spectator role language in research and practice. Research in the Teaching of English, 18(3), 320-331.
Burker, J. (2000). Reading reminders: Tools, tips, and techniques. Portsmouth, NH: Boyton/Cook.
Cai, M. (1997). Reader response theory and the politics of multicultural literature. In T. Rogers & A. O. Soter (Eds.), Reading across culture: Teaching literature in a diverse society (pp. 199-212). New York: Teachers College Press.
Cairney, T. H. (1990). Other Worlds: The Endless Possibilities of Literature. Sydney: Martin Educational.
Calfee, R.C., & Patrick, C. L. (1995). Teach our children well: Bringing K–12 education into the 21st century. Stanford, CA: Stanford Alumni.
Carlsson, M. A., Fulop, M., & Marton, F. ( 2001). Peeling the Onion: Student teachers’ comceptions of literary understanding. Scandinavian Jorunal of Educational Research, 45, 5-18.
Carnine, D.W., Silbert, J., & Kameenui, E.J. (1997). Direct instruction reading (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
Cherland, M. (1992). Gendered readings: Cultural constraints upon response to literature. The New Advocate, 5, 187-198.
Connecticut Teachers. (2004). CAPT reading across the disciplines. Ridgefield, CT: Webster House.
Cooney, B. (1988). Ways of saying , ways of knowing: Art for all ages. The New England Reading Association Annual Conference, Portland, ME.
Corcoran, B. & Evans, E. (Eds.). (1987). Readers, Texts, Teachers. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/ Cook.
Cox, C. (1999). Teaching language arts: A student- and response-centered classroom. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn Bacon.
Cox, C., & Many, J. E. (1989). Reader stance toward a literary work: Applying th transactional theory to children’s rsponses. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Cox, C., & Many, J. E. (1992). Eeyond choosing: Emergent categories of efferent and aesthetic stance. In Many, J. E., & Cox, C, (Eds.), Reader stance and literary understanding: Exploring the theories, research and practice (pp. 103-126). Norwood, NJ: Ablix.
Cox, C., & Zarrillo, J. (1990). Teaching with literature in the elementary school: A qualitative study applying Rosenblatt’s transactional theory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
Cullinan, B. E. (1987). Children’s literature in the reading program. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Cullinan, B. E., Harwood, k. T., & Galda, L. (1983). The reader and the story: Comprehension and response. Journal of Research and Development in Education , !6, 29-37.
Cunningham, A., & Shagoury, R. (2005). The sweet work of reading- Kindergartners explore reading comprehension using a surprisingly complex array of strategies. Educational leadership, 10, 53-57.
Danielson, K. E. (1992). Lireature groups. Reading Horizons, 32, 372-382.
Davey, B. (1983). Think aloud: Modeling the cognitive processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Reading, 27, 44-47.
Davidson, M. S. (2000). An application of Rosenblatt’s aesthetic/efferent continuum to the literarue curriculum of an advanced placement English twelve class. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh).
Dekker, M. (1991). Books, reading and response: A teacher-researcher tells a story. The New Advocate, 4, 37-46.
Dickinson, D. K., & Smith, M. W. (1994). Long-term dffects of preschool teachers’ book reading on low income children’s vocabulary and story comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 104-122.
Driessen, D, Z. (1984). A description of a select group of fifth grade students response to picture books. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).
Duke, N. (2003). Comprehension instruction for informational text. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Michigan Reading Association, Grand Rapids, MI.
Dymock, S. (2007). Comprehension Strategy Instruction: Teaching Narrative Text Structure Awareness. The Reading Teaching, 61(2), pp. 161-167.
Eagleton, T. (1983). Literary theory: An Introduction. London: Basil Blackwell.
Eeds, M., & Wells, D. (1989). Grand conversations: An exploration of meaning construction in literature study groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 23(1), 4-29.
Elleman, B. (1986). Picture book art: Evaluation. Booklist, 82, 154-158.
Elley, W. B., & Mangubhai, F. (1983). The impact of reading on second language reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 53-67.
Fish, S. (1980). Literature in the reader: Affective stylistics. In J. P. Tompkins(Ed.). Reader-response criticism. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Flood, J., & Lapp, D. (1995). Broadening the lens: Toward an expanded conceptualization of literacy. In K. Hinchman, D. J. Leu, & C. K. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice (pp. 1-16). Chicago: The National Reading Conference.
Gagne, R. M. (1985). The cognitive psychology on school learning . Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Galda, L. (1982). Assuming the spectator stance: An examination of the responses of three young readers. Research in the Teaching of English, 16(1), 1-20.
Galda, L. (1983). Research in response to literature. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 16, 1-20.
Galda, L. (1990). Children’s literature as a language experience. The Advocate, 3(4), 247-259.
Galda, L. (1998). Mirrors and windows: Reading as transformation. In T. E. Raphael & K. H. Au (Eds.), Literature-based instruction: Reshaping the curriculum (pp. 1-11). Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon Publishers.
Galda, L., & Cullinan, B. E. (1991). Literature for literacy: What research says about the benefits of using trade books in the classroom. In J. Folld, J. M. Jensen, D. Lapp, & J. R. Squire (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 529-535). New York: Macmillan.
Galda, L., Cullinan, B. E., & Strickland, D. S. (1993). Laguage, literacy and the child. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Gamble, N. & Yates, S. (2002). Exploring children’s literature: Teaching the language and reading of fiction. Paul Chapman Publishing.
Gambrell, L. B., Koskinen, P. S., & Kapinus, B. A. (1991). Retellling and the reading comprehension of proficient and less-proficient readers. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 356-362.
Gambrell, L. B., Palmer, B. M., & Coding, R. M. (1993). Motivation to read. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
Glazer, J. I. (1991). Literature for young children. (3rd ed.) New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Glazer, J. I. (1997). Introduction to Children’s Literature. (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Glazer, J. I. (2000). Literature for young children. (4nd ed.). NJ: Prenticep Hall.
Golden, J. M. (1988). The construction of a literary text in a story-reading lesson. In J. L. Green & J. O. Harker (Eds.), Multiple perspective analyses of classroom descoruse (pp. 71-106). Morwood, Nj: Ablex.
Golden, R., & Rumelhart, D. (1993). A parallel distributed processing model of story comprehension and recall. Discourse Processes, 16, 203-237.
Graham, J. (1998). Turning the visual into the verbal: Children reading workless books. In J. Evans (Ed.). What’s in the picture? Responding to illustrations in picture books. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
Graves, M. F., & Graves, B. B. (1994). Scaffolding reading experiences: Designs for student success. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Green, J. L., & Harker, J. O. (1982). Reading to children: A communicative process. In J. A. Langer & M. T. Smith-Burke (Eds.), Reader meets author/bridging the gap: A psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspective (pp. 196-221). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Gregory, E. (1996). Making sense of a new world: Learning to read in a second language. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, D. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hamman, V. E. (1995). Children’s literature in social studies. Is it used? Rural Educator, 17(1),3-4.
Hancock, M. R. (1993). Exploring the meaning-making process through the content of literature response journals: A case study investigation. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 335-368.
Hancock, M. R. (2000). A celebration of literature and response: Children, books, and teachers in K-8 classrooms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
Hepler, S. I. (1982). Patterns of response to literature: A one-year study of a fifth and sixth grade classroom. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).
Hess, M. L. (1993). “Why do I have to read?”: Multiplying perspectives through peer response. English Education, 25(3), 148-156.
Hickman, J. (1979). Responses to literature in the school environment: Grades K-5. (Unpublished doctoral dessertation, The Ohio State University).
Hiebert, E. H., & Raphael, T. E. (1996). Psychological perspective on literacy and extensions to educational practice. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 550-602). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Holland, N. H. (1975). Five readers reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Huck,C. S., Hepler, S., & Hickman, J. (1997). Children’s literature in the elementary school (6th ed.). Madison, WI : Brown & Benchmark.
Hunt, R. A., & Vipond, D. (1991). First, catch the rabbit: Methodological imperative and the dramatization of dialogic reading. In R. Beach, J. L. Green, M. L. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 69-90). Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English/ National Council of Teachers of English.
Hyde, A.A.,& Bizar, M.(1989). Thinking in context: Teaching cognitive process across the elementary school curriculum. NY:Longman
Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A Theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jacobs, J. S. & Tunnell, M. O. (1996). Children’s literature, briefly. Englewood Cliffs, N.J : Merrill
Kameenui, E. J. & Simmons, D. C. (1990). Designing instructional stratiges. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill Publishing.
Kiefer, B. Z. (1983). Picture books: More than a story. Booklist, 15, 492-494.
Kiefer, B. Z. (1995). The potential of picture books. New Jersey : Prentice-Hall.
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
Kucan, L. (2007). “I” Poems: Invitations for Students to Deepen Literary Understanding. The Reading Teacher, 60(6), 518–525.
Langer, J. A. (1981). From theory to practice: A prereading plan, Journal of Reading, 25, 152-156.
Langer, J. A. (1995). Envisioning literature: Literary understanding and literature instruction. NY: Teachers College Press & Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study fo teaching and learning. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Langer, J. A., & Nicholich, M. (1981). Prior knowledge and its effect on comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 375-378.
Lehr, S. (1988). The child’s developing sense of theme as a response to literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 337-357.
Long, T. W., & Gove, M. K. (2003). How engagement strategies and literature circles promote critical response in a fourth-grade, urban classroom. The reading teacher, 57(4), 350-361.
Lynch-Brown, C., & Tomlinson, C. M. (1993). Essentials of Children’s literature. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Many, J. E. (1991). The effects of stance and age level on children’s literary responses. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 61-85.
Many, J. E. (1994). The effects of reader stance on students’ personal understanding of literature. In Ruddell, M. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.) Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 653-667). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
Many, J., & Wiseman, D. L. (1992). The effect of teaching approach on third-grade students’ response to literature. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 265-287.
Mariene, A. (2000). Reader response in literature and reading instruction. Teacher librarian, 27(4), 62-64.
McConaughy, S. H. (1978). A developmental model for story comprehension in reading or listening. Paper presected at the 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.
Mcgee, L. M. (1992). Exploring the literature-based reading revolution. Language Arts, 69, 529-537.
Meyer, L., Wardrop, J., Stahl, S., & Linn, R. (1994). Effects of reading storybooks aloud to children. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 69-85.
Miller, D. (2002). Reading with meaning: Teaching comprehension in the primary grades. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
Monson, D., & Sam, S. (1991). Reading preferences. Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Morrow, L. M. (1985). Retelling stories: A strategy for improving young children’s comprehension, concept of story, and oral language complexity. The Elementary School Journal, 85(5), 647-661.
Morrow, L. M. (1987). The effects of small group story reading on children’s questions and comments. In S. McCormick & J. Zutell (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction: Thirty-seventh yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 77-86). Chicago , IL: National Reading Conference.
Morrow, L. M. (1988). Young children’s responses to one-to-one story readings in school settings. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 89-107.
Morrow, L. M., & Smith, J. K. (1990). The effects of group size on interactive storybook reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 214-231.
Morrow, L. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (1982). Increasing children’s use of literature through program and physical design changes. Elementary School Journal, 83, 131-137.
Morrow, L. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (1986). Encouraging voluntary reading: The impact of a literature program on children’s use of library centers. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 330-346.
National council of teachers of English commission on reading. (2004). On reading, learning to read, and effective reading instruction [Online]. Available: www.ncte.org/about/over/positions/category/ read/ 118620.htm
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of child Health and Human Development.
Newell, G. (1984). Learning from writing on two content areas: A case study/ protocol analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 205-287.
Noble, P. R. (1994). Hermeneutics and post-modernism: can we have a radical reader-response theory? Religious Studies, 30(4) , 419-437.
Nodelman, P. (1988). Words about pictures: The narrative art of children’s picture books. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
Norton, D. E. (1991). Through the eyes of a child (3rd ed.). New York : Macmillan.
Norton, D. E. (1997). The effective teaching of language arts (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New Uork: Teachers College Press.
Ogle, D.M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. Reading Teacher, 39, 564-570.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension- fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and instruction, 1, 117-175.
Paris, A. H., & Paris, S. G. (2001). Children’s comprehension of narrative picture books (CIERA Rep. No. 3-012). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
Paris, A. H., & Paris, S. G. (2003). Assessment narrative comprehension in young children. Reading research quarterly, 38(1), 37-76.
Paris, S., Wasik, B., & Tuner, J. (1991). The development of strategic readers. IN R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 186-212). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Patricia W. P. (2000). The relationship of stance to level of understanding: A study of fifth-grade students'' responses to historical fiction. Michigan: A Bell & Howell Company Press.
Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York: Viking.
Pressley, M., & Wharton-McDonald, R. (1998). The development of literacy, part 4. In M. Pressley (Ed.), Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teachihg (pp.192-227). NY: The Guilford Press.
Purves, A. C. (1975). Research in the teaching of literature. Elementary English, 52(4), 463-66.
Purves, A. C. (1981). The state of research in teaching literature. English Journal, 70, 82-84.
Purves, A. C., & Beach, R. (1972). Literature and the reader: Research on response to literature, reading interests, and the teching of literature. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a reseach and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Office of Education Research and Improvement.
Raphael, T. E. (1982). Question-answering strategies for children. The Reading Teacher, 36, 186-191.
Raphael, T. E. (1986). Teaching question answer relationships, revisited. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 516-523.
Readence, J. E., T. W. Bean, & R. S. Baldwin. (1998). Content area reading: An intrgrated approach. IA: Kendall/ Hunt.
Renteria, I. G. (1987). The effects of QARs on third grade students’ response to comprehension questions. (Unpublished master dessertation, The Arizona University).
Richards, J. C., & Anderson, N. A. (2003). How do you know? A strategy to help emergent readers make inferences. The Reading Teacher, 57(3), 290-293.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1985). The transactional theory of the literary work: Implications for research. In Charles Cooper. (Ed.), Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1991). Literature-S.O.S. Language arts, 68, 444-448.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1993). The transactional theory: Against dualisms. College English, 55, 377-386.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1995). Literature as exploration (5th ed.). NY: Modern Language Association.
Roser, N., & Martinez, M. (1985). Roles adults play in preschoolers’ response to literature. Language Arts, 62, 485-490.
Roser, N., Martinez, M., Fuhrken, C., & McDonnold, K. (2007). Characters as Guides to Meaning. The Reading Teacher, 60(6), 548–559.
Russell, D. L. (2009). Literature for children: A short introduction(6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Sandora, Beck & McKeown (1999). A comparison of two discussion strategies on students’ comprehension and interpretation of complex literature. Reading Psychology, 20 (3), 177-212.
Santa, C. Havens, L., & Maycumber, E. (1996). Project CRISS: Creating independence through student-owned strategies (2n ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Sayeski, K. L., Burgess, K. A., Pianta, R. C., & Lloyd, J. W. (2001). Literacy behaviors of preschool children participating in an early intervention program (CIERA Rep. No. 2-014). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
Sears, D. (1992). The effects fo genre and topic on fourth-grade students’ written resonse to literature. Unpublished dissertation, Kansas State Universtiy.
Sebesta, S., Monson, D., & Senn, H. (1995). A hierarchy to assess reader response. Jourmal of Reading, 38, 444-450.
Serafini, F., & Ladd, S. M. (2008). The challenge of moving beyond the literal in literature discussions. Journal of Language and Literacy Education [Online], 4(2), 6-20. Available: http://www.coe.uga.edu/jolle/2008_2/challenge.pdf
Silvey, A. (Ed.). (2002). The essential guide to children''s books and their creators. Boston : Houghton Mifflin.
Sipe, L. R. (1997). Children’s literature, literacy and literary understanding. Journal of Children’s Literature, 23, 6-19.
Sipe, L. R.（1999）. Children’s response to literature: Author, text, reader, context. Theory into Practice,（38）3, 120-129.
Sipe, L. R. (2000). The construction of literary understanding by first and second graders in oral response to picture storybook read-alouds. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 252-275.
Smith, M. W. (1991). Construction meaning from text:: An analysis of ninth-grade reader response. Journal of educational research, 84(5), 263-271.
Stewig, J. W. (1995). Looking at Picture Books. Wisconsin: Highsmith Press.
Sulzby, E. (1985). Children’s emergent reading of favorite books: A developmental study. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 458-481.
Sutherland, R. (1985). Hidden persuaders: Political ideologies in literature for children. Children’s literature in education, 16, 143-157.
Sutherland, Z. & Arbuthnot, M. H. (1991). Children and books. (8th ed.) New York: Harper Collins
Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). The CIERA school change project: Supporting schools as they implement home-grown reading reform (CIERA Rep. No. 2016). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, CIERA.
Teale, W. H. (1987). Emergent literacy: Reading and writing development in early childhood. Paper presented at the 36th annual meeting of the National Reading Conference. Austin, TX.
Tierney, R. J. ＆ Readence, J. E. (2000). Reading strategies and practices: A compendium (5th ed.), pp. 318-374. MA: A Pearson Education Company.
Tompkins, G. E., & McGee, L. M. (1993). Teaching reading with literature. New York: Macmillan.
Tovani, C. (2000). I read it, but I don’t get it: Comprehension strategies for adolescent readers. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. L. (1996). Contect area reading (5th ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. E. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehension during reading. In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grade (pp. 1-31). NY: Teacher College.
Vance, J. (1990). Developing comprehension and thinking in whole language classrooms. In W. Constance (Ed.), Understanding whole language (pp. 168-181). Canada: IRWIN Publishing.
Wade, S. E. (1990). Using think aloud to assess comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 43, 442-451.
Wang, Y. J. (1999). Reader response in foreign language education: A study of Taiwnaese EFL high school students’ responses to short storie. (Unpublished PhD dessertation, The University of Pittsburgh)
Watson, J. (1980). A comparison of picture book illustrations preferred by teachers and children. The Bulletin of the Children’ Literature Assembly, 6, 13-15.
Wikinson, L., & Anderson, R. (1995). Sociocognitive processes in guided silent reading: A microanalysis of small-group lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 710-740.
Wiseman, D. L., Many, J. E., & Altieri, J. (1992). Enabling complex aesthetic responses: An examination of three literary discussion approaches. Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 41, 283-289.
Wolf, S. A., & Heath, S. B. (1992). The braid of literature: Children’s worlds of reading. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wollman-Bonilla, J. E. (1989). Reading journals: Invitations to participate in literature. The Reading Teacher, 43, 121-120.
Yaden, D. (1985). Preschoolers’ spontaneous inquiries about print and books. Paper presented at the 34th annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA.
Zarrillo, J., & Cox, C. (1992). Efferent and aesthetic teaching. In J. Many & C. Cox (Eds.), Reader stance and literary understanding: Exploring the theories, research, and practice(pp. 235-249). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
三、圖畫故事書部分
大衛．威斯納/文圖(民90)。《瘋狂星期二》。台北：格林。
大衛．威斯納/文圖；林真美/譯(民86)。《夢幻大飛行》。台北：遠流。
大衛．威斯納/文圖；劉守儀/譯(民89)。《七號夢工廠》。台北：格林。
巴貝柯爾/文圖；吳燕凰/譯(民88)。《頑皮公主不出嫁》。台北：格林。
巴貝柯爾/文圖；黃迺毓/譯(民88)。《精采過一生》。台北：三之三。
王金芬編(民83)。《白雪公主》。台北：世一。
伊東．寬/文圖；陳珊珊/譯(民93)。《魯拉魯先生的庭院》。台北：小魯。
安東尼.布朗/文圖(民85)。《朱家故事》。台北：漢聲。
安東尼．布朗/文圖；林良/譯(民96)。《大手握小手》。台北：格林。
安東尼．布朗/文圖；林良/譯(民89)。《大猩猩》。台北：格林。
安東尼．布朗/文圖；陳瑞妶/譯(民86)。《穿過隧道》。台北：遠流。
安東尼布朗/文圖(民96)。《雞蛋踢石頭》。台北：格林。
安東尼布朗/文圖；陳怡芬/譯(民93)。《走進森林》。台北：格林。
克里斯‧凡‧艾斯伯格/文圖；張劍鳴譯(民93)。《天靈靈》。台北：上誼。
克里斯‧凡‧艾斯伯格/文圖；張劍鳴譯(民93)。《北極特快車》。台北：上誼。
克里斯‧凡‧艾斯伯格/文圖；楊茂秀譯(民93)。《巫婆的掃把》。台北：遠流。
佩特‧哈群斯/文圖(民88)。《母雞蘿絲去散步》。台北：上誼。
約克．米勒(民89)。《挖土機年年作響——鄉村變了》。新竹：和英。
約瑟夫‧魏(民93)。《小貓玫瑰》。台北：上誼。
約翰‧伯寧罕/文圖(民92)。《遲到大王》。台北：上誼。
約翰‧伯寧罕/文圖；林真美/譯(民87)。《莎莉，離水遠一點》。台北：遠流。
英諾桑提/文圖；林海音/譯(民83)。《鐵絲網上的小花》。台北：格林。
郝廣才主編(民83)。《繪本台灣風土民俗 》。台北：遠流。
郝廣才主編(民84)。《繪本莎士比亞》。台北：臺灣麥克。
郝廣才主編(民88)。《世界音樂童話繪本》。台北：臺灣麥克。
莫理士．桑達克/文圖；漢聲雜誌/譯(民76)。《野獸國》。台北：漢聲。
陳怡真/文；楊翠玉/圖(民78)。《繪本台灣民間故事》。台北：遠流。
萊恩/文；亞諾‧歐伯/圖；林良/譯(民81)。《討厭黑夜的席奶奶》。台北：遠流。
莎梅特/文，大衛麥克費爾/圖；漢聲雜誌譯(民74)。《我撒了一個謊》。台北：漢聲。
湯尼．羅斯/文圖；郝廣才/譯(民94)。《我要來抓你啦！》。台北：格林。
詹姆士．荷奧/文；楊志成/圖；黃迺毓/譯(民90)。《但願我是蝴蝶》。新竹：和英。
熊美如編(民83)。《賣火柴的小女孩》。台北：世一。
瑪格麗特‧威爾德/文，藍．布魯克斯/圖；林真美/譯(民92)。《狐狸》。台北：遠流。
賴馬著(民93)。《我變成一隻噴火龍了》。新竹：和英。
羅勃．麥羅斯基/文(民84)。《讓路給小鴨子》。台北：國語日報。