:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:制度的研究--「新制度論」觀點的比較與「後現代制度論」的發展
書刊名:理論與政策
作者:莊文忠 引用關係
作者(外文):Juang, Wen-jong
出版日期:2003
卷期:16:4=64
頁次:頁15-44
主題關鍵詞:制度制度分析新制度論理性抉擇制度論歷史制度論社會制度論後現代制度論InstitutionInstitutional analysisNew institutionalismRational choice institutionalismHistorical institutionalismSociological institutionalismPostmodern institutionalis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(15) 專書(4) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:297
  • 點閱點閱:148
     關於人類行為與政策決定的研究,制度的分析是一個不可忽略的面向。換言之,研究者如要瞭解個人行為與集體行動的型態,解釋政策結果的產生,就必要將制度因素納入考量。這也是為何許多學科領域的學者會致力於探討制度的多樣性和複雜性的原因,本研究也是箇中之一。 本文所關心的幾個問題包括:(一)制度的意涵為何?(二)舊(傳統)制度論與新制度論的差異性為何?(三)在後現代主義的系絡下,制度研究的未來面貌可能為何?本文討論的自的並不企圖對這些問題提令多數人滿意的答案,而是指出有關制度的討論中值得吾人關注的層面。
     Institution analysis has been conducive to a better understanding of human behaviors and policy decision. It has also been fruitful in the study of individual/collective actions and policy outcomes. The purposes of this paper focus on the following three dimensions: (1) what does institution mean? (2) how can we tell the differences between old (traditional) and new institutionalism? (3) what is the future prospect for the institution analysis in the context of postmodernism context ? The paper does not intend to provide answers. Rather, it is to try to pinpoint those which deserve to be paid more attention to in doing institution research.
期刊論文
1.彭文賢(19990900)。邁向後現代的組織理論?。中國行政評論,8(4),3-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hoksbergen, R.(1994)。Postmodernism and Institutionalism: Toward a Resolution of the Debate on Relativism。Journal of Economic Issues,28(3),679-713。  new window
3.Mule, Rosa(1999)。New Institutionalism: Distilling some "Hard Core" Propositions in the Works of Williamson and March and Olsen。Politics,19(3),145-151。  new window
4.Coase, R. H.(1937)。The Problem of Social Cost。Journal of Law and Economics,3,1-44。  new window
5.Scharpf, Fritz W.(2000)。Institutions in Comparative Policy Research。Comparative Political Studies,33(6/7),762-790。  new window
6.Fiorina, Morris(1995)。Rational Choice and the New (?) Institutionalism。Polity,28(1),107-115。  new window
7.Skocpol, T.(1995)。Why I Am an Historical Institutionalist。Polity,28(1),103-106。  new window
8.Koelble, Thomas A.(1995)。The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology。Comparative Politics,27(2),231-243。  new window
9.Lowndes, Vivien(1996)。Varieties of New Institutionalism: A Critical Appraisal。Public Administration,74(2),181-197。  new window
10.Hall, Peter A.、Taylor, Rosemary C. R.(1996)。Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms。Political Studies,44(5),936-957。  new window
11.March, James G.、Olsen, Johan P.(1984)。The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life。American Political Science Review,78(3),734-749。  new window
12.Vira, Bhaskar(1997)。The Political Coase Theorem: Identifying Differences between Neoclassical and Critical Institutionalism。Journal of Economic Issues,31(3),761-779。  new window
13.Kato, Junko(1996)。Institutions and Rationality in Politics--Three Varieties of Neo-Institutionalists。British Journal of Political Science,26(4),553-582。  new window
14.Ethington, Philip J.、McDonagh, Eileen L.(1995)。The Common Space if Social Science Inquiry。Polity,28(1),85-90。  new window
15.Ostrom, E.(1986)。An Agenda fort the Study of Institutions。Public Choice,48(1),3-25。  new window
16.King, D. S.、Rothstein, B.(1993)。Institutional Choices and Labor Market Policy。Comparative Political Studies,26(2),147-177。  new window
17.Lindsay, J. M.(1994)。Congress, Foreign Policy, and the New Institutionalism。Polity,28(1),107-115。  new window
18.Orren, K.(1995)。Ideas and Institutions。Polity,28(1),97-101。  new window
19.Pontusson, J.(1995)。From Comparative Public Policy to Political Economy。Comparative Political Studies,28(1),117-147。  new window
20.Skowronek, Stephen(1995)。Order and Change。Polity,28(1),91-96。  new window
會議論文
1.林鍾沂、許立一(1999)。後現代主義下的公共行政。沒有紀錄:世新大學行政管理學系。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.任德厚(1983)。政治學。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Schattschneider, E. E.(1975)。The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America。The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America。Fort Worth, TX:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers。  new window
3.Fox, Charles J.、Miller, Hugh T.(1995)。Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse。Sage Publication。  new window
4.North, Douglass C.、劉瑞華(1990)。制度、制度變遷與經濟成就。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.張國清(20000000)。後現代情境。臺北:揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Thelen, Kathleen(1992)。Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Simon, H. A.(1997)。Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization。New York:Free Press。  new window
8.Peters, B. Guy(1999)。Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism。Pinter Press。  new window
9.Weimer, David L.(1995)。Institutional Design。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
10.DiMaggio, Paul J.、Powell, Walter W.(1991)。The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
11.Downs, Anthony J.(1957)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
12.Evans, Peter B.、Rueschemeyer, Dietrich、Skocpol, Theda(1985)。Bringing the State Back In。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.March, James G.、Olsen, Johan P.(1989)。Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics。New York:The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan, Inc.。  new window
14.陳敦源(20020000)。民主與官僚:新制度論的觀點。臺北:韋伯文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.黃瑞祺(2000)。現代與後現代。台北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Munger, M. C.(2000)。Analyzing Policy。Analyzing Policy。New York, NY:W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
17.Rhodes, R. A. W.(1995)。The Institutional Approach。Theory and Methods in Political Science。London, UK:MacMillan Press。  new window
其他
1.薛承泰(2004)。老人照顧老人 將是臺灣現象,http://ntu.edu.tw/~psc_news9312/120701.htm, 20041207。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE