:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「歸本於黃老」與「以無為本」--韓非及王弼對老子哲學詮釋的比較研究
書刊名:國立臺灣大學哲學論評
作者:王曉波
作者(外文):Wang, Hsiao-po
出版日期:2005
卷期:29
頁次:頁1-63
主題關鍵詞:無為韓非王弼TaoWayWuNon beingYiuBeingBenEssentialMoTriflesWe WeiInactivityHan FeiWang Bi
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:225
  • 點閱點閱:64
韓非是戰國時代韓國的庶公子,王弼是漢末三國時代魏國的豪門之後,相隔六百多年,而都留下了對《老子》哲學的詮釋之作。韓非有《解老》、《喻老》,王弼有《老子注》,又各自在詮釋中改造了老子的哲學建立了自己的思想體系。韓非成為先秦法家的集大成者,而王弼則成為魏晉玄學的奠基者。同樣是詮釋《老子》,但韓非用的方法是「參驗」,王弼則是「得意忘言」;韓非的「道」是「與夫天地剖判也具生」,王弼的「道」是「先天地生」;韓非是主張「以法為本」,王弼則是「以無為本」;韓非主張「無為而無不為」,王弼主張「無為而為之」。所以韓非的哲學思想建立了秦漢以後的專制帝國,王弼的哲學思想則引進了隋唐佛學。
Han Fei is a descendent of former aristocracy who lived during the Warring States Period, while Wang Bi lived during the Late Han. Although separated by six hundred year, they have both left us with annotations dealing with the philosophy of Lao Tzu. Han Fei wrote “Interpretation of Lao Tzu” and “Expounding Lao Tzu Metaphorically,” while Wang Bi is known for “Annotating on Lao Tzu.” In their annotations of Lao Tsu's texts the y suggested new interpretations and systems of thought. Han Fei became leading legalist of Xian Qin period, and Wang Bi laid the foundation of metaphysics school of Wei & Jin Dynasties. Lao Tzu was interpreted differently by Han Fei and Wang Bi. Han relied on method of “comparing and examining,” while Wang emphasized “comprehending and let aside words.” Han's argument is “in the Beginning there was Universe” and then “Tao”. On the other hand, Wang held that Tao comes “before the Beginning of the Universe.” Han maintains that law is essential while for Wang the essential the Universe.” Han maintains that law is essential while for Wang the essential is Wu (Non being).Han believed that “inactivity activated all deeds”, while Wang countered by asserting “inactivity is activation”. This, Han's philosophy helped establish autocratic empires since the Qin and Han dynasties. Wang's interpretation of Lao Tzu helped introduce the Buddhist philosophy during the Sui and Tang dynasties.
期刊論文
1.楊國榮(1988)。知治統一--韓非認識論特點新探。齊魯學刊,1988(3)。  延伸查詢new window
2.王曉毅(200002)。魏晉玄學研究的回顧與瞻望。哲學研究,2000(2),57-62。  延伸查詢new window
3.許抗生(1996)。論玄學「有」「無」範疇的根本義蘊。文史哲,1996(1),28。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.梁啟雄(1971)。韓子淺解。台北:學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳寅恪、萬繩南(1999)。陳寅恪魏晉南北朝史講演錄。安徽合肥:黃山書社。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.湯用彤(1972)。魏晉玄學論稿。臺北:廬山出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.馮友蘭(1984)。中國哲學史新編。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.張純、王曉波(1983)。韓非思想的歷史研究。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.高晨陽(2000)。儒道會通與正始玄學。齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
7.王弼、樓宇烈(1992)。王弼集校釋。華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.容肇祖(1972)。韓非子考證。臺聯國風出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.韓非、陳奇猷(1974)。韓非子集釋。河洛。  延伸查詢new window
10.許抗生、李中華、陳戰國、那薇(1989)。魏晉玄學史。陝西師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE