:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:開放性風險評估芻議--以歐盟科技決策評估程序之反省為討論
書刊名:臺灣科技法律與政策論叢
作者:劉華美 引用關係周桂田 引用關係
作者(外文):Liou, Hwa-meeiChou, Kuei-tien
出版日期:2005
卷期:2:4
頁次:頁73-104
主題關鍵詞:歐盟開放性風險評估公眾信任專業知識的民主化擴張式的科學審查社群EUOpennessRisk assessmentPublic trustDemocratising expertiseExtended peer communities
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(3) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:133
  • 點閱點閱:49
期刊論文
1.Edmond, Gary、Mercer, David(1998)。Trashing "Junk" Science。Stanford Technology Law Review,3,1-31。  new window
2.周桂田(20000900)。生物科技產業與社會風險--遲滯型高科技風險社會。臺灣社會研究,39,239-283。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.周桂田(20020300)。在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口--遲滯型高科技風險社會。臺灣社會研究,45,69-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.周桂田(2005)。基因改造螢光魚的風險評估與科技政策。科學發展月刊,387,83-84。  延伸查詢new window
5.周桂田(20031200)。從「全球化風險」到「全球在地化風險」之研究進路:對貝克理論的批判思考。臺灣社會學刊,31,153-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Healy, Stephen(1999)。Extended peer communities and the ascendance of post-normal politics。Futures,31(7),655-669。  new window
7.Luks, Fred(1999)。Post-normal science and the rhetoric of inquiry: deconstructing normal science?。Futures,31,705-719。  new window
8.De Marchi, Bruna、Ravetz, Jerome R.(1999)。Risk management and governance: a post-normal science approach。Futures,31,743-757。  new window
9.Petersen, Alan(2005)。Securing our genetic health: engendering trust in UK Biobank。Sociology of Health & Illness,27(2),271-292。  new window
10.Wynne, Brian(2001)。Creating public alienation expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs。Science as Culture,10,445-481。  new window
11.劉華美(20050300)。歐盟之變遷和對商業廣告之規範。財產法暨經濟法,1,61-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.周桂田(20041200)。獨大的科學理性與隱沒(默)的社會理性之「對話」--在地公眾、科學專家與國家的風險文化探討。臺灣社會研究季刊,56,1-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.邵廣昭(1999)。海洋生物多樣性及其保育。生物多樣性研討會,258-288。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.(1999)。台灣生物多樣性國家報告。行政院農委會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ulrich, Beck(1996)。Risikogesellschaft, Auf dem Weg in einen andere Modeme。Suhrkamp。  new window
3.Dobson, A. P.(1996)。Conservation and Biodiversity, Scientific American Library, A Division of HPHLP。New York。  new window
4.Gerold, R.、Liberatore, A.(2001)。Report of the working group "Democratising expertise and establishing scientific reference systems。EU。  new window
5.Mayer, Sue(2003)。GM Nation? Engaging people in real debate?。Gene Watch UK。  new window
6.O'Brien, Mary(2000)。Making Better Environmental Decisions: An Alternative to Risk Assessment。Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press。  new window
7.Perrow, Charles、蔡承志(2001)。當科技變成災難--與高風險系統共存。台北:商周。  延伸查詢new window
8.Wilson, E. O.、金恆鑣(1997)。繽紛的生命。台北:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
9.Kuhn, Thomas S.、程樹德、傅大為、王道還、錢永祥(1994)。科學革命的結構。臺北市:遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.行政院衛生署(2002)。基因改造食品介紹,http://www.doh.gov.tw/cht/content.aspx?dept=R&class_no=3&now_fod_listjio=4268&array_fod_list_no=&level_no=2&doc_no=989&show=。  new window
2.Ragnar, Lofstedt(2003)。How can better risk management lead to greater public trust in Canadian institutions: some sobering lessons from Europe,http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/smartreg-regint/en/06/01/su-07.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.Gerrard, Simon、Petts, Judith(1998)。Isolation or integration? The relationship between risk assessment and risk management。Risk Assessment and Risk Management。Royal Society of Chemistry。  new window
2.Slovic, Paul(2000)。Perceived risk, trust, and democracy。The Perception of Risk。Earthscan Publications Ltd.。  new window
3.Wynne, Brian(1980)。Technology, risk and participation: on the social treatment of uncertainty。Society, Technology and Risk Assessment。New York:Academic Press。  new window
4.Wynne, Brian(1996)。May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide。Risk, Environment & Modernity。  new window
5.Funtowicz, Silvio O.、Ravetz, Jerome R.(1992)。Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post-Normal Science。Social Theories of Risk。Praeger。  new window
6.周桂田(2001)。科學風險 : 多元共識之風險建構。第二現代 : 風險社會的出路?。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE