臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：勢不可免的衝突：從結構／過程的辯證看美麗島事件之發生
書刊名：臺灣社會學
作者：湯志傑 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tang, Chih-chieh
出版日期：2007
卷期：13
頁次：頁71-128
主題關鍵詞：美麗島事件；結構／過程；社會／互動；權力；自己製造的現實；Kaohsiung Incident；Structure/process；Society/interaction；Power；By self produced reality
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(2) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:461
  • 點閱點閱:125
本文嘗試超越動機論局部因果解釋的格局，以及結構與過程二分對立的觀點，改從結構與過程的辯證來說明：美麗島事件實係難以避免的衝突，儘管它不必然要發生在1979 年12 月10 日的高雄。黨外陣營自1975 年逐漸成形以來，即一直處於擴張的階段；國民黨推動的派系替代過程，更出乎意料地讓黨外在1977 年選舉中獲得的席次大幅成長，從而改變了國民黨、地方派系與黨外三方賽局的結構。在這樣的情況下，國民黨1978 年底因與美國斷交，未明示期限停止選舉，令黨外持續擴張的榮景突然中挫，頓使黨外感到強烈的挫折與不滿。在這個關鍵時刻，國民黨卻又突然放棄原先鎖定的逮捕對象黃順興，改抓余登發，希望藉此警告黨外勿輕舉妄動。不料這卻被黨外解讀成全面鎮壓的開始，因此在兼具強烈沮喪與憤慨的矛盾心態驅使下，冒險進行絕地反攻，利用社會╱互動的差異進行公開示威，成功踏出激進化的第一步。國民黨在內外諸般顧慮下不鎮壓的作為，不但使得黨外成功突破戒嚴令，從而改變了政治系統的結構，讓群眾運動成為此後可能的選項，更促成黨外相信自己的實力，著迷於自己建構出來的，國民黨不會鎮壓的「現實」。在國民黨不願恢復選舉，仍循著威權統治的慣性邏輯行動，黨外則樂於擁抱街頭的新舞台的情況下，雙方的對峙不斷升高。終於，當「象徵性的」權力使用已無法嚇阻黨外和群眾，這就逼得國民黨只能訴諸直接的武力鎮壓，以確保人民繼續相信它的權力，避免引發政權倒台的骨牌效應。
The suppression of Formosa magazine was an unavoidable consequence, although its happening on December 10, 1979 was a contingent rather than a necessary development. Going beyond popular intentional explanations and the antimony of structure and process, this paper explains this suppression by analyzing the dialectic of structure and process with a long-term view. When in 1978 the KMT postponed the election without a definite deadline for its restoration, the opposition camp, danwai, which had won steadily expanding support since its formation in 1975, became very frustrated and angry. Consequently, danwai perceived the arrest of Deng-fa Yu as a signal of total suppression. For self-protection, the group adopted the "radical" response of demonstration, which succeeded by using the difference between interaction and society. Mass mobilization then became a possible action option and changed the structure of the political system. The KMT's inaction led danwai to believe in its own power, and its members were attracted by the reality of nonsuppression that they themselves had produced. The conflict between the KMT and danwai then escalated because the KMT would not agree to restore the election and danwai willingly embraced the new arena of the streets. When the "symbolic" use of power could not deter danwai and its supporters, the KMT could not help suppressing danwai with the direct use of physical violence, in order to assure the populace to believe its power, as well as to guard the regime's stability.
期刊論文
1.Clemens, Elisabeth S.、Cook, James M.(1999)。Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change。Annual Review of Sociology，25(1)，441-466。  new window
2.Fuchs, S.(2001)。Beyond agency。Sociological Theory，19，24-40。  new window
3.Hay, Colin、Wincott, Daniel(1998)。Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism。Political Studies，46(5)，951-957。  new window
4.湯志傑(20040600)。封建帝國的形成及其分化。國立政治大學社會學報，36，63-112。  延伸查詢new window
5.Snyder, Richard、Mahoney, James(1999)。The Missing Variable: Institutions and the Study of Regime Change。Comparative Politics，32(1)，103-122。  new window
6.Karl, Terry Lynn、Schmitter, Philippe C.(1991)。Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe。International Social Science Journal，128(2)，269-284。  new window
7.Kitschelt, Herbert(1992)。Political Regime Change: Structure and Process-driven Explanations?。American Political Science Review，86(4)，1028-1034。  new window
8.吳乃德(20001200)。人的精神理念在歷史變革中的作用--美麗島事件和臺灣民主化。臺灣政治學刊，4，57-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Carothers, Thomas(2002)。The End of the Transition Paradigm。Journal of Democracy，13(1)，5-21。  new window
10.吳乃德(19890300)。搜尋民主化的動力：兼談民主轉型的研究取向。臺灣社會研究季刊，2(1)，145-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳鼓應(1982)。七十年代以來臺灣新生一代的改革運動。中報月刊，30，33-38。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳鼓應(1982)。七十年代以來臺灣新生一代的改革運動。中報月刊，29，25-33。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳鼓應(1982)。七十年代以來臺灣新生一代的改革運動。中報月刊，28，27-35。  延伸查詢new window
14.Hall, Peter A.、Taylor, Rosemary C. R.(1998)。The Potential of Historical Institutionalism: A Response to Hay and Wincott。Political Studies，46(5)，958-962。  new window
15.Sewell Jr., William H.(199207)。A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency and Transformation。American Journal of Sociology，98(1)，1-29。  new window
16.Mahoney, James W.(2001)。Path-Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective。Studies in Comparative International Development，36(1)，111-141。  new window
17.馮建三(19950800)。異議媒體的停滯與流變之初探：從政論雜誌到地下電臺。臺灣社會研究季刊，20，177-234。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Hall, Peter A.、Taylor, Rosemary C. R.(1996)。Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms。Political Studies，44(5)，936-957。  new window
19.Thelen, Kathleen(1999)。Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics。Annual Review of Political Science，2(1)，369-404。  new window
20.Heider, Fritz(1946)。Attitudes and Cognitive Organization。The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied，21(1)，107-112。  new window
21.王甫昌(19960700)。臺灣反對運動的共識動員：一九七九至一九八九年兩次挑戰高峰的比較。臺灣政治學刊，1，129-209。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Immergut, Ellen M.(1998)。The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism。Politics & Society，26(1)，5-34。  new window
23.陳明通、朱雲漢(19920100)。區域性聯合獨占經濟、地方派系與省議員選舉：一項省議員候選人背景資料的分析。Proceedings of the National Science Council. Part C, Humanities and Social Sciences，2(1)，77-97。  延伸查詢new window
24.王振寰(19890300)。臺灣的政治轉型與反對運動。臺灣社會研究季刊，2(1)，71-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Cheng, Tun-jen(1989)。Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan。World Politics，41(4)，471-499。  new window
26.湯志傑(20061200)。重探臺灣的政體轉型：如何看待1970年代國民黨政權的「正當化」。臺灣社會學，12，141-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Boudon, Raymond(1998)。Limitations of Rational Choice Theory。American Journal of Sociology，104(3)，817-828。  new window
28.高克任(1980)。「哀矜勿喜」還是「見獵心喜」？－臺北軍法大審幕前幕後。七十年代，124，36-43。  延伸查詢new window
29.陳少廷(1972)。我對地方選舉延期的看法。大學雜誌，49，99-100。  延伸查詢new window
30.湯志傑(2004)。與其大公無私，不如私而有公。臺灣社會學會通訊，52，28-30。  延伸查詢new window
31.Kitschelt, Herbert(1993)。Review: Comparative Historical Research and Rational Choice Theory: The Case of Transitions to Democracy。Theory and Society，22(3)，413-427。  new window
32.Von Foerster, H.(1993)。Für Niklas Luhmann: Wie Rekursiv Ist Kommunikation?。Teoria Sociologica，1(2)，61-85。  new window
33.Mahoney, James、Snyder, Richard(1999)。Rethinking Agency and Structure in the Study of Regime Change。Studies in Comparative International Development，34(2)，3-32。  new window
34.Japp, K. P.(1984)。Selbsterzeugung Oder Fremdverschulden。Soziale Welt，35(3)，313-329。  new window
35.Japp, Klaus P.(1992)。Selbstverstärkungseffekte Riskanter Entscheidungen - Zur Unterscheidung von Rationalität und Risiko。Zeitschrift für Soziologie，21(1)，31-48。  new window
36.Bates, Robert H.、De Figueiredo, Rui J. P., Jr.、Weingast, Barry R.(1998)。The Politics of Interpretation: Rationality, Culture, and Transition。Politics & Society，26(4)，603-642。  new window
37.Abbott, Andrew(1988)。Transcending General Linear Reality。Sociological Theory，6(2)，169-186。  new window
38.Luhmann, Niklas(1995)。Why Does Society Describe Itself as Postmodern?。Cultural Critique，30，171-186。  new window
會議論文
1.鄭欽仁、艾琳達、魏廷朝(2001)。「美麗島事件與臺灣」座談會記錄。臺北市。361-372。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.郭正亮(1988)。國民黨政權在臺灣的轉化(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.湯志傑(1992)。Niklas Luhmann的系統理論及其對法律的社會學分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.古淑芳(1999)。台灣黨外運動(1977-1986)--以黨外言論為中心之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳乃德(1987)。The Politics of a Regime Patronage System: Mobilization and Control Within an Authoritarian Regime(博士論文)。University of Chicago。  new window
圖書
1.Valenzuela, Artuiu(1978)。The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes。Baltimore, MD：The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
2.Sewell, William H. Jr.(2005)。Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Berman, Daniel K.(1992)。Words Like Colored Glass: The Role of the Press in Taiwan's Democratization Process。Westview Press。  new window
4.南方朔(1994)。自由主義的反思批判。臺北：風雲時代出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Stones, Rob(2005)。Structuration Theory。New York：Palgrave MacMillan。  new window
6.Rueschemeyer, Dietrich、Stevens, Evelyne Huber、Stephens, John D.(1992)。Capitalist Development and Democracy。Chicago：Cambridge：University of Chicago Press：Polity。  new window
7.Luhmann, Niklas、King-Utz, Elizabeth、Albrow, Martin(1985)。A Sociological Theory of Law。Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
8.Arrigo, Linda Gail(1998)。激盪!台灣反對運動總批判。台北：前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Giddens, Anthony(1979)。Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis。University of California Press。  new window
10.呂秀蓮(1997)。重審美麗島。臺北市：前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.O'Donnell, Guillermo、Schmitter, Philippe(1987)。Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies。Baltimore, MD：Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
12.新臺灣研究文教基金會美麗島事件口述歷史編輯小組(1999)。走向美麗島：戰後反對意識的萌芽。臺北市：時報文化出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.新臺灣研究文教基金會美麗島事件口述歷史編輯小組(1999)。暴力與詩歌：高雄事件與美麗島大審。時報文化出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.鄭牧心(1987)。臺灣議會政治四十年。臺北：自立晚報文化出版部。  延伸查詢new window
15.若林正丈、洪金珠、許佩賢(1994)。臺灣--分裂國家與民主化。臺北：新自然主義。  延伸查詢new window
16.Scharpf, Fritz W.(1997)。Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism in Policy Research。Westview Press。  new window
17.彭懷恩(1989)。台灣政黨體系的分析（1950-1986）。台北：洞察出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.Green, Donald P.、Shapiro, Ian(1994)。Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science。Yale University Press。  new window
19.李筱峰(1987)。台灣民主運動四十年。台北：自立晚報社。  延伸查詢new window
20.Bates, Robert H.、Greif, Avner、Levi, Margaret、Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent、Weingast, Barry R.(1998)。Analytic Narratives。Princeton University Press。  new window
21.Giddens, Anthony(1984)。The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
22.Bourdieu, Pierre、Adamson, Matthew(1990)。In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology。Stanford University Press。  new window
23.新臺灣研究文教基金會美麗島事件口述歷史編輯小組(1999)。沒有黨名的黨：美麗島政團的發展。時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
24.蕭新煌(1989)。壟斷與剝削：威權主義的政治經濟分析。臺北：臺灣研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
25.江宜樺(20010000)。自由民主的理路。臺北：聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.陳明通(1995)。派系政治與臺灣政治變遷。月旦出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
27.Archer, Margaret Scotford(1995)。Realist Social Theory: the Morphogenetic Approach。Cambridge University Press。  new window
28.Geertz, Clifford J.(1983)。Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology。Basic Books, Inc.。  new window
29.Huntington, Samuel Phillips(1991)。The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century。University of Oklahoma Press。  new window
30.Przeworski, Adam(1991)。Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America。Cambridge University Press。  new window
31.Whitehead, Alfred North、Griffin, David Ray、Sherburne, Donald W.(1978)。Process and Reality。New York, NY：The Free Press。  new window
32.姚嘉文、陳菊(1979)。黨外文選。臺北：姚嘉文律師事務所。  延伸查詢new window
33.Luhmann, Niklas、Bednarz, John Jr.、Baecker, Dirk(1995)。Social Systems。Stanford, California：Stanford University Press。  new window
34.von Foerster, Heinz(1984)。Observing Systems。Seaside, CA：Intersystems Publications。  new window
35.Gold, Thomas Barton(1986)。State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle。Armonk：M. E. Sharpe。  new window
36.Luhmann, N.(2000)。Die Politik Der Gesellschaft。Die Politik Der Gesellschaft。Frankfurt am Main, Germany。  new window
37.(1988)。Democracy in Developing Countries。Democracy in Developing Countries。Boulder, CO。  new window
38.Gazibo, Mamoudou(2005)。New Institutionalism and the Crisis of Transitology。New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis。Toronto, Canada。  new window
39.包斯文(1980)。黨外人士何去何從？。黨外人士何去何從？。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
40.Domes, J.(1982)。Taiwan im Wandel。Taiwan im Wandel。Frankfurt am Main, Germany。  new window
41.Copper, J. F.(1984)。Taiwan's Elections: Political Development and Democratization in the Republic of China。Taiwan's Elections: Political Development and Democratization in the Republic of China。Baltimore, MD。  new window
42.Sztompka, Piotr(1991)。Society in Action: The Theory of Social Becoming。Society in Action: The Theory of Social Becoming。Cambridge, UK。  new window
43.Luhmann, Niklas(1990)。Soziologische Aufklärung, Vol. 5。Soziologische Aufklärung, Vol. 5。Nürnberg, Germany。  new window
44.Collier, Ruth Berins、Collier, David(1991)。Shaping the Political Arena。Shaping the Political Arena。Princeton, NJ。  new window
45.Lorenz, Chris(1997)。Konstruktion der Vergangenheit: Eine Einführung in die Geschichtstheorie。Konstruktion der Vergangenheit: Eine Einführung in die Geschichtstheorie。Köln, Germany。  new window
46.張釗維(2003)。誰在那邊唱自己的歌。誰在那邊唱自己的歌。臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.Simon, Fritz B.(2006)。Einführung in Systemtheorie und Konstruktivismus。Einführung in Systemtheorie und Konstruktivismus。Heidelberg, Germany。  new window
48.Koselleck, Reinhart(1984)。Vergangene Zukunft。Vergangene Zukunft。Frankfurt am Main, Germany。  new window
49.張茂桂(1993)。社會變遷與社會力的釋放。挑戰與回應－民國七０年代臺灣的鉅變。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
50.Sztompka, Piotr(1993)。Society as Social Becoming。Agency and Structure: Reorienting Social Theory。Yverdon, Switzerland。  new window
51.Orren, K.、Skowronek, S.(1994)。Beyond the Iconography of Order。The Dynamics of American Politics: Approaches and Interpretations。Boulder, CO。  new window
52.林佳龍(1998)。臺灣的選舉與國民黨政權的市場化。兩岸基層選舉與政治社會變遷。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
53.McAdam, Doug(2003)。Beyond Structural Analysis: Toward a More Dynamic Understanding of Social Movements。Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action。Oxford, UK。  new window
其他
1.Arrigo, L. G.(2004)。The Dynamics of Populism and Confrontation in the Formosa Magazine (Meilidao) Movement of 1970's Taiwan，0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Blau, P. M.(1969)。Objectives of sociology。A Design for Sociology: Scope, Objectives, and Methods。Philadelphia, Pa.：The American Academy of Political and Social Science。  new window
2.Thompson, J. B.(1989)。The theory of structuration。Social Theory in Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.徐火炎(1998)。臺灣的選舉與社會分歧結構--政黨競爭與民主化。兩岸基層選舉與政治社會變遷：哈佛大學東西方學者的對話。臺北：月旦出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Katznelson, Ira(1997)。Structure and Configuration in Comparative Politics。Comparative politics: rationality, culture, and structure。New York：Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Pierson, Paul、Skocpol, Theda(2002)。Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science。Political Science: State of the Discipline。W. W. Norton and Company。  new window
6.陳明通、林繼文(1998)。台灣地方選舉的起源與國家社會關係轉變。兩岸基層選舉與政治社會變遷。台北：月旦出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Thelen, Kathleen、Steinmo, Sven(1992)。Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics。Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Friedland, Roger、Alford, Robert R.(1991)。Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions。The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis。University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.Amsden, Alice H.(1985)。The State and Taiwan's Economic Development。Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：867（臺灣：854，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1498098 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67291283
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上