:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「民以食為天」:一個生態取向的營養教育課程發展研究
書刊名:衛生教育學報
作者:劉貴雲蘇富美
作者(外文):Liu, Cuey-YunSu, Fu-Mei
出版日期:2007
卷期:27
頁次:頁55-92
主題關鍵詞:營養教育課程發展典範轉移生態取向充權Nutrition educationParadigm shiftCurriculum developmentEcological approachEmpowerment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:104
  • 點閱點閱:58
在已開發國家中,現代人與食物的關係裡最常呈現的課題是營養不均衡或是營養過剩,因此也成為當前的營養教育中認知與行為改變的核心。這種介入策略包含一種前提假設是:「人們有東西吃,只是不知道怎樣正確的吃」,因此營養教育強調「吃什麼,會形成怎樣的你」。然而「你有能力,就可以這樣吃嗎?」富裕社會裡的過重問題及減重訴求,與貧乏地區的一餐難求、飢童眼神形成強烈對比;土地、糧食資源分配不均,物種、能源的耗竭等生態環境的危機,在在提醒營養教育者,重新思索並反省我們習以界定的「人與食物」的關係。本研究嘗試統整並建立具有在地關懷的生態取向營養教育課程理論基礎。在九十二學年度,選擇台北地區的某一所國民中學為對象,與學校教師團隊形成伙伴關係,透過充權策略,共同發展出「民以食為天」生態取向營養教育課程。經由過程及總結性的評量,研究成果確認應用充權策略的課程發展模式之可行性,對教師個人與專業的深刻影響,最重要的是透過理論與實作,數據與生命經驗的反覆對話,教師與研究者對教育及營養教育的觀點與如何落實生活環境有進一步的省思與超越。
You are what you eat? Or, you are how you eat! Nutrition educators always care about what people eat. Nutrients analysis, healthy and balance diet, calories control are major themes in contemporary nutrition education. What is Food, or they are living creatures on our earth sharing the same fate with human beings. Beyond specie arrogance, this study aims to restore the relationship among human and other spices on the food chain through school curricula by changing students' food perceptions, consuming pattern, and value concerns. Habermas' concept of knowledge paradigm and a set of ecological philosophy were held to examine the underlining conceptual models of later nutrition education programs, also applied to facilitate the establishment of new theoretical foundations for the ecological approach of nutrition education. After working with a group of junior school teachers for one year, a set of nutrition curricula and activities focusing on problem ownership, self-empowerment toward environment action was developed and implemented under the new approach. Process and outcome evaluation have confirmed the consistency and feasibility between construct and practice.
期刊論文
1.蔡瑞珍、陳怡君、胡雪萍(20020300)。某職場員工階段性行為的改變與營養活動之成效探討。中華民國營養學會雜誌,27(1),24-34。  延伸查詢new window
2.林佳蓉、謝秀幸、陳師瑩(20010600)。臺灣地區學齡前托兒中心教保人員營養相關工作現況及營養教育需求之研究。中華民國營養學會雜誌,26(2),119-128。  延伸查詢new window
3.Perry, C. L.、Stone, E. G.、Parcel, G. S.(1990)。School-based cardiovascular health promotion: the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH)。Journal of School Health,60,466-413。  new window
4.Morris, J. L.、Briggs, M.、Zidenberg-Cgeer, S.(2002)。Nutrition to grow on : a Garden-Enhanced nutrition education curriculum for upper-elementary schoolchildren。Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior,34(2),175-177。  new window
5.Maloney, S. K.、Olson, C. M.、Swadener, S. S.(1995)。The effectiveness of nutrition and implications for nutrition education policy, programs, and research: A review of research。Journal of Nutrition Education,27(6),287-290。  new window
6.Liquori, T.、Koch, P. D.、Contento, I. R.、Castle, J.(1998)。The coopshop program: outcome evaluation of a nutrition education program linking lunchroom food experiences with classcooking experiences。Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior,30(5),302-313。  new window
7.Freire, P.(1998)。Cultural action and conscientization。Harvard Educational Review,68(4),499-521。  new window
8.Ciliska, D.、Miles, E.、O'Brien, M. A.、Turl, C.、Tomasik, H. H.、Donovan, U.、Beyers, J.(2000)。Effectiveness of community-based interventions to increase fruit and vegetable consumption。Journal of Nutrition Education,32(6),341-352。  new window
9.Abrams, D. B.、Boutwell, W. B.、Grizzle, J.、Heimendinger, J.、Sorensen, G.、Varnes, J.(1994)。Cancer control at the workplace: the Working Well Trial。Prev Med.,23,1-13。  new window
10.劉貴雲(19990500)。國小學童營養教育介入效果研究--社會學習教學技巧與一般教學技巧。衛生教育學報,12,137-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃韶顏(20000800)。阿里山特富野鄒族營養教育現況與需求之研究。生活科學學報,6,127-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳良榕(2004)。高麗菜淘金熱。天下雜誌,306,164-166。  延伸查詢new window
13.林薇、吳文惠、陳虹如、郝承偉(19991100)。醫學系營養課程內容需求及現況研究。中華民國營養學會雜誌,24(4),321-338。  延伸查詢new window
14.林薇、劉貴雲、陳聖惠、劉怡君(20010900)。成人降低脂肪攝取營養教育課程--「減脂之旅」成效評估研究。中華民國營養學會雜誌,26(3),181-192。  延伸查詢new window
15.Crawford, R.(1977)。You are dangerous to your health: the ideology and politics of victim blaming。International Journal of health Services,7,663-680。  new window
16.閔宇經(20010800)。社會學的典範研究:典範.科學.進步。藝術學報,68,179-194。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.洪如玉(20011000)。九年一貫課程總綱中的環境教育哲學基礎之研究。國立編譯館通訊,14(4)=53,34-44。  延伸查詢new window
18.林薇、劉貴雲、徐近平、黃巧燕、高儷玲(20000900)。國民小學學校午餐菜單修正及營養教育介入研究。中華民國營養學會雜誌,25(3),170-180。  延伸查詢new window
19.舒詩偉(2005)。美國的「社區協力農業」(CSA)運動。青芽兒,13,38-53。  延伸查詢new window
20.郭實渝(19990600)。以生態文化教育的觀點看環境教育。環境教育季刊,40,15-23。  延伸查詢new window
21.Hungerford, Harold、Peyton, R. B.、Wilke, J. W.(1980)。Goals for curriculum development in environmental education。Journal of Environmental Education,11(3),42-47。  new window
22.林薇、王慧琦(19980200)。實施學校午餐指導活動對國小中年級學童飲食行為改變之研究。中華民國營養學會雜誌,23(1),15-26。  延伸查詢new window
23.郭實渝(20001200)。由生態教育理念探討弗拉瑞(Paulo Freire)的教育學理論。社會文化學報,11,1-28。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Sams, C.、黃又林(2004)。脆弱的地球--食物的背後。香港:三聯書店有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ryan, J. C.、Durning, A. T.、楊永鈺(2001)。日常生活中的環保神秘殺手--不可思議的消費鏈。台北:新自然主義股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Nettleton, S.(1995)。The sociology of health & illness。UK:Polity Press。  new window
4.Bowers, C. A.(1993)。Critical essays on education, modernity, and the recovery of ecological imperative。NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
5.康軒文教事業(2003)。國中健康與體育二下。台北縣:康軒文教事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.賴青松(20020000)。從廚房看天下:日本女性「生活者運動」三十年傳奇。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.US Department of Health and Human Services(1990)。Healthy people 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives。Washington, DC:US Government Printing Office.。  new window
8.教育部(2001)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
9.Orr, David W.(1994)。Earth in Mind: On Education, Environment, and the Human Prospect。Washington, D.C.:Island Press。  new window
10.陳惠邦(2003)。教育行動研究。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
11.Dewey, J.(1938)。Experience and education。New York, NY:Touchstone。  new window
12.陳玉峰(1997)。臺灣生態史話。臺北:前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Whyte, William Foote(1991)。Participatory Action Research。Newbury Park, California:Sage Publications。  new window
14.Honoré, Carl、顏湘如(2005)。慢活。臺北:大塊。  延伸查詢new window
15.教育部國教司(1994)。國民中學課程標準。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
16.教育部國民教育司(1983)。國民中學課程標準。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.教育部中等教育司(1972)。國民中學課程標準。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.黃瑞祺(19860000)。批判理論與現代社會學。臺北市:巨流圖書股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Green, L. W.、Kreuter, M. W.(1991)。Health promotion planning: An educational and environmental approach。Mountain View, CA:Mayfield Publishing Company。  new window
20.Apple, Michael W.(1990)。Ideology and curriculum。Routledge。  new window
21.余安邦、林民程、張經昆、陳烘玉、陳浙雲、郭昭燕、劉台光、周遠祁、趙家誌(2002)。社區有教室:學校課程與社區總體營造的遭逢與對話。遠流。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.李永展(2004)。觀光魚季?光光魚「祭」?,http://e-info.org.tw/reviewer/yjlee/2004/yj04051901.htm。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院衛生署(1999)。國民營養現況--1993~1996國民營養健康狀況變遷調查結果。  延伸查詢new window
3.台南市漁業資源保育協會(2004)。為何要拒吃魩仔魚,http://www.wetland.org.tw/subject/ocean/fish.ppt。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Jensen, B. B.(1994)。Health promoting schools in Denmark: an action competence approach to health education。The ecological public health form vision to practice。Queensland:Watson Ferguson & Company。  new window
2.范信賢(2001)。課程改革的核心--教學。九年一貫SWART--教師增能自修手冊。  延伸查詢new window
3.Mezirow, J.(1990)。How critical reflection triggers transformative learning。Fostering critical reflection in adulthood- a guide go transformative and emancipatory learning。San Francisco:Jossey Bass。  new window
4.Wallerstein, N.、Sanchez-Merki, V.、Dow. L.(1999)。Freirian praxis in health education and community organizing: A case study of an Adolescent prevention program。Community organizing & community building foe health。New Brunswick:Rutgers University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE