:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:由反思到洞察之路:哀傷研究者的啟發
書刊名:中華輔導學報
作者:王純娟
作者(外文):Wang, Chun-Chuan
出版日期:2007
卷期:22
頁次:頁71-117
主題關鍵詞:九二一大地震哀傷研究者啟發式探索親人驟逝的哀傷Grief out of sudden deathHeuristic inquiryThe 1999 Taiwan earthquakeThe grief researcher
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:97
  • 點閱點閱:41
由於執行國科會研究計畫,我自九二一震災兩年多始接觸子女驟逝的哀慟者,哀慟者深層、強烈且矛盾的哀傷,令我有難以觸及其內心之嘆;本研究乃肇因於研究者自認無能感同身受與哀慟者哀傷的浩瀚,促使研究者向內在探尋自己,透過啟發式探索歷程,以期獲得一些洞察與理解。 啟發式探索的哲學基礎主要溯及M. Polayni所提出的「沈靜之知」,啟發式探索的研究步驟是由Moustakas (1990)所發展出來,有六個時期,本研究即依循此六時期進行之。時期一為初步的接觸:本研究在此時期確定研究問題為「什麼是『深刻地感受到哀慟者的哀傷』的經驗」。時期二是融入:研究者無時無刻與所欲探究的研究問題相處著,經由此時期,本研究中發現了九個洞察。再經過時期三(沈潛)、時期四(照明、啟蒙)、時期五(詳細說明),到時期六(創造性的綜合),本研究綜合各個時期所發現的經驗意涵,與哀慟者的效度考驗,創造一個新的、可完整地涵蓋該經驗本質的現實。 經過此啟發式探索歷程,本研究所發現的五個主軸為:無時無刻地自我反思與體會哀傷、創造一個令內傷深重的人感到安全的情境、根植的特質和態度、學習放下我執、和「人」與「人」的互動。本研究主張:透過這五個主軸的體會與理解,哀傷研究者才能夠深刻地感受到哀慟者的哀傷。
The aim of the present study was to gain insights and comprehensions of grief of the bereaved using the experiences of a grief researcher. Heuristic inquiry, a qualitative research approach developed by Moustakas (1990), was used to conduct this study. The main philosophical foundation of heuristic inquiry was based on Michael Polayni's (1962, 1966) concept of ”tacit knowing.” The procedure of heuristic inquiry comprised six phases. They were initial engagement, immersion, incubation, illumination, explication, and creative synthesis. Following the procedure, a main research question was developed, ”what is the experience of gaining access to the inner world of the bereaved?” Five themes pointing to the grief researcher were derived accordingly. First, a researcher should encounter continuing self-reflexivity and experience grief at all possibilities. Second, the creation of a warm and secure climate is assumed to be crucial for the bereaved to encounter their grief. Third, a researcher's traits and attitudes that persist through life are important in beginning to lead him/herself to understand their stories. Fourth, a researcher should learn to let go of self-attachment and to transcend him/herself to understand their grief. Lastly, a genuine human interaction is expected between the researcher and the bereaved for the former to receive a true story. A composite depiction of the experience in question, with validation data considered, was completed at the end of the process. It was followed by the discussion of the five themes used by a grief researcher to gain access to the inner world of the bereaved.
期刊論文
1.范幸玲(20050900)。河流與陪伴者互動的故事--一位諮商師的反思歷程。中華輔導學報,18,203-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Stroebe, M. S.(1992)。Coping with bereavement: A review of the grief work hypothesis。Omega,26,19-42。  new window
3.王純娟(20020900)。哀傷歷程「階段論」之批判。輔導季刊,38(3),48-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Lindemann, E.(1944)。Symptomatology and management of acute grief。American Journal Psychiatry,151(6),155-160。  new window
5.畢恆達(19950800)。生活經驗研究的反省:詮釋學的觀點。本土心理學研究,4,224-259。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.鄧明宇(20050300)。從沉倫走向能動:一個諮商實務工作者的自我敘說到社會實踐。應用心理研究,25,115-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Douglass, B. G.、Moustakas, C.(1985)。Heuristic Inquiry: The Internal Search to Know。Journal of Humanistic Psychology,25(3),39-55。  new window
8.Cook, A. S.(1995)。Ethical Issues in Bereavement Research: An Overview。Death Studies,19,103-122。  new window
9.Barrineau, P.、Bozarth, J. D.(1989)。A Person-centered Research Model。Person-Centered Review,4(4),465-474。  new window
10.Melges, F. T.、DeMaso, D. R.(1980)。Grief Resolution Therapy: Reliving, Revising, and Revisiting。American Journal of Psychotherapy,34,51-61。  new window
11.Ironstone-Catterall, P.(2005)。When Isaak Was Gone: An Auto-ethnographic Meditation on Mourning a Toddler。Omega: Journal of Death and Dying,50(1),1-21。  new window
研究報告
1.行政院災後重建推動委員會(2000)。九二一大地震重要統計數字。臺北:行政院災後重建推動委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.周梅琴(1997)。支持性團體諮商對於喪親悲傷的大學生影響效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林家瑩(1999)。喪失子女的父母失落與悲傷反應及復原歷程之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳蕙蘭(2001)。喪親青少年死亡態度、悲傷反應與因應行為之研究--以九二一地震中部災區為例(碩士論文)。靜宜大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.李佩容(2001)。喪親青少年之哀悼歷程--以921地震的個案為例(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡麗芳(2001)。喪親兒童諮商中悲傷經驗改變歷程之研究(博士論文)。彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.葉何賢文(2003)。悲傷調適歷程及生命意義展現之研究--以喪子(女)父母為例(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.張淑玲(2002)。國小喪親兒童支持性團體之成效初探,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.楊惠南(1981)。佛學的革命:六祖壇經。佛學的革命:六祖壇經。臺北市:時報文化出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Berg, B. L.(2004)。Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
3.Moustakas, C.(1994)。Phenomenological Research Methods。Sage。  new window
4.Polanyi, Michael(1966)。The Tacit Dimension。New York, NY:Doubleday & Company。  new window
5.Worden, J. W.(2002)。Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy: A Handbook for the Mental Health Practitioner。New York, NY:Springer Publishing Co。  new window
6.Guba, E. G.、Lincoln, Y. S.(1984)。Naturalistic inquiry。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
7.Kübler-Ross, E.(1969)。On Death and Dying: What the Dying Have to Teach Doctors, Nurses, Clergy, and Their Own Families。New York:Macmillan。  new window
8.Polanyi, Michael(1962)。Personal Knowledge: towards a Post-critical Philosophy。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd。  new window
9.Rogers, C. R.(1980)。A way of being。Boston。  new window
10.王博(2004)。莊子哲學。北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.高柏園(2001)。禪學與中國佛學。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.張國一(2004)。唐代禪宗心性思想。臺北:法鼓文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.傑羅姆.布魯納、宋文里(2001)。教育的文化:文化心理學的觀點。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
14.Moustakas, C. E.(1990)。Heuristic Research: Design, Methodology, and Applications。Sage。  new window
15.牟宗三(1986)。中國哲學十九講:中國哲學之簡述及其所涵蘊之問題。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.吳光明(1992)。莊子。東大。  延伸查詢new window
17.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
18.Rinpoche, Sogyal、鄭振煌(1996)。西藏生死書。臺北:張老師文化。  延伸查詢new window
19.Patton, Michael Quinn(1990)。Qualitative Evaluation & Research Methods。Beverly Hills, CA。  new window
20.林繼平(1990)。文史哲論集。文史哲論集。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
21.Klass, D.(1996)。The Deceased Child in the Psychic and Social Worlds of Bereaved Parents during the Resolution of Grief。Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief。0。  new window
22.Parkes, C. M.(1997)。Help for the Dying and Bereaved。Death and Bereavement Across Cultures。London, UK。  new window
23.Rosenblatt, P. C.(1993)。Grief: The Social Context of Private Feelings。Handbook of Bereavement。0。  new window
24.Parkes, C. M.(1986)。Bereavement: Studies of Grief in Ault Life。Bereavement: Studies of Grief in Ault Life。Madison, CT。  new window
25.傅佩容、傅佩榮(2002)。解讀莊子。解讀莊子。臺北縣新店市。  延伸查詢new window
26.Freud, S.(1917)。Mourning and Melancholia。The Freud Reader。New York, NY。  new window
27.Rogers, C. R.(1980)。A Way of being Empathic: An Unappreciated Way of Being。Reprinted from the Counseling Psychologist。Boston, MA。  new window
28.Frantz, T. T.(1984)。Helping Parents Whose Child Has Died。Death and Grief in the Family。Rockville, MD。  new window
29.Kleinman, A.、Brodwin, P. E.、Good, B. J.、Good, M. D.(1992)。Pain as Human Experience: An Introduction。Pain as Human Experience: An Anthropological Perspective。Berkeley, CA。  new window
30.Raphael, B.、Middleton, W.、Martinek, N.、Misso, V.(1993)。Counseling and Therapy of the Bereaved。Handbook of Bereavement。New York, NY。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE