臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：當代禪宗哲學詮釋體系的辯證發展--以「開悟經驗」的論述為焦點
書刊名：新世紀宗教研究
作者：蔡昌雄
作者(外文)：Tsai, Chang Hsiung
出版日期：2008
卷期：6:3
頁次：頁1-40
主題關鍵詞：禪宗哲學；詮釋學；開悟經驗；Zen philosophy；Hermeneutics；Enlightenment experience
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:171
  • 點閱點閱:40
本文旨在針對禪學詮釋體系的代表性論述進行梳理，以初步釐清當代禪宗哲學辯證發展的思想線索。研究焦點放在各詮釋體系對禪宗「開悟經驗」的不同論述上，以「開悟經驗是否可能」的認識論問題，以及「開悟經驗以何種方式進行理解」的方法論問題，來評析各個詮釋體系以及體系間辯證發展的關係。 本文闡述的當代禪宗哲學包括鈴木大柮禪學西傳迄今的發展，觀點則跨越日美兩大學術圈。實際分析針對「鈴木禪學」、「京都禪學」、「批判禪學」及「整合禪學」四個主要詮釋體系進行評論。本文嘗試將當代禪宗哲學置入詮釋學的視域考察，其待從中窺見禪宗的宗哲思與經驗、歷史、文化及社會等面向的互動交鋒，並為未來禪宗哲學的發展方向奠定思考基礎。
The essay purports to initiate some clarifications on the lines of thought regarding the dialectical development of modern Zen philosophy by analyzing the major systems of Zen discourse. The research focus is placed upon the different discourse on Zen “enlightenment experience” proposed by the varying interpretive systems. The different systems are evaluated and analyzed by the epistemological question. i.e. “is enlightenment experience possible” and the methodological question, i.e. “how is it to be properly understood. “So are the dialectical relationships among the varying systems. The modern Zen philosophy explicated in this essay encompasses the period of time form the transmission of Zen to the West by D. T. Suzuki all the way down to the present, and the viewpoints discussed cut across the academic circles of Japan and North America. As of analysis, it focuses on four major systems of interpretation, i.e. “Suzuki Zen,” “Kyoto Zen,” “Critical Zen,” and “Integrative Zen.” This essay attempts to place modern Zen philosophy in the midst of the horizon of hermeneutics for exploration, hoping to see through the interactions and tensions among Zen’s religious thought, experience, history, culture, and society. Hopefully, it could lay the foundation for deliberations on the future development of modern Zen philosophy as well.
期刊論文
1.Sharf, Robert H.(1993)。The Zen of Japanese Nationalism。History of Religions，33(1)，1-43。  new window
2.Swanson, Paul(1993)。Zen is not Buddhism: Recent Japanese Critiques of Buddha-Nature。Numen，40(2)，115-149。  new window
3.Lavelle, Pierre(1994)。The Political Thought of Nishida Kitaro。Monumenta Nipponica，49(2)，139-165。  new window
4.Abe, M.(1998)。Nishida's Philosophy of "Place"。International Philosophical Quarterly，28(4)，355-371。  new window
5.Wright, Dale S.(1992)。Rethinking Transcendence: The Role of Language in Zen Experience。Philosophy East and West，42(1)，113-138。  new window
6.Abe, M.(1990)。"Inverse Correspondence" in the Philosophy of Nishida: The Emergence of the Notion。International Philosophical Quarterly，32(3)，325-361。  new window
7.Heine, S.(1994)。Transhistory and Narrative History: A Postmodern View of Hishitani's Philosophy of Zen。Philosophy East and West，44(2)，251-278。  new window
8.Kasulis, T. P.(1982)。The Kyoto School and the West: Review and Evaluation。The Eastern Buddhist，15(2)，125-144。  new window
9.Peerenboom, R. P.(1992)。Nonduality and Daoism。International Philosophical Quarterly，32(1)，38-42。  new window
圖書
1.Austin, James H.(1998)。Zen and the Brain: Toward an Understanding of Meditation and Consciousness。Cambridge Massachusetts：MIT Press。  new window
2.Dumoulin, Heinrich(1988)。Zen Buddhism: A History。New York：Macmillan Publishing Co。  new window
3.吳汝鈞(1995)。中國佛學的現代餘釋。台北：文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Nishida, Kitaro、Abe, Masao、Ives, Christopher(1990)。An Inquiry Into the Good。New Haven。  new window
5.Mitchell, Donald W.(1998)。Masao Abe: A Zen Life of Dialogue。Boston：Charles E. Tuttle Company。  new window
6.鈴木大拙(1959)。Zen and Japanese Culture。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
7.Faure, Bernard(1993)。Ch'an Insights and Oversights: An Epistemological Critique of the Ch'an Tradition。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
8.Austin, James H.(2006)。Zen-Brain Reflections。Cambridge Massachusetts：MIT Press。  new window
9.阿部正雄、王雷泉(1992)。禪與西方思想。台北：桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
10.佛洛姆、鈴木大拙、孟祥森(1971)。禪與心理分析。台北：志文。  延伸查詢new window
11.Heisig, J. W.、Maraldo, J.(1994)。Rude Awakening: Zen, the Kyoto School, and the Question of Nationalism。Honolulu：University of Hawaii Press。  new window
12.Nishitani, K.(1991)。Nishida Kitaro。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
13.Yuasa, Yasuo、Nagatomo, S.(1993)。The Body, Self-Cultivation and Ki-Energy。Albany：SUNY Press。  new window
14.Kalupahana, David J.(1987)。The principle of Buddhist psychology。Albany：State University of New York Press。  new window
15.Nagatone, S.(1992)。Attunement through the body。New York, NY：Albany：State University of New York Press。  new window
16.鈴木大拙(1961)。Essays in Zen Buddhism。New York：Grove Weidenfeld。  new window
17.西田幾太郎、余德慧、鄭育發(1984)。善的純粹經驗。台北：台灣商務。  延伸查詢new window
18.西谷啟治(1982)。Religion and Nothingness。Berkeley。  延伸查詢new window
19.Yuasa, Yasuo、Kasulis, Thomas P.、Nagatomo, Shigenori(1987)。The Body: Toward an Eastern Mind-body Theory。Albany：State University of New York Press。  new window
20.Lopez, Donald S. Jr.(1988)。Buddhist Hermeneutics。Honolulu, Hawaii：University of Hawaii Press。  new window
21.Faure, Bernard(1991)。The Rhetoric of Immediacy: A Cultural Critique of Chan/Zen Buddhism。Princeton：Princeton University Press。  new window
22.Gadamer, Hans-Georg、洪漢鼎、夏鎮平(1995)。真理與方法（II）：補充和索引。臺北：時報文化出版企業公司。  延伸查詢new window
23.賴賢宗(2003)。佛教詮釋學。臺北市：新文豐出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Palmer, Richard E.、嚴平(1992)。詮釋學。台北：桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
25.Gadamer, Hans-Georg、洪漢鼎(1993)。真理與方法：哲學詮釋學的基本特徵。台北：時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
26.吳汝鈞(1998)。絕對無的哲學：京都學派哲學導論。台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
27.傅偉勳(19950000)。佛教思想的現代探索。臺北：東大。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.林鎮國(19990000)。空性與現代性：從京都學派新儒家到多音的佛教詮釋學。臺北：立緖文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.西田幾多郎(2002)。善の研究。東京：岩波書店。  延伸查詢new window
30.傅偉勳(1980)。從創造的詮釋學到大乘佛教。臺北：東大。  延伸查詢new window
31.鈴木大拙(1972)。The Zen Doctrine of No-Mind。York Beach Maine：Samuel Weiser。  new window
32.西田幾多郎(1987)。自覺に於ける直觀と反省。東京：岩波書店。  延伸查詢new window
33.西田幾多郎(1987)。働くものから見るものへ。東京：岩波書店。  延伸查詢new window
34.Benoit, H.(1955)。Zen and the Psychology of Transformation: The Supreme Doctrine。Rochester Vermont：Inner Traditions International。  new window
35.Franck, Frederick(1982)。The Buddha Eye: An Anthology of the Kyoto School。New York：Crossroad Publishing Company。  new window
36.Forman, R. K. C.(1990)。The Problem of Consciousness: Mysticism and Philosophy。New York：Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
37.Izutsu, T.(1977)。Toward a Philosophy of Zen Buddhism。Tehran：Imperial Iranian Academy of Philosophy。  new window
38.Kasulis, T. P.(1981)。Zen Action/Zen Person。Honolulu：University of Hawaii Press。  new window
39.Loy, D.(1988)。Non Duality: A Study in Comparative Philosophy。New Haven：London：Yale University Press。  new window
40.Unno, T.(1990)。The Religious Philosophy of Nishitani Keiji: Ecounter with Emptiness。Berkeley：Asian Humanities Press。  new window
41.Waldenfels, H.(1980)。Absolute Nothingness: Foundations for a Buddhist-Christian Dialogue。New York：Paulist Press。  new window
42.Wargo, R. J.(1972)。The Logic of Basho and the Concept of Nothingness in the Philosophy of Nishida Kitarō。Ann Arbor Michigan：U. M. I. Dissertation Services。  new window
圖書論文
1.林永強(2000)。阿部正雄論自我：禪之自性的再思。兩岸當代禪學論文集。嘉義：南華大學宗教中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡昌雄(2000)。西田的場所哲學與禪的空間覺識。兩岸當代禪學論文集。嘉義：南華大學宗教中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Heisig, J. W.、Maraldo, J.(1990)。The Religious Philosophy of Kyoto School。The Religious Philosophy of Tanabe Hajime。Berkeley：Asian Humanities Press。  new window
4.Maraldo, J. C.(1994)。The Absolute Present: Chasm of History in Nishida Philosophy。The Philosophy of Nishida Kitarō。Tokyo：Sobunsha。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：369（臺灣：368，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67407045
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上