:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:企業菁英與公民意識:大學生應該接受什麼通識課程
書刊名:大葉大學通識教育學報
作者:蕭揚基 引用關係
作者(外文):Shiau, Young-key
出版日期:2008
卷期:1
頁次:頁235-249
主題關鍵詞:通識教育通識課程改革企業菁英公民意識General educationThe reform of the general education curriculumsBusiness excellenceCivic consciousness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:36
摘要 課程是學生獲得學位而必須參加一系列學術計畫。拉丁語中「課程」 (curriculum)的意義是「跑道」(race course),那麼學(修)完課程就 算是「跑道終點」了。課程表達是一所大學對教育本質的詮釋,它可能遠 比學生手冊裡學分數規定的複雜多了。晚近,由於社會變遷、學生構成的 變化,動搖了原先課程體系基礎,走向職業主義的潮流,導致大學課程改 革成為趨勢,引發關於大學教育目標的「論戰」。對此,通識教師也如一般 常人普遍對改革採取較為保守的態度。本文探討「大學生應該接受什麼通 識教育課程?」,當這個問題的出台時,緊跟在後就是通識課程改革問題, 它們不僅是一個理論問題,也是一個實踐問題。
Abstract The curriculum is a series of academic plans that students must learn before obtaining their academic degrees. The curriculum in Latin means “race course ”. When students acquire all of the curriculums that mean they have reached “the destination of the race”. The curriculum expresses a university for its interpretation of educational essence. It may be more complex than the grades in students’ manual. Lately, owing to the transition of society and the change of student’s structure, the curriculums have wavered in their original curricular foundations. They not only have changed toward the vocational principle, made universities reform their courses but also given rise to controversies about the goal of the university. Regarding this, literacy teachers keep conservative attitudes generally as most of the average people. The study discusses “What general education curriculums should university students accept ? ” When the issue hits, the following question is the reform of the general education curriculums. They are not only just a theory question but also a practice question.
期刊論文
1.楊思偉(20000700)。高等教育普及化發展模式初探。教育研究資訊,8(4),17-32+a13。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林孝信(20070700)。哈佛大學通識改革初探。通識在線,11,26-30。  延伸查詢new window
3.沈宗瑞(2007)。通識教育的結構性課題--下一波的通識教育改革重點。通識在線\url\http://www.chinesege.org.tw/geonline/epaper/08/V08-5-2.htm $d20080314,8。  延伸查詢new window
4.徐明珠(2003)。全球化時代,台灣高等教育之改革與創新。國家政策論壇季刊 \url\old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/092/EC-R-092-008.htm $d20080306,夏季號=92,258-267。  延伸查詢new window
5.高教司(2006)。高教簡訊183。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.金耀基(1996)。通識教育與大學教育之定性與定位。「大學院校通識課程教學改進」學術研討會。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐光台(2003)。通識教育與現代世界。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cobban, A. B.(1975)。Medieval Universities: Their Development and Organization。London:Methuen。  new window
2.楊龍立、潘麗珠(2005)。課程組織:理論與實務。臺北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
3.詹明信、唐小兵(1998)。後現代主義與文化理論。台北:合志文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Newman, John H. Cardinal(1996)。The Idea of a University。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
5.陳列(1998)。市場經濟與高等教育--一個世界性的課題。北京:人民教育。  延伸查詢new window
6.Doll, William E. Jr.、王紅宇(1999)。後現代課程觀。臺北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Kerr, Clark(2001)。The Uses of the University。Harvard University Press。  new window
8.Lewis, Harry R.(2006)。Excellence Without a Soul: How a Great University Forgot Education。New York:Public Affairs。  new window
9.Snow, C. P.(1998)。The Two Cultures。Cambridge。  new window
其他
1.The Bologna Declaration(1999)。  new window
圖書論文
1.楊國樞(1999)。大學之理念及其實踐。大學理念與實踐。台中市:私立逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE