:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣府際財政治理的競合關係:一個網絡分析的實證研究
書刊名:公共行政學報
作者:史美強 引用關係王光旭 引用關係
作者(外文):Shih, Mei-chiangWang, Guang-xu
出版日期:2008
卷期:28
頁次:頁39-83
主題關鍵詞:府際治理網絡分析治理資源依賴Intergovernmental governanceSocial network analysisGovernanceResource dependency
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(17) 博士論文(4) 專書(2) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:17
  • 共同引用共同引用:165
  • 點閱點閱:54
本文承繼著作者在二○○五年所出版《制度、網絡與府際治理》一書中的問題意識與思考脈絡,並在該研究的基礎上,從地方政府財政首長的觀點出發檢視在統籌分配稅款議題中地方政府間的互動樣態,並以網絡分析法來進一步思考研究府際間財政治理關係的可能性。本文希望能夠透過網絡分析法,針對該書中同一筆問卷資料進行重新的過錄與解讀,這樣的企圖顯現出兩個重要的目的:第一、在目前公共行政學界中,談到治理的機制,最大的共識便是在網絡的環境中進行治理的工作,但如何實際的對治理機制的運作,進行一個嚴謹且符合科學方法的檢驗,目前仍未有太大的進展。本文的目的是初步嘗試將網絡分析法運用在府際治理關係的分析上,希望能替公共行政學界帶入網絡分析的視野,協助公共行政學界在探討以關係為互動本質的公共事務,能有更經得起檢驗的研究方法;第二、就目前府際關係的研究而言,大多從法制面或歷史面對關係的發展進行陳述,較為缺乏的反而是從行動的層次來理解府際的關係。本文即將以府際間的財政關係為個案,並以網絡分析法為分析的方法,將分析落實到中央與各縣市間財政關係的相互依賴模式探索上。
This paper follows the research questions discussed in the book Institution, Network and Intergovernmental Governance (2005). Social network analysis, in this paper, is applied to re-analyze the same data collected by authors in 2003 to help us to examine the patterns of relationships among intergovernmental relations. This paper will have two important contributions to research community of public administration in Taiwan. First, social network analysis method will give us a guideline to analyze the complex governance phenomenon in public affairs. The paper will be the first one to try to apply social network analysis to answer the research questions regarding governance mechanism. Second, the researches on intergovernmental governance mostly emphasize on formal institutional and historical perspectives, and few researches focus on the dynamic relationships among county governments. Our research will provide another answer to the intergovernmental competitive and cooperative governance mechanism in fiscal intergovernmental relations. Our paper demonstrates three research outcomes. The first is that the financial resources centralize on Taipei and Kaohsiung cities and the financial allocation situation is disequilibrium one among 23 counties in Taiwan. The second is that the character of cooperative relationship is a stable alliance among agricultural county governments which DPP is in power. The third is that Taipei and Kaohsiung city governments are two financial resources competitors without collaborative relationships with other counties in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.van Bueren, Ellen M.、Klijn, Erik-Hans、Koppenjan, Joop F. M.(2003)。Dealing with Wicked Problems in Networks: Analyzing an Environmental Debate from a Network Perspective。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,13(2),193-212。  new window
2.Raab, Jörg、Milward, H. Brinton(2003)。Dark Networks as Problems。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,13(4),413-439。  new window
3.徐仁輝(2002)。統籌分配稅款的爭議探究。主計月刊,559,54-60。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳若予(20040600)。臺灣統籌分配稅款制度的政治性。臺灣民主,1(2),131-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.朱澤民(1993)。當前地方財政改進之研究。財稅研究,25(1),1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.徐仁輝(20010100)。地方政府支出預算決策的研究。公共行政學報,5,1-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.White, Harrison C.、Boorman, Scott A.、Breiger, Ronald L.(1976)。Social structure from multiple networks: I Blockmodels of roles and positions。American Journal of Sociology,81(4),730-780。  new window
8.王光旭(20050600)。政策網絡研究在公共行政領域的核心地位與方法錯位。政策研究學報,5,61-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Jones, Thomas M.(1995)。Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics。The Academy of Management Review,20(2),404-437。  new window
10.Krackhardt, David、Hanson, Jeffrey R.(1993)。Informal Networks: The Company Behind the Chart。Harvard Business Review,71(4),104-111。  new window
11.O'Toole, Laurence J., Jr.、Meier, Kenenth J.、O'Toole, L. J., Jr.、Meier, Kenneth J.(2004)。Public Management in Intergovernmental Networks: Matching Structural Networks and Managerial Networking。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,14(4),469-494。  new window
12.Raab, Jörg(2002)。Where Do Policy Networks Come from?。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,12(4),581-622。  new window
13.Huang, K.、Provan, Keith G.(2006)。Resource Tangibility and Patterns of Interaction in a Publicly Funded Health and Human Services Network。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,17(1),435-454。  new window
14.Klijn, Erik-Hans(2001)。Rules as Institutional Context for Decision Making in Networks: The Approach to Postwar Housing Districts in Two Cities。Administration and Society,33(2),133-164。  new window
會議論文
1.史美強(2000)。組織網絡與治理。行政管理學術研討會,(會議日期: 2000/05/13)。台北:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖坤榮(2002)。地方財政分權的理論與實際:統籌分配稅款的制度分析。0。  延伸查詢new window
3.紀俊臣(2000)。地方制度法修正後財政收支劃分之新策略。臺北市。1-17。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.熊瑞梅(1995)。臺中都市變遷:區位、政府及地方菁英影響力結構(Ⅱ)-行動體系觀之分析。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Peterson, Paul E.(1995)。The Price of Federalism。The Brookings Institution Press。  new window
2.Bardach, Eugene(1998)。Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship。Brookings Institution Press。  new window
3.Kooiman, Jan(1993)。Modern Governance。London:Sage。  new window
4.Rhodes, R. A. W.、Marsh, David(1992)。Policy Network in British Government。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
5.史美強(2005)。制度、網絡與府際治理。臺北市:元照出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.江大樹(20060000)。邁向地方治理:議題、理論與實務。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Rhodes, Robert A. W.(1997)。Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability。Open University Press。  new window
8.Ostrom, Elinor(1990)。Governing The Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Laumann, Edward O.、Knoke, David(1987)。The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains。University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
10.Wright, D. S.(1988)。Understanding Intergovernmental Relationship。Understanding Intergovernmental Relationship。Belmont, CA。  new window
11.Laumann, E. O.、Pappi, F. U.(1976)。Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence System。Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence System。New York, NY。  new window
12.Mizruchi, M. S.、Schwartz, M.(1987)。Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business。Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Banfield, E. C.(1961)。Political Influence。Political Influence。New York, NY。  new window
14.(2005)。Multi-level Governance。Multi-level Governance。Oxford, UK。  new window
15.6, Perri、Leat, Diana、Seltzer, Kimberly、Stoker, Gerry(2002)。Toward Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda。New York, NY:Palgrave。  new window
16.Pfeffer, J.、Salancik, G.(2003)。The External Control of Organization: A Resource Dependence Perspective。The External Control of Organization: A Resource Dependence Perspective。Stanford, CA。  new window
17.陳敦源(1999)。跨域管理:部際與府際合作。公共管理。臺北市:商鼎文化。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.徐仁輝(1999)。預算緊縮與財政分權。地方政府與政治:精省後之財政自主與地方分權。臺北市:商鼎文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃世鑫(1999)。地方財政自主與地方自治:精(凍?廢?)省後的省思。地方政府與政治:精省後之財政自主與地方分權。臺北:商鼎。  延伸查詢new window
3.Krackhardt, D.(1994)。The strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations。Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action。Boston, MA。  new window
4.O'Toole, L. J.(2000)。American Intergovernmental Relations: An Overview。Public Administration: Concepts and Cases。Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin。  new window
5.林健次、蔡吉源(1999)。財政賽局:零和?正和?負和?論統籌分配稅款與財政收支劃分法。地方政府與政治:精省後之財政自主與地方分權。臺北市:商鼎文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE