臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：選制改變前選區規模對立委分配政策提案行為的影響
書刊名：臺灣政治學刊
作者：羅清俊 引用關係／廖健良
作者(外文)：Luor, Ching-jyuhn／Liao, Chien-liang
出版日期：2009
卷期：13:1
頁次：頁3-53
主題關鍵詞：分配政策；肉桶行為；選區規模；分配理論；選舉制度；立法院；Distributive policy；Pork barrel behavior；District size；Distributive theory；Electoral system；Legislative Yuan
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(17) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:15
  • 共同引用共同引用:255
  • 點閱點閱:128
由於第七屆立法委員選舉制度改爲單一選區兩票制並將減半，本研究觀察第六屆區域立委在分配政策提案行爲上，是否會因爲選制的即將改變而產生變化？並與第五屆區域立委截然不同？變化幅度是否會隨著選區規模的不同而有所差異？本研究發現第五屆大型及中型選區立委的分配政策提案數量皆遠低於小型選區立委，其中又以大型選區立委的分配政策提案數量最少，代表選區規模越大，立委越沒有動機提出分配政策提案。而在第六屆立法院時期，大、中、小型選區立委之間的分配政策提案數量卻沒有顯著的差異。出現這種現象主要是因爲第六屆的中、大型選區立委在分配政策提案的數量上大幅地成長，顯著地多過於第五屆的中、大型選區立委。而小型選區立委的分配政策提案數量在五、六兩屆立法院之間並沒有顯著性的差異。這意味著來自選區規模越大的區域立委，受到選制即將改變爲單一選區與員額減少的影響也越深遠。本研究不但發現選區規模對於台灣立法委員分配政策提案行爲的顯著影響，同時也觀察到選舉制度即將改變之前就已經對國會議員分配政策提案行爲產生影響。
This paper explores the motives of legislators in seeking distributive benefits for their districts. Based on the perspective of distributive theory, the authors seek to determine whether the legislators of the Taiwan's 6(superscript th) Legislative Yuan are about to change their bill-initiation behavior, compared with the legislators of the 5(superscript th) Legislative Yuan, due to the upcoming changes in the electoral system (i.e. to reduce members by 50% and replace the SNTV by a single-member-district). The negative binomial model is used to explore the factors that would affect the bill-initiation behavior of legislators favoring distributive benefits for their districts. The analyses of the negative binomial model reveal a significant effect of district size on the initiation of distributive bills in the 5(superscript th) Legislative Yuan. The larger the district size is, the fewer the incentives that the legislators have, to pursue distributive policy interests. However, the statistical results do not exhibit a significant effect of district size on the initiation of distributive bills in the 6(superscript th) Legislative Yuan in the sense that the discrepancies in terms of bill initiation among legislators from districts of different sizes are reduced. To be specific speaking, compared with the 5(superscript th) Legislative Yuan, legislators who are from large districts in the 6(superscript th) Legislative Yuan tend to initiate more distributive bills. The same pattern is also found among the 6(superscript th) Legislators Yuan's legislators who were elected from medium-sized of districts. However, this is not true for the legislators of small districts. These findings imply that the impact of the upcoming changes in the electoral system is more likely to be felt by the legislators who are from larger districts as opposed to those from smaller ones. In sum, this paper finds a significant effect of district size on the legislators' distributive bill-initiation behavior. It also finds that the impact of the coming changes in the electoral system on legislative behavior is already at work before it goes into effect. These findings have implications for distributive politics in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Ames, Barry(1995)。Electoral Strategy Under Open-List Proportional Representation。American Journal of Political Science，39(2)，406-433。  new window
2.羅清俊(20001200)。政策利益分配的型態：最小獲勝聯盟？還是通通有獎？。政治科學論叢，13，201-232。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Ames, Barry(1995)。Electoral Rules, Constituency Pressure, and Pork Barrel: Bases of Voting in the Brazilian Congress。The Journal of Politics，57(2)，324-343。  new window
4.羅清俊、謝瑩蒔(20080600)。選區規模與立法委員分配政策提案的關聯性研究：第三、四屆立法院的分析。行政暨政策學報，46，1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Heitshusen, Valerie、Young, Garry、Wood, David M.(2005)。Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom。American Journal of Political Science，49(1)，32-45。  new window
6.羅清俊(20040900)。分配政策與預算制定之政治分析。政治科學論叢，21，149-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Lancaster, Thomas D.(1986)。Electoral Structures and Pork Barrel Politics。International Political Science Review，7(1)，67-81。  new window
8.盛杏湲(20050900)。選區代表與集體代表：立法委員的代表角色。東吳政治學報，21，1-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Lowi, Theodore J.(1964)。American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory。World Politics，16(4)，677-715。  new window
10.黃秀端(20000900)。立法院內不同類型委員會的運作方式。東吳政治學報，11，35-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.羅清俊(20000300)。猜猜看誰把醃肉帶回家了：補助款利益在縣市分配的分析。人文及社會科學集刊，12(1)，1-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.盛杏湲(19991100)。立法問政與選區服務：第三屆立法委員代表行為的探討。選舉研究，6(2)，89-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Alvarez, R. Michael、Saving, Jason L.(1997)。Deficits, Democrats, and Distributive Benefits: Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel in the 1980s。Political Research Quarterly，50(4)，809-831。  new window
14.Hirano, Shigeo(2006)。Electoral Institutions, Hometowns, and Favored Minorities: Evidence from Japanese Electoral Reforms。World Politics，59(1)，51-82。  new window
15.Crisp, Brian F., and Rachael E. Ingall.(2001)。“Determinants of Home Style: The Many Incentives for Going Home in Colombia.”。Legislative Studies Quarterly，26 (3)，487-512。  new window
16.Crisp, Brian F., and Rachael E. Ingall.(2002)。“Institutional Engineering and the Nature of Representation: Mapping the Effects of Electoral Reform in Colombia.”。American Journal of Political Science，46 (4)，733-48。  new window
17.Freeman, Patricia K., and Lilliard E. Richardson, Jr.(1996)。“Explaining Variation in Casework among State Legislatures.”。Legislative Studies Quarterly，21 (1)，41-56。  new window
18.Horiuchi, Yusaku, and Jun Saito.(2003)。“Reapportionment and Redistribution: Consequences of Electoral Reform in Japan. ”。American Journal of Political Science，47 (4)，669-82。  new window
19.Maag, U., C. Vanasse, G. Dionne, and C. Laberge-Nadeau.(1997)。“Taxi Drivers’ Accidents: How Binocular Vision Problems are Related to Their Rate and Severity on Terms of the Number of Victims.”。Accident Analysis and Prevention，29 (2)，217-24。  new window
20.Rundquist, Barry, Jeong-Hwa Lee, and Jungho Rhee.(1996)。“The Distributive Politics of Cold War Defense Spending: Some State Level Evidence.”。Legislative Studies Quarterly，21 (2)，265-81。  new window
21.Scholl, Edward L.(1986)。“The Electoral System and Constituency-Oriented Activity in the European Parliament.”。International Studies Quarterly，30 (3)，315-32。  new window
22.Stratmann, Thomas, and Martin Baur.(2002)。“Plurality Rule, Propotional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral Systems.”。American Journal of Political Science，46 (3)，506-14。  new window
23.Stroup, Michael D.(1998)。“Some Evidence of Congressional Political in DOD Personnel Allocations.”。Public Choice，94 (3)，241-54。  new window
會議論文
1.盛杏湲(2006)。The Personal Vote-Seeking and the Initiation of Particularistic Benefits Bills in the Taiwanese Legislature。International Conference on Political Center or Periphery : Legislatures & Parliaments in the 21st Century，(會議日期: 2006, July 7-8)。臺北：東吳大學政治學系。  new window
2.Stein, Robert M.、Bickers, Kenneth N.(1992)。Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel: The Interest Group Connection。88th Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association，(會議日期: 1992/09/03-06)。Chicago, Illinois。  new window
3.Horiuchi, Yusaku.(2003)。“Universalism within Districts: Distributive Politics Under the SNTV Electoral Rule in Japan.”。Philadelphia, PA。  new window
4.Kunicova, Jana、Remington, Thomas F.(2005)。The Effect of Electoral Rules on Distributive Voting: Some Evidence from the Russian State Duma, 1994-2003。The Yale Conference on Distributive Politics。New Haven, CT。  new window
研究報告
1.羅清俊(2006)。〈重新檢視台灣分配政治：台灣選民對於立法委員爭取補助利益的期待〉。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅清俊(2007)。《台灣分配政治的理論建構與實證檢驗（I）》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蕭怡靖(2003)。我國立法委員選擇常設委員會之研究：以第四屆立法委員為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇昭銘(2006)。臺灣文化創意產業網站內容分析(碩士論文)。世新大學，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cameron, A. C.、Trivedi, P. K.(1998)。Regression Analysis of Count Data。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Agresti, Alan(2007)。An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
3.Liao, Tim Futing(1994)。Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit, and Other Generalized Linear Models。Thousand Oaks, Calif：Sage Publication。  new window
4.Winkelmann, R.(2000)。Econometric Analysis of Count Data。Berlin, New York：Springer。  new window
5.王業立(200108)。比較選舉制度。台北：五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Lowi, Theodore J.(1979)。The End of Liberalism--The Second Republic of United States。New York：W.W. Norton & Company。  new window
7.薛曉源、陳家剛(2007)。全球化與新制度主義。臺北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
8.Arnold, R. Douglas(1990)。The Logic of Congressional Action。New Haven：Yale University Press。  new window
9.Johannes, John R.(1984)。To Serve the People: Congress and Constituency Service。Lincoln, NE。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：475（臺灣：444，外國：31） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1166620 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67081865
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上