:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:設置族群型代表性行政機關的理論論證
書刊名:臺灣政治學刊
作者:孫煒 引用關係
作者(外文):Sun, Way
出版日期:2010
卷期:14:1
頁次:頁105-158
主題關鍵詞:代表性官僚代表性行政機關族群代議政體文化公民權Representative bureaucracyRepresentative agencyEthnic groupRepresentative governmentCultural citizenship
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:778
  • 點閱點閱:139
在民主政治中以選舉爲主要機制的代議政體,無法完全追求與反映多元社會之中各種少數、弱勢與非主流團體的利益與價值。另一方面,行政部門內部具有資本性質的行政機關的重要性與管轄範疇,在全球化的影響之下與日俱增,排擠了其他行政機關,特別是以少數、弱勢與非主流團體爲服務對象的社會性行政機關。因此,在代議政體的代表性不足,以及行政部門的制度失衡之雙重侷限下,在當代公共行政研究之中,提出了代表性官僚的概念與理論,並具體地將種族、族群、性別等各部門的代表性,落實在文官體制的人口組成中,來保障少數、弱勢與非主流團體,以實現民主政治的核心價值。進一步而言,在保障少數族群方面,現代政府進一步將代表性官僚予以機構化,設置族群型代表性行政機關,以確保其利益與價值。然而,爲避免文官體制的偏袒作爲以及提升族群型代表性行政機關的正當性,本文進一步分析公民權的發展脈絡,以及文化公民權相關的意識型態背景。之後,本文聚焦在我國族群型代表性行政機關的職能,並由台灣歷史脈絡與政治社會的發展,探討我國族群型代表性行政機關的特色。在結論中,本文由公共行政觀點,提出具有文化能力行政體系的相關政策建議,以保障少數族群的利益與價值,促進族群的和諧關係。
In a democracy that features elections as the main mechanism for its representative government, the interests and values of minority, disadvantaged and non-mainstream groups in the pluralistic society can never be fully pursued and reflected. On the other hand, under the increasing influence of globalization, the importance and jurisdiction scope of the agencies which are capitalist in nature inside the executive branch have specifically crowded out other socially functioning agencies which aim to mainly serve minority, disadvantaged and non-mainstream groups. Thus, doubly confined by the representational deficit of representative government and the institutional imbalance of the executive branch, the notion and theory of representative bureaucracy has been brought forth into the contemporary study of public administration. It also facilitates the representation of various branches in terms of race, ethnic groups and gender via the personnel composition of bureaucracy. These efforts are to protect minority, disadvantaged and non-mainstream groups so as to ensure the core values of democracy. Furthermore, in regard to the protection of ethnic groups, a modern government shall further institutionalize representative bureaucracy by establishing representative agencies for respective ethnic groups in order to ensure their respective interests and values. However, to avoid bureaucratic partiality and better justify the representative agencies for ethnic groups, this article further analyzes the development course of citizenship and the related ideological background of cultural citizenship. This article then focuses on the functions of representative agencies for ethnic groups in Taiwan in order to explore the features of the representative agencies for ethnic groups while looking at Taiwan's historic development course and social-political context. In conclusion, this article proposes relevant policy recommendations with a culturally competent public administration in mind for the executive branch in order to protect the interests and values of ethnic groups, and foster harmonious relationships among various ethnic groups.
期刊論文
1.伊凡諾幹(20041000)。文官制度改革與原住民族發展:對於建構多元並具有民族特色之考銓制度的初步努力與檢討。考銓季刊,40,1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.韓保中(20071200)。憲政與行政:論威爾遜〈行政的研究〉的緣起與意義。政治科學論叢,34,105-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳淳文(20030600)。公民、消費者、國家與市場。人文及社會科學集刊,15(2),263-307。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.翁興利、陳文學(20080300)。我國原住民族文官之研究:消極代表性官僚的測量。國家菁英,4(1),1-17。  延伸查詢new window
5.江明修、曾冠球(20090300)。政府再造:跨部門治理的觀點。國家菁英,5(1),97-122。  延伸查詢new window
6.余致力(20071200)。性別差異對公共管理者任用之影響:代表性文官體系的理論省思與實證探索。國家菁英,3(4),61-84。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃煥榮(20071200)。突破玻璃天花板--女性行政菁英事業生涯發展的問題與展望。國家菁英,3(4),85-108。  延伸查詢new window
8.王俐容(20060900)。文化公民權的建構:文化政策的發展與公民權的落實。公共行政學報,20,129-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.蔡英文(20050900)。公民身分的多重性及其民主政治的意涵。政治與社會哲學評論,14,1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.施正鋒(20041000)。行政體系中的原住民族--由「優惠待遇」到「積極行動」。考銓季刊,40,47-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.顧慕晴、盧姵緁(20080300)。我國公部門原住民工作權保障之研究。國家菁英,4(1),19-42。  延伸查詢new window
12.Lim, Hong-hai(2006)。Representative Bureaucracy: Rethinking Substantive Effects and Active Representation。Public Administration Review,66(2),193-204。  new window
13.Meier, Kenneth J.、Wrinkle, Robert D.、Polinard, J. L.(1999)。Representative Bureaucracy and Distributional Equity: Addressing the Hard Question。The Journal of Politics,61(4),1025-1039。  new window
14.Wilkins, V. M.、Williams, B. N.(2008)。Black and Blue: Racial Profiling and Representation。Public Administration Review,68(4),654-664。  new window
15.Wise, Lois Recascino(2004)。Bureaucratic posture: On the need for a composite theory of bureaucratic behavior。Public Administration Review,64(6),669-680。  new window
16.張福建(20050900)。參與和公民精神的養成:彌爾 (J.S. Mill)《代議政府論》的一種解讀。東吳政治學報,21,41-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.陳秀容(1999)。〈族群權利理論:Vernon Van Dyke 的理論建構〉。《政治科學論叢》,10,131-170。  延伸查詢new window
18.Bush, C. T.(2000)。“Culture Competence: Implications of the Surgeon General’s Report on Mental Health.”。Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing,13 (4),177-78。  new window
19.Nabatchi, T.(2007)。The Institutionalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Federal Government。Public Administration Review,67(4),646-661。  new window
20.Olson, J. P.(2008)。“The Ups and Downs of Bureaucratic Organization.”。Annual Review of Political Science,11 (1),13-37。  new window
21.Wise, L. R., and M. Tschirhart.(2000)。“Examining Empirical Evidence on Diversity Effects.”。Public Administration Review,60 (5),386-94。  new window
會議論文
1.范振乾(2002)。客家事務行政體系之建構。「客家公共政策」研討會,(會議日期: 6月21-22日)。臺北:行政院客委會。12-17。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊聰榮(2004)。移民與本土化:中國戰後移民在亞太各國的遭遇。台北。21-42。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kellough, J. E., and J. Williams.(2007)。“Contracting and the Bureaucratic Representation of Minorities and Women: Examining Evidence from Federal Agencies.”。Chicago, IL。  new window
圖書
1.施正鋒(2005)。台灣原住民族政治與政策。台北:翰蘆圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Selden, Sally Coleman(1997)。The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency。M.E. Sharpe。  new window
3.朱鎮明、宋吉德、蔡志恆、劉秋月、鄭錫鍇(1998)。如何贏政府--行政院原住民委員會成立的謀略分析。台北:洪葉。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡良文(2008)。我國文官體制之變革:政府再造的價值。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.朱愛群(1993)。行政發展社會學與行政社會化。台北:三鋒出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Marshall, T. H.、Bottomore, T.(1992)。Citizenship and Social Class。Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto.。London, Concord (Mass.):Pluto Press。  new window
7.Barbalet, J. M.、談谷錚(1991)。公民資格。臺北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.施正鋒(2004)。台灣客家族群政治與政策。台中:新新台灣文化教育基金會。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張培倫(2005)。秦力克論自由主義與多元文化論。宜蘭縣礁溪鄉:佛光人文社會學院。  延伸查詢new window
10.江宜樺(20010000)。自由民主的理路。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Faulks, Keith、黃俊龍(2003)。公民身分。臺北:巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.蔡良文(19980000)。行政中立與政治發展。臺北:五南圖書有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Dolan, Julie A.、Rosenbloom, David H.(2003)。Representative Bureaucracy: Classic Readings and Continuing Controversies。M. E. Sharpe, Inc.。  new window
14.Edwards, Michael(2004)。Civil Society。Polity Press。  new window
15.Krislov, Samuel(1974)。Representative Bureaucracy。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
16.Lindblom, Charles Edward(1977)。Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
17.Miller, Toby E.(2007)。Cultural citizenship: cosmopolitanism, consumerism, and television in a neoliberal age。Philadelphia:Temple University Press。  new window
18.Mosher, Frederick C.(1968)。Democracy and the Public Service。Oxford University Press。  new window
19.Powell, G. Bingham Jr.(2000)。Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions。Yale University Press。  new window
20.Riccucci, Norma M.(2002)。Managing Diversity in Public Sector Workforces。Westview Press。  new window
21.Savas, Emanuel S.(1987)。Privatization: The Key to Better Government。Chatham House Publishers, Inc.。  new window
22.Savas, E. S.(2000)。Privatization and Public: Private Partnership。Chatham House。  new window
23.Stevenson, Nick(2003)。Cultural Citizenship: Cosmopolitan Questions。Open University Press。  new window
24.Kymlicka, Will(2001)。Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship。Oxford University Press。  new window
25.Kingsley, John Donald(1944)。Representative Bureaucracy: An Interpretation of the British Civil Service。The Antioch Press。  new window
26.王甫昌(20030000)。當代臺灣社會的族群想像。臺北市:群學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.吉娃詩.叭萬(2006)。〈從紐西蘭毛利族的語言巢看台灣的原住民母語教學〉。《當代紐西蘭民主政治》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
28.范振乾(2008)。〈從台灣發展史看客裔之未來:從客家運動20年說起〉。《多元族群與客家:台灣客家運動20 年》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
29.張慧芝、郭進成(譯);D. Heater(原作者)(2006)。公民身分( What is Citizenship)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
30.Carter, L. F., and K. D. Kitts.(2007)。“Managing Public Personnel: A Turn-of-the-Century Perspective.”。Handbook of Public Administration。Boca Raton, FL。  new window
31.Gulalp, H.(2006)。Citizenship and Ethnic Conflict: Challenging the Nation-State。New York, NY。  new window
32.Kellough, J. E.、Williams, J.(2006)。Understanding Affirmative Action: Politics, Discrimination, and the Search for Justice。Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press。  new window
33.White, H. L., and M. F. Rice.(2005)。“The Multiple Dimensions of Diversity and Culture.”。Diversity and Public Administration: Theory, Issue, and Perspectives。Armonk, NY。  new window
34.Wilson, H. T.(2001)。Bureaucratic Representation: Civil Servants and the Future。Leiden:Brill。  new window
35.Wise, L. R.(2003)。“Representative Bureaucracy.”。Handbook of Public Administration。London, England。  new window
其他
1.施正鋒。台灣族群政治,http://www.wufi.org.tw/shih/ethnic.htm, 2005/11/05。  new window
2.行政院客家委員會(2010)。行政院客家委員會99 年度施政計畫。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院原住民族委員會(2010)。行政院原住民族委員會99年度施政計畫。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.黃長玲(2007)。彼此鑲嵌,互相形構:轉變中的國家與社會關係。自由主義與新世紀臺灣。臺北:允晨。  延伸查詢new window
2.Manin, Bernard、Przeworski, Adam、Stokes, Susan C.(1999)。Elections and Representation。Democracy, Accountability, and Representation。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.江宜樺(1995)。政治社群與生命共同體:亞里斯多德城邦理論的若干啟示。政治社群。臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.王俐容(20060000)。多元文化的展示與族群關係:以文化藝術節為例。多元文化與族群關係。臺北:揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.石忠山(2006)。當代紐西蘭憲政體制。當代紐西蘭民主政治。臺北:臺灣國際研究學會。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳運棟(2007)。源流篇--臺灣客家的原鄉。臺灣客家研究概論。臺北:行政院客家委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊長鎮(2007)。族群關係篇。臺灣客家研究概論。行政院客家委員會。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bailey, M. L.(2005)。Cultural Competency and the Practice of Public Administration。Diversity and Public Administration: Theory, Issue, and Perspectives。New York:M. E. Sharpe, Inc.。  new window
9.Wilson, H. T.(2000)。The Downside of Downsizing: Bureaucratic Representation in Capitalist Democracies。The New Public Management: International Developments。Toronto:Captus Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE