:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:僧肇的實相哲學--以〈不真空論〉為主要典據的義理論述
書刊名:臺大佛學研究
作者:陳平坤 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Ping-kun
出版日期:2010
卷期:19
頁次:頁1-61
主題關鍵詞:自性實體不真實相EmptinessŚūnyatāSelf-natureSvabhāvaSubstanceUnrealityUntruthfulnessThorough realityDharmatā
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:177
  • 點閱點閱:221
本文採取義理論述的研究進路,旨在探討僧肇對於「諸法實 相」的哲學論議。文獻依據,主要是〈不真空論〉,同時旁及僧肇 其他論文。 本文指出,在肯定世人可能認識真正實在的「諸法實相」之 前提下,僧肇認為一切諸法的「實在性」,無法就著心意識所虛誑 妄取的對象去發現,而必須深入其底層才能找到。這一底層便是 對象所處的因緣關係;而它的深義,也就體現在「至虛無生」之 「空性」上。 問題是:緣起性空的諸法實相,如果無法通過語詞、概念所 構成的話語來傳達,那麼,世人又怎能與它覿面相照呢?基於佛 法教學總要採取一些足以打破世俗心識那種封閉在實體化思維路 徑所形成的觀念型態,才有辦法使人摸索出一點引歸實相的入門 指標。因此,僧肇以「不真」充當指摽概念,藉由論議一切諸法 「至虛無生」,來引領學人解悟「不真」所要開顯的「空義」。這 是僧肇為讓世人掌握諸法實相的一道路徑。因為在僧肇看來,所 謂「真實」,從實踐的角度來說,就在解悟「不真即空」之法義中被確認;而它的客觀化表示,則是毋容建立真假、虛實、有無、 生滅等分別論說的不可思議〔諸法緣生〕境界。
Using theoretical discussion as the research method, this study attempts to explore the philosophical viewpoints contributed by Seng-chao in connection with “thorough reality”. This study adopts “Bu-zhen-kong-lun” as the major reference literature, besides other essays written by Seng-chao. This study stresses that, assuming all people across the world have possibly understood the very significance of “thorough reality”, Seng-chao comes to conclude that it is unlikely to identify the reality of the rules governing the cosmos simply by the facts and phenomena distorted by consciousness. Most truly, the reality lies in the very bottom of phenomena. The bottom per se acts like a network in which the interdependent relationship lies. Therefore, the most profound meaning of reality has to be manifested through emptiness. Here comes a question. If there is no way to express the meaning of thorough reality by the languages made up of words and concepts, how can people like us understand it? This is the answer – Seng-chao uses “unreality” as a guided concept to solve the problem. He argued that all things are unreal and are not an entity that remains unchanged permanently. His viewpoint helps the Buddhism researchers to be enlightened with the “emptiness” manifested by “unreality”. This is how Seng-chao helps people like us to find out the real behind all things. From a doer’s standpoint, the essence of “reality” entails the comprehension of “unreality/untruthfulness attesting emptiness”, which is objectively expressed as the most marvelous land in which all interdependent relationships occur and perish one after another without consideration to whether any relationship is true or false, unreal or real, being or not-being, born or dead.
期刊論文
1.Leung, K.、Koch, P. T.、Lu, L.(1993)。A dualistic model of harmony and its implications for conflict management in Asia。Asia Pacific Journal of Management,19,201-220。  new window
2.楊國榮(2006)。體道與成人─《莊子》視域中的真人與真知。文史哲,2006(5),125-135。  延伸查詢new window
3.俞志慧(2000)。《論語.述而》「加我數年,五十以學易」章疏證。孔子研究,2000(3),116-118。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳晶(2005)。《莊子.大宗師》「真人」辨析。浙江海洋學院學報,22(1),100-104。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王月秀(2004)。僧肇思想研究──以《肇論》為中心(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅因(1996)。僧肇思想研究--兼論玄學與般若學之交會問題(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊士偉(1991)。知識與行動:僧肇聖人概念的批判分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.元弼聖(1995)。從僧肇之「不真空論」看空的意義以及其影響(碩士論文)。文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.阿羅漢、玄奘。阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hamlyn, D. W.(1984)。Metaphysics。Metaphysics。Cambridge, UK/ New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Putnam, Hilary(1987)。The Many Faces of Realism。La Salle, IL:Open Court。  new window
4.三枝充(1985)。中論偈頌總覽。東京:第三文明社。  延伸查詢new window
5.孫炳哲(2001)。肇論通解及研究。高雄。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.鳩摩羅什。維摩詰所說經。  延伸查詢new window
7.元康(1983)。肇論疏。台北:新文豐出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.唐秀連(2008)。僧肇的佛學理解與格義佛教。臺北:文史哲。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.別譯雜阿含經。  延伸查詢new window
10.涂艷秋(199604)。僧肇思想研究。臺北:東初出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.求那跋陀羅。雜阿含經。  延伸查詢new window
12.唐君毅(1992)。中國哲學原論:原道篇。台北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.(200905)。中阿含經。中華電子佛典協會。  延伸查詢new window
14.唐君毅(1992)。中國哲學原論‧導論篇。台北:學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.龍樹菩薩。中論。  延伸查詢new window
16.Pojman, Louis P.(2001)。What Can We Know?: An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge。Belmont, Califonia:Wadsworth Publishing Company。  new window
17.僧肇。注維摩詰經。  延伸查詢new window
18.李潤生(1989)。僧肇。臺北:東大圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.楊惠南(1989)。吉藏。台北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.鳩摩羅什。摩訶般若波羅蜜經。  延伸查詢new window
21.牟宗三(1989)。佛性與般若。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
22.吳汝鈞(19950000)。中國佛學的現代詮釋。臺北:文津。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.許抗生(1998)。僧肇評傳。南京:南京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.劉貴傑(1985)。僧肇思想研究--魏晉玄學與佛教思想之交涉。臺北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.鳩摩羅什。小品般若波羅蜜經。  延伸查詢new window
26.盧桂珍(20020000)。慧遠、僧肇聖人學研究。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版委員會。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.文才。肇論新疏。  延伸查詢new window
28.松本史朗(1994)。三論教學の批判的考察─dhātu-vādaとしての吉蔵の思想。禪思想の批判的研究。東京。  延伸查詢new window
29.邱敏捷(2003)。《肇論》研究的衍進與開展。《肇論》研究的衍進與開展。高雄。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.吳汝鈞(1983)。印度佛學的現代詮釋。印度佛學的現代詮釋。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.俞孟宣。本體論研究。本體論研究。上海。  延伸查詢new window
32.翁正石(2004)。僧肇之物性論─空及運動之討論。僧肇之物性論─空及運動之討論。高雄。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.黃百儀(2004)。僧肇《物不遷論》思想研究。僧肇《物不遷論》思想研究。高雄。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.(2002)。中論(上)。中論(上)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
35.上山春平、梶山雄一(1974)。空の論理。空の論理。東京。  延伸查詢new window
36.副島正光(2001)。大乗仏教の思想。大乗仏教の思想。東京。  延伸查詢new window
37.袴谷憲昭(1990)。本覚思想批判。東京:大藏。  延伸查詢new window
38.Russell, Bertrand Arthur William(1992)。Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits。Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits。London。  new window
39.Van Inwagen, Peter(2002)。Metaphysics。Metaphysics。Boulder。  new window
40.Honderich, Ted(2005)。The Oxford Companion to Philosophy。The Oxford Companion to Philosophy。New York。  new window
41.Parfit, Derk(2003)。Why Our Identity is Not What Matters。Personal Identity。Malden。  new window
42.松本史朗(2001)。縁起について。緣起と空─如來藏思想批判。東京。  延伸查詢new window
43.村上嘉賓(1955)。僧肇における真。肇論研究。京都。  延伸查詢new window
44.林鎮國(2002)。解構形上學的兩種版本。辯證的行旅。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
45.White, Nicholas P.(1992)。Plato’s Metaphysical Epistemology。The Cambridge Companion to Plato。Cambridge。  new window
其他
1.(後秦)釋僧肇。肇論。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE