郭店戰國楚竹簡，是二十世紀末非常重要的一批戰國哲學思想資料。其中含括16種文獻，其中有些可與傳世文獻相參照，有些則是佚籍。這些資料中，從學術家別言，學界大致認為是儒、道兩家之資料，但近來西方學者從事相關研究者，總是以戰國時無六家之名，反對對這些文獻作學術歸類。本文雖不採取這些西方學者之說明，但嘗試以墓葬中所收藏之資料，研究、分析這批竹簡中所反映的戰國中晚期學者對於「道」的思維。簡言之，這些不同的「道」思維、思想，充斥在他的生存空間，並存而不悖。

The bamboo documents from the Goudian in the Warring States Period are regarded as a significant discovery in the late 20th century, and those materials play a major role in the Warring States philosophical concepts. There are 16 documents among those materials: some are referable to the existing documents that had been passed down for generations; some are unearthed documents. From the perspective of Eastern scholars, these newly-found bamboo documents are associated with Confucianism and Taoism; nevertheless, there is also an opposing group of Western Scholars, who believe the six schools do not exist in the Warring States Period, claim that these documents should not be categorized in either Confucianism or Taoism. In the following argument, there will be analytical research of these unearthed documents, and how these documents reflect the scholars and their concepts of Taoism from the Warring States period. In conclusion, despite the fact that there are different concepts and thoughts of Tao, they can still coexist and be logical.