臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：概念卡通論證教學促進學童論證能力之研究
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：陳文正／古智雄／許瑛玿／楊文金
作者(外文)：Chen, Wen-cheng／Ku, Chih-hsiung／Hsu, Ying-shao／Yang, Wen-gin
出版日期：2011
卷期：19:1
頁次：頁69-99
主題關鍵詞：概念卡通；對科學的態度；論證；論證教學；Concept cartoon；Attitudes toward science；Argumentation；Argumentation instruction
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:40
  • 點閱點閱:62
摘要：本研究主要探討概念卡通論證教學如何促進學童之論證能力，並分析教學前後，個案學童「論證能力」及「對科學的態度」之變化情形。本研究採單組前後測設計，以東臺灣某國小高年級21位學童為研究對象，施以概念卡通策略之論證教學共六週六個單元。主要研究工具有自編的「論證能力測驗卷」及龍麟如(1997)的「國小高年級學童對科學的態度量表」。研究發現：經過概念卡通論證教學後，研究對象的論證能力表現得到提升。進一步以自然學業成就表現分析學童學習論證的成效，其中，低分組、中分組及高分組學童學習論證的表現有所不同。在「對科學的態度」方面，學童只在「對參與科學探討活動的態度」的提升達顯著性差異，其餘三個分項則無。最後，依據研究結果，提出三項研究建議。
Abstract The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of concept cartoon argumentation instruction on students’ argumentation ability. The difference between students’ “argumentation ability” and “attitudes toward science” after implementing this argument instruction was analyzed. A one-group pretest-posttest design was adopted in this research. The subjects were 21 upper graders in a remote elementary school. Based on the concept cartoon strategy, experimental argumentation instruction was provided during six consecutive weeks. The self-designed “paper-and-pencil test on argumentation ability” and “Attitudes Toward Science Scale (ATSS)” designed by Lung (1997) were used in the study. The results indicated that using the concept cartoon strategy in argumentation instruction could enhance the students’ argumentation ability. However, there was difference in argumentation performance between high- , mid- and low-score groups. With respect to pre- and post-test analyzing of ATSS, the sub-scale of the attitudes toward participating in science activities and inquiry showed significant difference after implementing the argumentation instruction, but none of the other three sub-scales did. Based on the research results, three research implications are suggested.
期刊論文
1.古智雄、孫東志、陳文正、楊文金(20100800)。從「熱認知觀點」探討學童科學解釋之合理性判斷--以班級社會常模下的順一致性為例。科學教育學刊，18:4，頁305-329。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Erduran, S.、Simon, S.、Osborne, J.(2004)。Taping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse。Science Education，88(6)，915-933。  new window
3.Scott, P. H.、Mortimer, E. F.、Aguiar, O. G.(2006)。The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons。Science Education，90(4)，605-631。  new window
4.Gijlers, H.,、de Jong, T.(2005)。The relation between prior knowledge and students’ collaborative discovery learning processes。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，42(3)，264-282。  new window
5.Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.(2004)。Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，41(10)，994-1020。  new window
6.Sadler, T. D.、Fowler, S. R.(2006)。A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation。Science Education，90(6)，986-1004。  new window
7.Webb, N. M.(1982)。Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups。Journal of Educational Psychology，74(4)，475-484。  new window
8.Kuhn, D.、Udell, W.(2003)。The development of argument skills。Child Development，74(5)，1245-1260。  new window
9.Kuhn, D.(1993)。Science as argument: Implication for teaching and learning scientific thinking。Science Education，77(3)，319-317。  new window
10.Erduran, S.、Osborne, J.、Simon, S.(2006)。Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in the Science Classroom。International Journal of Science Education，28(2/3)，235-260。  new window
11.莊嘉坤(19970400)。學童對自然科的態度與科學學習。國教天地，121，26-34。  延伸查詢new window
12.Osborne, J.、Simon, S.、Collins, S.(2003)。Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications。International Journal of Science Education，25(9)，1049-1079。  new window
13.林志能、洪振方(20080900)。論證模式分析及其評量要素。科學教育，312，2-18。  延伸查詢new window
14.莊雪芳、鄭湧涇(20020300)。國中學生對生物學的態度與相關變項之關係。科學教育學刊，10(1)，1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.蘇懿生、黃臺珠(19981200)。對科學的態度--一個有待研究的問題。科學教育，215，2-13。  延伸查詢new window
16.Haladyna, Tom、Shaughnessy, Joan(1982)。Attitudes toward science: A quantitative synthesis。Science Education，66(4)，547-563。  new window
17.Yager, R. E.、Penick, J. E.(1986)。Perceptions of four age groups toward science classes, teachers, and the value of science。Science Education，70(4)，355-363。  new window
18.蔡俊彥、黃台珠、楊錦潭(20080400)。國小學童網路論證能力及科學概念學習之研究。科學教育學刊，16(2)，171-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Driver, R.、Newton, P.、Osborne, J.(2000)。Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms。Science Education，84(3)，287-312。  new window
20.Duschl, R. A.、Osborne, J.(2002)。Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education。Studies in Science Education，38(1)，39-72。  new window
21.Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P.、Rodríguez, A. B.、Duschl, R. A.(2000)。"Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics。Science Education，84(6)，757-792。  new window
22.Newton, P.、Driver, R.、Osborne, J.(1999)。The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science。International Journal of Science Education，21(5)，553-576。  new window
23.林燕文、洪振方(20070300)。對話論證的探究中學童論述策略對促進科學概念理解之研究。屏東教育大學學報，26，285-324。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.林樹聲、黃柏鴻(20090400)。國小六年級學生在社會性科學議題教學中之論證能力研究--不同學業成就學生間之比較。科學教育學刊，17(2)，111-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.黃柏鴻、林樹聲(20070900)。論證教學相關實證性研究之回顧與省思。科學教育月刊，302，5-20。  延伸查詢new window
26.Kind, P.、Jones, K.、Barmby, P.(2007)。Developing attitudes towards science measures。International Journal of Science Education，29(7)，871-893。  new window
27.黃翎斐、胡瑞萍(2006)。論證與科學教育的理論和實務。科學教育月刊，292，15-28。  延伸查詢new window
28.Chin, C.、Teou, L. Y.(2009)。Using concept cartoons in formative assessment: Scaffolding students’ argumentation。International Journal of Science Education，31(10)，1307-1332。  new window
29.Ekici, F.、Ekici, E.、Aydin, F.(2007)。Utility of concept cartoons in diagnosing and overcoming misconceptions related to photosynthesis。International Journal of Environmental and Science Education，2(4)，111-124。  new window
30.Gardner, P. L.(1975)。Attitudes to science。Studies in Science Education，2(1)，1-41。  new window
31.Ginev, D.(1995)。Between epistemology and hermeneutics。Science and Education，4(2)，147-159。  new window
32.Haladyna, T.、Olsen, R.、Shaughnessy, J.(1982)。Relations of student, teacher, and learning environment variables to attitudes toward science。Science Education，66(5)，671-687。  new window
33.Heintzmann, W.(1989)。Historical cartoons: Opportunities to motivate and educate。Journal of the Middle States Council for Social Studies，11，9-13。  new window
34.Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R.、Pierson, W. T.、Lyons, V.(1985)。Controversy versus concurrence seeking in multi-grade and single-grade learning groups。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，22(9)，835-848。  new window
35.Kabapinar, F.(2005)。Effectiveness of teaching via concept cartoons from the point of view of constructivist approach。Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice，5(1)，135-146。  new window
36.Keogh, B.、Naylor, S.(1999)。Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: An evaluation。International Journal of Science Education，21(4)，431-446。  new window
37.Lock, R.(1991)。Creative work in biology -- a pot-pourri of examples. Part 2: Drawing, drama, games and models。School Science Review，72(261)，57-64。  new window
38.Naylor, S.、Keogh, B.、Downing, B.(2007)。Argumentation and primary science。Research in Science Education，37(1)，17-39。  new window
39.Stephenson, P.、Warwick, P.(2002)。Using concept cartoons to support progression in students’ understanding of light。Physics Education，37(2)，135-141。  new window
40.von Aufschnaiter, C.、Erduran, S.、Osborne, J.、Simon, S.(2008)。Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，45(1)，101-131。  new window
41.Wang, T.-L.、Berlin, D.(2010)。Construction and validation of an instrument to measure Taiwanese elementary students’ attitudes toward their science class。International Journal of Science Education，32(18)，2413-2428。  new window
會議論文
1.莊嘉坤(1995)。國小學生對科學的態度之探討。八十四學年度師範院教育學術論文發表會。屏東市：國立屏東師範學院。1-28。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.龍麟如(1997)。國小學生對科學的態度與相關變項關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lung, L.-J.(1997)。A study of relationships between attitudes toward science and related variables of elementary students，Taipei。  new window
圖書
1.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hodson, D.(1998)。Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach。Buckingham：Open University Press。  new window
3.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993)。Benchmarks for science literacy。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Toulmin, Stephen Edelston(1958)。The Uses of Argument。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Cohen, Jacob(1988)。Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences。Academic Press。  new window
6.林煥祥、洪振方、洪瑞兒(2007)。智育理念與實踐。德智體群美五育理念與實踐 \\ 教育部(主編)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.Naylor, S.、Keogh, B.(2000)。Concept cartoons in science education。Sandbach, UK。  new window
8.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.(2007)。PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow's world。Paris。  new window
9.Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.(2004)。Ideas, evidence & argument in science: CPD training pack。London。  new window
10.Sarkar, T. K.(1995)。Changing concepts of rationality in science。Facets of Rationality \\ D. Andler ; P. Banerjee ; M. Chaudhury ; O. Guillaume (Eds.)。New Delhi, India。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：501（臺灣：462，外國：39） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1931025 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67729716
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上