:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從多元文化教育理念論弱勢者教育之法制內涵
書刊名:教育與多元文化研究
作者:陳炫任曾大千
作者(外文):Chen, Hsuan-jenTseng, Dah-chian
出版日期:2011
卷期:4
頁次:頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:多元文化教育弱勢者教育教育機會均等課程模式Multicultural educationEducation for the disadvantagedEqual educational opportunityCurriculum model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:62
本文透過多元文化教育之觀點,試圖以課程概念針對我國弱勢者教育法制的相關規範進行探究。就理論而言,為妥適協助弱勢者自由開展於現代社會,依據教育法制所規劃的各種措施,理應契合多元文化教育之基本理念;事實上,現行法制除在經濟面向提供若干補償性措施,亦漸能於課程規範層面顧及弱勢者之教育需求,惟相關法制的實質內涵,則仍存有進一步探究的空間。據此,本文首先嘗試界定多元文化教育概念下的弱勢者範圍,並同時簡要陳述多元文化教育之意涵;其次,本文綜合主要文獻觀點,將多元文化教育之課程與教學,歸結出學習成就模式、貢獻添加模式、結構轉化模式及社會行動模式等四種基本類型。最後,本文分析我國憲法及教育法制之弱勢者相關規範,進而以多元文化教育觀點,逐一檢視原住民族、身心障礙者、婦女等三類弱勢者法制之課程內涵,並據此針對相關法制及其課程與教學提出結論與建議。
This paper explores education law in Taiwan as it relates to disadvantaged groups, from the perspective of curriculum and multicultural education. Theoretically, in order to help disadvantaged groups participate equally in modern society, the applicable education laws should be made more responsive to the precepts of multicultural education. In fact, in addition to government financial subsidies, education law in Taiwan to some extent does take into consideration the needs of disadvantaged groups in terms of curriculum regulations. Yet, whether the curriculum content and framework are appropriate for these groups deserves further explorations. This paper first defines the disadvantaged groups and examines the connotations of multicultural education. It then synthesizes the relevant literature to formulate models of multicultural curriculum and instruction, including the models of academic excellence, contribution-additive, transformation, and social action. This is followed up by a discussion of education law in Taiwan related to educating the disadvantaged, i.e., aboriginal groups, the physically or mentally disabled, and females. This section includes further analysis of the multicultural curriculum and instructional models compiled earlier. The paper concludes with suggestions for future modifications to the law regarding the education for the disadvantaged. The study also has implications for curriculum design and instructional practice in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.曾大千、何思瞇(20091200)。從法令規範論臺灣原住民族教育之本土脈絡。教育與多元文化研究,1,141-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Ladson-Billings, G.(2001)。Teaching and cultural competence: What does it take to be a successful teacher in a diverse classroom?。Rethinking School,15。  new window
3.Schugurensky, D.(2002)。The eight curriculum。Multicultural Education,10(2),2-6。  new window
4.Sleeter, C.、McLaren, P.(2000)。The origins of multiculturalism.15。  new window
圖書
1.Darder, Antonia(1991)。Culture and Power in the Classroom: A Critical Foundation for Bicultural Education。Bergin & Garvey。  new window
2.Ladson-Billings, G. J.(2001)。Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
3.Banks, J. A.(2006)。Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching。New York:Pearson Education。  new window
4.Banks, James A.(2008)。An introduction to multicultural education。Boston, MA:Pearson/Allyn and Bacon。  new window
5.Giroux, Henry A.(1983)。Theory and Resistance in Education--A Pedagogy for the Oppressed。Massachusetts:Bergin and Garvey。  new window
6.Freire, Paulo、Ramos, Myra Bergman(2000)。Pedagogy of the Oppressed。Continuum。  new window
7.Sleeter, C. E.、Grant, C. A.(2007)。Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race, class, and gender。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
8.Marshall, P. L.(2002)。Cultural diversity in our schools。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth/Thomson Learning。  new window
9.McLaren, P.(2006)。Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education。Boston。  new window
10.Nieto, S.、Bode, P.(2007)。Affirming diversity: The sociopolical context of multicultural education。Boston。  new window
11.Olsen, L.(2008)。Made in America: Immigrant students in our public schools。New York。  new window
12.Gollnick, D. M.、Chinn, P. C.(2006)。Multicultural education in a pluralistic society。Upper Saddle River, NJ。  new window
13.Ladson-Billings, G.(1994)。The dreamkeepers。San Francisco:Joseey-Bass。  new window
14.Tatum, B. D.(2003)。'Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?' and other conversations about race。New York:Basic Books。  new window
15.Tetreault, M. K. T.(2005)。Classrooms for diversity: Rethinking curriculum and pedagogy。Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives。Danvers, MA。  new window
16.Ladson-Billings, G.(1998)。Interview with Gloria Ladson-Billings。Education, power, and personal biography: Introduction to dialogues with critical educators。New York:Routledge。  new window
17.Ladson-Billings, G.(1999)。Preparing teachers for diversity: Historical perspectives, current trends, and future directions。Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
18.Ladson-Billings, G.(2000)。But that's just good teaching!。Notable selections in multicultural education。Guilford, CT。  new window
19.Meyer, L. H.、Bevan-Brown, J.、Harry, B.、Sapon-Shevin, M.(2005)。School inclusion and multicultural issues in special education。Multicultural. education: Issues and perspectives。Danvers, MA。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2004)。近四年來我國中央教育經費之分配與消長報告,http://www. edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/E0001/EDUION001/menu01/sub05/930304.htm, 2004/06/22。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Gay, G.(1995)。Mirror images on common issues: Parallels between multicultural education and critical pedagogy。Critical multiculturalism: Theory and praxis。Albany, NY:State University of New York。  new window
2.Banks, J. A.(2005)。Approaches to multicultural curriculum reform。Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives。Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons, Inc。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE