:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社區精神復健的另類服務:以新北市慈芳關懷中心的「會所模式」為例
書刊名:社區發展季刊
作者:呂又慧戴雅君
作者(外文):Lu, Yu-huiDai, Ya-jiun
出版日期:2011
卷期:136
頁次:頁308-330
主題關鍵詞:精神障礙者會所模式社會受苦社會模式社區福利服務People with mental illnessSocial modelSocial sufferingCommunity psychiatry service
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:61
  • 點閱點閱:526
現代社會的發展,其實也是許多疾病與痛苦產生的根源。科技文明的高度發展,使現代社會不斷面臨劇烈的變遷與擺盪。臺灣社會近年來,經歷了許多災難與變動,慢性精神病患(障礙者)有不斷增加的趨勢。從社會變遷的角度來看,精神障礙者的產生,已不只是一種腦科學醫療凝視之下的身心疾病,它更是某些社會群體反射精神失序的映照,與一種集體的社會受苦現象。 近幾年在臺灣開始出現的「會所模式」(clubhouse model),針對精神障礙者提供了一種新型態的福利服務。本文研究的目的在於檢視:這種另類新興服務團體,它的特色為何?與既存的社區精神復健服務模式有何不同?其意義或影響會是什麼? 研究結果發現,在慈芳會所發展出的這種服務模式,精障服務使用者與提供服務的工作者間,身分與關係已被重新定義。「會所模式」看待精障者為有貢獻潛能的人,而不只是病人。此外,在面對精障者的社會困境時,慈芳嘗試從「社會受苦」與「社會模式」的觀點切入,發展出集體敘說的策略,企圖營造精障社群之自我認同空間。 在新管理主義色彩濃厚的福利政策下,慈芳「會所模式」在進出體制之間,仍須面臨許多挑戰與課題。
The development of modern society is the origins of distress and disease. The scientific civilization causes dramatic social changes. From the perspective of social change, people with mental illness are not under medical-gaze, but the reflection of collective social suffering. Recently, clubhouse model provides a new type of service for people with mental illness. The objectives of this article are to look at what’s the ideas of clubhouse model? What’s different with the traditional community psychiatry service? And, it’s impact. The results show the relationship and role between service user and provider have been redefined in Easy House. Clubhouse model views people with mental illness in the way they are able persons, not patients. Moreover, Easy House has developed the strategy of collective narratives from the perspectives of “social suffering” and “social model”. They try to create the space to identify themselves as social community. Under the governance of New-Managerialism, Easy House has to face many challenges and hot issues since they are still of the institution .
期刊論文
1.鍾鎮城、黃湘玲(20090600)。客籍新移民女性之語言使用與自我移民認同形塑。高雄師大學報.人文與藝術類,26,49-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡友月(20070600)。遷移、挫折與現代性:蘭嶼達悟人精神失序受苦的社會根源。臺灣社會學,13,1-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡敦浩、劉育忠(20100900)。組織敘說:組織研究的敘說轉向。應用心理研究,47,21-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林昱貞(20021200)。批判教育學在臺灣:發展與困境。教育研究集刊,48(4),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.沈楚文(2011)。慈芳關懷中心國際認證的意義。臺北市康復之友協會99年年刊,17。  延伸查詢new window
6.Propst, R. N.(1997)。Stages in realizing the international diffusion of a single way of working: The cubhouse model。New Directions for Mental Health Services,74,53-66。  new window
7.Perkins, R.、Rinaldi, M.(2002)。Unemployment rates among patients with long-term mental health problems。Psychiatric Bulletin,26,295-298。  new window
8.Howard, M. L.、Heslin, M.、Leese, M.、McCrone, P.、Rice, C. Jarrett, M.(2010)。Supported employment: randomised controlled trial。The British Journal of Psychiatry,196,404-411。  new window
9.Lee, S.(1999)。Dignosis postponed: Shenjing Shuairuo and the transformation of psychiatry in post-Mao China。Medicine and Psychiatry,23,349-380。  new window
10.Kleinman, A.、Kleinman, J.(1999)。The transformations of everyday social experience: What a mental and social health perspective reveals about Chinese communitiles under global and local change。Culture, Medicine and Psychiary,23,7-24。  new window
會議論文
1.鄧志松(2000)。認同與認同衝突:一個自由主義的解決途徑。花蓮:花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂又慧、戴雅君、王增勇(2010)。精神障礙的社區福利新圖像:以精障自助社群為主的「會所模式」為例。嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
3.余郡蓉(2011)。慈芳公版之96年歷史43-46。  延伸查詢new window
4.許雅婷(2011)。演唱會回顧與意義34-36。  延伸查詢new window
5.蕭靜惠(2011)。慈芳國際認證29。  延伸查詢new window
6.謝佳蓉(2011)。走回人群的我62-64。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.慈芳(2008)。行動研究成果報告書。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.郭佩妤(2011)。實踐者主體生成與轉化:同志、會所社工與家庭關係的交織運動。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.江碧純(2006)。雇主僱用精神病患就業經驗之探索。中國醫藥大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林修雯(2009)。在會所遇見精神障礙者:一個社工的轉向。陽明大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Honey, A.(2002)。Mental illness and empolyment: personal perspectives。  new window
圖書
1.Kleinman, Arthur M. D.(1986)。Social Origins of Distress and Disease。London, UK/ New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
2.Barnes, Colin、Geof Mercer(2003)。Disability。Cambridge:Blackwell Press。  new window
3.Guba, E. G.、Lincoln, Y. S.(1984)。Naturalistic inquiry。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
4.Oliver, M.(1996)。Understanding disability: From theory to practice。Macmillan Press。  new window
5.徐美玲、胡紹嘉(2007)。醫療保健新聞報導的科學v.s科學建構。人文醫學與疾病敘事。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.鄒嘉彥、游汝傑(2008)。社會語言學教程。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.Anderson, Stephen B.(1988)。We are not alone: Fountain House and the clubhouse culture。N.Y.。  new window
8.Hernandez, A.(1997)。Pedagogy, democracy, and feminish: Rethinking the public sphere。Albany。  new window
9.Liver, M.、Barnes, C(1998)。Disability people and social policy: From exclusion to inclusion。  new window
10.Scott, L. M.(1996)。Science: miscellanea: History: Social aspects。New York。  new window
其他
1.ICCD國際準則。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kleinman, A.(1998)。Experience and its moral modes: culture, human conditions, and disorder,http://www.google.com.tw/search?hl=zh-TW&bih=5348&rlz=IR2SUNA_zh-T, 20100129。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE