本研究推論的研究路徑 (Appoach)是以黑格爾 (Hegel)、溫克爾曼 (Winckelmann)、烏福林 (Wolfflin)、法蘭柯 (Frankl)、波霍瑞斯 (Porphyrios)、塔夫里 (Tafuri)的建築史研究脈絡；由「視覺分析」走向「精神分析」、「意義分析」再走向「建築評論」的建築史詮釋模型。建築史的詮釋模型：以建築評論為出發點，將建築史知識的建構從抽象化，進而轉變為具體化、精緻化的建築史詮釋模型。透過此模型的理論分析讓建築史論述與建築書寫能與建築實踐進行對話。建築史詮釋模型分為四個層面：1. 風格層面包括：營建系統向度、形制轉變向度、藝術美學向度。2. 空間層面：空間使用向度、空間形式向度。3. 意義層面：時代精神向度、象徵意涵向度。4. 建築評論層面：論述實踐、建築中權力運作。透過建築史詮釋模型的理論，建築式樣的辨別和分析可透過此模型精進建築史知識。

The approach of this study focuses on architecture history of spiritual and historical view of Hegel, Winckelmann, Wolfflin, Paul Frankl, Porphyrios and Tafuri. To inherit the architecture history of Hegel, Wolfflin and Paul Frank goes“vision” toward“spirit”“architecture essence”and then“architecture criticism”to make clear model of architecture. The explanatory model on architecture history starts from architecture essences. Make from abstract from structure of architecture knowledge to concrete and delicate. In addition the inspectable tool models include four aspects of architecture essences: 1.Style aspect: constructer system, form transfer and esthetics. 2.Space aspect: space usage and space form. 3.Meaning aspect: Zeitgeist, symbol meaning. 4.Architecture Criticism. Through hypothesis of explanatory model on architecture histories distinguish architecture form and interpret model. Moreover, it will be power to explain how to form architecture history knowledge. That way the development of architecture form will be more objective and reliable.