臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：科學新聞資訊呈現形式及其對閱聽眾資訊接收的影響--以科學知識觀點與認知基模理論來探討
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：張卿卿 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chang, Ching-ching
出版日期：2012
卷期：20:3
頁次：頁193-216
主題關鍵詞：科學新聞；科學傳播；媒介影響；新聞報導；Science news；Science communication；Media effects；News reporting
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:71
  • 點閱點閱:54
本文探討科學新聞資訊呈現形式及其對閱聽眾1新聞接收的影響。主要有兩個研究目的：第一、從知識相關理論為基礎，描繪出科學知識的類型與特質，並援引基模相關理論，彙整可能幫助閱聽眾接收科學新聞的訊息呈現方式，並探究其普遍性。第二，從認知心理角度探討前述不同訊息呈現方式對新聞接收可能產生的影響。針對第一個研究目的，本研究以內容分析方式，探究四大報在報導科學新聞時，各類訊息呈現方式的普遍性，包括：「知識概念是否有解釋」、「知識概念的雙語化呈現」、「流程圖的應用」與「多元意見的提供」，結果顯示大部分的研究有解釋其知識概念(82.87%)，但僅有少部分研究以雙語方式呈現核心概念(24.19%)，使用流程圖(4.90%)或提供多元意見(39.83%)。針對第二個研究目的，本研究以實驗方式探討這些訊息呈現方式可能產生的影響，從三大影響面向來探討：「新聞注意度」、「新聞理解度」與「議題相關性」。實驗結果顯示，在「新聞注意度」部分，提供流程圖產生顯著正向效果；在「新聞理解度」部分，有解釋核心概念和提供中英對照名詞顯著的降低理解困難度。在「議題相關性」部分，解釋核心概念有顯著提升相關性感知。研究結果對於新聞記者如何呈現科學新聞可以提供實務上的價值。
This paper had two objectives. The first objective was to explore the potential problems associated with science reporting by asking the following questions: whether the news provided concept explanations, whether the news included English terms for the concepts, whether the news provided procedural graphs and whether the news offered multiple perspectives. The second objective was to examine that when news stories differed in terms of these information features, how readers’ understanding of the story and perceptions of the issues varied. To achieve the first objective, we conducted two content analyses, which found that even though most news provided concept explanations (82.87%), only a small percentage of news stories included English terms of the featured issue or concept (24.19%), provided procedural graphs (4.90%) and offered multiple perspectives (39.83%). For the second objective, we conducted an experiment to test the influences of these news features on news attentions, news comprehension and perceived issues relevance. The findings suggested that in terms of news attentions, the presence of procedural graphs was a positive and significant predictor; in terms of news comprehension, the presence of concept explanations and English terms were positive predictors; and with respect to issues relevance, the presence of concept explanations was a positive predictor. Findings reported herein may have practical values for journalists in their science news reporting.
期刊論文
1.Pellechia, M. G.(1997)。Trends in Science Coverage: A Content Analysis of Three US Newspapers。Public Understanding of Science，6(1)，49-68。  new window
2.Scheufele, Dietram A.(1999)。Framing as A Theory of Media Effects。Journal of Communication，49(1)，101-122。  new window
3.Alba, J. W.、Hasher, L.(1983)。Is memory schematic?。Psychological Bulletin，93(2)，203-231。  new window
4.馮建三(19950100)。科技新聞是意識形態嗎？--探討科技記者與科技專家的關係兼論另類科技新聞的可能空間。新聞學研究，50，41-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.謝瀛春(19920900)。全國科技會議新聞之分析。新聞學研究，46，131-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20080800)。「科學家發明了什麼？！」--解析學生對於科學新聞中的科技產物意象。科學教育學刊，16(4)，415-438。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Southwell, B. G.、Torres, A.(2006)。Connecting interpersonal and mass communication: Science news exposure, perceived ability to understand science, and conversation。Communication Monographs，73(3)，334-350。  new window
8.Star, Susan Leigh(1983)。Simplification in Scientific Work: An Example from Neuroscience Research。Social Studies of Science，13(2)，205-228。  new window
9.鄭宇君(20030100)。從社會脈絡解析科學新聞的產製--以基因新聞為例。新聞學研究，74，121-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Rittle-Johnson, B.、Alibali, M. W.(1999)。Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other?。Journal of Educational Psychology，91(1)，175-189。  new window
11.Mclnerney, Claire、Nucci, Mary、Bird, Nora(2004)。The Flow of Scientific Knowledge from Lab to the Lay Public。Science Communication，26(1)，44-74。  new window
12.Nisbet, M. C.、Lewenstein, B. V.(2002)。Biotechnology and the American media: A policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999。Science Communication，23(4)，359-391。  new window
13.Besley, J. C.、Shanahan, J.(2005)。Media attention and exposure in relation to support for agricultural biotechnology。Science Communication，26(4)，347-367。  new window
14.Weigold, M. F.(2001)。Communicating science: A review of the literature。Science Communication，23(2)，164-193。  new window
15.Kahlor, L.、Rosenthal, S.(2009)。If we seek, do we learn? Predicting knowledge of global warming。Science Communication，30(3)，380-414。  new window
16.徐美苓、丁志音(20040400)。小病微恙的真實再現--以「感冒」的新聞論述為例。新聞學研究，79，197-242。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.徐美苓、黃淑貞(19980100)。愛滋病新聞報導內容之分析。新聞學研究，56，237-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Freimuth, V. S.、Greenberg, R. H.、DeWitt, J.、Romano, R. M.(1984)。Covering cancer: Newspapers and the public interest。Journal of Communication，34(1)，62-73。  new window
19.黃俊儒(20080200)。構思科技社會中的即時學習：以學生及專家對於科學新聞文本之理解差異為例。科學教育學刊，16(1)，105-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.陳綱佩、張寶芳、洪瑞雲(20070600)。科學報導的閱讀理解與隱喻的角色。中華傳播學刊，11，71-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Adaval, R.、Wyer, R. S., Jr.(1998)。The role of narratives in consumer information processing。Journal of Consumer Psychology，7(3)，207-245。  new window
22.Hinnant, A.、Len-Rios, M. E.(2009)。Tacit understandings of health literacy: Interview and survey research with health journalists。Science Communication，31(1)，84-115。  new window
23.Brossard, D.、Shanahan, J.(2003)。Do citizens want to have their say? Media, agricultural biotechnology, and authoritarian views of democratic processes in science。Mass Communication and Society，6(3)，291-312。  new window
24.Chang, C.(2009)。Repetition variation strategies for narrative advertising。The Journal of Advertising，38(3)，51-65。  new window
25.Chew, F.、Mandelbaum-Schmid, J.、Gao, S. K.(2006)。Can health journalists bridge the state-of-the-science gap in mammography guidelines?。Science Communication，27(3)，331-351。  new window
26.de Jong, T.、Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M.(1996)。Types and qualities of knowledge。Educational Psychologist，31(2)，105-113。  new window
27.Dillard, J. P.、Weber, K. M.、Vail, R. G.(2007)。The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: A meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research。Journal of Communication，57(4)，613-631。  new window
28.Elliott, W. R.、Rosenberg, W. L.(1987)。Media exposure and beliefs about science and technology。Communication Research，14(2)，164-188。  new window
29.Gerbner, G.、Gross, L.、Morgan, M.、Signorielli, N.(1981)。Scientist on the TV screen。Culture and Society，18(4)，41-44。  new window
30.Wihelmsson, N.、Dahlgren, L. O.、Hult, H.、Josepheson, A.(2011)。On the anatomy of understanding。Studies in Higher Education，36(2)，153-165。  new window
31.Griffin, R. J.、Dunwoody, S.、Neuwirth, K.(1999)。Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors。Environmental Research，80(2)，S230-S245。  new window
32.Griffin, R. J.、Neuwirth, K.、Dunwoody, S.、Giese, J.(2004)。Information sufficiency and risk communication。Media Psychology，6(1)，23-61。  new window
33.Hampel, J. S.(2003)。Conflicts of interest and hyperbole: Nutrition in the media。Journalism & Mass Communication Educator，58(4)，364-372。  new window
34.Kahlor, L.、Dunwoody, S.、Griffin, R. J.、Neuwirth, K.(2006)。Seeking and processing information about impersonal risk。Science Communication，28(2)，163-194。  new window
35.Brossard, D.、Nisbet, M. C.(2007)。Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding U.S. opinion on agricultural biotechnology。International Journal of Public Opinion Research，19(1)，24-52。  new window
36.Hwang, Y.、Southwell, B. G.(2009)。Science TV news exposure predicts science beliefs: Real world effects among a national sample36(5)，724-742。  new window
37.McCromick, R.(1997)。Conceptual and procedural knowledge。International Journal of Technology and Design Education，7(1/2)，141-159。  new window
38.Price, J. P.、Desmond, S.、Kukulka, G.(1985)。High school students' perceptions and misperceptions of AIDS。Journal of School Health，55(3)，107-109。  new window
39.Siegler, R. S.(1989)。How domain-general and domain-specific knowledge interact to produce strategy choices。Merrill-Paimer Quarterly，35(1)，1-26。  new window
40.Singer, E.(1990)。A question of accuracy: How journalists and scientists report research on hazards。Journal of Communication，40(4)，102-116。  new window
41.Verhoeven, P.(2010)。Sound-bite science: On the brevity of science and scientific experts in Western European television news。Science Communication，32(3)，330-355。  new window
42.Laugksch, R. C.、Spargo, P. E.(1996)。Construction of a paper-and-pencil Test of Basic Scientific Literacy based on selected literacy goals recommended by the American Association for the Advancement of Science。Public Understanding of Science，5(4)，331-359。  new window
43.León, B.(2008)。Science related information in European television: A study of prime-time news。Public Understanding of Science，17(4)，443-460。  new window
44.MacDonald, S. P.(2005)。The language of journalism in treatments of hormone replacement news。Written Communication，22(3)，275-297。  new window
45.Mares, M.-L.、Cantor, J.、Steinbach, J. B.(1999)。Using television to foster children's interest in science。Science Communication，20(3)，283-297。  new window
圖書
1.LaFollette, Marcel C.(1990)。Making science our own: Public images of science, 1910-1955。University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Wyer, R. S., Jr.、Srull, T. K.(1989)。Memory and cognition in its social context。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Nelkin, Dorothy(1995)。Selling science: How the press covers science and technology。W. H. Freeman and Company。  new window
4.Gregory, Jane、Miller, Steve(1998)。Science In Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility。Basic Books。  new window
5.Holsti, Ole R.(1969)。Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities。Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.。  new window
6.Anderson, J. R.(1990)。Cognitive psychology and its implications。New York：Freeman and Company。  new window
7.Novak, Joseph D.、Gowin, D. Bob(1984)。Learning How to Learn。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.王石番(1991)。傳播內容分析法--理論與實踐。台北：幼獅文化。  延伸查詢new window
9.Friedman, S. M.、Dunwoody, S.、Rogers, C. L.(1986)。Scientist and journalists: Reporting science as news。New York。  new window
10.Popper, K. R.(1961)。The logic of scientific discovery。New York：Basic Books。  new window
11.Priest, S. H.(2001)。A grain of truth: The media, the pubic, and biotechnology。Lanham, MD。  new window
12.National Cancer Institute(1994)。Clear & simple: Developing effective print materials for low-literate readers。Bethesda, MD。  new window
13.Higgins, E. T.(1989)。Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources。Unintended thought。New York。  new window
14.Zehr, S. C.(1999)。Scientists' representations of uncertainty。Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
15.Rogers, C. L.(1999)。The importance of understanding audiences。Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
圖書論文
1.Taylor, S. E.、Crocker, J. L.(1981)。Schematic Bases of Social Information Processing。Social Cognition: The Qntario Symposium。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawerence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Millar, R.(1997)。Science education for democracy: What can the school curriculum achieve?。Science today: Problem or crisis?。London：Routledge。  new window
3.Petty, R. E.、Cacioppo, J. T.(1983)。Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: Application to Advertising。Advertising and Consumer Psychology。Lexington：Lexington Books。  new window
4.Markus, Hazel R.、Zajonc, Robert B.(1985)。The cognitive perspective in social psychology。Handbook of social psychology。New York, NY：Random House。  new window
5.Hiebert, J.、Lefevre, P.(1986)。Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis。Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：926（臺灣：922，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67415424
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上