:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社會運動如何改變制度:抗爭事件對立法過程之影響
書刊名:臺灣人權學刊
作者:陳中寧
作者(外文):Chen, Chung-ning
出版日期:2013
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁203-220
主題關鍵詞:抗爭事件社會運動立法過程Protest eventsSocial movementsLegislative process
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:217
  • 點閱點閱:12
有些時候社會運動會循制度而行,有些時候則會透過集體行動挑戰體制。本研究將社會運動所採取的集體行動稱之為「抗爭事件」。透過抗爭事件,被排外者可由外而內地促成制度改變。 本研究的問題在於抗爭事件如何且在那些條件上,能夠造成改變。這邊指的條件分為四個層面:內部因素、外部因素、媒介效果與政治時機當透過抗爭事件能夠有效增進被排外者的權益,那抗爭應該被視為一種理性行為。同時,若抗爭能夠令制度改善,也該被看作是民主社會中一種必要的參與途徑。
Social movements either function within the institutional framework or they challenge the political system by collective actions. In this research, the collective actions in social movements are called "protest events". By protest events, the groups excluded from the political process aim at institutional changes from without. The question of this research is how and with what conditions the protest events could make changes. The conditions have four dimensions: internal factor, external factor, media effect and the strategic timing. When the rights of the excluded groups were improved with the protest events, the protest should be seen as a rational behavior. Besides, when protests lead to making the institutions better, it should be seen as necessary participation in the democratic system.
期刊論文
1.Birkland, Thomas A.(1998)。Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting。Journal of Public Policy,18(1),53-74。  new window
2.盛杏湲(20120300)。媒體報導對企業型政治立法成敗的影響。東吳政治學報,30(1),1-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.辛翠玲(2010)。三種跨國公民政治模式之比較。中國政治學會年會暨「能知的公民?民主的理想與實際」研討會,中國政治學會 。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Giugni, Marco、Passy, Florence(1998)。Social Movements and Policy Change: Direct, Mediated, or Joint Effect?。  new window
學位論文
1.Anderson, Fernandez Cora(2012)。The Impact of Social Movements on State Policy: Human rights and Women Movements in Argentina, Chile and Uruguay(博士論文)。University of Notre Dame。  new window
2.沈有忠(2001)。臺灣統治聯盟之轉型--從黨國威權體制到三角聯盟(碩士論文)。東吳大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Risse, Thomas、Ropp, Stephen C.、Sikkink, Kathryn(1999)。The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Weldon, Laurel(2011)。When Protest Makes Policy: How Social Movements Represent Disadvantaged Groups。University of Michigan Press。  new window
3.Birkland, Thomas A.(1997)。After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy and Focusing Events。Washington, D.C.:Georgetown University Press。  new window
4.Kingdon, John W.(1997)。Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies。Harper Collins Publishers。  new window
5.McAdam, Doug(1999)。Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970。Chicago:University Of Chicago Press。  new window
6.Schwartz, Michael(1988)。Radical Protest and Social Structure: The Southern Farmers' Alliance and Cotton Tenancy, 1880-1890。University Of Chicago Press。  new window
7.陳柔縉(1999)。總統的親戚:臺灣權貴家族。臺北市:時報文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Keck, Margaret E.、Sikkink, Kathryn(1998)。Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics。Cornell University Press。  new window
9.陳東升(19950000)。金權城市:地方派系、財團與臺北都會發展的社會學分析。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.台灣農村陣線(2013)。農村陣線大事記,http://www.taiwanruralfront.org/node/236。  延伸查詢new window
2.林河名(20061206)。明天決戰 黨產條例 橘拒逕付二讀。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Giugni, Marco G.(1998)。Introduction: Social Movements and Change: Incorporation, Transformation, and Democratization。From Contention to Democracy。Maryland:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc。  new window
2.Giugni, Marco G.(1999)。Introduction: How Social Movements Matter Post Research, Present, Future Developments。How Social Movements Matter。Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
3.黃秀端、陳中寧(2011)。法案的類型與國會之審議。民主、國會與決策學術研討會論文集。台北:東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳中寧(2010)。從集遊法審議過程看立法委員立場之差異。2010年「轉變中的行政與立法關係」學術研討會論文集。台北:東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.Burstein, Paul(1999)。Social Movements and Public Policy。How Social Movements Matter。Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE