:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大陸電視新聞收視率研究:以城市電視臺為例
書刊名:傳播與社會學刊
作者:林照真 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Chao Chen
出版日期:2015
卷期:32
頁次:頁135-165
主題關鍵詞:中國收視率電視臺商品新聞ChinaCommodityNewsRatingsTelevision
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:48
以「黨的喉舌」為主的「時政新聞」、以及與民眾生活有關的「民生新聞」,為中國城市新聞台的兩大主軸,都以收視率為成效檢驗標準。收視率在中國大陸產製電視內容時扮演的角色,則是本研究的重點。本研究採取參與觀察法與深度訪談法,以大陸某城市台的時政新聞節目與民生新聞節目各一為研究對象,並以一個禮拜的時間在電視新聞台內部進行民族誌的觀察與訪談。本研究發現,收視率為商業電視的衡量機制,已成為大陸各類新聞製作的重要指標,並且是衡量記者表現的標準;獲得收視率的社會新聞,並無法獲得第一線新聞工作者的認同。民生新聞因為積極追求收視率,竟能出現少數超出電視新聞報導限制的內容。
In Mainland China, news items regarding political parties and related to people’s lives are among the major contents of city–based television channels. Both of these kinds of television news programs are evaluated by ratings. This research tries to examine the role of ratings in the production of television news coverage in China. A political news program and a people’s daily lives news program were chosen as research objects from a certain city television news channel in China. Based on the participants’ observations and in-depth interviews, this paper argues that ratings are an indicator of commercial television but also a crucial one for China’s television industry regarding news production. Ratings are also criteria about the performances of journalists. Furthermore, sensational news can achieve ratings, but cannot result in the acceptance of news reporters. However, if presented with fewer restrictions, news related to people’s daily lives may allow for reports beyond the current limitations and expand the ratings for city-based television news in China.
期刊論文
1.Little, M.(2012)。Finding the wisdom in the crowd: Storyful helps news organizations verify social media。Nieman Reports,66(2),14-17。  new window
2.McNair, B.(2000)。Journalism and Democracy: A Millennial Audit。Journalism Studies,1(2),197-211。  new window
3.李玉琢(2010)。媒體角色的轉變與公共新聞的發展趨勢。新聞天地,2010(11),99-100。  延伸查詢new window
4.李明、劉明(2011)。大型策劃活動對提升民生新聞節目品牌的效應。當代電視,2011(6),73-75。  延伸查詢new window
5.朱菁、江黎黎(2005)。從「民生新聞」到「公共新聞」--電視民生新聞的可持續發展探討。新聞實踐,2005(2),52-53。  延伸查詢new window
6.武俊(2006)。公共新聞是民生新聞的突圍之道嗎?。青年記者,2006(6),46-47。  延伸查詢new window
7.何菊仙(2013)。收視率評價的路徑矯正及動力機制建構。中國廣播電視學刊,2013(5),14-16。  延伸查詢new window
8.李德剛、李嶺濤(2009)。理論創新與實踐價值:互聯網時代電視評價體系的建構。現代傳播,2009(5),6-9。  延伸查詢new window
9.洪皓軼(2013)。電視劇收視率預估的市場化操作模式構建探析。電視研究,2013(2),71-73。  延伸查詢new window
10.姚廣林(2009)。收視率新批判。現代傳播,2009(1),99-101。  延伸查詢new window
11.郭蓓(2013)。媒體責任與收視率博弈下民生新聞出鏡記者的角色定位。經營者管理,2013(10),349。  延伸查詢new window
12.張林江(2010)。把握正確輿論導向堅持新聞立台、精品立台。當代電視,2010(9),59-61。  延伸查詢new window
13.連娜、谷征(2013)。資本VS技術:新媒體語境下的收視率調查業。新聞界,2013(24),50-53。  延伸查詢new window
14.侯迎忠(2006)。電視民生新聞研究綜述。現代傳播,2006(5),59-62。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃季寬、邱國強、陳虹謹(2011)。動車事故敲醒大陸高鐵優越夢。全球中央,2011(32),26-27。  延伸查詢new window
16.馮小艷(2011)。淺談民生新聞如何走創新之路。當代電視,2011(5),87-88。  延伸查詢new window
17.陳晶晶(2011)。「記錄」有價值的民生片斷。綜藝報,2011(5),321-322。  延伸查詢new window
18.燕道成(2010)。中外傳媒責任倫理研究綜述。當代傳播,2010(2),34-37。  延伸查詢new window
19.鄭保衛、樊亞平(2008)。我國公共新聞研究的回顧與前瞻。新聞記者,2008(8),39-42。  延伸查詢new window
20.劉德寰、左燦(2009)。收視率調查狀況與中國收視率發展模式的探討--兼談資料壟斷。媒體與廣告,2009(4),66-71。  延伸查詢new window
21.劉燕南(2012)。再談收視率造假: 緣起、技術與監管。現代傳播,2012(10),1-6。  延伸查詢new window
22.劉燕南(2011)。電視節目評估體系解析--模式、動向與思考。現代傳播,2011(1),45-54。  延伸查詢new window
23.Smythe, D. W.(1978)。Rejoinder to Graham Murdock。Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory,2(2),120-127。  new window
24.McManus, J. H.(1992)。What kind of commodity is news?。Communication Research,19(6),787-805。  new window
25.Briller, B.(1988)。The peoplemeter: Who, what, when and why。Television Quarterly,13(3),77-86。  new window
26.Smythe, D. W.(1977)。Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism。Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory,1(3),1-27。  new window
會議論文
1.童靜蓉(2011)。微博傳播和中國新聞業的「認知權威」:以溫州動車事故為例。傳播與社會學刊5週年國際學術會議。香港。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gans, Herbert J.(2004)。Deciding What's News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time。Evanston, Illinois:Northwestern University Press。  new window
2.林思平(2008)。通俗新聞:文化研究的觀點。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Larson, E.(1992)。The naked consumer: How our private lives become public commodities。New York:Henry Holt and Company。  new window
4.王業蘭、呂值友(2009)。中國城市電視台可持續發展路徑。北京:中國傳媒大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.林照真(2009)。收視率新聞學:電視新聞商品化。台北:聯經出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張海潮(2004)。眼球為主:中國電視的數字化、產業化生存。北京:華夏。  延伸查詢new window
7.布赫迪厄、林志明(2006)。布赫迪厄論電視。台北:麥田出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.林富美(2006)。台灣新聞工作者與藝人:解析市場經濟下的文化勞動。台北市:秀威資訊。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Rosentiel, T.、Just, M.、Perilla, A.、Dean, W.、Chinni, D.(2007)。We interrupt this newscast: How to improve local news and win ratings, too。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Page, R. E.(2012)。Stories and social media: Identities and interaction。New York, NY:London:Routledge。  new window
11.Meehan, E. R.(2005)。Why TV is not our fault: Television programming, viewers,and who' s really in control。London。  new window
12.Lipschultz, J. H.、Hilt, M. L.(2002)。Crime and local television news: Dramatic,breaking, and live from the scene。Mahwah:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
13.Goedkoop, R. J.(1988)。Inside local television news。Salem:Sheffield Publishing Company。  new window
14.Croteau, D.(2006)。The business of media: Corporate media andthe public interest。Thousand Oaks, CA:Pine Forge press。  new window
15.劉旭鋒(2006)。收視率葵花寶典。臺北縣:INK印刻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.劉旭鋒(2006)。收視率萬歲!誰在看電視?。臺北:INK印刻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.Goald, R. S.(1994)。Behind the scenes at the local news。Boston:Focal Press。  new window
18.Gitlin, T.(2000)。Inside prime time: With a new introduction。Berkeley, California:University of California Press。  new window
19.McChesney, Robert W.(1999)。Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times。Urbana-Champaign, IL:University of Illinois Press。  new window
20.Hoynes, William(1994)。Public Television for Sale: Media, the Market, and the Public Sphere。Westview Press。  new window
21.McManus, John H.(1994)。Market-driven Journalism: Let the citizen beware?。Sage。  new window
其他
1.人民網(2006)。胡錦濤同志關於新聞、宣傳工作的論述和新思維,http://media.people.com.cn/GB/40606/4633009.html, 2014/04/15。  延伸查詢new window
2.東方今報(2013)。崔永元談媒體責任:收視率是萬惡之源,http://big5.chinanews.com:89/yl/2013/12-23/5653281.shtml, 2014/04/12。  延伸查詢new window
3.曹玲娟,劉陽(2010)。收視率造假:缺乏懲戒降低造假風險誰偷走了樣本戶,http://culture.people.com.cn/BIG5/87423/12061391.html, 2014/04/10。  延伸查詢new window
4.(20110710)。評價體系試運行。  延伸查詢new window
5.黎魚魚(2012)。誰能夠證明收視率「真的有原罪」?,http://beijingww.qianlong.com/1470/2012/08/06/290@164074.htm, 2014/04/07。  延伸查詢new window
6.懷安數字圖書館(2004)。關於廣播電視宣傳貫徹落實「三貼近」的安排意見(2003年6月18日國家廣播電影電視總局發佈),http://hasztsg.com/auto/db/detail.aspx?db=10101&rid=120882&agfi=0&cls=0&uni=True&cid=0&md=38&pd=6&mdd=38&pdd=6&reds=%D0%C2%CE%C5%CF%DF%CB%F7, 2014/04/15。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉燕南(2011)。解讀央視新評價體系新形勢下的中國電視傳播效果評估,http://www.zcom.com/article/39164/, 2014/04/14。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Harris, J.(2000)。What is missing from your news?。The businessof journalism: The leading reporters and editors on the perils and pitfalls of thepress。New York:The New Press。  new window
2.Dean. W. C.(2007)。The meter monster。We interrupt this newscast: How to improve local news and win ratings, too。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE