:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:審美之維:王靜芝先生《詩經通釋》「比興說」衍義
書刊名:輔仁國文學報
作者:廖棟樑 引用關係
作者(外文):Liao, Tong-liung
出版日期:2017
卷期:44
頁次:頁67-120
主題關鍵詞:詩經王靜芝比興類似之聯想接近之聯想ShijingWang JingzhiBi-XingThe association based on likenessThe association based on approach
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:138
  • 點閱點閱:90
關於《詩經》,「詩言志」、「比興」、「溫柔敦厚」的「詩教」批評意念等,被朱自清稱為我國古代詩歌理論的三個「基本的觀念」,「後世論詩,都以這三者為金科玉律。」其中「比興說」,雖被稱為「詩學之正源,法度之準則」,卻又最難分解清楚。對於「比興」此一歷史的意義的釐訂與澄清的工作,朱自清在其《詩言志辨》言之甚明,不擬多贅。靜芝先生對「比興」的區分雖亦自傳統的觀念中延伸出來,但為了嚴格地劃分它們語意上的界域,有時便不能不走出傳統的觀念之外,而注入了新的內涵。靜芝先生說:「比是以彼事物比作此事物,為類似之聯想。而興則以彼事物,由聯想而引起此一事物,為接近之聯想,非直接作比。興是先以興起之詞,引起敘事之詞。亦可謂先以一相關引起之語,引起賦體之鋪敘,二者合併則為興。比體則純是比,而不與賦體合併而成也。」定義「簡明扼要」,但其語言美學的內涵卻勝義迭出。本文謹以「比興說」為議題,據《詩經通釋》的說法為主,佐之以《經學通論》、〈詩比興釋例〉等專章、論文的分類釋例,探討王靜芝先生的觀點,揭明源頭、機制及特色,並徵引當代隱喻理論加以衍義,以明其學術深度與意義。
The critical theories concerning poetry instruction about Shijing, Poems to Express Ideal, Bi-Xing, as well as Gentleness and Kindness, were called the three Basic Concepts in the traditional Chinese poetry theory, in The Analyze of Poem Express Ideal by Zhu Ziqing. "Later generations' poetry Critics are based on the three basic concepts," said by Zhu. Among the three, the theory of Bi-Xing is the most difficult to explain clearly, although it has been called the Origin of Traditional Chinese Poetic, and the Code of Poetic Norms. Theories about Bi-Xing in history have been clarified by Zhu Ziqing in The Analyze of Poem Express Ideal. Wang Jingzhi distinguished Bi from Xing based on the traditional concepts as well; however, he sometimes stepped out of the traditional theories and gave Bi and Xing new connotations to strictly divide their semantic boundaries. Wang Jingzhi defined, "Bi is to compare one thing to another, which is the association based on likeness. On the contrary, Xing is linking one thing to another through association, which is the association based on approach, instead of comparison. Xing is giving rise to the described ones by the Xing words, which uses correlatives leading to narrate described ones in detail. The combine of the described ones and the Xing words is Xing. On the other hand, Bi is independent, which does not depend on the combination with the described ones." Wang Jingzhi's definitions of Bi and Xing are concise and to the point. However, there are rich aesthetic connotations in his definitions. This paper will discuss Wang Jingzhi's theory of Bi-Xing, based on his Full Explanation of Shijing, followed by examples in his General Theory of Confucian Classics and Examples for Bi-Xing of Shijing. The sources, mechanisms and characteristics of Wang's theory will be revealed, and the present-day metaphor theory will be quoted to elucidate the academic depth and significance of Wang's theory of Bi-Xing.
期刊論文
1.王靜芝(19790500)。詩經的來源與價值。光復大陸,149,2-4。  延伸查詢new window
2.李湘(1983)。「興」法分類考。中州學刊,1983(5)。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱全國(2009)。隱喻與相似性。文學評論叢刊,11(1)。  延伸查詢new window
4.周英雄、尚定、維成(1995)。作為組合模式的「興」的語言和修辭結構。古代文學理論研究,17,271-292。  延伸查詢new window
5.張宏梁(1987)。文學創作聯想的結構發生研究--文學創作主體研究之一。學術月刊,1987(3)。  延伸查詢new window
6.夏傳才(2006)。台港的《詩經》研究--《20世紀詩經學》之十。西華師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版),2006(2)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.趙沛霖(2006)。現代學術文化思潮與詩經研究--二十世紀詩經研究史。北京:學苑出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Eliot, T. S.、王恩衷(1989)。艾略特詩學文集。北京:國際文化出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱熹、黎靖德(1983)。朱子語類。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.繆靈珠、章安祺(1998)。繆靈珠美學譯文集。北京:中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.裴普賢(1977)。詩經研讀指導。臺北:東大圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.朱熹(1983)。詩經集傳。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉勰、范文瀾、黃叔琳(1980)。文心雕龍注。臺北:學海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.余冠英(1990)。詩經選。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.王靜芝(2003)。王靜芝學術論文集。臺北:輔仁大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.朱自清、鄔國平(2008)。詩言志辨。南京:鳳凰出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.王夢鷗(20090000)。中國文學理論與實踐。臺北:里仁。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.童慶炳(1992)。中國古代心理詩學與美學。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.Heidegger, Martin、孫周興(2004)。林中路。上海:上海譯文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.朱熹(2002)。詩集傳。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.何晏、邢昺(1985)。論語注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
16.鄭玄、孔穎達(1985)。毛詩正義。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
17.鄭玄、賈公彥(1985)。周禮注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
18.王靜芝(1972)。經學通論。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
19.楊載(1981)。詩法家數.詩學正源。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.柯慶明(20050000)。現代中國文學批評述論。臺北:大安出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.周憲(2014)。文學理論導引。北京:高等教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.常森(2012)。屈原及其詩歌研究。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.趙沛霖(1987)。興的源起。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.黃侃(2014)。文心雕龍札記。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
25.米歇爾.福柯、莫偉民(2001)。詞與物。上海:上海三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
26.鄭郁卿(1976)。詩集傳之賦比興研究。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.霍克斯.特倫斯、瞿鐵鵬(1995)。結構主義與符號學。上海:上海譯文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
28.周英雄(1983)。結構主義與中國文學。台北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
29.姚一葦(1989)。欣賞與批評。台北:聯經文化出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
30.屈萬里(1983)。詩經詮釋。聯經出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
31.張啟成(2003)。詩經研究史論稿。貴陽:貴州人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
32.顧領剛(1982)。古史辨。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
33.王靜芝(1968)。詩經通釋。輔仁大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.王運熙(2006)。中國古代文論中的比興說。中國古代文論管窺。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.王靜芝(1978)。詩經的創作方法和形式。文學論集。華岡。  延伸查詢new window
3.葉嘉瑩(1985)。中國古典詩歌中形象與情意之關係例說--從形象與情意之關係看「賦、比、興」之說。迦陵談詩二集。臺北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.羅曼.雅各布森、滕守堯(2004)。語言學與詩學。符號學文學論文集。天津:百花文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.艾亨鮑姆(1989)。「形式主義」方法。俄蘇形式主義文論選。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.馬爾庫塞、李小兵(1989)。審美之維--對馬克思主義美學地批判性考察。審美之維--馬爾庫塞美學論著集。北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE