脈絡因素、學業自我概念、與學習投入對學業表現的影響：臺灣國小三年級經濟弱勢與一般學生之比較_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	脈絡因素、學業自我概念、與學習投入對學業表現的影響：臺灣國小三年級經濟弱勢與一般學生之比較
書刊名：	當代教育研究季刊
作者：	陳慧蓉／張郁雯／薛承泰
作者(外文)：	Chen, Karen Hui-jung／Chang, Yuwen／Hsueh, Cherng-tay
出版日期：	2018
卷期：	26:2
頁次：	頁73-107
主題關鍵詞：	經濟弱勢學生；脈絡因素；學業自我概念；學習投入；學校關係；學習投入的動機歷程理論；Economically disadvantaged students；Social context；Academic self-concept；Learning engagement；School relationship；Motivational model of engagement
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:7 共同引用:15 點閱:3

研究目的：面對經濟弱勢學生的學業成就低落問題，必須釐清影響因素，才有改善的可能。本研究以｢動機發展的自我系統模式｣（the Self system Model of Motivational Development, SSMMD）為理論基礎，加入家庭教育資源以及家長的學習參與兩個重要的脈絡因素，提出「學習投入的動機歷程理論」（Motivational Model of Engagement ,MME），探討該理論在一般學生與經濟弱勢學生的適用性，透過對照比較以突顯經濟弱勢學生學習表現之影響因素。研究設計／方法／取徑：本研究採用問卷調查法，並透過分層等機率二階段抽樣法抽出國小三年級學生1,097 人，含一般學生942 人、經濟弱勢學生155 人，以AMOS 軟體進行結構方程模式（Structural Equation Model, SEM）資料分析，判別兩群學生模式的結構係數之異同性。研究發現或結論：本研究之主要研究發現，兩群學生模式的差異性為：經濟弱勢學生的學習投入對於學業表現之影響顯著高於一般學生。共同性則包括：(1) 學校關係、家長的學習參與、及家庭教育資源可以預期學業自我概念；(2) 學校關係及家庭關係對學習投入有顯著影響；(3) 學業自我概念對學習投入有顯著影響；(4) 學校關係與家庭關係有顯著的相關性；(5) 學業自我概念及學習投入為脈絡因素影響學業表現的中介因素；(6) 學業自我概念會透過學習投入影響學業表現。對經濟弱勢學生而言，脈絡因素的變項中以學校關係對於中介變項（學業自我概念及學習投入）之關係的結構係數最大，因此建議從早期加強經濟弱勢學生的學校關係以增進其學業自我概念及學習投入。研究原創性／價值：本研究的獨特性是以SSMMD 理論為基礎，在脈絡因素除了學生的社會關係之外，加入了家庭教育資源及家長的學習參與，提出學習投入的動機歷程理論。此模式可以系統性地探討一般學生與經濟弱勢學生的學業表現影響因素，進而找出影響弱勢學生學習表現的獨特因素。本研究的研究結果可作為教育實踐及政策制定中，經濟弱勢學生的社會資源投入之參考。

以文找文

Purpose: To close the achievement gap between economically disadvantaged and general students, factors affecting academic performance should be identified. Referring to the Self-System Model of Motivational Development (SSMMD), this study proposed a model called ＂Motivational Model of Engagement (MME)＂ by adding two social context variables: home educational resources and parental involvement. The study investigated the empirical applicability of the model and identified the factors contributing to the achievement gap between economically disadvantaged students and others. Design/methodology/approach: A survey was conducted with a two-stage cluster sampling using probability proportional to size for the school selection. There were 1,097 students with 942 general students and 155 economically disadvantaged students. Structural equation model (SEM) analyses using AMOS software were performed to compare the structural coefficients for the two groups. Findings: Results of the comparison revealed that the predictive power of learning engagement on academic achievement was higher for the economically disadvantaged students. These students are similar to the general students in the following aspects: (1) school relationships, parent involvement in learning, and home education resources have significant effects on the academic self-concept, (2) positive school relationship or family relationship led to greater learning engagement, (3) academic self-concept significantly predicts learning engagement, (4) a covariant relationship exists between school relationship and family relationship, (5) academic self-concept and learning engagement positively mediated the relationship between social context and academic achievement, (6) self-concept affects academic performance through learning engagement. It is noticed that, for the economically disadvantaged students, the structural coefficients of the relationship between school relationship and the mediators (academic self-concepts and learning engagement) are larger than those between family-related context variables and the mediators. The results suggested that to enhance the academic self-concepts and learning engagement of the economically disadvantaged students, one must strengthen their school relationship in early year. Originality/value: On the basis of the SSMMD theory, this study proposed a model called ＂Motivational Model of Engagement＂ by adding home educational resources and parental involvement as the social context factors. The model can be used systematically to identify factors affecting academic achievement for students with varied economic status. Implications for educational practices and policies are provided, especially for the allocation of social resources among economically disadvantaged students.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Calsyn, Robert J.、Kenny, David A.(1977)。Self-concept of ability and perceived evaluation of others: Cause or effect of academic achievement?。Journal of Educational Psychology，69(2)，136-145。
2.	Finn, J. D.、Rock, D. A.(1997)。Academic success among students at risk for school failure。Journal of Applied Psychology，82(2)，221-234。
3.	Hoover-Dempsey, K. V.、Battiato, A. C.、Walker, J. M. T.、Reed, R. P.、DeJong, J. M.、Jones, K. P.(2001)。Parental involvement in homework。Educational Psychologist，36(3)，195-209。
4.	Barile, J. P.、Donohue, D. K.、Anthony, E. R.、Baker, A. M.、Weaver, S. R.、Henrich, C. C.(2012)。Teacher-student relationship climate and school outcomes: implications for educational policy initiatives。Journal of Youth and Adolescence，41(3)，256-267。
5.	Alexander, K. L.、Entwisle, D. R.、Olson, L. S.(2007)。Lasting consequences of the summer learning gap。American Sociological Review，72(2)，167-180。
6.	Caro, D. H.、McDonald, J. T.、Willms, J. D.(2009)。Socio-economic status and academic achievement trajectories from childhood to adolescence。Canadian Journal of Education，32(3)，558-590。
7.	Song, I.-S.、Hattie, J.(1984)。Home environment, self-concept and academic achievement: a causal modeling approach。Journal of Educational Psychology，76(6)，1269-1281。
8.	Marsh, Herbert W.、Martin, Andrew J.(2011)。Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering。British Journal of Educational Psychology，81(1)，59-77。
9.	Wang, Ming-Te、Eccles, J. S.(2013)。School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective。Learning and Instruction，28，12-23。
10.	Wentzel, K. R.、Watkins, D. E.(2002)。Peer relationships and collaborative learning as contexts for academic enablers。School Psychology Review，31(3)，366-377。
11.	Dupont, S.、Galand, B.、Nils, F.、Hospel, V.(2014)。Social context, self-perceptions and student engagement: A SEM investigation of the self-system model of motivational development (SSMMD)。Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology，12(1)，5-32。
12.	Fall, A. M.、Roberts, G.(2012)。High school dropouts: Interactions between social context, self-perceptions, school engagement, and student dropout。Journal of Adolescence，35(4)，787-798。
13.	Sinclair, M. F.、Christenson, S. L.、Lehr, C. A.、Anderson, A. R.(2003)。Facilitating student engagement: Lessons learned from check & connect longitudinal studies。The California School Psychologist，8(1)，29-41。
14.	Skinner, E. A.、Furrer, C.、Marchand, G.、Kindermann, T.(2008)。Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic。Journal of Educational Psychology，100(4)，765-781。
15.	Alexander, Karl L.、Entwisle, Doris R.、Olson, Linda S.(2001)。Schools, achievement, and inequality: A seasonal perspective。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，23(2)，171-191。
16.	Epstein, J. L.、Dauber, S. L.(1991)。School programs and teacher practices of parent involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools。The Elementary School Journal，91(3)，289-305。
17.	White, K. R.(1982)。The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement。Psychological Bulletin，91(3)，461-481。
18.	Greenwood, C. R.、Horton, B. T.、Utley, C. A.(2002)。Academic engagement: Current perspectives on research and practice。School Psychology Review，31(3)，328-349。
19.	DiPrete, Thomas A.、Eirich, Gregory M.(2006)。Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments。Annual Review of Sociology，32，271-297。
20.	Trautwein, U.、Liidtke, O.、Koller, O.、Baumert, J.(2006)。Self-esteem, academic self-concept, and achievement: how the learning environment moderates the dynamics of self-concepts。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，90(2)，334-349。
21.	McLoyd, Vonnie C.(1998)。Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development。American Psychologist，53(2)，185-204。
22.	龔心怡、李靜儀(20151200)。影響國中經濟弱勢學生之學業表現與中輟傾向之因素：以「脈絡-自我-行動-結果」之動機發展自我系統模式為取向。教育科學研究期刊，60(4)，55-92。延伸查詢
23.	Benner, A. D.、Graham, S.、Mistiy, R. S.(2008)。Discerning direct and mediated effects of ecological structures and processes on adolescents' educational outcomes。Developmental Psychology，44(3)，840-854。
24.	Berkowitz, R.、Moore, H.、Astor, R. A.、Benbenishty, R.(2017)。A research synthesis of the associations between socioeconomic background, inequality, school climate, and academic achievement。Review of Educational Research，87(2)，425-469。
25.	Brewster, A. B.、Bowen, G. L.(2004)。Teacher support and the learning engagement of Latino middle and high school students at risk of school failure。Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal，21(1)，47-67。
26.	Cangur, S.、Ercan, I.(2015)。Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modeling under multivariate normality。Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods，14(1)，152-167。
27.	Cemalcilar, Z.、Goksen, F.(2014)。Inequality in social capital: social capital, social risk and drop-out in the Turkish education system。British Journal of Sociology of Education，35(1)，94-114。
28.	Chang, Y.(2015)。Science motivation across Asian cultures: Links among future-oriented motivation, self-efficacy, task values, and achievement outcomes。The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher，24(1)，247-258。
29.	Chiu, M. M.、Chow, B. W. Y.(2015)。Classmate characteristics and student achievement in 33 countries: Classmates' past achievement, family socioeconomic status, educational resources, and attitudes toward reading。Journal of Educational Psychology，107(1)，152-169。
30.	Cratty, D.(2012)。Potential for significant reductions in dropout rates: Analysis of an entire 3rd grade state cohort。Economics of Education Review，31(5)，644-662。
31.	Davalos, D. B.、Chavez, E. L.、Guardiola, R. J.(2005)。Effects of perceived parental school support and family communication on delinquent behaviors in Latinos and White non-Latinos。Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology，11，57-68。
32.	Duncan, G. J.、Magnuson, K.、Kalil, A.、Ziol-Guest, K.(2012)。The importance of early childhood poverty。Social Indicators Research，108(1)，87-98。
33.	Elmore, G. M.、Huebner, E. S.(2010)。Adolescents' satisfaction with school experiences: Relationships with demographics, attachment relationships, and learning engagement behavior。Psychology in the Schools，47(6)，525-537。
34.	Fredricks, J. A.、Blumenfeld, P. C.、Paris, A. H.(2004)。Learning engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence。Review of Educational Research，74，59-109。
35.	Furrer, C.、Skinner, E. A.、Pitzer, J. R.(2014)。The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students' classroom engagement and everyday motivational resilience。National Society for the Study of Education，113(1)，101-123。
36.	Harwell, M.、Maeda, Y.、Bishop, K.、Xie, A.(2017)。The Surprisingly Modest Relationship Between SES and Educational Achievement。The Journal of Experimental Education，85(2)，197-214。
37.	King, R. B.(2015)。Sense of relatedness boosts engagement, achievement, and well-being: A latent growth model study。Contemporary Educational Psychology，42，26-38。
38.	Larose, S.、Bernier, A.、Tarabulsy, G. M.(2005)。Attachment state of mind, learning dispositions, and academic performance during the college transition。Developmental Psychology，41(1)，281-289。
39.	Lippman, L. H.、Moore, K. A.、McIntosh, H.(2011)。Positive indicators of child well-being: A conceptual framework, measures, and methodological issues。Applied Research in Quality of Life，6(4)，425-449。
40.	Maaz, K.、Trautwein, U.、Ludtke, O.、Baumert, J.(2008)。Educational transitions and differential learning environments: How explicit between-school tracking contributes to social inequality in educational outcomes。Child Development Perspectives，2(2)，99-106。
41.	Marks, H. M.(2000)。Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementaiy, middle and high school years。American Educational Research Journal，37，153-184。
42.	Martin, D. P.、Rimm-Kaufman, S. E.(2015)。Do student self-efficacy and teacher-student interaction quality contribute to emotional and social engagement in fifth grade math?。Journal of School Psychology，53(5)，359-373。
43.	McCormick, M. P.、O'Connor, E. E.、Horn, E. P.(2017)。Can teacher-child relationships alter the effects of early socioeconomic status on achievement in middle childhood?。Journal of School Psychology，64，76-92。
44.	Morgan, V.、Fraser, G.、Dunn, S.、Cairns, E.(1992)。Parental Involvement in Education: How do parents want to become involved?。Educational Studies，18(1)，11-20。
45.	Moss, E.、St-Laurent, D.(2001)。Attachment at school age and academic achievement。Developmental Psychology，37(6)，863-874。
46.	Murray, C.(2009)。Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth。The Journal of Early Adolescence，29(3)，376-404。
47.	Pan, J.、Zaff, J. F.、Donlan, A. E.(2017)。Social support and academic engagement among reconnected youth: Adverse life experiences as a moderator。Journal of Research on Adolescence，27(4)，890-906。
48.	Pitzer, J. R.、Skinner, E. A.(2016)。Predictors of changes in students' motivational resilience over the school year: The roles of teacher support, self-appraisals, and emotional reactivity。International Journal of Behavioral Development，33，1-15。
49.	Quin, D.(2017)。Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher-student relationships and student engagement: A systematic review。Review of Educational Research，87(2)，345-387。
50.	Rigdon, Edward E.(1996)。CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，3(4)，369-379。
51.	Ruzek, E. A.、Hafen, C. A.、Allen, J. P.、Gregory, A.、Mikami, A. Y.、Pianta, R. C.(2016)。How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence。Learning and Instruction，42，95-103。
52.	Spilt, J. L.、Koomen, H. M. Y.、Thijs, J. T.(2011)。Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher-student relationships。Educational Psychology Review，23(4)，457-477。
53.	Walker, S. O.、Petrill, S. A.、Plomin, R.(2005)。A genetically sensitive investigation of the effects of the school environment and socio-economic status on academic achievement in seven-year-olds。Educational Psychology，25(1)，55-73。
54.	Wang, M. T.、Eccles, J. S.(2012)。Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of learning engagement from middle to high school。Child Development，83(3)，877-895。
55.	You, S.、Sharkey, J. D.(2009)。Testing a developmental-ecological model of student engagement: A multilevel latent growth curve analysis。Educational Psychology，29(6)，659-684。
56.	Roorda, D. L.、Koomen, H. M. Y.、Spilt, J. L.、Oort, F. J.(2011)。The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students' school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach。Review of Educational Research，81(4)，493-529。
57.	Kenny, David A.、McCoach, D. Betsy(2003)。Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling。Structural Equation Modeling，10(3)，333-351。
58.	Sirin, Selcuk R.(2005)。Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research。Review of Educational Research，75(3)，417-453。
59.	Skinner, E. A.、Belmont, M. J.(1993)。Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effect of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year。Journal of Educational Psychology，85(4)，571-581。
60.	Iacobucci, Dawn(2010)。Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics。Journal of Consumer Psychology，20(1)，90-98。
61.	Furrer, C. J.、Skinner, E. A.(2003)。Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance。Journal of Educational Psychology，95(1)，148-162。
62.	Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology，94(suppl.)，S95-S120。
63.	Fornell, Claes R.、Larcker, David F.(1981)。Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics。Journal of Marketing Research，18(3)，382-388。
64.	Lyons-Ruth, K.、Alpern, L.、Repacholi, B.(1993)。Disorganized infant attachment classification and maternal psychosocial problems as predictors of hostile-aggressive behavior in the preschool classroom。Child Development，64(2)，572-585。

研究報告
1.	教育部(2016)。104學年度國民中小學校概況統計。延伸查詢
2.	Lippman, L. H.、Moore, K. A.、McIntosh, H.(2009)。Positive indicators of child well-being: A conceptual framework, measures and methodological issue。Florence：UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre。
3.	國家發展委員會(2015)。都市及區域發展統計彙編。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Hair, J. F. Jr.、Black, W. C.、Babin, B. J.、Anderson, R. E.、Tatham, R. L.(2010)。Multivariate Data Analysis。Prentice-Hall。
2.	Arbuckle, J. L.(2010)。IBM SPSS Amos 19 user's guide。Crawfordville, FL：Amos Development Corporation。
3.	Hernandez, D. J.(2011)。Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation。Baltimore, MD：The Annie E. Casey Foundation。
4.	Olsen, G.、Fuller, M. L.(2010)。Home-school relations。Boston：Pearson Allyn。

其他
1.	衛生福利部社會救助及社工司(2017)。救助措施，https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOSAASW/cp-569-5007-103.html。延伸查詢
2.	教育部(2017)。制定《偏遠地區學校教育發展條例》--落實教育機會實質平等，https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DAl1E/42e700cc-3741-4c04-9d44-50df30dd5fe3。延伸查詢
3.	監察院(2016)。監察院調查報告(調查案號：105教調0003)，https://www.cy.gov.tw/sp.asp?xdUrl=./CyBsBox/CyBsRl.asp&mp=l&ctNode=910。
4.	Kenny, D. A.(2015)。Measuring model，http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm。
5.	OECD(2012)。PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity，https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-voIume-II.pdf。
6.	Texas Education Agency(2007)。Statewide comprehensive needs assessment Texas migrant education program，http://tea.texas.gov/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=2147492495。
7.	Workman, H.(2014)。Third-grade reading policies，http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/01/16/44/11644.pdf。

圖書論文
1.	Chase, P. A.、Warren, D. J.、Lerner, R. M.(2015)。Learning engagement, academic achievement, and positive youth development。Promoting positive youth development。New York, NY：Springer。
2.	Eccles, J. S.(2007)。Where Are A ll the Women? Gender Differences in Participation in Physical Science and Engineering。Why aren't more woman in science? Top researchers debate the evidence。Washington, DC：American Psychological Association。
3.	Finn, Jeremy D.、Zimmer, Kayla S.(2012)。Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter?。Handbook of Research on Student Engagement。Springer。
4.	Marsh, H. W.、Seaton, M.(2013)。Academic self-concept。International guide to student achievement。New York, NY：Routledge。
5.	Reardon, Sean F.(2011)。The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations。Whither opportunity? Rising inequality and the uncertain life chances of low-income children。New York, NY：Sage。
6.	Reschly, A. L.、Christenson, S. L.(2012)。Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct。Handbook of research on student engagement。Springer。
7.	Skinner, E. A.、Pitzer, J. R.(2012)。Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience。Handbook of Research on Student Engagement。New York, NY：Springer Science。
8.	Skinner, E. A.、Kindermann, T. A.、Connell, J. P.、Wellborn, J. G.(2009)。Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development。Handbook of motivation in school。Routledge。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	愛在流轉：某偏鄉國中傳承式生涯輔導方案之實施與成效
2.	給錢還是給關心？經濟不利或文化不利學生就學扶助措施效益分析--以經濟不利或文化不利學生身份別為干擾變項
3.	國中資優生學業自我概念與學習投入關係：恆毅力之中介效果之探討
4.	兒少經歷家庭經濟困境者於成年初顯期的復原力經驗探究
5.	國中生所知覺到的教師自主支持、自我效能、任務價值對學習投入之影響
6.	經濟弱勢青少年的家庭危險因子、家庭凝聚力、自尊與學業表現之關係
7.	「我」對「他們」：都會弱勢國中生公民素養之研究
8.	學校管理模式與學生偏差行為關係之研究：以教師教學投入與教學支援為中介變項
9.	從校園輔導工作初探拒學議題之生態指標
10.	國小高年級家貧與一般學童的可能自我與成就目標之比較
11.	表達性藝術團體對兒童人際關係及情緒管理之影響
12.	國小學童所知覺到的教師自主支持、教師心理控制、自我決定動機及學業情緒對學習投入之影響：以數學領域為例
13.	經濟弱勢學生學習態度與學業表現之縱貫研究
14.	經濟弱勢青少年的教師支持與憂鬱情緒之關係：以自我概念為中介變項
15.	在家靠父母，出外靠朋友？不同社經地位青少年的父母支持、同儕支持與心理健康之關係

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	老師．斯卡也答--在偏遠地區小學任教案例
2.	偏鄉教育的未來展望
3.	特效藥或安慰劑：《偏遠地區學校教育發展條例》適切性之檢視
4.	教師對偏鄉雙語教育的看法與建議
5.	偏鄉教育的美麗與哀愁：一位國中主任帶領魯凱族學生科展培力與困境之個案研究
6.	改善偏鄉教育問題：症狀解與根本解的反思與啟示
7.	偏鄉國小國語補救教學實施跨年級教學之行動研究
8.	探討學生科學能力與教師探究教學實務的關係
9.	奠基進教室活動設計與成效評估：縮放繪
10.	從幾堂好課，談素養導向自然科學教科書編寫設計
11.	教師對數學數位閱讀素養文本輔助國小高年級學童閱讀動機、理解與溝通互動之探討
12.	素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育：國立臺灣大學「探究式-素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議
13.	素養導向之數學教材設計與發展
14.	馬來西亞中小學新課程內涵分析
15.	素養導向課程設計與實踐--以酵素科學探究與實作課程為例

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫