:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育:國立臺灣大學「探究式-素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:符碧真 引用關係
作者(外文):Fwu, Bih-jen
出版日期:2018
卷期:63:4
頁次:頁59-87
主題關鍵詞:十二年國教核心素養師資培育師資職前教育課程教師專業素養Core competenciesK-12 educationPre-service teacher education coursesTeacher educationTeacher professional competence
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(20) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:20
  • 共同引用共同引用:246
  • 點閱點閱:18
新課綱強調核心素養,是史上最大規模的課程改革,自108學年度起上路。為培育新課綱所需的師資,2017年公布的《師資培育法》規定教育部要訂定「教師專業素養指引」及「師資職前教育課程基準」。師資培育機構須根據這些規定,自行規劃課程,並自108學年度起實施,這對師資培育機構是很大的挑戰。本研究探討兩個問題:一、新課綱強調「核心素養」,新《師資培育法》強調教師「專業素養」,一時之間素養成為「顯學」,究竟何謂「素養」?有無同時適用於中、小學教育及教師專業的素養定義?素養為何如此重要?二、師資培育機構該如何規劃職前教育課程,以培育新課綱所需的師資?本研究指出素養包括「功能性素養」及橫跨各學科的「共通性能力」,藉由知識與真實情境的連結,可培養素養,並減少學生「學這要幹嘛」及「學這有何用」的疑問,以提升學習動機。此外,本研究根據學理,提出國立臺灣大學「探究式─素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議,希望拋磚引玉,引發學界對話,為108學年度新課綱及新師資培育課程同步實施做好準備。
A large-scale curriculum reform for K-12 education that emphasizes the cultivation of core competencies will be launched in 2019. To prepare future teachers for this reform, teacher education institutions (TEIs) are required to restructure their curriculum by 2019 in accordance with the "core competencies for teachers" and "standards for pre-service teacher education" specified by the new Teacher Education Act. "Core competencies" has become a jargon commonly used in discussions of K-12 and teacher education; however, its definition remains unclear. This paper investigated (1) whether a common definition of core competencies exists for both K-12 education and teacher education, and why core competencies have reached their current level of prominence; and (2) how TEIs have restructured their new curriculum to meet K-12 educational requirements. The results revealed that core competencies are defined as functional literacy and transversal competence, linking academic knowledge to real-life experience. Moreover, National Taiwan University proposed a restructuring of the teacher education curriculum based on theoretical reasoning of teacher education. It is believed that clarifying the definition of core competencies and the proposed plan may provoke discussions among educators in TEIs regarding implementing a curriculum reform in 2019 for both K-12 education and teacher education.
期刊論文
1.Byman, R.、Krokfors, L.、Toom, A.、Maaranen, K.、Jyrhama, R.、Kynaslahti, H.、Kansanen, P.(2009)。Educating inquiry-oriented teachers: Students' attitudes and experiences towards research- based teacher education。Educational Research and Evaluation,15(1),79-92。  new window
2.Schön, Donald A.(1995)。Knowing-in-action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology。Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning,27(6),26-34。  new window
3.吳淑禎(20111200)。中等學校師資培育課程的發展特色與教育專業課程的能力指標分析。教育研究集刊,57(4),1-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Korthagen, F. A. J.、Kessels, J. P. A. M.(1999)。Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education。Educational Researcher,28(4),4-17。  new window
5.張祐維、張盛硯、林詣翔(2013)。物理迷思:什麼?原來「光」會轉彎?!。臺大教育實習輔導通訊,66,5-6。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃源河、符碧真(20100900)。芬蘭師資培育:研究為基礎的派典與課程實踐。教育研究集刊,56(3),105-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Zeichner, K. M.(1999)。The new scholarship in teacher education。Educational Researcher,28(9),4-15。  new window
8.Zeichner, K. M.(1983)。Alternative paradigms of teacher education。Journal of Teacher Education,34(3),3-9。  new window
9.靳知勤(20071200)。科學教育應如何提升學生的科學素養--臺灣學術精英的看法。科學教育學刊,15(6),627-646。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Goldstein, G.、Fernald, P.(2009)。Humanistic education in a capstone course。College Teaching,57(1),27-36。  new window
11.Mazzocchi, F.(2010)。Complexity in biology, Exceeding the limits of reductionism and determinism using complexity theory。EMBO Reports,9(1),10-14。  new window
12.呂良正(2014)。臺大土木系Capstone課程經驗分享。評鑑雙月刊,49,21-24。  延伸查詢new window
13.林永豐(20170300)。核心素養的課程教學轉化與設計。教育研究月刊,275,4-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.符碧真、黃源河(20160600)。實地學習:銜接師資培育理論與實務的藥方?。教育科學研究期刊,61(2),57-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳瓊花(20170300)。美感素養導向教學之理論與實踐。教育研究月刊,275,18-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.符碧真(20170300)。大學學習成果總檢驗:合頂石--總結性課程。教育研究集刊,63(1),31-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.吳璧純、鄭淑慧、陳春秀(20170300)。以學生學習為主軸的生活課程素養導向教學。教育研究月刊,275,50-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.張景媛、林佳慧(20170300)。綜合活動領域素養導向教學設計發展與實例。教育研究月刊,275,34-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Symeonidis, V.、Schwarz, J. F.(2016)。Phenomenon-Based Teaching and Learning through the Pedagogical Lenses of Phenomenology: The Recent Curriculum Reform in Finland。Forum Oświatowe,28(2),31-47。  new window
20.(2012)。國中學習力調查:1/4不能完全聽懂上課內容。天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
21.李田英、曹博盛、左台益、謝豐瑞、黃福坤、陸健榮、張俊彥、楊芳瑩、洪志明、黃芳裕、張文華、張永達、童麗珠、楊文金、羅珮華(20080800)。中學科學教師之教育學程修習狀況與成效。科學教育,311,2-16。  延伸查詢new window
22.彭杏珠(2017)。一次看懂大學考招、108課綱。遠見雜誌,6,13-18。  延伸查詢new window
23.Malaty, G.(2007)。What are the reasons behind the success of Finland in PISA?。Gazette des Mathématiciens,108,59-66。  new window
24.Mulder, M.、Weigel, T.、Collins, K.(2007)。The concept of competence in the development of vocational education and training in selected EU member states: A critical analysis。Journal of Vocational Education & Training,59(1),67-88。  new window
25.潘慧玲、王麗雲、簡茂發、孫志麟、張素貞、張錫勳、陳順和、陳淑敏、蔡濱如(20040800)。國民中小學教師教學專業能力指標之發展。教育研究資訊,12(4),129-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Li, Jin(2012)。Cultural foundations of learning: East and west。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.蔡清田(2014)。國民核心素養:十二年國教課程改革的DNA。高等教育出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Hull, Clark L.(1943)。Principles of behavior: an introduction to behavior theory。Appleton-Century Crofts。  new window
4.Von Bertalanffy, L.(1968)。General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications。New York:George Braziller。  new window
5.Ludmerer, K. M.(1996)。Learning to heal: The development of American medical education。Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
6.Weber, Max(1947)。The Theory of Social and Economic Organization。Free Press。  new window
7.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2013)。PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn: Students' engagement, drive and self-beliefs。Paris:OECD。  new window
8.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(2014)。PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in mathematics, reading and science。Paris:Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development。  new window
9.教育部(2003)。中等學校、國民小學教師師資職前教育課程教育專業課程科目及學分。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
10.Spring, J.(2008)。Globalization of education: An introduction。London:Routledge。  new window
11.Venezky, R. L.、Wagner, D. A.、Ciliberti, B. S.(1990)。Toward defining literacy。Newark, DE:International Reading Association。  new window
12.Blake, B. E.、Blake, R. W.(2002)。Literacy and learning: A reference handbook。Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO。  new window
13.Lewin, K.、Cartwright, D.(1952)。Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers。London:Tavistock。  new window
14.McCown, R. R.、Driscoll, M. P.、Roop, P. G.(1996)。Educational psychology: A learner-centered approach to classroom practice。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
15.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2017)。PISA 2015 results: Collaborative problem solving。Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
16.Schön, Donald A.(1983)。The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action。Basic Books, Inc.。  new window
17.Wiggins, Grant、McTighe, Jay(2005)。Understanding by Design。Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
18.Dewey, John(1933)。How We Think。Heath。  new window
19.Korthagen, F. A. J.、Kessels, J.、Koster, B.、Lagerwerf, B.、Wubbels, T.(2001)。Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
其他
1.Hsieh, F.-J.,Wang, T.-Y.,Hsieh, C.-J.,Tang, S.-J.,Chao, G.(2010)。A milestone of an international study in Taiwan teacher education--An international comparison of Taiwan mathematics teacher preparation (Taiwan TEDS-2008),http://tedsm.math.ntnu.edu.tw/TEDS-M_2008_International_Study_in_Taiwan_Mathematics_Teacher_Education.pdf。  new window
2.符碧真(2012)。知識花園的探險樂趣:探究式教學法,http://ctld.ntu.edu.tw/_epaper/news_detail.php?f_s_num=116。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gordon, J.,Arjomand, G.,Rey, O.,Siewiorek, A.,Vivitsou, M.,Gilje, O.(2013)。KeyCoNet 2013 literature review: Key competence development in school education in Europe,http://keyconet.eun.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=060f39a1-bd86-4941-a6ca-8b2a3ba8548e&groupId=11028。  new window
圖書論文
1.Glaser, Robert(1962)。Psychology and Instructional Technology。Taining Research and education。Pittsburgh, PA:University of Pittsburgh Press。  new window
2.鄭淵全、黃榮宗、李佳穎(2014)。國立新竹教育大學創新師培典範之實踐。面對十二年國民基本教育的師資培育挑戰。中華民國師範教育學會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Henscheid, J. M.、Barnicoat, L. R.(2003)。Capstone courses in higher education。Encyclopedia of education。New York, NY:Macmillan。  new window
4.Weinert, F. E.(2001)。Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification。Defining and selecting key competencies。Hogrefe & Huber。  new window
5.Kansanen, P.(2003)。Teacher education in Finland: Current models and new developments。Institutional approaches to teacher education within higher education in Europe: Current models and new developments。Bucharest:UNESCO-CEPES。  new window
6.Kansanen, P.(2006)。Constructing a research-based program in teacher education。Competence oriented teacher training: Old research demands and new pathways。Sense。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE