:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小低年級弱勢兒童生活適應圑體之輔導效果
書刊名:國立屏東大學學報.教育類
作者:許依婷黃素雲
作者(外文):Hsu, I-tingHuang, Su-yun
出版日期:2019
卷期:3
頁次:頁1-38
主題關鍵詞:弱勢兒童國小低年級圑體輔導生活適應Disadvantage childrenEarly elementary school studentsGroup guidanceLife adaptation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:97
  • 點閱點閱:5
本研究旨在探討生活適應團體對國小低年級弱勢兒童之生活適應的輔導效果。本實驗採用準實驗前後測不等組設計,研究對象取自高雄市某國小低年級弱勢兒童,對6名實驗組成員進行定向輔導30分鐘及每次50分鐘的生活適應團體十二次,而6名控制組成員則於實驗期間未接受任何處理。研究期間以「國小低年級學童學校生活適應量表」為測驗工具,分別對實驗組和控制組進行前測、後測及追蹤測量。所得之資料再以Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney無母數統計方法進行統計分析,以考驗研究對象經實驗處遇後之立即及追蹤輔導效果。研究綜合量化資料及成員、成員家長、成員導師的回饋和訪談資料,進行實驗組輔導效果之分析。研究結果如下:1.團體輔導對實驗組成員的生活適應沒有立即輔導效果。2.兩週後的追蹤評量顯示,實驗組成員在「整體生活適應」、「家庭適應」具有追蹤輔導成效,但在「個人適應」、「學校適應」和「同儕適應」上無顯著成效。3.從成員、導師及家長的質化觀察、回饋資料顯示,生活適應團體輔導對成員具有正向輔導效果,成員對於團體有高的滿意度,且團體獲得成員的家長和導師的肯定,認為生活適應輔導團體對提升成員之生活適應有助益。
The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of life adjustment group guidance on the disadvantage lower-grade elementary children. The unequal pre-test and post-test experimental design was conducted in this research in which 12 disadvantage children in the lower elementary grades in Kaohsiung were selected as the sample. The participants were randomly divided into the experiment and control groups with 6 members in each group. The children of experimental group received 30-minute orientation and 12 sessions of group activities with one session lasting 50 minutes each week. The control group didn’t receive any treatment. The Life Adjustment Scale for the disadvantage lower-grade elementary children was used in pretest, posttest and follow-up to measure life adjustment of children. The obtained data were analyzed with nonparametric statistics in the rank-based Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon. In addition, a thorough analysis of collected data including group process records, interviews, and the feedback from children’s teacher and parents was then conducted so as to further investigate into the effectiveness of the application of Life Adjustment Group Guidance. Results were summarized as follow:1.The experiment group had no immediate effect on Life Adjustment.2.On the two-week follow-up for experimental children, there were significant effects on the Overall Life Adjustment and Family Adjustment, whereas no significant effect was found on the Individual Adjustment, School Adjustment, and Peer Adjustment.3.According to feedback from the experimental group members, a full review of recorded video, and teacher and parent’s interview and feedback data, life-adjustment group guidance had positive effects on the experimental members. The members were satisfied with group activities and their teacher and parents reported that life-adjustment group guidance definitely had a positive effect on children.
期刊論文
1.何緯山、陳志賢、連廷嘉(20110300)。新移民家庭子女自我概念、學業表現與生活適應之相關研究。大仁學報,38,49-67。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉惠君、陳麗卿(20100600)。雲林縣國小新生學童學校生活適應之研究。幼兒教育研究,2,107-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Hoag, Matthew J.、Burlingame, Gary M.(1997)。Evaluating the effectiveness of child and adolescent group treatment: A meta-analytic review。Journal of Clinical Child Psychology,26(3),234-246。  new window
4.陳玉娟(20090800)。新移民子女教育問題、成因及其策略之研究:以國民教育階段為例。初等教育學刊,33,33-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳雅鈴(20060600)。貧窮如何影響兒童。教育研究,146,87-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張憲庭(20050200)。關懷弱勢--談外籍配偶子女之教育問題。國教世紀,214,93-98。  延伸查詢new window
7.曾端真(20050800)。弱勢兒童的關懷與輔導。教師天地,137,28-33。  延伸查詢new window
8.鍾鳳嬌、趙善如(20090500)。教學場域的看見與行動--教師觀點談新臺灣之子的學習。幼兒教保研究期刊,3,41-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.鄧蔭萍(20120900)。兒童情緒智力與社會行為之初探。兒童照顧與教育,2,1-21。  延伸查詢new window
10.田秀蘭、陳淑琦、劉玲君、王櫻芬(20030900)。兒童團體輔導能力的內涵與評量研究。中華輔導學報,14,89-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Estrada, L.、Dupoux, E.、Wolman, C.(2006)。The relationship between locus of control and personal-emotional adjustment and social adjustment to college life in students with and without learning disabilities。College Student Journal,40(1),43-54。  new window
12.Ryan, A. M.、Patrick, H.(2001)。The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents' motivation and engagement during middle school。American Educational Research Journal,38(2),437-460。  new window
13.Amato, P. R.、Previti, D.(2003)。People's reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment。Journal of Family Issues,24(5),602-626。  new window
14.P'erusse, R.、Goodnough, G. E.、Lee, V. V.(2009)。Group counseling in the school。Psychology in the Schools,46(3),225-232。  new window
15.紀幸妙、黃郁婷(20061200)。代理父母--隔代教養祖父母健康狀況之研究。生活科學學報,10,243-264。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.張高賓(20010300)。單親兒童父母教養方式、家庭環境與情緒穩定之關係研究。屏東師院學報,14(上),465-504。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Evans, G. W.(2004)。The environment of childhood poverty。American Psychologist,59(2),77-92。  new window
18.吳佳蓉、張德勝(20030600)。隔代教養學生與非隔代教養學生學校生活適應之比較。花蓮師院學報. 教育類,16,109-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Piaget, J.(1964)。Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2(3),176-186。  new window
20.張高賓、戴嘉南(20050900)。國內「兒童團體諮商與心理治療」整合分析研究。中華輔導學報,18,77-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Chen, F. S.、Lin, Y. M.、Tu, C. A.(2006)。A study of the emotional intelligence and life adjustment of senior high school students。World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education,5(3),473-476。  new window
22.陳麗珠(20080800)。弱勢學生照顧政策之檢討與改進。教育研究,172,5-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Schwartz, D.、Proctor, L. J.(2000)。Community violence exposure and children's social adjustment in the school peer group: the mediating roles of emotion regulation and social cognition。Journal of consulting and clinical psychology,68(4),670-683。  new window
24.鄭凱芸(20111100)。從生命歷程觀點看危機家庭隔代教養者之困境。家庭教育雙月刊,34,6-27。  延伸查詢new window
25.Pettit, G. S.、Erath, S. A.、Lansford, J. E.、Dodge, K. A.、Bates, J. E.(2011)。Dimensions of social capital and life adjustment in the transition to early adulthood。International Journal of Behavioral Development,35(6),482-489。  new window
26.徐藝華、黃木蘭、李介麟(20060800)。把弱勢學生帶上來。師友月刊,470,8-25。  延伸查詢new window
27.李淑容(20141200)。全球化下的勞動與貧窮。社區發展季刊,148,64-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.邱冠斌(20080600)。新竹縣外籍配偶子女國小一年級國語文學習成就之研究--以竹北市爲例。中華行政學報,5,145-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.林錦蘭、劉波兒、林孟燕、黃芝瑋、賴詩雅、劉懿瑩、許佳祺、胡立穎、馬維芬(20071100)。現存臺灣外籍配偶子女教養問題之文獻探討。弘光學報,51,51-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.馬宗潔、江建仁(20121200)。兒童團體工作實務概述。社區發展季刊,140,79-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.黃淑敏(20090900)。單親家庭子女教育介入策略之探討。家庭教育雙月刊,21,31-39。  延伸查詢new window
32.楊靜齡(2000)。低收入家庭兒童的生活與工作境況。人本教育札記,134,14-16。  延伸查詢new window
33.趙善如(20121200)。弱勢家庭兒童少年社區照顧的建置與發展。兒童及少年福利期刊,20,141-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.鄭鈴諭、朱惠瓊、連廷嘉(20120600)。藝術治療團體對外籍配偶子女校園生活適應之介入效果研究。臺東大學教育學報,23(1),181-213。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.顏素如、張進上(20091200)。東南亞籍配偶子女團體輔導效果之研究。嘉南學報. 人文類,35,397-411。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.Brain, P. A.、Eleanor, S. B.、Carroll, E. I.(2004)。The relations between contextual risks, earned incomes, and the school adjustment of children from economically disadvantaged families。Developmental Psychology,40(2),204-216。  new window
37.Dodge, K. A.、Lansford, J. E.、Burks, V. S.、Bates, J. E.、Pettit, G. S.、Fontaine, R.、Price, J. M.(2003)。Peer rejection and social information processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children。Child Development,74,374-393。  new window
38.Huang, S. Y.(2013)。Group dynamics in working with children。Scholarly Journal of Education,2(6),77-83。  new window
39.Jimenez, T. I.、Musitu, G.、Ramos, M. J.、Murgui, S.(2009)。Community involvement and victimization at school: An analysis through family, personal and social adjustment。Journal of Community Psychology,37(8),959-974。  new window
40.Lawhon, T.(2004)。Teachers and schools can aid grieving students。Education,124(3),559-566。  new window
41.Newman, H.(1981)。Communication within ongoing intimate relationships: An attributional perspective。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,7,59-70。  new window
42.Wright, C.、Diener, M.、Kay, S. C.(2000)。School readiness of low-income children at risk for school failure。Journal of Children & Poverty,,6(2),99-117。  new window
學位論文
1.王曉瑄(1999)。阿德勒學派遊戲治療團體對國小單親兒童輔導效果之研究(碩士論文)。臺南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.章翠吟(2013)。實施小團體輔導對四年級新移民子女自我概念影響之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳淑慧(2009)。表達性藝術團體之實施對提昇弱勢兒童自我概念之效果研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.朱詩穎(2006)。隔代教養的低年級學童學校生活適應之研究--以台北縣雙和區為例(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.邱千容(2010)。認知行為團體方案對單親兒童情緒能力輔導效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.莫惠玲(2003)。理情團體輔導對單親兒童自我概念輔導效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊小青(2010)。藝術治療介入隔代教養兒童家庭概念之影響(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.謝麗紅(2002)。團體諮商方案設計與實例。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Tallent, N.(1978)。Psychology of adjustment: Understanding ourselves and others。New York:Van Nostrand。  new window
3.Jacobs, E. E.、Masson, R. L.、Harvill, R. L.、Schimmel, C. J.(2012)。Group counseling: Strategies and skills。Belmont, CA:Brooks/Cole/Thomson Learning。  new window
4.Trotzer, J. P.(1977)。The counselor and the group: Intergrating theory, training and practice。Montery, CA:Brooks/Cole。  new window
5.Lazarus, R. S.(1976)。Patterns of adjustment。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
6.Olson, D.、DeFrain, J.、Skogrand, L.(2008)。Marriages and families: Intimacy, diversity and strengths。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
7.Brigman, G.、Goodman, B. E.(2008)。Group Counseling for School Counselors: A Practical Guide。Portland, ME:Walch Education。  new window
8.Thompson, C. L.、Henderson, D. A.(2007)。Counseling Children。Belmont, CA:Brooks/Cole。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE