:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:自由的條件:晚清時期張君勱思想中的「人民程度」
書刊名:臺灣師大歷史學報
作者:詹景雯
作者(外文):Chan, Ching-wen
出版日期:2020
卷期:63
頁次:頁81-133
主題關鍵詞:張君勱彌爾人民程度精英平民陽明心學Zhang JunmaiJ. S. MillCompetency of the peopleEliteCommon peopleWang Yang-ming's philosophy of mind
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:127
  • 點閱點閱:11
關於「人民是否需要具備某些條件才能擁有自由」之議題,是中國與世界其他民主國家進入近代政治體制之後,不能迴避的現實難題。觀察晚清時期張君勱對此問題之探索,可以發現他於1907年從原本接受約翰.彌爾認為「人民程度」與自由的獲取(透過議會召開的方式)密切相關的主張, 轉而放棄此二者之關聯, 並改以陽明心學中「心即理」與「天人合一」的思想模式來強調政黨精英「振發、代表」人民反抗專制之心所能產生的作用。藉由闡述張君勱此一思想轉折,並與彌爾思想及其所從出之英國社會文化思想脈絡相較,本文指出,此時張君勱除了不再接受西方文明國家對於人類進化所設定的西方中心標準外,他並援用傳統心學中消減精英/一般人民之間界線的思想特徵,同時回應了彌爾的自由思想無法踐行於中國的情況,及當時中國追求議會政制改革所面臨的困難。此一轉變既有著傳統特徵,又極富現代意義,揭示了晚清中國知識分子在思考西學東漸、國家存亡問題時所展現的主體性與開放性。而陽明心學在張君勱的重釋下,有別於過往學者對其修身工夫之著重、對它可能導致集體主義後果之擔憂,顯示了心學內涵成為中國自由主義發展資源的可能性。
One of the central issues in modern politics is whether a people who have not attained a basic level of competency should have the right to political freedom. This paper examines how the philosopher and public intellectual Zhang Junmai (also known as Carson Chang) struggled with this question. It is found that in 1907 Zhang abandoned J. S. Mill’s idea of a positive correlation between people's competence and their acquisition of freedom, and later on turned instead to the Neo-Confucian philosopher Wang Yang-ming for inspiration. Using Wang's modes of thinking that "mind is principle" and that "heaven and man are a unity," Zhang emphasized the effects resulting from party elites' arousing and representing the people in their resistance to autocratic monarchy. By elaboration on changes in Zhang's thinking, comparing his thought with that of Mill, and situating Zhang in the social, cultural, and intellectual context of his time, this paper points out that Zhang not only denied the standard for evolution of human culture set by Western civilized countries, he also appropriated traditional Chinese philosophy that stressed that there were no real boundaries between elites and commoners. Zhang's ideas provided a response to the difficulties in setting up a parliamentary system and the inapplicability of Mill's political theory in China. On the above issues, Zhang's thoughts revealed the subjectivity and openness shown by Chinese intellectuals as well as how Western and Chinese, and traditional and modern ideas were applied in an attempt to solve the burning issues of the day. This paper also points to an aspect of Wang Yang-ming's philosophy that is worth further exploration and may be employed in the development of liberalism in China.
期刊論文
1.王遠義(20020500)。儒學與馬克思主義:析論梁漱溟的歷史觀。臺大文史哲學報,56,145-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張福建(20011200)。文明的提昇與沉淪--彌爾、嚴復與史華茲。政治科學論叢,15,83-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張灝(20120100)。政教一元還是政教二元?:傳統儒家思想中的政教關係。思想,20,111-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.張君勱(1907)。國會與政黨。政論,2,43-63。  延伸查詢new window
5.山下重一(2011)。永峰秀樹訳「代議政体」--ミル「代議政治論」の本邦初訳。國學院法學,49(2),53-120。  延伸查詢new window
6.Fung, Edmund S. K.(2003)。New Confucianism and Chinese Democratization: The Thought and Predicament of Zhang Junmai。Twentieth-Century China,28(2),41-71。  new window
7.山村奨(2017)。井上哲次郎と高瀬武次郎の陽明学--近代日本の陽明学における水戸学と大塩平八郎。日本研究,56,55-93。  延伸查詢new window
8.山村奨(2016)。明治期の陽明学理解--社会主義と明治維新との関係から。東洋文化研究,18,99-118。  延伸查詢new window
9.Sun, Lung-Kee(1992)。Social Psychology in the Late Qing Period。Modern China,18(3),235-262。  new window
會議論文
1.王遠義(2005)。現代中國思想變遷中的歷史主義。中國文學歷史與思想中的觀念變遷國際學術研討會。臺北:國立臺灣大學文學院。381-416。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.翁賀凱(2010)。現代中國的自由民族主義:張君勱民族建國思想評傳。北京:法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.張枬、王忍之(1963)。辛亥革命前十年時論選集。北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
3.Himmelfarb, Gertrude(1990)。On Liberty and Liberalism: The Case of John Stuart Mill。ICS Press。  new window
4.Fung, Edmund S. K.(2010)。The Intellectual Foundations of Chinese Modernity: Cultural and Political Thought in the Republican Era。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.劉季倫(20120000)。青年毛澤東的思想與中國共產革命。臺北:國立政治大學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.孫中山、中國社科院近代史所(1981)。孫中山全集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.鄭大華(1997)。張君勱傳。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.Mill, John Stuart、程崇華(1986)。論自由。臺北:唐山出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Metzger, Thomas A.(1977)。Escape from Predicament: Neo-Confucianism and China's Evolving Political Culture。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
10.Hayek, Friedrich A.(1944)。The Road to Serfdom。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
11.Jenco, Leigh K.(2010)。Making the Political: Founding and Action in the Political Theory of Zhang Shizhao。Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.張灝(1987)。Chinese Intellectuals in Crisis: Search for Order and Meaning (1890-1911)。University of California Press。  new window
13.張朋園(20150000)。從民權到威權:孫中山的訓政思想與轉折兼論黨人繼志述事。臺北:中央研究院近代史研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Jeans, Roger B. Jr.(1997)。Democracy and Socialism in Republican China: The Politics of Zhang Junmai (Carsun Chang), 1906-1941。Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers。  new window
15.王陽明、吳光(2010)。王陽明全集。杭州:浙江古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.Meisner, Maurice(1982)。Marxism, Maoism, and Utopianism: Eight Essays。Madison:University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
17.Collini, Stefan(1991)。Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain, 1850-1930。Oxford University Press。  new window
18.黃克武(2000)。自由的所以然:嚴復對約翰彌爾自由思想的認識與批判。上海:上海書店出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.余英時(2004)。宋明理學與政治文化。允晨文化實業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.Bellamy, Richard(1992)。Liberalism and Modern Society: A Historical Argument。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
21.列寧(1988)。怎麼辦。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.Le Bon, Gustave(1896)。The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind。New York:Macmillan。  new window
23.Mill, John Stuart、汪瑄(2009)。代議制政府。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
24.王本存(2010)。憲政與德性--張君勱憲政思想研究。北京:中國政法大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.江勇振(1987)。張君勱。臺北:臺灣商務出版社。  延伸查詢new window
26.Harvie, Christopher、Matthew, H. C. G.、韓敏中(2015)。日不落帝國興衰史--十九世紀英國。北京:外語教學與研究出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.Jones, H. S.(2000)。Victorian Political Thought。London:St. Martin's Press。  new window
28.Schwartz, Benjamin(1964)。In Search of Wealth and Power: Yan Fu and the West。Cambridge:Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
29.薛化元(19930000)。民主憲政與民族主義的辯證發展:張君勱思想研究。臺北:稻禾。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Schwarcz, Vera(1986)。The Chinese Enlightenment: Intellectuals and the Legacy of the May Fourth Movement of 1919。University of California Press。  new window
31.梁啟超、張品興(1999)。梁啟超全集。北京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
32.故宮博物院明清檔案部(1979)。清末籌備立憲檔案史料。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
33.Meisner, Maurice J.(1967)。Li Ta-Chao and the Origins of Chinese Marxism。Harvard University Press。  new window
34.朱熹(1994)。四書章句集注。大安出版社。  延伸查詢new window
35.Polanyi, Karl(1957)。The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time。Beacon Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.張君勱(1971)。穆勒約翰議院政治論。開國前後言論集。台北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Schwartz, Benjamin I.(1976)。Notes on Conservatism in General and in China in Particular。The Limits of Change: Essays on Conservative Alternatives in Republican China。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.張福建(1995)。社群、功效與民主:約翰.彌勒政治思想的另一個側面。政治社群。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.余英時(1992)。中國知識分子的邊緣化。中國文化與現代變遷。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.Gibbins, John(1990)。J. S. Mill, Liberalism, and Progress。Victorian Liberalism--Nineteenth-Century Political Thought and Practice。Routledge。  new window
6.張灝(2004)。扮演上帝:二十世紀中國激進思想中人的神化。時代的探索。台北:聯經出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.王汎森(2003)。中國近代思想中的傳統因素--兼論思想的本質與思想的功能。中國近代思想與學術的系譜。台北:聯經出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.余英時(20120000)。天人之際--中國古代思想的起源試探。中國史新論:思想史分冊。臺北:中央研究院。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.林毓生(2014)。二十世紀中國激進化反傳統思潮、中式馬列主義與毛澤東的烏托邦主義。公民社會基本觀念。臺北:中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
10.李澤厚(1996)。啟蒙與救亡的雙重變奏。中國現代思想史論。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.王汎森(2003)。反西化的西方主義與反傳統的傳統主義--劉師培與「社會主義講習會」。中國近代思想與學術的系譜。臺北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
12.張君勱(1971)。論今後民黨之進行。開國前後言論集。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.梁啟超(1971)。政聞社宣言書。開國前後言論集。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.余英時(2004)。從價值系統看中國文化的現代意義。余英時文集。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.孫亞夫(1976)。寶山張先生年譜初稿。張君勱九秩誕辰紀念冊。臺北:中國民主社會黨中央總部。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳瑋芬(2005)。「西洋倫理」與「東洋道德」的交會--由井上哲次郎對「東洋哲學史」的實踐談起。近代日本漢學的「關鍵詞」研究:儒學及相關概念的嬗變。臺北:臺大出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
17.黃克武(2006)。蔣介石與陽明學:以清末調適傳統為背景的分析。蔣中正與近代中日關係。臺北:稻鄉出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.楊貞德(20130000)。人心、制度與歷史:張君勱的憲政思維及其意涵。視域交會中的儒學:近代的發展。臺北:中央研究院。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.羅志田(1999)。近代中國社會權勢的轉移:知識分子的邊緣化與邊緣知識分子的興起。權勢轉移:近代中國的思想、社會與學術。武漢:湖北人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.Chang, Hao(1990)。Some Reflections on the Problems of the Axial-Age Breakthrough in Relation to Classical Confucianism。Ideas across Cultures: Essays on Chinese Thought in Honor of Benjamin I. Schwartz。Cambridge:Harvard University University Press。  new window
21.Berlin, Isaiah(2002)。John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life。Liberty。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
22.Magid, Henry M.(1987)。John Stuart Mill。History of Political Philosophy。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
23.Sally, Razeen(1998)。What is Classical Liberalism?。Classical Liberalism and International Economic Order: Studies in Theory and Intellectual History。London:Routledge。  new window
24.江宜樺(2001)。約翰.密爾論自由、功效與民主政治。自由民主的理路。臺北:聯經出版事業公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.王汎森(2003)。近代知識份子自我形象的轉變。中國近代思想與學術的系譜。臺北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE