:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公共政策論述的倫理
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:林水波王崇斌
作者(外文):Lin, Shoei-poWang, Ch'ung-pin
出版日期:1996
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁1-26
主題關鍵詞:政策論述論述倫理溝通理性有效性訴求歷史感知Policy discourseDiscoursive ethicsCommunicative rationalityClaims of validityHistorical sensitivity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:100
  • 點閱點閱:34
本文主要從倫理學的角度,分析促成良善公共政策制訂,體現民主價值的政策論述,所應具備的性質與特徵。中心目的一方面企圖透過此依研究,對現實政策過程中所涉及的論述行為,提供一些方向的指引;另一方面,則是提供一個理念型的參照架構,作為批判不合理政策論述的基礎。政策論述的倫理,大體可分為行為倫理及主體兩方面。在行為倫理方面:論述的動機必須取向於相互了解;論述的方式則要在共同且完整的基礎上,針對政策問題進行推論;而傳遞論述的管道,則要合乎多元、易接近、公開的原則。在論述主體的倫理方面,則要由具備公共精神及公民資格者,彼此承認有效性訴求,並使訴求取得事實或驅向於事實的地位,以營造一個有效溝通的社會互動網絡:進而以分析及批判並重的態度面對環境,以避免環境對論述主體單向的不當宰制。最後,為了彰顯政策論述倫理本應具備時空現實性格,乃進一步分析強調其應用的必要性與可能性。本文特別以即將召開的國家發展會議,和理論進行擬人化的對話,以為本文的理論分析,找尋一個在現實情境中,能相互對照觀察的例證。
The themc of the paper is to address, from ethics perspective, the required attributes and characteristics of policy discourse for promoting good and democratic policy-making process. The two core of purposes of this paper are: 1.to provide some guidelines of discoursive behavior involved in policy proccss; 2.to construct an ided-type framework of reference in order for criticizing unreasonable foundations of policy discourse. The paper furthly analyzes two kinds of discoursive ethics of public policy: behavioral ethics and subjectivity ethics. The requirements for achieving behavioral ethics are that: 1. the motivation of discourse is oriented to mutual understanding; 2.the style of discourse is based on common and complete back ground and reasoned from the nature of policy problem; 3. the communicative channels of discourse are multiple. accessible and open. The subjects of discourse should have public spirit and citizenship and dialogue claims of validity for gaining ethics. The claimcrs are willing to build an interactive network for effcctive communication and able to lct their, claims approach ,the status of fact. At the same time, the subjects of discourse should also confront environment with analytic and critical attitudes in order to avoid environmemal domination. Finally, in order to show ,the realism of ethical policy discourse, the paper also identifies the way to pragmatically use it. Conference of National Development is selected as an example to be dialogued with theoretic analysis discussed in this paper. By doing so, it is proved for the pragmatic power of ethics of policy discourse.
期刊論文
1.Bovens, M.、Hart, P.(1996)。Frame Multiplicity and Policy Fiascoes: Limits to Explanation。Knowledge and Policy,8(4),61-82。  new window
2.Granovetter, M.(1985)。Economic action and social structures: The problem of embeddedness。American Journal of Sociology,91(3),481-510。  new window
3.林水波、王崇斌(19960600)。臺灣制訂愛滋病防治政策的錯誤傾向與其引發的離心化困境。政治科學論叢,7,157-185。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Hofmann, J.(1995)。Implicit Theories in Policy Discourse: An Inquiry into The Interpretation of Reality in German Technology Policy。Policy Sciences,28,127-148。  new window
5.Yanow, D.(1995)。Practices of Policy Interpretation。Policy Sciences,28,111-126。  new window
6.方孝謙(19950400)。如何研究象徵霸權理論與經驗的探索。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,78,27-59。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.施能傑(1991)。以「公共」做為公共行政研究與教育的起點。紀念張金鑑教授八秩晉九誕辰--我國公共行政教育內涵之精進行政學術研討會,(會議日期: 1991年12月)。臺北:國立政治大學公共行政研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.李丁讚(1992)。日常生活與媒體論述:兩岸關係為例。台灣民主化過程中國家與社會研討會。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃瑞祺(1986)。理性討論與民主:哈伯馬斯溝通理論的民主涵義。中研社科所多元主義政治思想研討會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蔡慶同(1996)。當運匠聽到地下電台--論地下電台與社會運動之關係(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.謝扶雅(1973)。倫理學新論。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.Rochefort, David A.、Cobb, Roger W.(1994)。The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda。Lawrence, Kansas:University Press of Kansas。  new window
3.MacDonell, Diane(1986)。Theories of Discourse: An Introduction。Oxford:Basil Blackwell。  new window
4.Berger, P. L.、Luckman, T.(1966)。The Social Construction of Reality。NY:NT:Anchor Books。  new window
5.Fishkin, James S.(1995)。The voice of the people。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
6.Barber, Benjamin(1984)。Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age。Univ. of California Press。  new window
7.Bourdieu, P.(1991)。Language and Symbolic Power。Cambridge, England:Polity Press。  new window
8.Almond, G.、Powell, G.(1978)。Comparative Politics: Systems, Process, and Policy。Boston:Little Brown Press。  new window
9.劉康(1995)。對話的喧聲。台北:麥田。  延伸查詢new window
10.Hambermas, J.(1979)。Communication and The Evolution of Sociology。Boston:Beacon Press。  new window
11.Bourdieu, Pierre、Nice, Richard(1977)。Outline of a Theory of Practice。Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Dryzek, John S.(1990)。Discursive democracy: politics, policy, and political science。Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.黃瑞祺(1990)。批判理論與現代社會學。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.MacRae, Duncan Jr.(1993)。Guidelines for Policy Discourse: Consensual Versus Adversarial。The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning。Duke University Press。  new window
2.Linder, S. H.、Peters, B. G.(1995)。The Two Traditions of Institutional Designing: Dialogue Versus Decision?。Institutional Design。Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
3.Hajer, M.(1993)。Discourse Coalitions and The Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Britain。The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning。Durham:Duke University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE