:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣制訂愛滋病防治政策的錯誤傾向與其引發的離心化困境
書刊名:政治科學論叢
作者:林水波王崇斌
作者(外文):Lin, Shoei-poWang, Ch'ung-pin
出版日期:1996
卷期:7
頁次:頁157-185
主題關鍵詞:臺灣愛滋病防治政策政策制訂錯誤困境
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:130
  • 點閱點閱:31
     本文首先論述錯誤傾向的政策制訂過程,乃是形成不良政策的根本原因,導致政策失靈的關鍵因素。這項指陳的目的在於:提醒相關決策者及政策分析學子,應由過去不太妥適的認定反省,轉而注意真正造成政策成敗的焦點。 而錯誤傾向的政策制訂過程,每由不當的政策透視角度所起。如若透視角度深受過往決策經驗宰制,不容許網絡中行為者的理性互動,欠缺對環境的對應性及反省,則會產生所謂不良的政策。 基於這項新的反省與體認,本文進一步探究臺灣在制訂愛滋病防治政策上,所出現的種種錯誤傾向,及因而引發的離心化困境。並為了扭正制訂過程的錯誤傾向,本文最後探討如何從不當透視角度的轉型,來化解離心化困境之道。
     The first purpose of this paper is to discuss that the real cause of bad policy is resulted from error-prone policy-making processes. This discussion is to remind practitioners and policy students that policy itself is not the root cause of policy failure but its inappropriate making processes. However, policy perspective formed by policy environment, policy networks and past experiences constrains the whole policymaking processes and leads to bad policy. According to this reflection and understanding, the paper furtherly addresses the error-prone Anti-AIDS policy-making in Taiwan and points out its errors and predicaments. The predicaments of Anti-AIDS policy-making in Taiwan - the centrifugalization of policy stakeholders - need to be attacked. Their attacking strategies to transform policy perspective and mitigate the degree of centrifugalization are also designed in this paper.
期刊論文
1.Schneider, A. L.、Ingram, H.(1993)。Social construction of target populations: Implication for politics and policy。American Political Science Review,87(2),334-347。  new window
2.White, Louise G.(1994)。Policy Analysis as Discourse。Journal of Public Policy Analysis and Management,13(3),505-529。  new window
3.Stivers, Camilla(1994)。The Listening Bureaucrat: Responsiveness in Public Administration。Public Administration Review,54(4),364-369。  new window
4.林水波(19951100)。全民健保政策的問題及轉型。律師通訊,194,11-24。  延伸查詢new window
5.林水波、王崇斌(1995)。專家決策的有限性--南部科學園區設置地點評選過程所顯示的政策現象。銓敍與公保,5(2),3-21。  延伸查詢new window
6.古明君(1992)。媒體的恐同性戀症候群。中國論壇,32(9),78-80。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳秀英(19950300)。愛滋病與人權。愛滋病防治季刊,10,5-12。  延伸查詢new window
8.林金定、張正芳、Yeostros, Amy E.(19950900)。性工作者對愛滋病知識、態度、自覺危害及相關因素分析。愛滋病防治季刊,12,35-38。  延伸查詢new window
9.林金定、張正芳、Yeostros, Amy E.(19951200)。性工作者對愛滋病知識、態度、自覺危害及相關因素分析。愛滋病防治季刊,13,23-28。  延伸查詢new window
10.胡幼慧(1990)。文化、行為與健康。公共衛生,15(3),103-125。  延伸查詢new window
11.施皓青(1995)。命運、病毒與愛人的三角遊戲。愛滋病防治季刊,10,20-25。  延伸查詢new window
12.迷走(1992)。愛滋病與男同性戀的困境。中國論壇,32(4),72-75。  延伸查詢new window
13.莊徵華(1993)。愛滋病定義之演變。愛滋病防治季刊,4,15-17。  延伸查詢new window
14.Day, P.、Klein, R.(1989)。Interpreting the Unexcepted: The Case of AIDS Policy Making in Britain。Journal of Public Policy,9(3),337-353。  new window
15.Donovan, M. C.(1993)。Social Construction of People with AIDS: Target Populations and United States Policy, 1981-1990。Policy Studies Review,12(314),3-29。  new window
16.Fischer, F.(1993)。Citizen Participation & the Democratization of Policy Expertise: From Theoretical Inquery to Practical Cases。Policy Sciences,26(2),165-187。  new window
17.Friman, H. R.(1993)。From Policy Beliefs to Policy Choices: The Resurgence of Tariff Retaliation in the U.S. Pursuit of Fair Trade。Journal of Public policy,13(2),163-182。  new window
18.Granovetter, M.(1985)。Economic Action & Social Structure。American Journal of Sociology,91(3),481-510。  new window
19.Hermann, C. E.(1990)。Changing Course: When A Government Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy。International Studies Quartly,34(1),3-21。  new window
20.Levin, M. A.(1993)。The Day After an AIDS Vaccine Is Discovered: Management Matters。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,12(3),438-455。  new window
21.Schneider, V.(1992)。The Structure of Policy Network: A CompaTsion of the Chemicals Control & Telecommunications Policy Domain in Germany。European Journal of Political Research,21(1/2),109-129。  new window
22.葛應欽(19881000)。後天免疫不全症候群流行病學。公共衛生,15(3),318-327。  延伸查詢new window
23.許須美(19940300)。從臺灣地區愛滋病的流行病學探討預防措施。醫學繼續教育,4(2),147-152。  延伸查詢new window
24.Mcdonnell, L. M.、Elmore, R. F.(1987)。Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,9(2),133-152。  new window
25.吳英明(19930600)。公私部門協力關係和「公民參與」之探討。中國行政評論,2(3),1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.陳東升(19931100)。組織間關係的理論探討。社會科學論叢,41,31-61。  延伸查詢new window
27.林水波、王崇斌(19990100)。公民參與與有效的政策執行。公共行政學報,3,175-202。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.涂醒哲(1994)。愛滋病毒的流行。愛滋病與社會工作研討會,中華民國社會工作專業人員協會 。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林超琦(1995)。層級式治理結構的評估與轉型(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Berger, Peter L.、Luckmann, Thomas(1966)。The Social Construction of Reality。Anchor Books。  new window
2.胡幼慧(1993)。社會流行病學。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Hayes, Michael T.(1992)。Incrementalism and Public Policy。New York:Longman。  new window
4.行政院衛生署(1991)。愛滋病全貌。台北:行政院衛生署。  延伸查詢new window
5.Fishkin, J. S.(1991)。Democracy & Deliberation。New Heaven:Yale University Press。  new window
6.Thompson, N.(1995)。Theory and Practice in Health and Social Welfare。Buckingham:Open University Press。  new window
7.Chen, H. T.(1990)。Theory-Driven Evaluation。Sage Publications。  new window
8.Covey, S. R.(1992)。Principle-Centered Leadership。NT:Simon & Schaster。  new window
9.Dryzek, J. S.(1990)。Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy & Political science。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Stone, D. A.(1988)。Policy Paradox & Political Reason。New York:Harper-Collins。  new window
11.Senge, P. M.(1990)。The Fifth Discipline。New York:Doubleday Currency。  new window
12.行政院衛生署(1995)。臺灣地區公共衛生發展史。臺北:行政院衛生署。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.何春蕤(19951207)。不要以文化隱喻看待疾病,中國時報。  延伸查詢new window
2.倪家珍(19951210)。台灣的愛滋病防治到底做了什麼?。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Rochefort, D. A.、Cobb, R. W.(1994)。Instrumental versus Expressive Definitions of AIDS Policy-Making。The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda。Lawrence, KA:University Press of Kansas。  new window
2.Rochefort, D. A.、Cobb, R. W.(1994)。Problem Definition: An Emerging Perspective。The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda。Lawrence, Kansas:The Univ. Press of Kansas。  new window
3.徐正光(1990)。從異化到自主:臺灣勞工運動的基本性格和趨勢。臺灣新興社會運動。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE