壹、中文部分
王如哲（2003）。教育行政學。台北市：五南。
立法院（2005）。立法院全球資訊網。2005年3月17日，取自http://www.ly.gov.tw/index.jsp
田隆源（1993）。我國著作權法修正政策合法化之研究。國立台灣師範大學三民主義研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
古登美、沈中元、周萬來（2004）。立法理論與實務。台北縣：國立空中大學。
白佳慧（1995）。全民健康保險法合法化過程之研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
行政院（2004）。中央行政機關法制作業應注意事項。台北市：行政院。
朱志宏（1990）。公共政策概論。台北市：三民。
朱志宏（1991）。政策的合法化。載於魏鏞、朱志宏、詹中原、黃德福（編著），公共政策（頁151-171）。台北縣：空大。
朱志宏（1995）。立法論。台北市：三民。
朱志宏（2004）。公共政策。台北市：三民。
吳定（1991）。公共行政論叢。台北市：天一。
吳定（2000）。公共政策（全）。台北縣：空大。
吳定（2004）。公共政策辭典。台北市：五南。
何信全（1988）。海耶克自由理論研究。台北市：聯經。
呂餘慶（1998）。國民小學教育政策執行現況及其相關因素之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
余致力（2003）。民意與公共政策—理論探討與實證研究。台北市：五南。李連寧、孫葆森（1998）。教育法制概論。北京市：教育科學。
李惠宗（2004）。教育行政法要義。台北市：元照。
周志宏、陳舜芬主編（2000）。教育法規。台北市：學林。
周志宏（2003）。教育法與教育改革。台北市：高等教育。江芳盛（1998）。垃圾桶模式在我國教育決策分析上的應用。教育政策論壇，1（2），13-25。林天祐、虞志長、張志毓、余瑞陽、邱春堂、楊士賢（1996）。教育政策行程及制訂過程之分析。初等教育學刊，5，1-40。
林水波、張世賢（2001）。公共政策。台北市：五南。
林閔政（1996）。論「民眾參與」在教育政策制定過程中的理論與實踐—以師資培育法為例。東海大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
林嘉誠、朱浤源（1992）。政治學辭典。台北市：五南。
官有垣（1998）。利益團體與政黨。載於翁興利、施能傑、官有垣、鄭麗嬌（主編），公共政策（頁69-111）。台北縣，空大。
沈弘毅（1998）。美國賭博合法化之研究-以發展沿革、觀光賭場之管制及影響效果為中心。中國文化大學美國研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
沈世國（2002）。勞基法修法合法化過程之研究—以工時案為例。國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
柯三吉（1998）。公共政策：理論、方法與台灣經驗。台北市：時英。
柯正峰（1998）。我國邁向學習社會政策制定之研究—政策問題形成、政策規劃及政策合法化探討。國立台灣師範大學社會教育學系博士論文，未出版，台北市。洪德旋、林振裕、江亮演、林勝義（1996）。社會政策與立法。台北縣：空大。
徐佳青（2002）。台灣利益團體影響墮胎藥物RU486合法化過程之研究。國立陽明大學衛生福利研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
翁興利（1998）。議程設定。載於翁興利、施能傑、官有垣、鄭麗嬌（主編），公共政策（頁167-209）。台北縣：空大。
孫治本（譯）（1999）。U. Beck著。全球化危機（Was 1st globalisierung?）。台北市：商務。
許育典（2002）。法治國與教育行政。台北市：高等教育。
張世賢（編）（2005）。公共政策分析。台北市：五南。
張芳全（1999）。教育政策。台北市：師大書苑。
張芳全（2000）。教育政策立法。台北市：五南。
張芳全（2001）。教育政策導論。台北市：五南。
張建成（2002）。批判的教育社會學研究。台北市：學富。
張景泰（1997）。我國社會工作師法合法化過程之研究。政治作戰學校政治研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
張鈿富（1996）。教育政策分析—理論與實務。台北市：五南。
教育百科辭典編審委員會（1994）。教育百科辭典。台北市：五南。
教育部（2004）。各級學校名錄。台北市：教育部。
曹俊漢（1990）。公共政策。台北市：三民。
陳文玉（1997）。政策制定過程之研究—台北縣開放教育政策個案分析。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
陳加再（2002）。教育政策合法化過程之研究—以教育基本法之制定為例。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳向明（2000）。質的研究方法與社會科學研究。北京：教育科學出版社。陳芳玲（2002）。教育政策行銷之研究—以台北縣國民小學九年一貫課程之推動為例。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，南投縣。
陳朝政（1998）。我國安樂死政策合法化議題之研究。台灣大學政治研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳銘祥（2002）。立法政策—將政策轉化為法律之理論與實踐。月旦法學，86，73-81。舒緒緯（1998）。師資培育法制訂過程及其內涵之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，高雄市。黃一峰（譯）（1987）。D. C. Kozak & J. D. Macartney著。權力遊戲規則—立法程序。載於詹中原（主編），權力遊戲規則—國會與公共政策（Congress and public policy）（頁271-316）。台北市：五南。
黃立怡（1998）。美國同性戀婚姻合法化之研究。淡江大學美國研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北縣。
黃昭元、蔡茂寅、陳忠五、林鈺雄（主編）（2001）。綜合小六法。台北市：學林。
彭詩文（2003）。艾波（M. W. Apple）「合法化知識」之研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
彭鳳偵（1990）。我國立法過程中黨政關係之研究—人民團體法個案分析。國立政治大學三民主義研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
結構群編輯群（編譯）（1991）。R. Cotterrell著。法律社會學導論（The sociology of law : An introduction）。台北市：結構群文化。
湯絢章（1993）。公共政策（上下）。台北市：商務。
楊桂杰（1999）。我國教育立法歷程及其模式建構之研究。國立台灣師範大學三民主義研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。詹金月（1995）。我國全民健康保險政策合法化過程之研究。國立陽明大學衛生福利研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
廖俊松、周俊妹、邱靜儀（1999）。立法決策機會因素的研究。中國行政評論，8（2），75-108。劉國兆（2003）。地方教師會影響教育政策合法化過程之研究—以台北市國中小校長遴選自治條例為例。銘傳大學公共管理與社區發展研究所碩士在職專班論文，未出版，台北市。
翟國將（1985）。資訊系統與政策合法化：我國立法院資訊系統之方案設計及預評。國立中興大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
葉連祺（2000）。析論中小學學校內部規範法治化之流程和策略。學校行政，10，93-98。
葉俊榮（2001）。面對行政程序法—轉型台灣的程序建制。台北市：元照。謝文全（2003）。教育行政學。台北市：高等教育。
謝卓君（2002）。教育基本法制定過程之個案研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
謝美慧（2001）。教育政策評估理論之研究—以北高兩市幼兒教育卷政策為例。國立台灣師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，台北市。謝瑞智（1996）。教育法學。台北市：文笙。
謝榮泰（1982）。墮胎合法化問題之研究。東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
應群（1982）。我國國家賠償法的政策分析。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
蔣嘉一（1985）。司法院大法官會議與政策合法化之研究。國立台灣大學政治研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
蔡茂寅、李建良、林明鏘、周志宏（2001）。行政程序法實用。台北市：學林。顏國樑（1996）。教育政策執行及其相關因素之研究—理論建構與應用分析。國立台灣師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，台北市。顏國樑（1997）。教育政策執行理論與應用。台北市：師大書苑。
顏國樑（2002a）。我國教育政策合法化的過程、影響因素及其啟示。新竹師院學報，15，1-36。
顏國樑（2002b）。教育法規。高雄市：麗文。
顏厥安、周志宏、李建良（1995）。教育法令之整理與檢討。載於行政院教育改革審議委員會委託研究案學術研討會系列一之「鬆綁原則」學術研討會論文集。瞿立鶴（1987）。教育政策理論之分析。理論與政策月刊，1（2），5-9。羅清水（1999）。教育政策執行評估之研究—以高職實用技能班政策為例。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。羅傳賢（2002）。立法程序與技術。台北市：五南。
羅傳賢（2004）。國會與立法技術。台北市：五南。
羅曉雯（2001）。國中基本學力測驗教育政策執行之研究—以台北市國民中學為例。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
貳、外文部分
Alexiadou , N. (2002). Social inclusion and social exclusion in England: Tensions in education policy. Journal of Educational Policy, 17(1), 71-86.Alpert, E. J. (1979). A reconceptualization of representational role theory. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4, 587-604.
Anderson, J. E. (1975). Public policy-making. New York: Praeger.
Anderson, J. E. (1990). Public policy making. New York: CBS College Publishing.
Anderson, J. E. (1997). Public policy making: An introduction. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Barnett, R. A. (1985). Higher education: Legitimation crisis. Studies in Higher Education, 10(3), 241-255.
Bentley, A.F. (1967). The process of government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Binderkrantz, B. (2005). Interest group strategies: Navigating between privileged access and strategies of pressure. Political Studies, 53(4), 694-719.
Birnbaum, R. (2000). Policy scholars are from Venus: Policy makers are from Mars. The Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 119-132.
Blackmore, J., & Thorpe, S. (2003). Media / ting change: The print media’s role in mediating education policy in a period of radical reform in Victoria, Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 18(6), 577-595.
Box, R.C. (1995). Critical theory and the paradox of discourse. American Review of Public Administration, 25(1), 1-17.Carl, H. V., Baumer, D. C., & Gormley, W. T. (1992). Politics and public policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Cobb, J. J. (1981). An introduction to educational law: For administrators and teachers. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Codd, J. A. (1988). The construction and deconstruction of educational policy documents. Journal of Education Policy, 3(3), 235-247.
Dahl, R. A., & Lindblom, C. E. (1953). Politics, economics, and welfare. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Daugherty, R., & Eleed-Owens, P. (2003). A national curriculum for Wales: A case study of education policy making in the era of administrative devolution. British Journal of Education Studies, 51(3), 233-253.
Derthick, M., & Quirk, P. (1985). The politics of deregulation. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution.
Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Dror, Y. (1968). Public policymaking reexamined. New York: Chandler Pulishing.
Dudley, G. (2004). The enlightenment function and dimensions of time: Evolutionary theory and limits of privatisation in British Trunk Roads policy. Political Studies, 6, 389-408.
Dyke, V. V. (1968). Process and policy as focal concepts in political research. In R. Austin(Ed.), Political Science and Public Policy, (pp.23-40). Chicago: Markham.
Dye, T. R., & Zeigler, L. H. (1975). The irony of democracy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Dye, T. R. (1998). Understanding public policy. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Easton, D. (1953). Political system. New York: Knopf.
Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Elleven, R. K., & Walker, M. (2003). Legal training and perception of chief housing officers: A southwestern United State study. Education and the Law, 15(1), 59-66.Etzioni, A. (1969). Readings on modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Farrar, E. (1988). Introduction to “Federal education policy: A review of the 80s”. Educational Policy, 2(4), 339-342.
Fenger, M., & Klok, P. (2001). Interdependency, beliefs, and coalition behavior: A contribution to advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sciences 34, 157-170.
Fisher, L.A. (1988). State legislatures and the autonomy of colleges and universities: Comparative study legislation in four states. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(2), 133-162.
Franklin, B. (2004). Education, education and indoctrination! Packaging politics and the three ‘Rs’. Journal of Education Policy, 19(3), 255-271.
Friedrich, C. J. (1963). Man and his government: An empirical theory of politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Garson, G. D. (1976). Handbook of political methods. Boston: Holbrook.
Gawthrop, L. (1971). Administrative politics and social change. New York: St. Martins.
Gershberg, A. I. (1999). Education ’decentralization’ process in Mexico and Nicaragua: Legislative versus ministry-led reform strategies. Comparative Education, 35(1), 63-85.Goldstein, K. M. (1999). Interest groups, lobbying, and participation in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gouveia-Pereira, M., Vala, J., Palmonavi, A., & Rubin, M. (2003). School experience, relational justice and legitimation of institutional. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18(3), 309-325.
Grant, K., & Edgar, D. (2003). Using the theory of policy networks and communities to explore who determines the Scottish higher education research policy: Issues for education managers. The International Journal of Educational Management, 17(7), 318-329.
Gunnell J. (1996). The genealogy of American pluralism: from Madison to behavioralisn. International Political Science Review, 17(3), 253-265.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge: Polity.
Hasecke, E. B. (2002). Balancing the Legislative Agenda: Scheduling in the United States House of Representatives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
Herman, V., & Mendel, F. (1976). Parliaments of the world. London: Macmillan.
Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Honig, M. I. (2004). Where is “up” in bottom-up reform? Educational Policy 18(4), 527-561.
Jansen, J. D. (1990). Curriculum policy as compensatory legitimation? A view form the periphery. Oxford Review of Education, 16(1), 10-29.Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1990). Democratic politics and policy analysis. Baltimore, MD: Brooks Publishing.
Jewell, M. E., & Patterson, S. C. (1977). The legislative process in the United States. New York: Random House.
Johannesson, I. A., Geirsdottir, G. & Finnbogason, G. E. (2002). Modern education sagas: Legitimation of idea and practice in Iceland education. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research, 46(3), 1-49.
Johnson, B.L. (1999). The politics of research-information use in the education policy arena. Education Policy, 13(1), 23-36.Jones, C. O. (1973). Political science and state and local government. Washington D. C.: American Political Science Association.
Jones, C. O. (1977). An introduction to the study of public policy. Boston : Duxburg.
Jones, C. O. (1984). An introduction to the study of public policy. Monterey, CA: Books Cole.
Jordan, G. (2000). The process of government and the government process. Political studies, 48, 788-801.
Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Kollman, K. (1998). Outside lobbying: Public opinion and interest group strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kuklinski, J. H., & Elling, R. C. (1977). Representational role, constituency option and legislative roll-call behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 72, 165-177.
Kuklinski, J. H. (1979). Representativeness and elections: A policy analysis. American Political Science Review, 21, 135-147.
Lasswell, H., & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Levi, M. (1990). Introduction: the limits of rationality. In M. Levi et al. (Ed.), The limits of rationality (pp.1-16). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, B. (2004). Media-government relations in education. Journal of Educational Policy, 19(3), 271-284.
Levite, A., & Tarrow, S. (1983). The legitimation of excluded parties in dominant party system: A comparison of Israel and Italy. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15(3), 295-327.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19, 79-88.
Lindblom, C. E. (1968). The policy-making process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lindblom, C. E. (1979). Still mudding, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39(6), 517-526.
Lindblom, C. E. (1994). Success through inattention in school administration and elsewhere. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(2), 199-213.
Lowi, T. J. (1995). The end of the republican era. Norman, OK: The University of Oklahoma Press.
Magalhes, P. C. (2003).The limit to judicialization: Legislative politics and constitutional review in the Iberian democracies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
Mahoney, C. (2004). The power of institution: State and interest group activity in the European Union. European Union politics, 5(4), 441-466.
March, J. G., & Olson, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free.
Mazzoni, T. M. (1991). Analyzing state school policymaking: An arena model. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 13(2), 115-138.
McDaniel, J. E., Sims, C. A., & Miskel, C.G. (2001). The national reading policy arena: Policy actors and perceived influence. Educational policy, 15(1), 92-114.McLendon, M. K. (2003). Setting the governmental agenda for state decentralization of higher education. The journal of higher education, 74( 5), 479-515.
Merelman, R. M. (1966). Learning and legitimacy. American political science review, 60, 553.
Meyer, K. (1980). Legislative influence: Toward theory development through causal analysis. Legislative studies quarterly, 5(4), 32-54.
Milbrath, L. (1963). The Washington lobbyists. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1996). Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change. Policy studies journal, 24, 420-434.
Mondak, J. J. (1994). Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The Sources and Contexts of legitimation. Political Research Quarterly, 47(3), 675-692.
Mundo, P. A. (1992). Interest groups: Cases and characteristics. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Nord, W. R. (1976). Concept and controversy in organization behavior. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publisher.
Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ordeshook, P. C. (1986). Game theory and political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ornstei, N., & Elder, S. (1978). Interest groups, lobbying and policymaking. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
Peabody, R. L. et al. (1973). To enact a law. New York: Praeger.
Persianis, P. (1998). Compensatory legitimation in Greek educational policy: An explanation for the abortive educational reforms in Greece in comparison with those in France. Comparative Education, 34(1), 71-84.Persianis, P. (2000). Conflict between centrality and localism and its impact on knowledge construction and legitimation in peripheral universities: The case of the University of Cyprus. Compare, 30(1), 35-51.Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Quade, E. S. (1989). Analysis for public decisions. New York: American Elsevier.
Quie, A. H. (1973). The U.S. House of representative and education legislation. Educational Research, 2(9), 11-17.
Quie, A. H. (1979). Albert H. Quie: Education policy legislation. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(4), 71-74.Ranney, A. (1968). The study of policy content: A framework for choice. In R. Austin (Ed.), Political science and public policy (pp.3-22). Chicago: Markham.
Ranney, A. (1996). Governing: An introduction to political science. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rieselbach, L. N. (1973). Congressional politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Riker, W. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rochford, F. (2003). Academic freedom as insubordination: The legalisation of the academy. Education and the Law, 15(4). New York: Routledge.
Rosenthal, A., & Fuhrman, S. (1981). Legislative education staff in the states. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 3(4), 5-16.
Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21-48.Sabatier, P. A. (1999). Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Sancken, D. M., & Medina, M. J. (1990). Investigation the content of state-level policy formation: A case study of Arizona’s bilingual education legislation. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(4), 389-402.
Sato, H. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: The policy process analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 27(1), 28-44.Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden.
Schlager, E. (1995). Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sciences, 28, 243-270.
Seidman, L. M. (2002). Democracy and legitimation: A response to professor Guinier. Loyola University Chicago Law, 34(1), 77-87.Sharkansky, I. (1972). Public administration: Policy-marking in government agencies. Chicago: Markham.
Shoop, R. J., & Dunklee, D. R. (1992). School law for the principal: A handbook for practitioners. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Smith, R. A. (1995). Interest group influence in the U. S. congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 20(21), 89-159.
Smith, T. A. (1982). A phenomenology of the policy process. International Journal of Sociology , 23(1), 1-16.Song. M., & Miskel, C. (2005). Who are the influentials? A cross-state social network analysis of the reading policy domain. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 7-48.Starling, G. (1988). Strategies for policy making. Chicago: The Dorsey.
Stewart, D. J. (1998). Legalisation of education: Implications for principals' professional knowledge. Journal of Educational Administration, 36 (2), 129-145.
Ston, D. (2000). Non-governmental policy transfer: The strategies of independent policy institutes. Governance: An international Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(1), 45–62.Tacheron, D., & Udall, M. K. (1970). The job of the congressman. Indianapolis. IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Tamanaha, B.Z. (1999). The view of Habermas from below: Doubts about the centrality of law and legitimation enterprise. Denver University Law Review, 76(4), 456-478.
Taylor, A. (2002). Informing education policy. Journal of Educational Policy, 17(1), 49-70.Teichler, U. (1998, December). Current agendas and priorities in higher education policy research: An international view. Paper presented at National conference on the future of higher education policy and research. Canberra, Australia.
Thorpenberg, S. (2005). University policy and ideological shift: On reversed reification and norm system changes. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 3(1), 52-78.Truman, D. B. (1971). The governmental process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Wade, L. L. (1972). The elements of public policy. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Wahlke, J., Eulau, H., Buchanan, W., & Ferguson, L. C. (1962). The legislative system: Explorations in legislative behavior. New York: Wiley.
Weiler, H. N. (1983). Legalization, expertise, and participation: Strategies of compensatory legitimation in education. Comparative Education Review, 27(2), 259-277.
Weiler, H. N. (1988). The politics of reform and nonreform in French education. Comparative Education Review, 32(3), 251-261.
Yates, B. L. (2004). Media literacy and the policymaking process: A framework for understanding influences on potential educational policy outputs. Simile, 4(1), 257-289.Zander, M. (1990). The law-making process. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Zelditch, M. (2001). Process of legitimation: Recent development and new direction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(1), 4-17.