:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:理學在清初的沒落過程
書刊名:國文學誌
作者:張麗珠
作者(外文):Zhang, Li-zhu
出版日期:2000
卷期:4
頁次:頁99-117
主題關鍵詞:實用化孫奇逢黃宗羲李顒易圖大學古文尚書Practical useSuen, Chi-fengHuang, Zong-xiLi, YongYi mapDa XueAntiquated Book
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(3) 專書(4) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:702
  • 點閱點閱:37
     清初,理學的影響力仍未完全衰替。康熙帝為重整綱紀,甚至提倡程朱理學,重開日講,並且恢復經筵大典;此外,以朱子思想為官方哲學的考試政策,清代也一直沿襲未變。只不過清近之推尊程朱,有其藉思想統一以遂箝制思想之政治目的。因此清廷之推尊程朱,著重在道德約束,主於藉倫常之教以鞏固封建序;至於理學中心思辨色彩,則是被摒棄在外的。但是這樣「實用化」與道德教條僵化的狹隘走向,使得理學的學術生命被扼殺,而步上理論貧乏的難以賡續發展之路。另一方面則王學也在清廷的獨尊程朱之下,發展空間遭受嚴重阻滯;復在「空談誤國」的各方集矢下,修正其學風為轉趨經世徵實,如孫奇逢、黃宗羲、李顒等。再者,喋喋不休的朱、王之爭,在清初也各自轉向尋求經典的支持,如此一來,更加直接地推動了有清一代的經典考證之學。至此,理學益發退居伏流,而方興未艾的考據學,則取代其主流地位且蔚為風潮了。
     Li Studies were still in a strong position in the early decades of the Cing Dynasty. In order to reestablish social and political order, Emporor Kang Xi (康熙) even promoted Cheng and Zhu's Studies (程朱理學). He ordered daily lectures be given and Forums of classical studies be reconvened. In addition, the Ching Dynasty still employed Zhu Xi's thought as the official philosophy in its examination system to elect state bureaucrats. It is clear that the Court had political purposes in emphasizing Cheng and Zhu. They wanted to unify thought in order to contain it. By focusing on moral constraint they strengthened feudal order through state ethical apparatus. As for the dialectical elements in Cheng-zhu Studies, the Ching Dynasty simply discarded it. This development of practical and narrow dogmatism barricades the scholarly prospects of Cheng-zhu Studies, making the poverty of theory a route unfit for thought growth. On the other hand, the space of development for Wang Studies (王陽明學) was seriously hampered by courtly privileging of Cheng-Zhu Studies. Worse still, attacked by the phrase "Empty discourses destroy state," scholars such as Suen Chi-feng (孫奇逢), Huang Zong-xi (黃宗羲), and Li Yong (李顒) started to redirect their thought, making it more worldly oriented and adapted to reality. Additionally, the controversies over Zhu and Wang also ended up in seeking support from the Classics, furthermore contributing to the focus of textual criticism during the next two centuries. This is how Cheng-zhu Studies declined to the state of a hidden river and how textual criticism completely swapped Cheng-zhu Studies and became the main trend of Ching scholarship.
Other
1.顧亭林。夫子之言性與天道。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.清聖祖(1966)。康熙帝御製文集(4冊)。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.梁啟超(197809)。中國近三百年學術史。臺北:臺灣中華書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.章學誠(1980)。文史通義。臺北:華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳確(1979)。陳確集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.張麗珠(19990000)。清代義理學新貌。臺北:里仁書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)朱筠(1980)。國朝漢學師承記,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1980)。朱子晚年定論,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1982)。答顧東橋書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.顧亭林(1982)。與人書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.清聖祖實錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.(1993)。謝濟世著書案,江蘇。  延伸查詢new window
7.(1985)。與朱自綠書,北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.(清)黃宗羲(1987)。序,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.(清)黃宗羲(1970)。移史館論不宜立理學傳書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.(1986)。王守仁傳,上海。  延伸查詢new window
11.持守,北京。  延伸查詢new window
12.(1968)。示徐生書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.(1974)。新刻十三經注疏序,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.(1982)。大禹謨,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.全祖望(1977)。二曲先生窆石文。鮚埼亭集。臺北:華世書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE