資料顯示，伯公瓏遺艗的考古材料，並不能做為定義「網形文化」的基礎。但「網形文化」卻草率地被發表，甚至納入國中，高中和大學生的歷史教科書裡，當成認和了解臺灣史前史的唯一教材。本文列舉各項令人質疑和引發爭議的部份，一方面希望編輯教科書的專家們重視這個問題；此外，也讓使用這些教材的老師和學生們明白問題的癥結；最重要的，企盼研究臺灣考古的專家學者們檢討和反省，定義一個新考古文化的判準和可能造成的嚴重後果。

　　　　　At present, there are three different versions of prehistoric cultural developmental sequences and chronology in Taiwan. However, the textbook editors of Junior middle, Senior high, and some in college have adopted the one which has "Wang-hsing Wen-hua (Wang-hsing culture)" in preceramic time period as exclusive material to learn the prehistory of Taiwan. The goal of this paper is to point out, based on the archaeological data and final field report yielded form Po-kung-long site, not enough material could define this "newly found" cultural component in Taiwan. The paper would also like to call attention to the archaeologists in Taiwan: never try to discover a cultural component simply by "like goes with like" principle, lest the public should be miseducated.