:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高科技產業薪資管理、薪資滿意、公平認知與人才吸引和維持效果關係之研究
書刊名:高應科大人文社會科學學報
作者:余明助 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Ming-chu
出版日期:2004
卷期:1
頁次:頁213-231
主題關鍵詞:報酬結構公平認知薪資滿意人才吸引人力維持CompensationEquityCompensation satisfactionManpower attractivenessHuman maintenance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:57
  • 點閱點閱:38
本研究主要目的在於驗證臺灣高科技公司的薪資結構是否會受到亣資滿意度、薪鄭公平認知的中介作用,進而影響人才吸引與維持的效果,並試圖建立一倍較完整的架構,來說明薪資管理體系與人才吸引與維持之間的關係。本研究針對101家臺灣高科技公司進行豆。主要的研究結果為:(1)薪資政策中的風險分站與資內部一致性會影響薪資滿意度;(2)職本位和技能本位給薪會影響個人公平認知,績效本位給薪會影響內部公平認知,技能本位給薪會影響外部公平認知;(3)薪資滿意度會影響人才吸引、員工關係和離職傾向;(4)內部公平認知會顯著影響員工關係和離職傾向,而內部公平與外部公平認知同時會影響人才吸引。
This research attempts to establish an appropriate model to examine how, in Taiwan’s high-tech companies, manpower attractiveness, relationships, and leave of absences are affected by compensation structure through the mediation of compensation satisfaction and equity. By stratified random sampling, the sample consists of 101 high-tech companies. The important findings are as follows: (1) Risk sharing and internal consistency in pay relationships are both positive factors exerting impact on compensation satisfaction. (2) Job-based pay and skill-based pay are both positively correlated to cognition of individual equity. Performance-based pay is making significant impact on internal equity, and skill-based pay is positively correlated to external equity. (3) Compensation satisfaction is positively correlated to manpower attractiveness, employee relationships and leave of absences. (4) Internal equity has a significant impact on employee relationships and leave of absences. External equity and individual equity are both positively correlated to manpower attractiveness.
期刊論文
1.Buchko, Aaron A.(1992)。Employee Ownership, Attitudes, and Turnover: An Empirical Assessment。Human Relations,45(7),711-733。  new window
2.Snell, S. A.、Dean, J. W. Jr(1994)。Strategic compensation for integrated manufacturing: The moderating effects of job and organizational inertia。Academy of Management Journal,37,1109-1140。  new window
3.Gomez-Mejia, L. R.、Welbourne, T. H.(1988)。Compensation Strategy: An Overview and Future Steps。Human Resource Planning,11(3),173-189。  new window
4.丘宏昌(19970600)。各種薪資酬償制度之介紹與比較。臺北銀行月刊,27(6)=320,50-55。  延伸查詢new window
5.Berger, C. J.、Schwab, D. P.(1980)。Pay Incentives and Pay Satisfaction。Industrial Relations,19,206-211。  new window
6.Fay, C. H.、Thompson, M. A.(2001)。Contextual Determinants of Reward System'€™s Success:An Exploratory Study。Human Resource Management,40(3),213-226。  new window
7.Milkovich, T. A.(1988)。A Strategic Perspective on Compensation Management。Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management,6,263-288。  new window
8.Balkin, David B.、Gomez-Mejia, Luis R.(1990)。Matching compensation and organizational strategies。Strategic Management Journal,11,153-169。  new window
9.Brown, C.(1990)。Firms choice of method of pay。Industrial and Labor Relations Review,43,165-182。  new window
10.Dittrich, J. E.、Carrell, M. R.(1979)。Organizational equity perceptions, employee job satisfaction, and departmental absence and turnover rates。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,24(1),29-40。  new window
11.溫金豐、錢書華(20020300)。報酬結構、認知公平與研發人員績效關係之研究:以某高科技研究機構為例。人力資源管理學報,2(1),19-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃同圳(19951200)。教育程度、工作年資與性別對薪資決定之交互作用效果分析。中山管理評論,3(4),64-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Cooper, Elizabeth A.、Scholl, Richard W.、McKenna, Jack F.(1987)。Referent Selection in Determining Equity Perceptions: Differential Effects on Behavioral and Attitudinal Outcomes。Personnel Psychology,40(1),113-124。  new window
14.洪瑞聰、余坤東、梁金樹(19980400)。薪資決定因素與薪資滿意關係之研究。管理與資訊學報,3,97-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Lippert, R. L.、Porter, G.(1997)。A Test of Two Pay-to- Performance Sensitivity Measures with Alternative Measures of Alignment and Influence。Journal of Business Research,40(2),21-38。  new window
16.Balkin, D. B.、Gomez-Mejia, L. R.(1987)。Toward A Contingency Theory of Compensation Strategy。Strategic Management Journal,8(2),169-182。  new window
17.Moorman, Robert H.(1991)。Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?。Journal of Applied Psychology,76(6),845-855。  new window
18.諸承明(20010600)。薪酬設計理論與實務之整合性模式--臺灣大型企業實證分析。人力資源管理學報,1(1),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林泓典(1998)。電腦整合製造與薪資策略之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭榮哲(1992)。策略性的薪資設計在管理上的應用(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳文俊(1990)。員工薪資滿足之研究--以製造業為例(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡玲玉(1989)。薪酬管理制度與勞資關係氣氛之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃家齊(1997)。技術特性與薪資給付基礎之關係研究:績效控制觀點(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Henderson, R. I.(1989)。Compensation management: Rewarding performance。New York:Prentice Hall。  new window
2.吳家聲(1988)。員工分紅入股制度之研究。行政院勞工委員會綜合規劃處。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅業勤(1998)。績效管理--専業經理人手冊。台北:羅業勤。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lawler, E. E.(1971)。Pay and Development。MA:Addison- Wesley。  new window
5.Martocchio, Joseph J.(2000)。Strategic compensation: A Human Resource Management Approach。New Jersey:Prentice Hall, Inc.。  new window
6.李長貴(1998)。績效管理與績效評估。台北:華泰書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.Wallace, M. J. Jr.、Fay, C. H.(1988)。Compensation Theory and Practice。Boston:PWS-KENT Publishing Co.。  new window
8.Lawler, E.(1971)。Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
9.何永福、楊國安(1995)。人力資源策略管理。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.李誠(2001)。高科技產業人力資源管理。臺北:天下遠見。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃英忠(1997)。人力資源管理。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Leventhal, Gerald S.(1980)。What should be done with equality theory?。Social exchange: Advance in theory and research。New York, NY:Plenum Press。  new window
2.Heneman, H. G.、Judge, T. A.(2000)。Compensation attitudes。Compensation in Organizations : Current Research and Practice。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE