:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:戴震「陰陽氣化」說
書刊名:中國文化大學中文學報
作者:陳正宜
作者(外文):Chen, Cheng-yi
出版日期:2009
卷期:19
頁次:頁39-64
主題關鍵詞:戴震陰陽宇宙觀人性論氣化以情絜情Dai ZhenYin and YangChiCosmologyTheory of human natureChi transformationQi
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:137
  • 點閱點閱:77
戴震生於清朝雍正、乾隆之際,其學術風潮由總結明亡之因而轉向實學,此轉向正提供了氣學得以成熟發展的環境。因此,戴震在此學風下,加上自身由服膺程朱,到開始反對程朱之學,甚而批判其摻雜佛老不復孔孟儒學宗旨。故其思想產生變化,冀透過經典考據,藉由溯源的方法以回歸儒學之義理,所以戴震具體將羅欽順、王廷相以來的氣本體論,豐富其本體內涵,以「陰陽五行,氣化之實」說明本體之氣因內在二五比例的不同,因而生成萬殊之世界。此不僅合理詮釋世界之多樣性外,更指出程朱以絕對形上本體之理解釋氣化世界之多變,是與經驗事實相違背。再者,戴震重氣之實踐,認為一氣通貫形上下,不僅消融天人之別,更將本體之道德義賦予形下人倫日用中,並使人成為唯一的道德實踐者;此不但讓氣化宇宙具人文精神,亦證明了人的價值。故此透過對戴震「氣」的分析,以推見其「天地間百物生生,無非推本陰陽」的基本主張。
Dai-Zhen, Ching Dynasty, was born between Yong-Zheng and Qian-Long two emperors. Because of the fall of Ming Dynasty, the academic trend at the time shifted from pure theoretic practices to practical applications. This change provided the study of Chi an environment to mature. Thus, under this kind of atmosphere, Dai- Zhen switched from a firm supporter of Cheng-Chu Neo -Confucianism to opposing them; going as far as stating their principals contain elements of Buddhism and Daoism, therefore cannot represent the ideas of Confucius. This prompted him to try to find the true meaning of Confucius' ideas by studying old documents. Dai- Zhen complemented Lo-Chin Shun and Wang-Ting's idea of Chi, using "Yin-Yang and five elements, concrete content of the change of Chi" to illustrate how the different ratios of elements in a body can create various changes. Not only does this theory rationally explained the versatility of the world, it also pointed out how unpractical Cheng-Chu's "metaphysics" theory is at performing such task. Dai-Zhen also placed a great emphasis on the practical application of Chi, thinking that Chi can go through visible and invisible, not only diminishing the differences between man and nature, but also possessing a virtuous meaning. This implied that man has the ability to exercise virtuous deeds, making this versatile world not only humanistic, but also proving the value of man. So through Dai-Zhen's analyzing of Chi, we can conclude that in his understanding, nothing of this world is born without the aid of the Ying and the Yang.
期刊論文
1.吳宣德(20010500)。戴震「理欲」說對宋明理學的繼承與改造。哲學與文化,28(5)=324,440-456+478。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陶清(20060900)。戴震哲學思想研究--以《孟子字義疏證》為個案。鵝湖,32(3)=375,31-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.杜保瑞(2005)。戴震重建儒學概念的理解與評價。哲學與文化,32(11),33-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.王俊彥(2007)。戴震的氣化整體論。臺北。152。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.任繼愈(1990)。中國哲學史(四)。中國哲學史(四)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.姜國柱(1993)。中國歷史思想史(壹、先秦卷)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱子。四書集註。  延伸查詢new window
4.張麗珠(2002)。清代義理學新貌。臺北:里仁書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王充、黃暉(1995)。論衡校釋。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳怡(1994)。老子解義。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃宗羲(1992)。明儒學案。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.張立文(1991)。戴震。臺北:東大圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王廷相(1989)。王廷相集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.王弼、樓宇烈(1992)。王弼集校釋。華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.張載(1968)。張子全書。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.羅欽順、閻韜(1990)。困知記。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.王夫之(1998)。張子正蒙注。岳麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
14.董仲舒、蘇輿(1974)。春秋繁露義證。臺北:河洛圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.朱熹(1979)。朱文公集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)戴震(1995)。孟子私淑錄,合肥。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)戴震(1995)。東原文集,合肥。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)戴震(1995)。中庸補注,合肥。  延伸查詢new window
4.(清)戴震(1995)。原善,合肥。  延伸查詢new window
5.(清)段玉裁(1995)。東原年譜定補,安徽。  延伸查詢new window
6.(清)戴震(1995)。孟子字義疏證,安徽。  延伸查詢new window
7.(西漢)司馬遷。史記,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.(清)戴震(1995)。緒言,合肥。  延伸查詢new window
9.(清)戴震(1995)。戴東原先生文,合肥。  延伸查詢new window
10.(明)王夫之(1973)。讀四書大全說,北京。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE