:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:自我發展與利他服務價值觀的融合:華人工作價值的變遷與發展
書刊名:本土心理學研究
作者:王叢桂 引用關係羅國英 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Chung-kweiLo, Kuo-ying
出版日期:2010
卷期:33
頁次:頁3-57
主題關鍵詞:工作價值價值融合Altruistic valueIntegration of valuesSelf-developmentWork values value
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:623
  • 點閱點閱:89
台灣地區過去十餘年間在政治、社會結構與經濟體系上有極大的轉變,對傳統華人以關係取向建構的自我概念與相關價值造成衝擊;本文企圖從個別工作者的訪談中分析台灣華人工作價值的變遷過程。研究者訪問了八位同時重視自我成長與服務群體價值的工作者,根據受訪者的工作價值發展與融合的歷程,將他們分為下列二種類型,雖然他們都同時重視自我成長與利他社會服務,二者在價值融合的動機與機制上並不相同:(1)經由服務社群以發展自我能力與價值達成自我實現者;(2)經由服務社群以建構獨立自主自我的工作者。研究者進一步指出社會經濟結構變化帶來的富裕、貧富差距、社會運動與非政府組織的興起、傳統哲學思想與西方自我實現概念的引入,是使工作者能夠融合自我發展與服務社群的工作價值觀念的重要因素。
The study was intended to depict the work end-value development process of workers who integrate individual-oriented self-development values and relationship-oriented altruistic values. Researchers interviewed 3 male and 5 female part time or full time worker for non-profit organizations. Age of interviewees ranged from 30 to 57 at time of interview. Results suggested that the structural change of social and economic context, the rise of social movements and NGOs, the introduction of western self-actualization theory and concepts, and traditional Chinese philosophical beliefs contribute to the integration of self-development and altruistic values. Interviewees were categorized into 2 subtypes based on their value formation process. Four interviewees regarded altruistic social services as the fulfillment of their innate abilities and inherited values. The other four self-verified and reconstructed their self identities by assisting disadvantaged minorities with whom they had fused identities.
期刊論文
1.葉啟政(19951200)。結構以外:歷史的社會學理路初探。二十一世紀,32,39-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Brindley, T. A.(1990)。Socio-psychological Values in the Republic of China。Asian Thought and Society,15(43),1-16。  new window
3.Schimmack, U., Oishi, S.,、Diener, E.(2005)。Individualism: A valid and important dimension of cultural differences between nations。Personality & Social Psychology Review,9,17-31。  new window
4.Chirkov, V.、Ryan, R. M.、Kim, Y.、Kaplan, U.(2003)。Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84(1),97-110。  new window
5.Chinese Culture Connection(1987)。Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture。Journal of Cross--Cultural Psychology,18(2),143-164。  new window
6.Markus, Hazel Rose、Kitayama, Shinobu(1991)。Cultural and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation。Psychological Review,98(2),224-253。  new window
7.瞿宛文(20070300)。臺灣戰後經濟發展與民主運動。臺灣社會研究季刊,65,183-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Ho, D. Y. F.(1995)。Selfhood and identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Constructs with the West。Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior,25(2),115-139。  new window
9.Yeh, K. H.、Yang, Y. J.(2006)。Construct validation of individuating and relating autonomy orientations in culturally Chinese adolescents。Asian Journal of Social Psychology,9(2),148-160。  new window
10.Triandis, H. C.(1989)。The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts。Psychological Review,96(3),506-520。  new window
11.Batson, C. D.、Polycarpou, M. P.、Harmon-Jones, E.、Imhoff, H. J.、Mitchener, E. C.、Bednar, L. L.、Highberger, L.(1997)。Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72(1),105-118。  new window
12.陸洛、楊國樞(20050600)。社會取向與個人取向的自我實現觀:概念分析與實徵初探。本土心理學研究,23,3-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陸洛(20031200)。人我關係之界定--「折衷自我」的現身。本土心理學研究,20,139-207。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Hsu, Francis L. K.(1971)。Psychosocial Homeostasis and Jen: Conceptual Tools for Advancing Psychological Anthropology。American Anthropologist,73(1),23-44。  new window
15.楊國樞(20041200)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究:社會取向與個人取向的觀點。本土心理學研究,22,11-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.王叢桂(19931200)。三個世代大學畢業工作者的價值觀。本土心理學研究,2,206-250。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.王叢桂(20020600)。影響工作價值觀傳遞之因素:男性中小企業主及一般職業工作者子女之比較。應用心理研究,14,117-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Brewer, Marilynn B.、Gardner, Wendi W.(1996)。Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71(1),83-93。  new window
19.Brewer, M. B.,、Chen Y. R.(2007)。Where (Who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of indicidualism and collectivism。Psychological Review,114(1),133-151。  new window
20.Fiske, A. P.(2002)。Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures-A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al。Psychological Bulletin,128(1),78-88。  new window
21.Ho D. Y. F.(1991)。Relational orientation and methodological relationalism。Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society,26-27,;81-95。  new window
22.Swann, W. B. Jr. Gómez, Á. Seyle, D. C. Morales, J. F.、Huici, C.(2009)。Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,96(5),,995-1011。  new window
23.Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M.,、Kemmelmeier, M.(2002)。Rethinking indicidualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.。Psychological Bulletin,128,,3-72.。  new window
會議論文
1.王叢桂、羅國英(2007)。:〈體制與價值:影響台灣校園人權信念落實之因素〉。台北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.楊國樞(1995)。父子軸家庭與夫妻軸家庭的運作特徵與歷程:夫妻關係 (計畫編號:NSC85-2417-H-002-028-G8)。台北:行政院青年輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Yang K. S.(2001)。Beyond Maslow’s culture-bound, linear theory: A preliminary statement of the Double-Y model of basic human needs.。Lincoln, NE。  new window
圖書
1.Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich、Baillie, J. B.(1967)。The Phenomenology of Mind。New York:Harper & Row Publishers。  new window
2.鄭伯壎(2005)。組織行為的回顧與前瞻:個人層次。臺北縣新店市:桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Deci, Edward、Ryan, Richard(1985)。Intricic Motivation and Self-determination。New York, NY:Plenum Press Publishing Co.。  new window
4.Smith, Jonathan A.、丁興祥、王勇智、曾寶瑩、李文玫、張慈宜(2006)。質性心理學:研究方法的實務指南。臺北:遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Fukuyama, Francis(1992)。The End of History and the Last Man。London:New York:Hamish Hamilton:Free Press。  new window
6.Giddens, Anthony(1991)。Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age。Cambridge:Blackwell Publishers。  new window
7.Fukuyama, Francis、李宛蓉(1998)。誠信:社會德性與繁榮的創造。臺北:立緒文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.何明修(2005)。社會運動概論。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.文崇一(19890000)。中國人的價值觀。臺北:東大圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Hofstede, Geert H.(1980)。Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values。Beverly Hills, California:Sage。  new window
11.Maslow, Abraham H.(1954)。Motivation and Personality。Harper & Row。  new window
12.黃光國(20090000)。儒家關係主義:哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Hofstede, Geert H.(2001)。Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organisations Across Nations。Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications。  new window
14.楊國樞(20020000)。華人心理的本土化研究。臺北市:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Burkitt, I.(2008)。Social selves: Theories of self and society。London:Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.Markus, Hazel Rose、Kitayama, Shinobu(1994)。The Cultural Construction of Self and Emotion: Implications for Social Behavior。Emotion and Culture: Empirical Studies of Mutual Influence。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
2.Hsu, F. L. K.(1985)。The self in cross-cultural perspective。Culture and Self: Asian and Western perspectives。Tavistock。  new window
3.楊中芳(19910000)。試論中國人的「自己」:理論與研究方向。中國人.中國心:人格與社會篇。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Tajfel, Henri、Turner, John C.(1979)。An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict。The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations。Brooks/Cole。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE