臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：澳洲布里斯本澳籍臺裔的離散認同研究
書刊名：人口學刊
作者：蔡珮 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tasi, Pei
出版日期：2010
卷期：40
頁次：頁91-155
主題關鍵詞：離散；混雜的想像共同體；離散認同；臺灣移民；澳洲；Diaspora；Hybrid imagined community；Diasporic identity；Taiwanese immigrants；Australia
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:74
  • 點閱點閱:270
本論文在澳洲布里斯本進行22個月的田野調查，深度訪談65位澳籍台裔，從符號互動論角度瞭解台灣移民如何在人際互動中建構自我認同並構連所歸屬的想像共同體。本文在理論耙梳與田野來回交錯中，發現Mead符號互動論在互動中構連自我認同與想像共同體的關鍵是「重要象徵符號」，不過，Mead似乎只考慮了一個共同體中「趨同」的重要象徵符號，但忽略和外部族群互動所產生的「區異」重要象徵符號也會形成族群邊界。本論文於是結合Mead符號互動論與Barth族群邊界理論，掌握「邊界」同時具備了「區分」（他族與我族）與「連結」（我族個體）兩種特質，比符號互動僅關注「趨同」面向，更能直指「認同」的核心：既是「差異」也是「同一」。研究發現，澳籍台裔離散認同是一個「混雜的想像共同體」，由三種族群想像共同體組成：「中國人共同體」、「台灣人共同體」與「澳洲人共同體」，源自三種共同體的離散認同有八種樣貌：「在澳洲的台灣人」、「也（不）是台灣人也（不）是澳洲人，或是不同比例的兩種組合」、「台裔澳洲人」、「華裔澳洲人」、「中國人或來自台灣的中國人」、「在哪裡就是哪裡人」、「國際人」與「亞澳居間人」。就台裔離散而言，離散認同的邊界不盡然維持，也不盡然腐蝕，有的只是邊界的跨越、矛盾與協商。面對全球化的多元發展，理解一群離散移民認同的方式應該關注其中的混雜與流動，離散族群在同一時間會歸屬於不同的共同體，「混雜的想像共同體」正在離散族裔內部浮現。
This research examined the diasporic identities of Taiwanese immigrants in Brisbane, Australia, using theoretical frameworks of both Mead's symbolic interactionism and Barth's theory of ethnic boundary to analyze the ethnographic observations and in-depth interviews the researcher conducted with 65 Taiwanese migrants in Brisbane, in order to understand how Taiwanese migrants construct self identities through interpersonal interactions and how they construct imagined communities. In Mead's symbolic interactionism, the crucial factor to articulate self identity and imagined community was the "significant symbol". However, Mead seemed to consider the "identifying" significant symbols only within a community. He ignored the "differentiating" significant symbols derived from inter-group contact which would also form an ethnic boundary. The researcher combined the theories of Mead and of Barth to demonstrate that boundary contains two characteristics at the same time: differentiating (my own group from other groups) and connecting (members of my own group). The combined approach complements Mead's symbolic interactionism, which focused primarily on identifying the commons, and better represents the core nature of identity: it is both difference and similarity at the same time. The research results showed that the diasporic identities among Taiwanese immigrants in Australia are a "hybrid imagined community" consisting of Chinese, Taiwanese, and Australian imagined communities. Eight kinds of ethnic identities originated from those three imagined communities: "Taiwanese in Australia", "both (or both not) Taiwanese and Australian (or the combination of both types with various ratios)", " Taiwanese Australian", "Chinese Australian", "Chinese or Chinese from Taiwan", "Australian when in Australia, and Taiwanese when in Taiwanese", "global citizen", and "Asian Australian". For Taiwanese diaspora, the boundary of diasporic identities could neither be completely maintained nor eroded. There are boundary crossings. It is fluid boundary that could be crossed, contradicted, and negotiated. The understanding of diasporic migrant identities under globalization and multicultural development should focus on the fluidity and hybridism within identities. Diasporic groups belong to different communities at the same time. The "hybrid imagined community" is emerging within diasporic groups.
期刊論文
1.Safran, William(1991)。Diaspora in Modern Societies: Myths of Homeland and Return。Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies，1(1)，83-99。  new window
2.廖珮君、姜蘭虹、徐榮崇(2005)。年輕移民在台灣、澳洲兩地之間的流動原因、適應與自我認同。中國地理學會會刊，35，59-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.徐榮崇、姜蘭虹(20040600)。澳洲臺灣移民的空間性與地方性：居住地的選擇與決策思考。人口學刊，28，81-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Cheng, Simon H.、Kuo, Wen H.(2000)。Family Socialization of Ethnic Identity among Chinese American Pre-adolescents。Journal of Comparative Family Studies，31(4)，463-484。  new window
5.Rumbaut, R. G.(1994)。The crucible within: Ethnic identity, self-esteem,and segmented assimilation among children of immigrants。International Migration Review，28(4)，784-794。  new window
6.Brubaker, Rogers(2005)。The "diaspora" diaspora。Ethnic and Racial Studies，28(1)，1-19。  new window
7.Clifford, J.(1994)。Diasporas.'。Cultural Anthropology，9(3):，302-338。  new window
8.Gillespie, A.(2005)。G. M. Mead: Theorist of the Social Act。Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour，35(1)，21-39。  new window
9.Lien, P. T.(2004)。Behind the numbers: Talking politics with foreign-born Chinese Americans。International Migration，42(2)，87-112。  new window
10.Martin, J.(2005)。Perspectival selves in interaction with others: Re-reading G. H. Mead's social psychology。Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour，35，231-253。  new window
11.Soysal, Y.(2000)。Citizenship and identity: Living in diasporas in post-war Europe。Ethnic and Racial Studies，23(1)，1-15。  new window
12.Spicer, E.(1981)。Persistent cultural system: A comparative study of identity system that can adapt to contrasting environments。Science，174，795-800。  new window
學位論文
1.Fu, M.(2002)。Acculturation, ethnic identity, and family conflict among first and second generation Chinese American(博士論文)。Alliant International University，California。  new window
2.楊智翔(2006)。澳洲台灣年輕移民生活適應與身分認同過程之探討：以墨爾本為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳鈺淳(2010)。台灣1.5代年輕回流移民之適應與認同(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.鍾佳君(2007)。加拿大台灣回流年輕移民在適應與認同之研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cohen, Anthony P.(1992)。The Symbolic Construction of Community。Routledge。  new window
2.Cooley, Charles Horton(1983)。Human nature and the social order。Transaction Publishers。  new window
3.黃沛榮(2009)。部件教學法的運用及其局限。漢字教學的理論和實踐。臺北：樂學書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.林濁水(2006)。共同體：世界圖像下的台灣。台北：左岸文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Cohen, Robin(1997)。Global Diaspora: An Introduction。Seattle, Washington：University of Washington Press。  new window
6.Gilroy, P.(1993)。Small acts: Thoughts on the politics of black cultures。London：Serpent’s Tail。  new window
7.Tian, G.(1999)。Chinese-Canadian, Canadian-Chinese: Coping and adapting in North America。New York：Edwin Mellen Press。  new window
8.Loudon, D. L. and A. J. Della Bitta.(1993)。Consumer behaviour: Concept and application (4th ed.)。New York：McGraw-Hill。  new window
9.Webb, J. R.(1992)。Understanding and designing marketing research。London：Academic Press。  new window
10.Dunn, Robert G.(1998)。Identity crisis: A social critique of postmodernity。Minneapolis, MN：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
11.Georgiou, M.(2006)。Diaspora, identity and the media: Diasporic transnationalism and mediated spatialities。Cresskill, N.J.：Hampton Press。  new window
12.Hecht, M. L.、Jackson, R. L. II、Ribeau, S. A.(2003)。African American communication: Exploring identity and culture。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
13.Jenkins, Richard(2004)。Social Identity。London：Routledge。  new window
14.Cooley, Charles Horton(1909)。Social organization: A study of the larger mind。New York：Charles Scribner's Sons。  new window
15.Craib, Ian、廖立文(1986)。當代社會理論：從派深思到哈伯瑪斯。臺北：桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.Dewey, John(1966)。Democracy and education。The Free Press。  new window
17.Mead, George Herbert、Morris, Charles W.(1934)。Mind, Self and Society。University of Chicago Press。  new window
18.楊國樞(20020000)。華人心理的本土化研究。臺北市：桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Chu, G. C.(1985)。The changing concept of self in contemporary China。Culture and Self。NY。  new window
20.Kalra, V. S., R. Kaur, and J. Hutnyk .(2005)。Diaspora & hybridity。CA:。  new window
21.Kim. Y. Y.(2001)。Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communicationand cross-cultural。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
22.Schak, D.(1999)。Middle-class migration and problems of adjustment: Taiwanesebusiness migrants in Brisbane,'。Asian Migration:Pacific Rim Dynamics, Monograph,。Taipei:。  new window
23.Solomon, M. R.(1994)。Consumer behaviour: Buying, having and being (2ed ed).。Boston:。  new window
24.Wang, G.(1999)。A single Chinese diaspora? Some historical reflections。Imaging the Chinese diaspora: Two Australian perspectives,。Canberra。  new window
圖書論文
1.杜維明(1985)。Selfhood and otherness in Confucian thought。Culture and self: Asian and Western perspectives。New York, NY：Tavistock Publication。  new window
2.Hall, S.(1992)。The question of cultural identity。Modernity and Its Futures。Cambridge：Polity。  new window
3.Hall, Stuart(1990)。Cultural Identity and Diaspora。Identity: Community, Culture, Difference。London：Lawrence and Wishart。  new window
4.Hsu, F. L. K.(1985)。The self in cross-cultural perspective。Culture and Self: Asian and Western perspectives。Tavistock。  new window
5.Barth, F.(2000)。Boundaries and Connections。Signifying Identities: Anthropological Perspectives on Boundaries and Contested Values。London：Routledge。  new window
6.胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。一些質性方法上的思考：信度與效度？如何抽樣？如何收集資料、登錄與分析？。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Barth, Fredrik(1994)。Enduring and Emerging Issues in the Analysis of Ethnicity。The Anthropology of Ethnicity: Beyond "Ethnic Groups and Boundaries"。Amsterdam：Het Spinhuis Publishers。  new window
8.Miller, W. L.、Crabtree, B. F.(1992)。Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map。Doing qualitative research。Newbury Park, CA：Sage Publication。  new window
9.Tajfel, Henri、Turner, John C.(1979)。An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict。The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations。Brooks/Cole。  new window
10.Tajfel, Henri、Turner, John C.(1986)。The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior。Psychology of Intergroup Relations。Nelson-Hall。  new window
11.張玲(2001)。台灣新移民在美國的文化認同。台灣的現代化與文化認同。八方文化。  延伸查詢new window
12.Chen, L. J.(2000)。Community formation and Taiwanese immigrant identity。Race, colour and identity in Australia and New Zealand。Sydney：UNSW Press。  new window
13.Hogg, M. A.(1996)。Intragroup process, groups structure and social identity。Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel。Bristol：Bristol University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：361（臺灣：356，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2133566 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67931294
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上