:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:華人工作團隊之社會關係與成員效能:多元向度、多重網絡的探討
作者:周麗芳 引用關係
作者(外文):Li-Fang Chou
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:心理學研究所
指導教授:鄭伯壎
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2006
主題關鍵詞:社會網絡與社會資本差序式領導關係與特殊連帶價值觀與性格相似性情感信任支持網絡social network and social capitaldifferentiated leadershipguanxi and particularistic tievalues and personality similarityaffective trustsupport network
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:85
在全球化的競爭、聯盟趨勢、以及創新求變的壓力下,團隊(Team)儼然成為組織中較具有資源使用彈性、效率、並能有效解決複雜問題的工作型態。然而,在強調任務、專業互依與密集互動之下,「人際」的因素已超越技術、任務型態等因素,成為影響團隊運作的重要因素。因此,本研究採團隊中個人的研究層次,從多重網絡(團隊內水平網絡與垂直網絡、團隊外網絡)、多元向度(結構性向度、認知性向度及關係性向度),探討成員社會關係中鑲嵌之社會資本與效能間關係。團隊規模(領導者與成員)15人以下,且團隊成員填答率需為80%以上的條件下,本研究以台灣不同產業、不同任務型態之105個工作團隊(105位團隊領導者及629位團隊成員)為研究樣本進行研究。研究結果發現:(1)成員間的關係網絡主要會影響成員間的任務支持網絡與工作績效(任務績效與創造性績效);而成員間價值觀與性格相似則主要影響成員間的情感信任網絡與態度效能(團隊承諾與合作滿意);(2)團隊中,相對地較被領導者支持的成員,其效能較佳;且此種差序式領導對成員效能的影響,部分會受到團隊整體領導氣氛與差序幅度的調節;(3)在情感信任網絡與義務性承諾、合作滿意的關係中,差序式領導具有必要角色(essential role)之調節作用;但在任務支持網絡方面,差序式領導則與其扮演互補的角色;(4)成員團隊外的支持網絡對工作績效有直接的影響作用;而對態度效能而言,則是團隊內關係性社會資本的情境因素。最後,針對本研究的主要研究發現與研究限制進行討論,並說明本研究之未來研究方向與管理實務意涵。
In facing the pressures of globalized competition, alliance tendency and innovation, the team has become a new job design in organization. It has more resilience and higher efficiency in resource utilization and is capable of resolving complicated problems effectively. However, due to the conditions that emphase task, profession interdependence and intensive interaction, the interpersonal factors have surpassed technical- and task-related factors and become the critical element that will affect team effectiveness. Therefore, this study uses the individual within a team as research level and takes multiple networks (intrateam horizontal and vertical network, extrateam network) and multiple dimensions (structural dimensions, cognitive dimensions and relational dimensions) to explore the relationship between member’s effectiveness and social capital embedded within member’s social relationship. Based on the requirement of a team size no more than 15 (including team leader and members) and the response rate higher than 80%, this study took 105 work teams consisting of 105 team leaders and 629 team members, with different task types from various industries, as subjects. Here are the findings: (1) The members’ guanxi networks mainly affects task support network and job performance (task performance and creativity performance) while values and personality similarity mainly influence affective trust network and attitudinal effectiveness (team commitment and cooperation satisfaction). (2) Within the team, a member with relatively more supports from the team leader has better effectiveness. The influence of the differentiated leadership on the members’ effectiveness are partially moderated by the whole team leadership climate and differentiated latitude. (3) The differentiated leadership plays an essential role to moderate the relationships between the affective trust network and attitudinal effectiveness (obligated commitment and cooperation satisfaction) while plays a complementary role with task support network for the obligated commitment and cooperation satisfaction. (4) Members’ extrateam support networks have main effects on job performance but moderate the relationships between the intrateam relational social capital and attitudinal effectiveness. Finally, it is also discussed in this study for the main findings and limitations as well as future study directions and management implications.
參考文獻

任金剛、林明村、陳以亨(2002)。「華人員工歸類之標準與實徵研究」。第四屆華人心理學學家學術研討會發表之論文。台北:中央研究院。
危芷芬(2001)。「華人的關係類型與人際義務」(未發表之博士論文)。台北:國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。new window
何友暉、陳淑娟、趙志裕(1991)。關係取向:為中國社會心理學方法論求答案。見楊國樞、黃光國(主編):「中國的心理與行為」,頁49-66。台北:桂冠。new window
李美枝、許正聖(1995)。從台灣大學生內團體徧私基礎之解析看社群意識發展的能性。「本土心理學研究」,4,150-182。new window
沈其泰(2002)。「團隊共享心智模式對知識分享之影響—以成員特性與成員組合為調節變項」(未發表之碩士論文)。桃園:元智大學管理研究所。
周麗芳(2002)。華人組織中的關係與社會網絡。「本土心理學研究」,18,175-228。new window
周麗芳、鄭伯壎、陳靜慧、任金剛、許金田(2005)。華人高階管理者網絡中的特殊連帶與人際情感:深層心理契合與正式工作關係的效果。「本土心理學研究」,23,201-257。new window
林南(2001)。社會資本:爭鳴的範式和實證的檢驗。「香港社會學學報」(香港),2,1-38。
金耀基(1992)。關係和網絡的建構:一個社會學的詮釋。「二十一世紀月刊」(香港),12,143-157。new window
姜定宇(2005)。「華人部屬與主管關係、主管忠誠、及其後續結果:一項兩階段研究」(未發表之博士論文)。台北:國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。
帥韻儀(2003)。「以問題解決為導向之衝突問題解決模式建立之研究」(未發表之碩士論文)。中壢:中原大學企業管理學研究所。
徐瑋伶(2004)。「海峽兩岸企業主管之差序式領導:一項歷程性的分析」(未發表之博士論文)。台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。new window
徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎(2003)。組織認定與組織倫理。見鄭伯壎、姜定宇、鄭弘岳(主編):「組織行為研究在台灣-三十年回顧與展望」,頁335-360。台北:桂冠。
徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎、郭建志、胡秀華(2004)。「差序式領導」。華人本土組織行為研究的方向與策略:追求卓越計畫的成果與展望學術研討會論文集。台北:國立台灣大學。new window
徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎、黃敏萍(2002)。華人企業領導人的員工歸類與管理行為。「本土心理學研究期刊」,18,51-94。new window
張志學(2001)。社會互動中的關係及人情。見楊中芳(主編):「中國人的人際關係、情感與信任」,頁407-414。台北:遠流。
陳明璋(1984)。家族文化與企業管理。見楊國樞、黃光國、莊仲仁(主編):「中國式管理研究會論文集」,頁467-488。台北:台灣大學心理學系。
陳德榮(2004)。「組織內部社會網絡的形成與影響:社會資本觀點」(未發表之博士論文)。高雄:國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
陳靜慧(2000)。「關係與人際關係品質:主觀契合度的中介效果與關係類型的調節效果」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。
喬健(1982)。關係芻議。見楊國樞、文崇一(主編):「社會及行為科學研究的中國化」,頁345-360。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
彭泗清(2001)。信任的建立機制:關係運作與法制手段。見楊中芳(主編):「中國人的人際關係、情感與信任」,頁337-370。台北:遠流。
彭泗清(2003)。關係與信任:中國人人際信任的一項本土研究」。見鄭也夫、彭泗清等(著):「中國社會中的信任」,頁1-12。北京:中國城市出版社。
費孝通(1948)。「鄉土中國與鄉土重建」。上海:觀察社。
黃光國(1988)。「中國人的權力遊戲」。台北:巨流。new window
黃敏萍(2000)。「跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能--任務特性與社會系絡之影響」(未發表之博士論文)。台北:國立台灣大學商學研究所。new window
黃懿慧(2002)。「關係取向」理論模式初探:組織與利益關係人關係之探討」。「本土心理學研究」,18,95-174。new window
楊中芳(1999)。人際關係與人際情感的構念化。「本土心理學研究」,12,105-180。new window
楊中芳(2001a)。在文化/社會/歷史的脈絡中看西方群體互動的研究。見楊中芳(主編) :「如何理解中國人」,頁17-60。台北:遠流。
楊中芳(2001b)。中國人的人己觀:「自己」的「大我」與「小我」。見楊中芳(主編):「如何理解中國人」,頁365-406。台北:遠流。
楊中芳(2001c)。西方社會/性格心理學及文化/性格研究的危機及反省。見楊中芳(主編) :「如何理解中國人」,頁51-106。台北:遠流。
楊中芳、彭泗清(2001)。人際信任的構念化:一個人際關係的觀點。見楊中芳(主編) :「中國人的人際關係、情感與信任」,頁371-399。台北:遠流。new window
楊國樞(1993)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。見楊國樞、余安邦(主編):「中國人的心理與社會行為—理念及方法篇」,頁82-142。。台北:桂冠。new window
楊國樞(2002)。「華人心理的本土化研究」。台北,桂冠。new window
樊景立、鄭伯壎(2000)。華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析。「本土心理學研究期刊」,13,127-180。new window
鄭弘岳(2003)。組織內衝突與衝突管理研究之回顧與前瞻。「應用心理學」,20,53-82new window
鄭伯壎(1995)。差序格局與華人組織行為。「本土心理學研究期刊」,3,142-219。new window
鄭伯壎(1999)。華人人際關係研究的困境與出路。「本土心理學研究」,12,203-214。new window
鄭伯壎(2001)。企業組織中上下屬的信任關係。見楊中芳(主編):「中國人的人際關係、情感與信任」,頁271-292。台北:遠流。
鄭伯壎(2005)。「華人領導—理論與實際」。台北,桂冠。new window
鄭伯壎、任金剛、張慧芳、郭建志(1997)。台灣企業關係網絡中的對偶關係:關係形成與關係效能。「中華心理學刊」,39,75-92。new window
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、黃敏萍、樊景立、彭泗清(2003)。家長式領導的三元模式:中國大陸企業組織的證據。「本土心理學研究」,20,209-280。new window
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(2000)。家長式領導量表:三元模式的建構與測量。「本土心理學研究」,14,3-64。new window
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(2005)。「家長式領導三元模式:現代轉化及其影響機制(1/4)」。行政院國家科學委員會華人本土心理學研究追求卓越延續計畫成果報告(計畫編號:NSC93-2752-H-002-003-PAE),未出版。new window
鄭伯壎、林家五(1999)。差序格局與華人組織行為:台灣大型民營企業的初步研究。「中央研究院民族學研究所集刊」,86,29-72。new window
鄭伯壎、郭建志、任金剛(2001)。「組織文化:員工層次的分析」。台北:遠流。new window
鄭伯壎、郭建志、徐瑋伶、胡秀華(2002)。「人治主義與家長式領導:中介模式的驗證式」。教育部華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究報告,台北。new window
鄭伯壎、劉怡君(1995)。義利之辨與企業間的交易歷程:台灣組織間網絡的個案分析。「本土心理學研究」,4,36-92。new window
鄭伯壎、樊景立(2001)。初探華人社會的社會取向:台灣與大陸之比較研究。「中華心理學刊」,43,207-221。new window
羅家德(2004)。「社會網分析講義」。北京: 社會科學文獻出版社。
邊燕杰(1999):社會網絡與求職過程。見涂兆慶、林益民(主編):「改革開放與中國社會」。香港:牛津大學出版社。
邊燕杰(2004)。城市居民社會資本的來源及作用:網絡觀點與調查發現。「中國社會科學」,3,136-146。
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299.
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17-40.
Allport, F. H. (1937). Toward a science of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1, 7-23.
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665.
Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1994). Labeling process in the organization: Constructing the individual. Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 413-461.
Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based MBA program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1369-1397.
Balkundi, P., & Harrison, D. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure''s effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 49-68.
Barnes, J. A. (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations, 7, 39-58。
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K.(1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-ananlysis. Perosnonnel Psycholgoy, 44, 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., Mitchell, T. R., & Stewart, G. L. (2003). Situational and motivational influences on trait-behavior relationship. In M. R. Barrick & A.M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations (pp. 60-82). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 43-51.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team process and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.
Bartel, C., & Milliken F. J. (2004). Perceptions of time in work groups: Do members develop shared cognitions about their temporal demands. In E. Mannix, M. A. Neale and S. Blount (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Vol. 6. Time in groups (pp. 87-109). Amsterdam, London: JAI Press.
Beehr. T., Drexler. J., & Faulkner, S. (1997). Working in small family businesses: Empirical comparisons to non- family businesses. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 297-312.
Bienenstock, E. J., & Bonacich, P. F. (1997). Network exchange as a cooperative game. Rationality and Society, 9, 37-65.
Bishop, J. W., Scott, K. D., Goldsby, M. G., & Cropanzano, R. (2005). A construct validity study of commitment and perceived support variables: A multifoci approach across different team environment. Group Organization Management, 30, 153-180.
Blau, P. M. (1974). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
Bonito, J. A. (2002). The analysis of participation in small groups: Methodological and conceptual issues related to interdependence. Small Group Research, 33, 412-438.
Bono, J. E., & Anderson, M. H. (2005). The advice and influence networks of transformational leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1306-1314.
Brass, D. J. (1981). Structural relationship, job characteristics, and worker satisfaction and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 331-348.
Brass, D. J. (1992). Power in Organizations: A social network perspective. In G. Moore & J. A. White (Eds.), Research in politics and society (pp. 295-323). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Brass, D. J. (1995). A social network perspective on human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 39-79.
Brass, D. J. (2000). Networks and frog ponds: Trends in multilevel research. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 557-571). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 795-817.
Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281-302). New York: Academic Press.
Brickson, S. (2000). The impact of identity orientation on individual and organizational outcomes in demographically diverse settings. Academy of Management Review, 25, 82-101.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Sage Publications.
Burt, R. S. (1984). Network items and general social survey. Social Networks, 6, 293-339.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 345-423.
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 822-834.
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Farh, J. L. (2006). Does employee’s authoritarian values matter: The effectiveness of people-related and task-related authoritarian leadership in China and Taiwan’s private business. Paper presented at the 2006 International Association for Chinese Management Research (IACMR) Biannual Conference, Nanjing, China.
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Huang, M. P. (2002). Shared team value and team effectiveness: Assessing the mediating effect of intrateam processes. Paper presented at the 8th ISSOWV Conference, Warsaw, Poland.
Cheng, B.S., Chou, L. F., Wang, T. Y., & Huang, M. P. (2005). Values diversity and teammember’s effectiveness: The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness. Paper presented at 2005 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, U.S.A.
Choi, J. N. (2002). External activities and team effectiveness: Review and theoretical development. Small Group Research, 33, 181-207.
Chou, L. F., Cheng, B. S., Huang, M. P., & Cheng, H. Y. (2006). Guanxi networks and member''s effectiveness in Chinese team: The mediated effects of trust networks. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 79-95.
Chou, L. F., Cheng, B. S., & Jen, C. K. (2005). The contingent model of paternalistic leadership: Subordinate dependence and leader competence. Paper presented at 2005 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, U.S.A.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlations analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
Cole, M. S., Schaninger, W. S., & Harris, S. G. (2002). The workplace social exchange. network: A multilevel, conceptual examination. Group & Organization Management, 27 ,142-167.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human of capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 740-751.
Conway, J. M. (1996). Additional construct validity evidence for the task/contextual performance distinction. Human Performance, 9, 309–329.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853-863.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: PAR.
Dansereau, F., Alutto, J., & Yammarino, F. (1984). Theory testing in organizational behavior: The varient approach .Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Dickson, M. W., Den Hartog, D. N., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2003). Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 729-768.
Dragoni, L. (2005). Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: The role of leadership and multi-level climate perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1084-1095.
Drucker, P. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, 66(1), 45-53.
Elfenbein, H. A., & O’Reilly, C. A. (2002). “Fitting in”: The effects of relational demography and person-organization fit on group process and performance. Research paper No.1728, Graduate school of business, Stanford University.
Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance, Academy of Management Review, 29, 459-478.
Farh, J. L., Dobbins, O., & Cheng, B. S. (1991). Culture relativity in action: A comparison of self-ratings made by Chinese and U.S. workers. Personnel Psychology, 44, 129-147.
Farh, J. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. S. (1998). The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9, 471-487.
Fink, B., & Wild, K. P. (1995). Similarities in leisure interests: Effects of selection and socialization in friendships. A longitudinal study. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 471-480.
Finkelstein, S., & Haleblian, J. (2002). Understanding acquistion performance: The role of transfer effects. Organization Science, 13, 36-47.
Fisher, S. G., Hunter, T. A., & Macrosson, W. D. (1997). Team or group? Managers'' perceptions of the differences. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12, 232-242.
Flynn, F. J. (2005). Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 737-750.
Fried, Y., & Tiegs, R. B. (1993). The main effect model versus buffering model of shop steward social support: A study of rank and file auto workers in the USA. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 481–493
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Gavin, M. B., & Hofmann, D. A. (2002). Using hierarchical linear modeling to investigate the moderating influence of leadership climate. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 15-33.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513-524.
Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
Granovetter, M. S. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 25-56). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Halfhill, T., Sundstrom, E., Lahner, J., Calderone, W., & Nielsen, T. M. (2005). Group personality composition and group effectiveness: An integrative review of empirical research. Small Group Research, 36, 83-105.
Hansen, M. T., Mors, M. L., & LØVÅS, B. (2005). Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 776-793.
Hardin, R. (1982). Collective action. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Harrison, D., Price, K., & Bell, M. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and theeffects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams and task performance: Changing effects of surface and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029-1045.
Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
Herbiniak, L. G. & Alutto, J. A. (1972). Personal and role-related factors in the development of organisational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 555-573.
Hiller, N. J., & Day, V. D. (2003). LMX and teamwork: The challenges and opportunities of diversity. In G. B. Graen (Ed.), Dealing with diversity (pp. 29-58). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Hinds, P., Carley, K., Krackhardt, D., & Wholey, D. (2000). Choosing workgroup members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 226-251.
Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K. P., & Munson, C. L. (2003). Team-level antecedents of individuals'' knowledge networks. Decision Sciences, 34, 471-500.
Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). Application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 467-511). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hogg, M. A., Martin, R., & Weeden, K. (2003). Leader-member relations and social identity. In D. Van Knippenberg & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Identity, leadership and power (pp. 8-33). London: Sage.
Homans, G. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1981). Americans and Chinese: Passage to differences (3rd Ed.). Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.
Hu, H. H., Hsu, W. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2004). The reward allocation decision of Chinese managers: The influences of employee categorization and allocation situation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 221-232。
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422-447.
Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of woman and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56-87.
Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity in social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Review, 38, 673-703.
Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence and sense-making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 277-303
Jackson, S. E., & Joshi, A. (2004). Diversity in social context: A multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 675-702.
Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801-830.
Jacobs, J. B. (1979). The concept of guanxi and local politics in a rural Chinese cultural setting. In S.L. Greenblatt, R.W. Wilson, & A. A. Wilson (Eds.), Social interaction in Chinese society (pp. 209-236). New York: Praeger.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). Rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.
Jehn, K., & Bezrukova, K. (2004). A field study of group diversity, group context, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25 ,1-27
Jehn, K., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
Jehn, K. A., & Shah, P. P. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of meddiating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775-790.
Jessup, H. R. (1990). New roles in team leadership. Training and Development Journal, 44, 79-83.
Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-Factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530-541.
Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797-807.
Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational Stress. New York: Wiley.
Kanungo, R. N., & Mendonca, M. (1996). Ethical dimensions of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Kasperson, R. E., Golding, D., & Tuler, S. (1992). Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 161-187.
Katz, N., Lazer, D., Arrow, H., & Contractor, N. (2004). Network theory and small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 307-332.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the High-performance prganization. Boston: Harvard Business School.
Kee, H. W., & Knox, R. E. (1970). Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14, 357-366.
Kelly, R., & Voydanoff, P. (1985). Work/family role strain among employed parents. Family Relations, 34, 367-374.
Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1986). Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 422-431.
Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126-137.
Kilmann, R. H., Saxton, M. J., & Serpa, R. (1985). Gaining control of the corporate culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall. R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19 , 195-229.
Klein, K., Bliese, B., Kozlowski, S., Dansereau, F., Gavin, M., Griffin, M. et al., (2000). Multilevel analytical techniques: Commonalities, differences, and continuing questions. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations (pp. 512-556). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Klein, K. J., Lim, B. C., Saltz, J. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of network centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 952-963.
Kluckhohn, C. K. M. (1951). Value and value organization in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In T. Parsons & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388-433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1982). Network analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333-375). London: Wiley.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, J. K. (2000). A multi-level approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal and emergent processes. In J. K. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Josey Bass.
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 216-239). Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
Krackhardt, D. (1995). Group, roles, and Simmelian ties in organizationa. Working paper, Heinz School of Public Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittshburgh, PA.
Krackhardt, D., & Brass, D. (1994). Intraorganizational networks: The micro side. In S. Waserman & J. Galaskewicx (Eds.), Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 209-230). London: Sage Publications.
Krackhardt, D., & Hanson, J. (1993). Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Business Review, 71 (4), 104–111.
Kreft, I. G. G. (1996). Are multilevel techniques necessary? An overview including simulation studies. Retrieved March 4, 2005, from http://www.calstatela.edu/faculty /ikreft/quarterly/quarterly.html.
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49.
Kuo, C. C. (2004). Research on impacts of team leadership on team effectiveness. Journal of American Academy of Business, 5, 266-277.
Laumann, E., Galaskiewicz, J., & Marsden, P. V. (1978). Community structure as interorganizational linkages. Annual Review of Sociology, 4, 455-484.
Law, K. S., Wong, C., & Mobley, W. H. (1998). Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review, 23, 741-755.
Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8, 1-22.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger (Ed.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 8-66). New York: Van Mostrand.
Lazer, D., & Katz, N. (2000). Putting the network into teamwork. Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting, Toronto, Canada.
Lemieux-Charles, L., Murray, M., Baker, G. R., Barnsley, J., Tasa, K., & Ibrahim, A. S. (2003). The effect of quality improvement practices on health care team effectiveness: A mediational model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 533-553.
Levi, D. (2001). Group dynamics for teams. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp.14-139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lewin, K. (1943). Psychology and the process of group living. Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 113-132.
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967-985.
Liden, R. C. , Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe. R. T. (2000). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting, Toronto, Canada.
Lin, N. (1982). Social resources and instrumental action. In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 131-145). Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
MacGillvray, A., & Walker, P. (2000). Local social capital: Making it work on the Ground. In S. Baron, J. Field, & T. Schuller (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspectivs (pp. 197-211). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
Marwell, G., & Oliver, P. (1993). The critical mass in collective action: A micro-social theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen , N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Milliken, F. J., & Martines, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 402-433.
Mishra, J., & Morrissey, M. A. (1990). Trust in employee/employer relationships: A survey of West Michigan managers. Public Personnel Management, 19, 443-486.
Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. (2003). Personality heterogeneity in teams: Which differences make a difference for team performance? Small Group Research, 34, 651-677.
Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. C. (2004). Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1015-1039.
Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman, A. M. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mohammed, S., Mathieu, J. E., & Bartlett, A. L. (2002). Technical-administrative task performance, leadership task performance, and contextual performance: Considering the influence of team- and task-related composition variables. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 795-814.
Molm, L. D. (1994). Dependence and risk: Transforming the structure of socia exchange. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 163-176.
Morris, M. W., Leung, K., Ames, D., & Lickel, B. (1999). Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Academy of Management Review, 24, 781-796.
Mossholder, K. W., & Bedeian, A. G. (1983). Cross-level inference and organizational research: Perspectives on interpretation and application. Academy of Management Review, 8, 547-558.
Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Five-Factor model and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance, 11, 145-165.
Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. (1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary model effect. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 268-277.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
Nord, W. R., Brief, A. P., Atich, J. M., & Doherty, E. M. (1988). Work Values and the conduct of organizational behavior. In G. R. Ferris & K. M. Rowlan (Eds.), Reserch in personal and human resources management (pp. 1-42). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality rating. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
O''Reilly, C. A. (1978). The intentional distortion of information in organizational communication: A laboratory and field investigation. Human Relations, 31, 173-193.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492-499.
Oh, H., Chung, M. H., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 860-875.
Oh, H., Labianca, G., & Chung, M. H. (2006). A multilevel model of group social capital. Academy of Management Review, 31, 569-582.
Parker, G. M. (1990). Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business strategy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press.
Pelled, L. H., & Xin, K. (1997). Work values and their human resources management implications: A theoretical comparison of China, Mexico, and the United States. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 6, 185-198.
Peng, S. Q. (1998). Guanxi in trust: An indigenous study of Chinese interpersonal trust. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hong Kong.
Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. In L. L. Cummings & B. N. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 299-357). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Pfeffer, J. (1992). Understanding Power in Organizations. California Management Review, 34, 29–50.
Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. (1997). Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673-94
Porter, L. W., Lawler, E. E., & Hackman, R. (1975). Behavior in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ports, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1320-1350.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Raider, H., & Krackhardt, D. J. (2001). Intraorganizational networks. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to organizations (pp. 58-74). Oxford: Blackwell.
Randel, A., & Jaussi, K. (2003). Functional background identity, diversity, and individual performance in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 763–774.
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. (2001). Networks, diversity and performance: The social capital of R&D units. Organization Science, 12, 502-517.
Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., & McEvily, B. (2004). How to make the team: Social network v.s. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 101-133.
Redding, S. G. (1990). The spirit of chinese capitalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Redding, S. G., Norman, A., & Schlander, A. (1993). The nature of individual attachment to the organization: A review of East Asia variations. In M. D. Munnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 647-688). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825-836
Riordan, C. M. (2000). Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 19,131-173.
Roberson, Q., & Colquitt, J. (2005). Shared and configural justice: A social network model of justice in teams. Academy of Management Review, 30, 595-607.
Roberts, K. H., & O’Reilly, C. A. III. (1979). Some correlates of communication roles in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 42-57.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
Scanzoni, J. (1979). Social exchange and behavioral interdependence. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 61-98). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & Wienk, J. A. (2003). Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 779-802.
Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Cogliser, C. C. (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 63-113.
Schultz, D., & Schultz, S. E. (1994). Theories of personality (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Schumacker, R., & Lomax, R. (1996). A beginner''s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Seers, A., Petty, M. M., & Cashman, J. F. (1995). Team-member exchange under team and traditional management: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Group & Organization Management, 20, 18-38.
Seibert, R. T., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219-236.
Seidel, M., Polzer, J., & Stewart, K. (2000). Friends in high places: The effects of social Networks on discrimination in salary negotiation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 1-24
Shaw, J. B., & Barrett-Power, E. (1998). The effects of diversity on small work group processes and performance. Human Relations, 51, 1307-1325.
Shonk, J. H. (1982). Team-based organizations. Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin.
Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic "remedies" for trust /distrust. Organization Science, 4, 367-392.
Sivasubramaniam, N., Murry, W. D., Avolio, B. J., & Jung, D. I. (2002). A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. Group & Organization Management, 27, 66-96.
Smith, P. B., & Wang, Z. M. (1996). Chinese leadership and organizational structures. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of chinesep psychology (pp. 322-337). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Smyrnios, K. X., Romano, C. A., Tanewski, G. A., Karofsky, P. I., Millen, R., & Yilmaz, M. R. (2003). Work-family conflict: A study of American and Australian family businesses. Family Business Review, 16, 35-48.
Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C. (2005). Two routes to influence: Integrating Leader-Member exchange and social network perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 505-535.
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316-325.
Spender, J. C., & Grant, R. M. (1996). Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 5-9.
Staw, B. M. (1975). Attribution of the ”causes” of performance: A general Alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 414-432.
Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. New York: Doubleday Currency.
Stewart, G. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of the multilevel role of personality in teams. In M. R. Barrick & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations (pp. 183-204). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135-148.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity of intergroup behavior. In. S. Worchel and W. Austin(Eds.), Psychology and intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Thomas, D. A. (1993). The dynamics of managing racial diversity in developmental relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 169-194.
Thomas, J. L., Bliese, P. D., & Jex, S. M. (2005). Interpersonal conflict and organizational commitment: Examining two levels of supervisory support as multilevel moderators. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2375-2398
Tichy, N. M. (1981). Networks in organizations. In W. H. Starbuck & P. C. Nystrom (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design: Remodeling organiationasl and their environments (pp. 225-249). New York: Oxford University Press.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148.
Triandis, H. C., & Suh, E. M. (2002). Cultural influence son personality. Annual Review of Personality, 53, 133-160.
Trimmer, K. J., Domino, M. A., & Blanton, J. E. (2002). The impact of personality diversity on conflict in ISD teams. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42, 7-14.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41. 464-476
Tsang, E. (1998). Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 64-73.
Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O''Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. (1997). Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24, 56-79.
Tsui, A. S., Farh, J. L., & Xin, K. (2000). Guanxi in the Chinese context. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 225-244). London: MacMillan.
Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 , 850-863.
Vissers, G., & Dankbaar, B. (2002). Creativity in multidisciplinary new product development teams. Creativity & Innovation Management, 11, 31-42.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 767-793). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Weber, M. (1915). The religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism ( C,1951). New Yourk: Free Press.
Wellins, R. S., Byham, W. C., & Dixon, G. R. (1994). Inside teams: How 20 world-class organizational are winning through teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wenger, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 319-339.
Werbel, J. D., & Johnson, D. J. (2001). The use of person-group fit for employment selection: A missing link in person-environment fit. Human Resource Management, 40, 227-240.
Whitley, R. D. (1991). The social construction of business systems in East Asia. Organization Studies, 12, 1-28.
Whitely, W., Dougherty, T. W., & Dreher, G. F. (1991). The relationship of career mentoring and socioeconomic origin to managers'' and professionals'' early career progress. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 331-351.
Wiener, Y. (1988). Forms of value systems: A focus on organizational effectiveness and cultural change and maintenance. Academy of Management Review, 13, 534-545.
Williams, K.Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. Ⅲ. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations:A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.
Wollack, S., Goodale, J. G., Witjing, J. P., & Smith, P. G. (1971). Development of the survey of work values. Journal of Applied Psycholgoy, 55, 331-338.
Worchel, S., & Coutant, D. (2003). It takes two to tango: Relating group identity to individual identity within the framework of group development. In M. Hog & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social pscychology: Group processes (pp. 461-481). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Xin, K., Farh, J. L., Cheng, B. S., & Tsui, A. S. (1999). Guanxi and vertical dyads: Evidence from Taiwan and the PRC. Paper Presented at the Conference of the Asian Association of Social Psychology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Xin, K., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for structural support. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1641-1658.
Yammarino, F., & Dansereau, F. (2004). Overview: Multi-level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Processes. In F. J.Yammarino & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Research in multilevel issues: Vol. 3. Multi-level issues in organizational behavior and processes (pp. xiii-xxxiii). Amsterdam: JAI Press / Elsevier.
Yeung, I. Y., & Tung, R. L. (1996). Achieving business success in Confucian societies: The importance of guanxi (connections). Organizational Dynamics, 25, 54-65.
Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Zahrly, J., & Tosi, H. (1989). The differential effect of organizational induction process on early work role adjustment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 59-74.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual difference metric. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77, 1271-1288.
Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE