:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:王船山的人性論--以先天善性與後天習性之關係為中心的討論
書刊名:興大人文學報
作者:陳祺助
作者(外文):Chen, Chi-ju
出版日期:2010
卷期:45
頁次:頁27-61
主題關鍵詞:人性論性日生日成Natural dispositionHabitsTheory of human natureUniversality王船山王夫之
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:2140
  • 點閱點閱:44
本論文以先天善性與後天習性的關係為主軸,來討論王船山人性論的問題。由於船山以「氣」為本體,但並不否定「理」為氣化之主宰的意義,因此,論文首先分析船山論人性乃「理氣一體」的涵義,以及性與心既一又異的關係,說明性善而心可能(然而不必然)有不善。其次,說明人性必是「氣質中之性」,而因人人氣質各異,形成人性不一致又「相近」的情形。其三,論人性是先天的道德性與後天的習性渾合一體,故人既日受善性於天,亦可能因習於不善而日成不善之性。最後,對船山以習性一成乃「不可移」的觀點與性善、性日生日成之說之間的可能矛盾,嘗試加以會通。
This thesis discusses Wang Chuan-shan's theory of human nature, and focuses on the connection between inherent goodness and acquired habits. Wang Chuan-shan considered "disposition" as the noumenon, but he did not deny that "moral philosophy" determines the resultant disposition. Therefore, this study will first examine Wang Chuan-shan's concept of human nature: that "moral philosophy exists within disposition." Due to the fact that nature and "heart" are two sides of one coin, human nature is originally good but the heart can be (albeit not necessarily) bad. Second, human nature is a combination of "natural disposition and character", both of which vary from person to person. Consequently, while human nature varies among individuals, in many aspects, it is universally similar. Third, human nature is a combination of natural moral creativity and acquired habits. Even though people have an inherent natural goodness, they may acquire bad habits and develop a bad nature. Finally, contradictory arguments arose concerning Wang's theory that once established, habits were impervious to change; the philosophy that men were created 'good'; and the view that the nature of human beings could be changed. The thesis will also try to resolve these contradictions.
期刊論文
1.陳贇(20010300)。形而上與形而下:以隱顯為中心的理解--王船山道器之辨的哲學闡釋。清華學報,31(1/2),37-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林安梧(19990900)。明末清初關於「格物致知」的一些問題--以王船山人性史哲學為核心的宏觀理解。中國文哲研究集刊,15,313-335。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃懿梅(19840100)。船山「道大善小,善大性小」說之評析。國立臺灣大學哲學論評,7,225-234。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.張永儁(19930900)。析論王船山「君相可以造命論」之民主精神。哲學與文化,20(9)=232,860-869。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.袁保新(1991)。試論孟子心身觀在其人性論上之蘊含。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王夫之(1972)。尚書引義。臺北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.王夫之(1972)。張子正蒙注。臺北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.王夫之(1972)。周易內傳。台北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.王夫之(1972)。詩廣傳。台北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.王夫之(1972)。四書訓義。台北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.王夫之(1972)。周易外傳。台北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.林聰舜。明清之際儒家思想的變遷與發展。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.王夫之(1972)。讀四書大全說。台北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.王夫之(1972)。讀通鑑論。自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.牟宗三(1981)。心體與性體。台北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.曾昭旭(1983)。王船山哲學。遠景。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.王廷相(1989)。王廷相集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.林安梧(19870000)。王船山人性史哲學之研究。臺北:東大圖書股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.牟宗三(1985)。圓善論。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.蔡仁厚(19840000)。孔孟荀哲學。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.楊祖漢(19980000)。當代儒學思辨錄。臺北:鵝湖。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.曾昭旭。性之說統新探。道德與道德實踐。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.(明)王夫之(1972)。續左氏春秋傳駁議。續左氏春秋傳駁議。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(明)王夫之。俟解。  延伸查詢new window
2.尚書引義。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)戴震(1995)。孟子字義疏證,安徽。  延伸查詢new window
4.(明)王夫之(1972)。思問錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.程顥、程頤、王孝魚(1981)。河南程氏遺書。二程集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE