:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:英文能力分級制度對技職校院學生學習成效之影響
書刊名:嶺東學報
作者:陳憶如張惟懽
作者(外文):Chen, I-juChang, Wei-huan
出版日期:2016
卷期:39
頁次:頁231-243
主題關鍵詞:英文分級教學安置測驗統一會考學習落後Ability groupingPlacement testJoint examPoor achiever
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:89
  • 點閱點閱:30
本研究主在了解科技大學四技學生英文分級教學實施成效,以「四技二專統一測驗」英文成績,作為大一英文安置測驗的分級標準。本研究參與學生日間部四技大一學生共計有1817 人,分為普、中、優三組。所有學生皆於學期中參與期中統一會考及期末統一會考。使用SPSS 統計軟體用之描述性統計及成對樣本t 檢定等統計方法加以分析。研究主要結果發現實施分級教學後,大一新生接受分級教學後之期末考成績與期中考成績有顯著差異;中班及優班的同學之期中期末成績都有顯著進步。惟普班學生期中及期末考成績無顯著差異外,其成績退步的現象值得未來研究探討分級教學對於學習落後學生的效益。建議與實施英文分級教學之其他科技大學,進行成果比較與分析,導出更具體可行的教學對策。
This study aimed to investigate the effect of implementing ability grouping for freshman English at a university of technology in central Taiwan. A total of 1817 freshmen participated in the present study. The participants were divided into three levels, ranging from basic to advanced levels, according to their English scores on Technological & Vocational Education Joint College Entrance Examination. With the descriptive statistics and pair sample t test methods, it was found that after implementing ability grouping in freshman English instruction, participants, in general, performed better on their final exam. Participants’ final scores of the intermediate level and advanced level were higher than those of midterm exam. Yet, participants from the basic level did not show significant progress after joining ability grouping. The reasons why low achievers performed poor or even worse need further investigation. It was suggested that more studies should probe into the issues of ability grouping among technology colleges so as to better understand the effect of ability grouping for different levels of the students.
期刊論文
1.Chen, H.-Y.(2007)。On grade-based English teaching and learning in higher vocational colleges。US-China Foreign Language,5(12),38-40。  new window
2.Dukmak, S.(2009)。Ability Grouping and Teacher-Students Interaction among High and Low Achieving Students in Middle Primary Schools in the United Arab Emirates。Journal of Faculty of Education,26,1-30。  new window
3.溫素美(20111200)。私立科技大學四技大一新生英文能力分級教學成效分析。臺中教育大學學報. 人文藝術類,25(2),65-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡金治(20080200)。The Outcomes and Implementation of the Ability Grouping Program of Freshman English at the National Kaohsiung Marine University。國立高雄海洋科大學報,22,169-184。new window  new window
5.李金玲、蘇綉惠(20090300)。英語分級教學成效分析--以中區某科技大學為例。新竹教育大學人文社會學報,2(1),233-253。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Lee, C. L.、Lin, C. J.(2013)。A Method of English Ability-Grouping Teaching in a University of Technology。International Journal of Information and Education Technology,3(2),268-272。  new window
7.Jha, S. K.(2014)。Shall We Teach English as a Subject or as a Language?。Education Practice and Innovation,1(1),17-24。  new window
8.王美蓉、王妙妃(20080600)。Does It Work? Ability-based Grouping and Instruction。高餐通識教育學刊,4,1-12。  延伸查詢new window
9.張武昌(20060400)。臺灣的英語教育:現況與省思。教育資料與研究,69,129-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.蘇綉惠、林翠英(20080600)。大一英語能力安置測驗之實施成效探討--以某科技大學為例。朝陽人文社會學刊,6(1),221-242。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.游毓玲、蔡佳怡、莊雯琪、郭金芳、盧惠瑛(2000)。技職校院學生英語學習困難介入方案實驗--以雲林科技大學機械系一年級學生為例。第九屆中華民國英語文教學國際研討會。台北:文鶴。640-649。  延伸查詢new window
2.王世平(1998)。大專英語能力分級實證教學研究。第十五屆英語文教學研討會。臺北:文鶴。311-330。  延伸查詢new window
3.李輝華(2000)。有利於英語教學的學校措施。第九屆中華民國英語文教學國際研討會。臺北:文鶴。574-585。  延伸查詢new window
4.徐昌慧(2005)。教育部提升技專校院學生英語能力具體措施。2005年和春技術學院應用英文系語言能力檢定與教學研討會。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.周碩貴(2002)。科技大學學生英文字彙量與閱讀補救教學研究 (計畫編號:NSC 91-2411-H224-008)。台南縣:國立雲林科技大學應用外語系。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.毛國楠(1997)。如何激勵學生的學習動機。有效學習的方法。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE