臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：從關係主義文化變遷觀點建構男性親密暴力者的分類架構
書刊名：中華輔導與諮商學報
作者：邱獻輝 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chiou, Hsien-huei
出版日期：2016
卷期：46
頁次：頁93-126
主題關鍵詞：文化變遷；家庭暴力；華人；類型學；Chinese；Cultural change；Domestic violence；Typology
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:436
  • 點閱點閱:26
男性親密暴力有其變異性，因此實用有效的分類是理解其心理機制的重要基礎。目前較受關注的國內外分類架構皆未考量華人關係主義及其變遷的影響性，且常植基於受暴女性觀點，以致未能周延反映台灣強制處遇男性親密暴力者的主觀經驗。因此本研究嘗試從華人關係主義文化變遷的適應觀點出發，以強制處遇男性親密暴力者的經驗敘說為主體，佐以司法文件作為校正素材，進行分類建構。為達此目的，本研究在方法學上遵循建構主義典範，邀請24名男性接受半結構深度訪談，其中6人為家暴專監的親密暴力收容人，18人為某地方法院裁定社區親密暴力強制處遇之相對人，所得訪談文本以共識質性研究法進行分析。研究結果綜合出五個分類向度，包括華人父權認同與親密暴行、伴侶角色實踐的省思、從子女關注到伴侶關注、酒精使用、人格與臨床症狀；據此五個向度將受訪者分成四個類型，包括自我調整型、避罰傳統型、混亂再犯型、反擊型。本研究並針對研究結果與其意涵進行討論。
Males who commit intimate partner violence vary across cases, so a practical and valid typological frame work is essential for understanding the psychological mechanisms and characteristics of male perpetra-torsviolence. However, many well-known western typologies have not considered traditional Chinese Relationalism and the changing context within the Taiwanese society. Additionally, existing typologies are often based on female descriptions about male batterers; thus, they are limited in terms of their utility in understanding the subjective phenomenon of male batterers. Therefore, there is an urgent need to construct an indigenous typology according to the narratives of male perpetrators within the context of Chinese Relationalism and its changing situation within the Taiwanese society. In addition, this study also considered the crime diaries of male batterers, forensic documents, and court statements. To achieve this goal, this study followed the constructivism paradigm and adopted the consensual qualitative research approach method to analyze the text. Twenty four interviewees were invited as participants for semi-structural in-depth interviews; they had committed intimate partner violence and violated domestic law. The results indicated that the interviewees could be divided into four types according to the following five dimensions: Reflect related to Relationalism patriarchy; criticism to role duties of partners; concerns about parenting; alcoholic use; and personality disorder and clinical symptoms. The four types are as follows: Self-modification, following-law and tradition, distress, and fighting-back. Based on the results, practical implications and directions for future research were discussed.
期刊論文
1.Chan, K. L.(2009)。Protection of Face and Avoidance of Responsibility: Chinese Men'€™s Account of Violence against Women。Journal of Social Work Practice，23(1)，93-108。  new window
2.Chan, K. L.(2012)。The Role of Chinese Face in the Perpetration of Dating Partner Violence。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，27(4)，793-811。  new window
3.Holtzworth-Munroe, A.、Meehan, J. C.、Herron, K.、Rehman, U.、Stuart, G. L.(2000)。Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart batterer typology。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，68(6)，1000-1019。  new window
4.Holtzworth-Munroe, A.、Meehan, J. C.、Herron, K.、Rehman, U.、Stuart, G. L.(2003)。Do subtypes of maritally violent men continue to differ over time?。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，71(4)，728-740。  new window
5.Wu, B.(2009)。Intimate homicide between Asians and non-Asians:The impact of community context。Journal of interpersonal violence，24(7)，1148-1164。  new window
6.Dutton, D. G.、Corvo, K.(2007)。The Duluth model: A data-impervious paradigm and a failed strategy。Aggression and Violent Behavior，12(6)，658-667。  new window
7.Giifus, M. E.、Traboid, N.、O'Brien, P.、Fiecif-Henderson, A.(2010)。Gender and intimate partner violence: Evaluating the evidence。Journal of social work education，46(2)，245-263。  new window
8.Archer, J.(1999)。Assessment of the reliability of the Conflict Tactics Scales: A meta-analytic review。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，14，1263-1289。  new window
9.Cavanaugh, M. M.、Gelles, R. J.(2005)。The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies: New directions for research, policy, and practice。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，20，155-166。  new window
10.Holtzworth-Munroe, A.、Stuart, G. L.(1994)。Typologies of male batters: Three subtypes and the difference among them。Psychological Bulletin，116，476-497。  new window
11.邱獻輝、葉光輝(2014)。臉面在教唆殺妻歷程的心理意涵：華人臉面理論的應用。人文及社會集刊，26(3)，483-523。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.蕭英玲、利翠珊(20091200)。夫妻間的恩情與親密：簡效量表的發展。本土心理學研究，32，3-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Anderson, K. L.(2010)。Conflict, power, and violence in families。Journal of Marriage and Family，72，726-742。  new window
14.Calton, J. M.、Cattaneo, L. B.、Gebhard, K. T.(2015)。Barriers to help seeking for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer survivors of intimate partner violence。Trauma, Violence, & Abuse，1-16。  new window
15.Dutton, D. G.(1995)。A scale for measuring the propensity for abusiveness。Journal of Family Violence，10(2)，203-221。  new window
16.Elisha, E.、Idisis, Y.、Timor, U.、Addad, M.(2010)。Typology of intimate partner homicide personal, interpersonal, and environmental characteristics of men who murdered tneir female intimate partner。International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology，54(4)，494-516。  new window
17.Gondolf, E. W.(1988)。Who are those guys? Toward a behavioral typology of batterers。Violence and Victims，3(3)，187-203。  new window
18.Graham-Kevan, N.、Archer, J.(2003)。Physical aggression and control in heterosexual relationships:The effect of sampling。Violence and Victims，18(2)，181-196。  new window
19.Hamberger, L. K.、Lohr, J. M.、Bonge, D.、Tolin, D. F.(1996)。A large sample empirical typology of male spouse abusers and its relationship to dimensions of abuse。Violence and Victims，11，277-292。  new window
20.Levant, R. E.(1996)。The new psycholoigy of men。Professional psychology : research and practice，27(3)，259-265。  new window
21.Mak, W. W. S.、Chong, E. S. K.、Kwong, M. M. F.(2010)。Prevalence of same-sex intimate partner violence in Hong Kong。Public Health，124，149-152。  new window
22.Nazroo, J.(1999)。Uncovering gender difference in the use of marital violence: The effect of methodology。Sociology，29(3)，475-494。  new window
23.Nowinski, S. N.、Bowen, S.(2012)。Partner violence against heterosexual and gay men: Prevalence and correlates。Aggression and Violent Behavior，17，36-52。  new window
24.Stults, C. B.、Javdani, S.、Greenbaum, C. A.、Barton, S. C.、Kapadia, F.、Halkitis, P. H.(2015)。Intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization among YMSM : The PI8 cohort study。Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity，2(2)，152-158。  new window
25.Hill, C. E.、Knox, S.、Thompson, B. J.、Williams, E. N.、Hess, S.、Ladany, N.(2005)。Consensual qualitative research: An update。Journal of Counseling Psychology，52(2)，196-205。  new window
26.Hill, C. E.、Thompson, B. J.、Williams, E. N.(1997)。A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research。The Counseling Psychologist，25，517-572。  new window
27.Ho, D. Y. F.(1998)。Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationism。Asian Journal of Social Psychology，1(1)，1-16。  new window
28.利翠珊、陳富美(20020000)。Affection in Marriage: A Study of Marital Enqing and Intimacy in Taiwan。Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies，3(1)，37-59。  new window
29.Lu, L.、Gilmour, R.(2006)。Individual-oriented and socially oriented cultural conceptions of subjective well-being: Conceptual analysis and scale development。Asian Journal of Social Psychology，9(1)，36-49。  new window
30.Vandello, J. A.、Cohen, D.(2003)。Male Honor and Female Fidelity: Implicit Cultural Scripts That Perpetuate Domestic Violence。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，84(5)，997-1010。  new window
31.Markus, Hazel R.、Kitayama, Shinobu(1991)。Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation。Psychological Review，98(2)，224-253。  new window
32.林明傑、沈勝昂(20040600)。婚姻暴力加害人分類之研究。中華心理衛生學刊，17(2)，67-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.邱獻輝、葉光輝(20131000)。失根的大樹：從文化觀點探究親密暴力殺人者的生命敘說。中華輔導與諮商學報，37，89-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Lu, L.(2008)。The individual-oriented and social-oriented Chinese bicultural self: Testing the theory。The journal of social psychology，148(3)，347-373。  new window
35.林明傑(20091200)。家庭暴力案件危險評估與危險分級之進階實務。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，5(2)，305-315。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.葉光輝、黃宗堅、邱雅沂(20060400)。現代華人的家庭文化特徵：以臺灣北部地區若干家庭的探討為例。本土心理學研究，25，141-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.陳高凌(20010600)。義與面子在華人家庭暴力裡的運作及其對治療之啟示。本土心理學研究，15，63-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.楊國樞(20041200)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究：社會取向與個人取向的觀點。本土心理學研究，22，11-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.陳秉華、李素芬、李美珣(20080400)。諮商中伴侶關係的自我協調歷程。本土心理學研究，29，117-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.邱獻輝、葉光輝(20121200)。從傳統華人貞節觀念探討男性殺妻。本土心理學研究，38，43-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.潘淑滿、楊榮宗、林津如(20120600)。巢起巢落：女同志親密暴力、T婆角色扮演與求助行為。臺灣社會研究季刊，87，45-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.Lincoln, Y. S.(1995)。Emerging Criteria for Qualitative and Interpretive Research。Qualitative Inquiry，1(3)，275-289。  new window
43.Chen, Ping-Hwa(2009)。A Counseling Model for Self-Relation Coordination for Chinese Clients with Interpersonal Conflicts。The Counseling Psychologist，37(7)，987-1009。  new window
44.黃光國(1987)。Face and favor: the Chinese power game。American Journal of Sociology，92(4)，944-974。  new window
45.李良哲(20000900)。維繫婚姻關係因素的成人期差異研究。中華心理衛生學刊，13(3)，61-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.葉光輝(20041200)。現代華人家人的互動關係及其心理歷程。本土心理學研究，22，81-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.羅燦煐(2011)。我國同居親密關係之暴力樣態、歷程及服務需求研究 (計畫編號：PG10003-0754)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Sun, K.(2008)。Correctional counseling: A cognitive growth perspective。Sudbury, Massachusetts：Jones and Bartlett Publishers。  new window
2.Kunda, Ziva(1999)。Social cognition: making sense of people。Cambridge, Massachusetts：MIT Press。  new window
3.Johnson, M. P.(2008)。A typology of domestic violence。University Press of New England。  new window
4.費孝通(1947)。鄉土中國。上海：觀察社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Dobash, R. E.、Dobash, R. P.(1979)。Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy。New York：Free Press。  new window
6.American Psychiatric Association(2000)。Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder。Washington, DC：American Psychiatric Association。  new window
7.Potter, H.(2008)。Black women and intimate partner abuse。New York, NY：University Press。  new window
8.Zehr, H.(2014)。The little book of restorative justice: Revised and updated。New York, NY：Good Books。  new window
9.Corbin, J. M.、Strauss, A. L.(2008)。Basics of qualitative research:Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory。Los Angeles, Calif。  new window
10.Jacobson, N.、Gottman, J.(1998)。When men batter women。New York：Simon & Schuster。  new window
11.Pence, E.、Paymar, M.(1996)。Education groups for men who batter: the Duluth model。Duluth, Minnesota：Minnesota Program Development Inc。  new window
12.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquiry。Sage。  new window
13.陳向明(2002)。教師如何做質的研究。洪葉文化。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃光國(20090000)。儒家關係主義：哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究。臺北：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Hsu, F. L. K.(1985)。The self in cross-cultural perspective。Culture and Self: Asian and Western perspectives。Tavistock。  new window
2.Babcock, J. C.、Canady, B.、Graham, K. H.、Schart, L.(2007)。The evolution of battering interventions: From the dark ages into the scientific age。Family therapy for domestic violence: A practitioner's guide to gender-inclusive research and treatment。New York, N Y：Springer。  new window
3.Hsu, F. L. K.(1971)。A hypotheses on kinship and culture。Kinship and culture。Chicago, IL：Aldine。  new window
4.Voorhis, P. V.、Salisbury, E. J.(2014)。The process of correctional counseling and treatment。Correctional counseling and rehabilitation。Waltham, MA：Anderson.。  new window
5.楊國樞、余安邦、葉明華(1991)。中國人的個人傳統性與現代性：概念與測量。中國人的心理與行為（一九八九）。臺北：桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Charmaz, Kathy(2000)。Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods。Handbook of qualitative research。Sage。  new window
7.Guba, E. G.、Lincoln. Y. S.(2005)。Paradigmatic controversies, contradiction, and emerging confluences。The sage Handbook of qualitative research。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
8.Yang, K. S.(1996)。Psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization。The handbook of Chinese psychology。Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：614（臺灣：613，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2042760 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67840611
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上